Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 36:4 (2012) ► pp.947–955
Book review

Peter Trudgill. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. xxxviii+236 pp. ISBN 978-0-19-960434-0Hardback 978-0-19-960435-7Paperback

Reviewed by
| Dartmouth College
Published online: 25 January 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.4.11sta
References (35)
References
Andersson, Lars Gunnar. 2005. Some languages are harder than others. In Laurie Bauer & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language myths, 50–57. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2005. Must sound change be linguistically motivated? Diachronica 221. 219–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bynon, Theodora. 1977. Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. In press. Historical linguistics: An introduction, 3rd edn. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Campbell, Lyle & William Poser. 2008. Language classification: History and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1997. An introduction to historical linguistics, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Testing the assumption of complexity invariance: The case of Elfdalian and Swedish. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil, & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 50–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Basic linguistic theory I: Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Laurie Bauer. 2007. Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language 831. 388–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Carleton. 1970. The linguistic cycle. Language Sciences 131. 1–7.Google Scholar
Gordon, Eric V. 1957. An introduction to Old Norse, 2nd edn., revised by A. R. Taylor. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1946. A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part VI: Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kusters, Wouter. 2003. Linguistic complexity: The influence of social change on verbal inflection. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2007. Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millward, Celia M., & Mary Hayes. 2012. A biography of the English language, 3rd edn. Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Leslie Milroy. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 211. 339–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nettle, Daniel. 1999. Linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1997. Social networks and kinds of speech community events. In Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language, 209–61. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2009. A linguistic axiom challenged. Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil, & Peter Trudgill (eds.), 1–18.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.). 2009. Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shosted, Ryan. 2006. Correlating complexity: A typological approach. Linguistic Typology 101.1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Hjalmar P. Peterson, Jógvan í Lon Jacobsen & Zakaris Svabo Hansen. 2004. Faroese: An overview and reference grammar. Tórshavn: Føroya Fródskaparfelag.Google Scholar
Thurston, William. 1989. How exoteric languages build a lexicon: Esoterogeny in West New Britain. In Ray Harlow & Robin Hooper (eds.), VICAL I: Papers in oceanic linguistics, 555–79. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1992. Dialect typology and social structure. In Ernst Jahr (ed.), Language contact and language change, 195–212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996a. Dialect typology: Isolation, social network and phonological structure. In Gregory Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin, & John Baugh (eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honour of William Labov. Volume 1: Variation and change in language and society, 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1996b. Dual-source pidgins and reverse creoloids: Northern perspectives on language contact. In Ernst Jahr & Ingvild Broch (eds.), Language contact in the Arctic: Northern pidgins and contact languages, 5–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Typology and sociolinguistics: Linguistic structure, social structure, and explanatory comparative dialectology. Folia Linguistica 31(3–4). 349–60.Google Scholar
. 2004. Linguistic and social typology: The Austronesian migrations and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology 81. 305–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bostoen, Koen & Gilles-Maurice de Schryver
2015. Linguistic innovation, political centralization and economic integration in the Kongo kingdom. Diachronica 32:2 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.