Article published in:On multiple source constructions in language change
Edited by Hendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde
[Studies in Language 37:3] 2013
► pp. 515–533
An inquiry into unidirectionality as a foundational element of grammaticalization
On the role played by analogy and the synchronic grammar system in processes of language change
This paper assumes that in order to explain rather than describe language change, historical linguists should not only consider what happens diachronically at the language output level but also, crucially, what speaker-listeners do at the processing level. The reason for this is that the structure of the language is shaped by the properties of the neurolinguistic mechanism underlying both language use and language learning. It will be argued that analogy as an important principle in grammar formation is the main mechanism in grammaticalization and in change in general when looked at from a processing point of view. The paper discusses the workings of analogy in a number of cases in the history of English which have traditionally been interpreted as unidirectional cases of grammaticalization . It will be shown instead that multiple source constructions were involved, which influenced one another and thus gave direction to the change.
Keywords: unidirectionality, grammaticalization, analogy, syntactic change, processing errors, language processing, pragmatic markers, epistemic modals
Published online: 07 October 2013
Cited by other publications
No author info given
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
Neels, Jakob & Stefan Hartmann
Rhee, Seongha & Hyun Jung Koo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.