Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 38:1 (2014) ► pp. 4479
References
Aissen, Judith
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity and economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435-483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter
2008Thematic roles, event structure, and argument encoding in semantically aligned languages. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 101-117. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
1992Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991, 109-149. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baird, Louise
2008A grammar of Klon: A non-Austronesian language of Alor, Indonesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Beavers, John
2011On affectedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(2). 335-370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2008On the scope of the referential hierarchy in the typology of grammatical relations. In Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations. Papers in honour of Bernard Comrie, 191-210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1991Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In Dieter Wanner & Douglas A. Kibbee (eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics, Selected Papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 1988 , 143-170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1988Agreement vs. case marking and direct objects. In Michael Barlow & Charles A. Fergusson (eds.), Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, descriptions, 159-180. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva
2011Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Hoop, Helen & Andrej Malchukov
2007On fluid differential case marking: A bidirectional OT approach. Lingua 117(9). 1636-1656. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1985On active typology and the nature of agentivity. In Frans Plank (ed.), Relational typology, 47-60. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
1979Ergativity. Language 55(1). 59-138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark
2008Bound pronominals in the West Papuan languages. In Claire Bowern, Bethwyn Evans & Luisa Miceli (eds.), Morphology and language history: In honour of Harold Koch, 43-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Søren Wichmann
(eds.) 2008The typology of semantic alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1991Thematic protoroles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547-619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S
1986Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62(4). 808-845. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durie, Mark
1987Grammatical relations in Acehnese. Studies in Language 11(2). 365-399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2004Experiencer objects in Iwaidjan languages (Australia). In Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata (eds.), Non-nominative subjects, 77-100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Pseudo-argument affixes in Iwadja and Ilgar: A case of deponent subject and object agreement. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches. Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 1451, 271-296. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedden, Sebastian, Dunstan Brown, Greville G. Corbett, Marian Klamer, Gary Holton, Laura C. Robinson & Antoinette Schapper
2013Conditions on pronominal marking in the Alor-Pantar languages. Linguistics 51(1). 33-74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1976Subject, topic, and grammatical agreement. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 57-98. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grimes, Charles E., Tom Therik, Barbara Dix Grimes & Max Jacob
1997A guide to the people and languages of Nusa Tenggara. Kupang: Artha Wacana Press.Google Scholar
Haan, Johnson W
2001The grammar of Adang: A Papuan language spoken on the island of Alor East Nusa Tenggara – Indonesia. Sydney: University of Sydney dissertation.Google Scholar
Heusinger, Klaus von & Georg Kaiser
2011Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish. Morphology 21(1). 1-25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holton, Gary
2010Person-marking, verb classes, and the notion of grammatical alignment in Western Pantar (Lamma). In Michael Ewing & Marian Klamer (eds.), Typological and areal analyses: Contributions from east Nusantara, 97-117. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Holton, Gary, Marian Klamer & František Kratochvíl
2009The languages of Alor-Pantar (Eastern Indonesia): A (re)assessment. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (11-ICAL), Aussois, France, 22-26 June, 2009.
Holton, Gary, Marian Klamer, František Kratochvíl, Laura C. Robinson & Antoinette Schapper
2012The historical relations of the Papuan languages of Alor and Pantar. Oceanic Linguistics 51(1). 86-122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251-299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, James R
2007The origins of meaning: Language in the light of evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Studies in the Evolution of Language 8).Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian
2008The semantics of semantic alignment in eastern Indonesia. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 221-251. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010aA grammar of Teiwa (Mouton Grammar Library 49.) Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bDitransitive constructions in Teiwa. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook, 427-455. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
n.d. Teiwa corpus. Toolbox file (11,000 words of proper text plus 6,000 words of elicited material).
Klamer, Marian & František Kratochvíl
2006The role of animacy in Teiwa and Abui (Papuan). In Proceedings of BLS 32 . Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratochvíl, František
2007A grammar of Abui. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Kratochvíl, František
2011Transitivity in Abui. Studies in Language 35(3). 589-636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1991Active/agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67(3). 510-546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Does passivization require a subject category? In Bernard Comrie, Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie, 211-240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, Tara
1990Arguments in Hindi. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2004What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects. Lingua 114(9-10). 1186-1212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Case semantics and the agent-patient opposition. In Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds.), Case, valency and transitivity, 309-327. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew, Simon P. Gi, Ian S. Majnep & John Kias
2000Hunger acts on me: The grammar and semantics of bodily and mental process expressions in Kalam. In Videa P. De Guzman & Byron W. Bender (eds.), Grammatical analysis: Morphology, syntax and semantics. Studies in honour of Stanley Starosta, 153-185. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Reesink, Ger
2010Prefixation of arguments in West Papuan languages. In Marian Klamer & Michael Ewing (eds.), East Nusantara, typological and areal analyses, 71-95. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Robinson, Laura C. & Johnson W. Haan
To appear. Adang. In Antoinette Schapper (ed.) Papuan languages of Timor-Alor-Pantar: Sketch grammars
Ross, Malcolm
2005Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 15-66. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette
To appearKamang. In Antoinette Schapper (ed.), Papuan languages of Timor-Alor-Pantar: Sketch grammars. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette & Marten Manimau
2011 Kamus Pengantar bahasa Kamang-Indonesia-Inggris (Introductory Kamang-Indonesian-English dictionary; UBB Language & Culture Series, A-7, Charles E. Grimes, series editor). Kupang: Unit Bahasa dan Budaya.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Verbal person marking. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 102. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/1. (19 September, 2011).Google Scholar
Singer, Ruth
2011Typologising idiomaticity: Noun-verb idioms and their relations. Linguistic Typology 151. 625-659. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stokhof, W.A.L
1975Preliminary notes on the Alor and Pantar languages (East Indonesia). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1981Split case-marking in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19(5-6). 389-438.Google Scholar
1985Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21(2). 385-396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Saad, George, Marian Klamer & Francesca Moro
2019. Identifying agents of change: Simplification of possessive marking in Abui-Malay bilinguals. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo
Schapper, Antoinette
2015.  In The Linguistics of Temperature [Typological Studies in Language, 107],  pp. 858 ff. Crossref logo
van Lier, Eva & Maria Messerschmidt
2022. Lexical restrictions on grammatical relations in voice and valency constructions. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.