Article published in:
Advances in research on semantic roles
Edited by Seppo Kittilä and Fernando Zúñiga
[Studies in Language 38:3] 2014
► pp. 512542
References

References

Åkermalm, Åke
1965Rubriksvenska och andra studier (Skrifter utgivna av Modersmålslärarnas Förening 100). Falköping: Gleerups.Google Scholar
Conon, Lars
1973Rubrikspråket på Dagens Nyheters förstasidor I–II (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Philologiae Scandinavicae Upsaliensia 8). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1984Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language 8(2). 181–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Event construal and case role assignment. Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS). 338–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W.
2010Basic Linguistic Theory: Volume 1 methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1989On the semantic content of the notion ‘thematic role’. In Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee & Raymond Turner (eds.), Properties, types and meaning II: Semantic issues (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy), 69–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Pål, Seppo Kittilä & Leena Kolehmainen
2010The linguistics of weather: Cross-linguistic patterns of meteorological expressions. Studies in Language 34(3). 565–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1970The grammar of hitting and breaking . In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 120–133. Waltham: Ginn.Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam & Jan-Ola Östman
2004Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective (Constructional Approaches to Language 2), 11–86. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure (Cognitive Theory of Language and Culture). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey
1965Studies in lexical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993A grammar of Lezgian (Mouton Grammar Library 9). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
1991Syntaktiset rakenteet kertomuksen jäsennyksen osoittimina. Virittäjä 95(1). 33–47.Google Scholar
2001Syntax in the making: The emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversation (Studies in Discourse and Grammar 9). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas
2003Incremental existence: The world according to the Finnish existential sentence. Linguistics 41(3). 461–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas & Krista Ojutkangas
2006An introduction to Finnish spatial relations: Local cases and adpositions. In Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell (eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 277), 11–20. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972Semantic interpretation in Generative Grammar (Current Studies in Linguistics 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1976Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 89–150.Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo
2005Remarks on involuntary agent constructions. Word 56(3). 381–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Animacy effects on Differential Goal Marking. Linguistic Typology 12(2). 245–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Jussi Ylikoski
2011Remarks on the coding of Direction, Recipient and Vicinal Direction in European Uralic. In Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds.), Case, animacy and semantic roles (Typological Studies in Language 99), 29–64. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopotev, Mikhail
2007aWhat a difference a verb makes! Russian and Finnish verbless sentences. In Marja Nenonen & Sinikka Niemi (eds.), Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes, Joensuu, May 19-20, 2006 (Studies in Languages, University of Joensuu, vol. 41), 177–192. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar
2007bWhere Russian syntactic zeros start: Approaching Finnish? In Juhani Nuorluoto (ed.), Topics on the ethnic, linguistic and cultural making of the Russian North (Slavica Helsingiensia 32), 116–137. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1998Actancy. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leino, Pentti
1993Polysemia – kielen moniselitteisyys: Suomen kielen kognitiivista kielioppia 1 (Kieli 7). Helsingin yliopiston suomen kielen laitos.Google Scholar
2001Verbit, konstruktiot ja lausetyypit. In Pentti Leino, Ilona Herlin, Suvi Honkanen, Lari Kotilainen, Jaakko Leino & Maija Vilkkumaa, Roolit ja rakenteet: Henkilöviitteinen allatiivi Biblian verbikonstruktioissa (Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 813), 11–66. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Moor, Marianne
1985Studien zum lesgischen Verb. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Mårdh, Ingrid
1980Headlinese: On the grammar of English frontpage headlines (Lund Studies in English 58). Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2003Transitivity: From semantics to structure. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen dissertation.Google Scholar
2007Prototypical transitivity (Typological Studies in Language 72). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2010On comparative concepts and descriptive categories: A reply to Haspelmath. Language 86(3). 688–695. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
2008The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44. 129–167.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1996Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and unaccusatives. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
2000The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
2001Experiencing derivations. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT 11), 365–387. Ithaca: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.Google Scholar
2002The theta system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3). 229–290.Google Scholar
Rice, Sally & Kaori Kabata
2007Crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns of the allative. Linguistic Typology 11(3). 451–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena
1988Thematic restrictions on derived nominals. In Wendy Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and semantics 21: Thematic relations, 147–165. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1989Are thematic relations discrete? In Roberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman & Michael Noonan (eds.), Linguistic categorization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61), 115–130. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Kristina
2000The emergence and development of headlines in British newspapers. In Friedrich Ungerer (ed.), English media texts – past and present: Language and textual structure (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 80), 45–65. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
1981The grammar of headlines in The Times 1870–1970 (Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België 95). Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar
Siro, Paavo
1964Suomen kielen lauseoppi. Helsinki: Tietosanakirja.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
2011There’s more than “more animate”: The Organization/Document Construction in Korean. In Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds.), Case, animacy and semantic roles (Typological Studies in Language 99), 183–206. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Straumann, Heinrich
1935Newspaper headlines: A study in linguistic method. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Vahtera, Ralf
2009Otsikkorakenteita: Kontrastiivinen tutkimus suomen- ja ruotsinkielisten sanomalehtien syntaktis-semanttisista otsikkotyypeistä (Acta Wasaensia No 209, Kielitiede 41). Vaasa: University of Vaasa.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax: Structure, meaning and function (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Västi, Katja
2011aA case in search of an independent life: Semantics of the initial allative in a Finnish verbless construction. In Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds.), Case, animacy and semantic roles (Typological Studies in Language 99), 65–109. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011bMihin verbittömien konstruktioiden merkitystyypit perustuvat? Skemaattiset ja polyseemiset tapahtumanilmaukset. Sananjalka 53. 34–60.Google Scholar
2012Elävä lähde: Alkuasemaisen ablatiivin merkitystyypit verbittömässä konstruktiossa. Virittäjä 116(1). 67–97.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Shin, Gyu-Ho
2020. People also avoid repetition in sentence comprehension: Evidence from multiple postposition constructions in Korean. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1 Crossref logo
Shin, Gyu-Ho & Hyunwoo Kim
2021. Roles of verb and construction cues. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2  pp. 332 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.