Exploring a diachronic (re)cycle of roles
The Dative complex from Latin to Romance
In this paper we explore the struggle between the use of the Dative case and the competing strategy featuring the preposition ad ‘to’ and the Accusative from Latin to Early Romance. Unlike the Dative, the prepositional strategy is semantically transparent, since ad ‘to’ has a clear allative meaning. We first consider the diachronic development of the roles involved in the Dative-marked complex within a chronological span ranging from Plautus to the Vulgate and show that competing manifestations featuring ad are conditioned by semantic factors, since the extension of the prepositional strategy can be better explained in terms of metaphoric and metonymic processes. We discuss the gradual expansion of the prepositional turn in Early Romance with a view to exploring the paths along which it gradually took over the functions traditionally associated with the Dative complex. Building on these data, the paper assesses the theoretical implications for a better understanding of competing multifunctional devices that encode role complexes from a diachronic perspective and shows how a pool of synchronic variation can trigger and constrain linguistic change.
References (70)
Adams, James N
2011 Late Latin. In
J. Clackson (ed.),
The Blackwell Companion to the Latin Language, 257–283. Oxford: Blackwell.
Baldi, Philip & Andrea Nuti
2010 Possession. In
P. Cuzzolin &
Ph. Baldi (eds.),
New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, 239–388. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baños Baños, José Miguel
1996 Litteras Neroni / ad Neronem mittere: ¿alternancia dativo / ad + acus.? In
A. Agud,
J.A. Fernández Delgado &
A. Ramos Guerreira (eds.),
Las lenguas de corpus y sus problemas lingüísticos, 217–236. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.
Baños Baños, José Miguel
1998 Sintaxis y semántica del dativo objeto indirecto: su concurrencia con ad-acus. en latín clásico. In
M.E. Torrego (ed.),
Nombres y funciones: estudios de sintaxis griega y latina, 11–41. Madrid: U.A.M. Ediciones Clásicas.
Baños Baños, José Miguel
2000 Vulgarismos sintácticos en Plauto (II): quae ad patrem vis nuntiari
. In
B. García Hernandez (ed.),
Latín vulgar y tardío, 1–15. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.
Baños Baños, José Miguel
2009 Dativo. In
J.M. Baños Baños (ed.),
Sintaxis del latín clásico, 185–209. Madrid: Liceus Ediciones.
Bastardas Parera, Juan
1953 Particularidades sintácticas del latín medieval. Barcelona: Escuela de Filología.
Bennett, Charles Edwin
1914 Syntax of Early Latin. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Blake, Barry J
2001 [1994] Case, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blume, Kerstin
1998 A contrastive analysis of interaction verbs with dative complements.
Linguistics 36 (2). 253–280.
Cennamo, Michela
1999 Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the unaccusative hypothesis.
Transactions of the Philological Society 97(1). 103–150.
Chomsky, Noam A
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam. A
1966 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christol, Alain
1998 Marquage oblique des actants. In
J. Feuillet (ed.),
Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 457–523. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dąbrowska, Ewa
1997 Cognitive Semantics and the Polish Dative. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Densusianu, Ovide
1938 Histoire de la langue roumaine II1. Paris: Librairie Ernest Leroux.
Dik, Simon
C. 1989[1997].
The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd revised edn. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas
1953.
Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.
Fagard, Benjamin
2010 Espace et grammaticalisation – L’évolution sémantique des prépositions dans les langues romanes. Sarrebruck: Editions Universitaires Européennes.
Fried, Mirjam
2010 Between verb semantics and interpersonal meanings in participant realization. Paper presented at theWorkshop on Variation and Change in Argument Realization, Naples and Capri, May 27-30, 2010.
Goldberg, Adele E
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goyens, Michèle, Lamiroy, Béatrice & Ludo Melis
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haudry, Jean
1968 Les emplois doubles du datif et la fonction du datif indo-européen.
Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 631. 141–159.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hofmann, Johann Baptist
1936 Lateinische Umgangssprache. Winter: Heidelberg.
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Anton Szantyr
1972 [1965] Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck(= Leumann-Hoffmann-Szantyr,
Lateinische Grammatik, 2nd edn.).
Jacob, Daniel
1991 Dativ im Französischen? Zur Funktionsweise und Semantik der Ergänzungsklasse ‘à + NP’. In
P. Koch &
Th. Krefeld (eds.),
Connexiones Romanicae: Dependenz und Valenz in romanischen Sprachen, 157–186. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Jakobson, Roman
1966 A la recherche de l’essence du langage. In
Problèmes du langage, Diogène 511: 22–38. English translation 1971, “Quest for the Essence of Language”, in Roman Jakobson, Selective writings, vol. 2: Word and Language, 345–359. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
Kittilä, Seppo
2005 A typology of involuntary agent constructions.
Word 561. 341–81.
Kittilä, Seppo, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski
König, Ekkehard & Martin Haspelmath
1998 Les constructions à possesseur externe dans les langues de l’Europe. In
J. Feuillet (ed.),
Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 525–606. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kühner, Raphael & Carl Stegmann
1976 Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Hannover: Verlag Hahnsche Buchhandlung.
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964 The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Langacker, Ronald
1992 [1991] Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, 2nd edn. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Lazard, Gilbert
1998 Actancy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lehmann, Christian
1991 Predicate classes and PARTICIPATION. In
H. Seiler &
W. Premper (eds.),
Partizipation: das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, 183–239. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Levin, Beth
1993 Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Löfstedt, Bengt
1961 Studien über die Sprache der langobardischen Gesetze. Beiträge zur frühmittelalterlichen Latinität. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Longacre, Robert E
2007 [1985] Sentences as combinations of clauses. In
T. Shopen (ed.),
Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn., 372–420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luraghi, Silvia
2010 Adverbials. In
Ph. Baldi &
P. Cuzzolin (eds.),
New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, vol. 21, 19–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Luraghi, Silvia
2014 Plotting diachronic semantic maps: The role of metaphor. In
S. Luraghi &
H. Narrog (eds.),
Perspectives on Semantic Roles, 101–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mathieu, Eric
2006 Quirky subjects in Old French.
Studia Linguistica 60(3). 282–312.
Maiden, Martin
1996 A Linguistic History of Italian. New York: Longman.
Menge, Hermann
2007 Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik, völlig neu bearbeitet von Thorsten Burkard und Markus Schauer, 3. Auflage. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Molinelli, Piera
1998 Dai casi alle preposizioni in latino: analisi sociolinguistica e spiegazione tipologica. In
P. Ramat &
E. Roma (eds.),
Sintassi storica, 147–166. Roma: Bulzoni.
Newman, John
1996 Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens, Lars Heltoft & Lene Schøsler
Palmer, Frank Robert
1994 Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pinkster, Harm
1990 The development of cases and adpositions in Latin. In
H. Pinkster &
I. Genee (eds.),
Unity in Diversity, 195–209. Dordrecht: Foris.
Prandi, Michele
2008 Transferring constructions: Grammatical relations and roles. In
M. Papi Bertuccelli,
A. Bertacca &
S. Bruti (eds.),
Threads in the Complex Fabric of Language: Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honour of Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi, 293–305. Pisa: Felici Editore.
Reddy, Michael J
1993 The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In
A. Ortony (ed.),
Metaphor and Thought, 164–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1974 [1916] Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. Critical edition by T.de Mauro, Paris: Payot, 1972. Engl. transl.: Course in General Linguistics. London: Fontana / Collins.
Selig, Maria
1991 Inhaltskonturen des ‘Dativs’: Zur Ablösung des lateinischen Dativs durch ad und zur differentiellen Objektmarkierung. In
P. Koch &
Th. Krefeld (eds.),
Connexiones Romanicae: Dependenz und Valenz in romanischen Sprachen, 187–211. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Serbat, Guy
1996 Grammaire fondamentale du latin. Tome IV, L’emploi des cas en latin, Vol. 11. Louvain et Paris: Peeters.
Steinitz, Renate
1969 Adverbial-Syntax. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Sznajder, Lyliane
2012 Dixit autem serpens ad mulierem / Mulieri quoque dixit: la double expression de l’allocutaire dans les propositions introductrices de discours directs dans la Vulgate.
F. Biville,
M. Lhommé &
D. Vallat (eds.),
LATIN VULGAIRE-LATIN TARDIF IX, Actes du IXe colloque international ‘latin vulgaire – latin tardif,’ (Lyon, 2-6 septembre 2009), 271–290. Lyon: Collection de la maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée 49, Série Linguistique et Philologie 8.
Théoret, Michel
1982 Les discours de Cicéron: La concurrence du tour casuel et du tour prépositionnel. Montreal: Presse de l’Université de Montréal.
Väänänen, Veikko
1963 Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Klincksieck.
Van Hoecke, Willy
1996 The Latin dative. In
W. Van Belle &
W. Van Langendonck (eds.),
The Dative, Vol. I: Descriptive Studies, 3–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Villar, Francisco
1981 Dativo y locativo en el singular de la flexión nominal indoeuropea. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
Woodcock, Eric Charles
1959 A New Latin Syntax. London: Methuen.
Zamboni, Alberto
2000 Alle origini dell’italiano. Dinamiche e tipologie della transizione dal latino. Roma: Carocci.
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Fedriani, Chiara & Maria Napoli
2023.
The Missing Dative Alternation in Romance: Explaining Stability and Change in the Argument Structure of Latin Ditransitives.
Transactions of the Philological Society 121:1
► pp. 33 ff.
Napoli, Maria
2018.
Ditransitive verbs in Latin: A typological approach.
Journal of Latin Linguistics 17:1
► pp. 51 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.