Lexical coding vs. syntactic marking of homogeneity
Evidence from Spanish and Danish
Henrik Høeg Müller | Copenhagen Business School
The purpose of this article is to substantiate the claim that the semantic feature of homogeneity manifests itself differently in different languages. By contrasting data from Spanish and Danish it is shown that homogeneity is lexically coded in Danish nouns, whereas Spanish nouns are lexically neutral to homogeneity. In Spanish the homogeneity interpretation of nouns is determined when they are inserted into a syntactic structure. The empirical relevance of this assumption is assessed by investigating syntactic and semantic aspects related to the occurrence of bare nominals in object position in the two languages under scrutiny. It is well-known that Spanish as a canonical pattern does not semantically license bare singular nouns with count interpretation (BNs) in object position, viz. #Juan repara coche [Juan repairs car], while in Danish the occurrence of BNs in object position is both possible and normal, viz. Ole maler hus [Ole paints house]. It is argued that this contrast is a predictable consequence of the premise that, in Spanish, transitive activity verbs impose a mass reading on any bare object noun whereas, in Danish, BNs maintain their lexically encoded denotation as inhomogeneous entities. However, contrasting with the leading pattern, the so-called HAVE-verbs (Borthen, 2003) actually license Spanish BNs in object position (cf., e.g., Espinal, 2010; Espinal & Mcnally, 2011), viz. Juan tiene perro [Juan has dog]. It is claimed that the occurrence of BNs in these cases is strongly related to the assumption that HAVE-verbs, contrary to activity verbs, are functionally non-eventive and, therefore, do not impose a specific homogeneity reading on the bare noun in object position.
Keywords: homogeneity, activity verbs, HAVE-predicates, bare nouns, event structure
Published online: 08 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.4.12mul
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.4.12mul
References
Arche, M.J
Arsenejević, B
Asudeh, A. & L.H. Mikkelsen
Barner, D. & J. Snedeker
Borthen, K
2003 Norwegian bare singulars. NTNU dissertation.
Bosque, I
Bouchard, D
Bunt, H.C
Carlson, G.N
Cheng, C-Y
Chierchia, G
Christophersen, P
Climent, S
Contreras, H
Dayal, V
2003 A semantics for pseudo incorporation. Ms., Rutgers University.
de Swart, H. & J. Zwarts
Dobrovie-Sorin, C
Dobrovie-Sorin, C., T. Bleam & M.T. Espinal
Doetjes, J
Engelberg, S
Espinal, M.T
Espinal, M.T. & J. Mateu
Espinal, M.T. & L. McNally
2008 Spanish and Catalan bare singular nominals at the syntax–semantics interface. In paper presented at the XXXVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. University of Indiana, Urbana-Champaign.
Farkas, D. & H. de Swart
Garrido, J
Geenhoven, V. van
Gillon, B.S
Hansen, E
Hansen, E. & Heltoft, L
Heine, B
Herslund, M
Joosten, F
Josefsson, G
2013 Pancake sentences and the semanticization of formal gender in Mainland Scandinavian. Handout for the
46th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea
, Split, September 18.
Kallulli, D
1996 Bare singulars and bare plurals: Mapping syntax and semantics. In
Proceedings of ConSole 5. Leiden: University of Leiden Press.
Kleiber, G
Korzen, I
Koslicki, K
Krifka, M
Lambrecht, K
Langacker, R.W
Leonetti, M
Link, G
Longobardi, Giuseppe
Mardale, A
Martin, R
McNally, L
Morreale, M
Nedergaard Thomsen, O. & M. Herslund
Olsen, M.B
Pelletier, F.J
Pelletier, F.J. & L.K. Schubert
Rijkhoff, J
Rischel, J
Stark, E
Suñer, M
de Swart, H. & J. Zwarts
Tenny, C. & J. Pustejovsky
Tsoulas, G
2006 Plurality of mass nouns and the grammar of number. Paper presented at the
29th GLOW colloquium in Barcelona
.
Vendler, Z
Vikner, C
Wierzbicka, A
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Müller, Henrik Høeg
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.