Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 38:4 (2014) ► pp. 896955
References
Allan, K
1980Nouns and countability. Language 561. 541–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arche, M.J
2006Individuals in time: Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arsenejević, B
2006Inner aspect and telicity: The decompositional and the quantificational nature of eventualities at the syntax-semantics interface. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden dissertation.Google Scholar
Asudeh, A. & L.H. Mikkelsen
2000Incorporation in Danish: Implications for interfaces. In R. Cann, C. Grover & P. Miller (eds.), A collection of papers on head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bach, E
1986The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 91. 5–16.Google Scholar
Barner, D. & J. Snedeker
2005Quantity judgements and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition 971. 41–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G
2009A constructional analysis of quasi-incorporation in Dutch. Gengo Kenkyu 1351. 5–28.Google Scholar
Borthen, K
2003Norwegian bare singulars. NTNU dissertation.
Borer, H
2005Structuring sense (vols. 1 and 21). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I
1996Por qué determinados sustantivos no son sustantivos determinados: Repaso y Balance. In I. Bosque (ed.), El sustantivo sin determinación. La ausencia de determinante en la lengua española, 13–119. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
1999El nombre común. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española 11, 3–75. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Bouchard, D
1995The semantics of syntax: A minimalist approach to grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bunt, H.C
1980On the why, the how, and the whether of a count-mass distinction among adjectives. In J. Groenendijk & M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language, 51–77. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.Google Scholar
1985Mass terms and model-theoretic semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.N
1977A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 11. 413–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C-Y
1973Comments on Moravcsik’s paper. In K.J.J. Hintikka, J.M.E. Moravcsik & P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to natural language, 286–288. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G
1998aPlurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 52–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998bReference to Kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4). 339–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 1741. 99–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christophersen, P
1939The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Climent, S
2001Individuation by partitive constructions in Spanish. In P. Bouillon & F. Busa, (eds.). The language of word meaning, 192–215. The USA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Contreras, H
1996Sobre la distribución de los sintagmas nominales no predicativos sin determinante. In I. Bosque (ed.), El sustantivo sin determinación. La ausencia de determinante en la lengua española, 141–168. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
David, N
2008Mass nouns and plural logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(2). 211–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dayal, V
2003A semantics for pseudo incorporation. Ms., Rutgers University.
de Swart, H. & J. Zwarts
2009Less form – more meaning: Why bare singular nouns are special. Lingua 119(2). 280–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, C
2009Existential bare plurals: From properties back to entities. Lingua 1191. 296–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, C., T. Bleam & M.T. Espinal
2006Bare nouns, number and types of incorporation. In L. Tasmowski & S. Vogeleer (eds.), Non-definiteness and plurality 51–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, J
1997Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
Dowty, D
1979Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engelberg, S
1999Punctuality and Verb Semantics. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6(1). Article 10.Google Scholar
2000The magic of the moment: What it means to be a punctual verb. BLS 251. 109–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M.T
2010Bare nominals in Catalan and Spanish: Their structure and meaning. Lingua 1201. 984–1009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M.T. & J. Mateu
2011Bare nominals and argument structure in Catalan and Spanish. The Linguistic Review 281. 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M.T. & L. McNally
2007Bare singular nominals and incorporating verbs. In G. Kaiser & M. Leonetti (eds.), Proceedings of the III NEREUS International Workshop. Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance languages, Arbeitspapier 122, 45–62. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
2008Spanish and Catalan bare singular nominals at the syntax–semantics interface. In paper presented at the XXXVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. University of Indiana, Urbana-Champaign.
2011Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics 471. 87–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, D. & H. de Swart
2004Incorporation, plurality, and the incorporation of plurals: A dynamic approach. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 31. 45–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrido, J
1996Sintagmas nominales escuetos. In I. Bosque (ed.), El sustantivo sin determinación. La ausencia de determinante en la lengua española, 269–338. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Geenhoven, V. van
1996Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic. Tübingen: University of Tübingen dissertation.Google Scholar
Gillon, B.S
1992Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 151. 597–639. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, N
1966The structure of appearance, 2nd edn. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J
1990Argument structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, E
2001(1994)Generisk substantiv. In H. Galbjerg Jacobsen & H. Jørgensen (eds.), Glæden ved grammatik. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. & Heltoft, L
2011Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. København: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Heine, B
1997Possession, cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Ways of explaining possession. In I. Baron, M. Herslund & F. Sørensen (eds.), Dimensions of possession, 311–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herslund, M
(ed.) 1997Det franske sprog, Chapter I: Grundlag, preliminary version. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1999Det franske sprog, Chapter VI: Nominalsyntagmet, preliminary version. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
2002Incorporation and transitivity in romance. In O. Nedergaard Thomsen & M. Herslund (eds.), Complex predicates and incorporation: A functional perspective. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Copenhague, vol. XXXII1, 175–206. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzel, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J
1985On Semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 161. 547–593.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T
1988Small clause results. Lingua 741. 101–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Aspect and Theta theory. In I.M. Roca (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, 145–174. Berlin: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O
1924The philosophy of grammar. London: Georges Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R
1991Parts and boundaries. Cognition 411. 9–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johns, A
2009Additional facts about noun incorporation (in Inuktitut). Lingua 1191. 185–198 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joosten, F
2003Accounts of the count-mass distinction: A critical survey. In A. Dahl, K. Bentzen, P. Svenonius (eds.), Proceedings of SCL 19 / Nordlyd 31(1). 216–229.Google Scholar
Josefsson, G
2013Pancake sentences and the semanticization of formal gender in Mainland Scandinavian. Handout for the 46th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea , Split, September 18.
Kallulli, D
1996Bare singulars and bare plurals: Mapping syntax and semantics. In Proceedings of ConSole 5. Leiden: University of Leiden Press.
1999The comparative syntax of Albanian: On the contribution of syntactic types to propositional interpretation. Durham: University of Durham dissertation.Google Scholar
Kearns, K
1991The semantics of the English progressive. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
2000Semantics. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Kiefer, F
1994Noun incorporation in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 40(1-2). 149–177.Google Scholar
Kleiber, G
1989Comment traiter LE générique? In M. Wilmet (ed.), Génerécité, spécificité et aspect (Travaux de linguistique 19), 145–169. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
1990L’article LE générique: La généricité sur le mode massif. Geneva/Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
1994Nominales: Essais de sémantique référentielle. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Korzen, I
2008Determination in endocentric and exocentric languages. In H. Müller & A. Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination. From morphology to discourse management (Studies in Language Companion Series 99), 79–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koslicki, K
2006Nouns, mass and count. In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy, 2nd edn. USA: MacMillan Reference.Google Scholar
Krifka, M
1989Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In J. van Benthem, R. Bartsch & P. van Emde (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In I. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters, 30–52. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Laca, B
1990Generic objects: Some more pieces of the puzzle. Lingua 811. 25–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Acerca de la semántica de los plurales escuetos del español. In I. Bosque (ed.), El sustantivo sin determinación. La ausencia de determinante en la lengua española, 241–268. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
1999Presencia y ausencia de determinante. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, I, 891–928. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
2004Romance “Aspectual” Periphrases: Eventuality modification versus “Syntactic” aspect. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, 425–440. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K
1984Formulaicity, frame semantics and pragmatics in German binomial expressions. Language 601. 753–796. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landman, F
1989Groups, I. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5). 559–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Structures for semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M
1999El artículo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.). Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, I, 787–890. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Link, G
1983The logical analysis of plural and mass nouns: A lattice-theoretic approach. In R. Bäuerle, et al. (eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 302–323. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
2001How comparative is semantics? A unified parametric theory of bare nouns and proper names. Natural Language Semantics 91. 335–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.Google Scholar
Lönning, J.-T
1987Mass terms and quantification. Language and Philosophy 10(1). 1–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, J.E
2006The syntax of inner aspect. Stony Brook: Stony Brook University dissertation.Google Scholar
2008The syntactic nature of inner aspect: A minimalist perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mardale, A
2013Romanian complex adnominal prepositional phrases. The example of de-Phrases. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics XV(1). 57–69.Google Scholar
Martin, R
1989La référence “massive” des unités nominales. In J. David & G. Kleiber (eds.), Termes massifs et termes comptables, Recherches Linguistiques 131, 37–46. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
McNally, L
1995Bare plurals in Spanish are interpreted as properties. In G. Morrill & R. Oehrle (eds.), Formal Grammar, 197–222. Barcelona: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.Google Scholar
Mithun, M
1984The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60(4). 847–894. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, F
1997Parts and wholes in semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morreale, M
1971/1973Aspectos gramaticales y estilísticos del número. BRAE 51. 83-138. & BRAE 531. 99–206.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A
1978Events, processes, and states. Linguistics and Philosophy 21. 415–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nedergaard Thomsen, O. & M. Herslund
2002Complex predicates and incorporation – An introduction. In O. Nedergaard Thomsen & M. Herslund (eds.), Complex predicates and incorporation: A functional perspective (Travaux du cercle linguistique de Copenhague XXXII) 7–47. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzel.Google Scholar
Olsen, M.B
1994The semantics and pragmatics of lexical aspect features. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 241. 361–375.Google Scholar
1997A semantic and pragmatic model of lexical and grammatical aspect. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Pelletier, F.J
1979Non-singular reference. In F.J. Pelletier (ed.), Mass terms: Some philosophical problems, 1–14. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, F.J. & L.K. Schubert
1989Mass expressions. In G. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic, vol. 41, 327–407. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, J
1991The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 171. 409–441.Google Scholar
1995The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O
1960Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Renzi, L
1988Grande grammatica italiana de consultazione, vol. 11. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, J
2002The noun phrase (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rischel, J
1983On Unit Accentuation in Danish – and the distinction between deep and surface phonology. Folia Linguistica XVII1. 51–97.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S
2010Counting and the mass count distinction. Journal of Semantics 27(3). 343–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, R.S
1996Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C
1991The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stark, E
2008Typological correlations in nominal determination in Romance. In H.H. Müller & A. Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination: From morphology to discourse management (Studies in Language Companion Series 99), 45–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M
1982Syntax and semantics of Spanish presentational sentence-types. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
de Swart, H. & J. Zwarts
(2009) Less form – more meaning: Why bare singular nouns are special. Lingua 119(2). 280–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tenny, C
1994Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tenny, C. & J. Pustejovsky
2000A history of events in linguistic theory. In C. Tenny & J. Pustejovsky (eds.), Events as grammatical objects. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Travis, L
1991Inner aspect and the structure of VP. ms. McGill University.Google Scholar
Tsoulas, G
2006Plurality of mass nouns and the grammar of number. Paper presented at the 29th GLOW colloquium in Barcelona .
Vendler, Z
1967Verbs and times: Linguistics in philosophy, 97–121. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, C
1994Change in Homogeneity in verbal and nominal reference. In C. Bache, et al. (eds.), Tense, aspect and action: Empirical and theoretical contributions to language typology, 141–164. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A
1988The semantics of grammar (Studies in Language Companion Series 18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zamparelli, R
2008Bare predicate nominals in Romance languages. In H.H. Müller & A. Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination: From morphology to discourse management (Studies in Language Companion Series 99), 101–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Müller, Henrik Høeg
2017. Bare nouns in Danish with special reference to the object position. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 40:1  pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.