There is a functional overlap between motion towards the deictic center and (di-)transitive events directed at speech act participants. Grammatical evidence for this comes from verbal morphemes that are used in motional clauses like ‘come to me!’ and ditransitive clauses like ‘give (it) to me!’ While the literature suggests that such syncretic markers develop through extension from a cislocative (venitive/ventive) to a speech act participant index, the evidence presented here indicates that this development has gone the other way in Karbi (Tibeto-Burman). This suggests that neither cislocative nor non-subject speech act participant indexation is more primary, but that they share an equally basic idea of orientation towards and therefore impact on the deictic center.
2001Lectures on Functional Syntax. Presented at the LSA Summer Institute, UC Santa Barbara. [URL].
DeLancey, Scott
2013The history of postverbal agreement in Kuki-Chin. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 61. 1–17.
Ebert, Karen H
1991Inverse and pseudo-inverse prefixes in Kiranti languages: Evidence from Belhare, Athpare and Dungmali. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1). 73–92.
Grüßner, Karl-Heinz
1978Arleng Alam, die Sprache der Mikir: Grammatik und Texte. Beiträge zur Südasienforschung 39. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
2014aA Grammar of Karbi. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon dissertation.
Konnerth, Linda
2014bKarbi and Pnar: A case study of the relationship between tibeto-burman and austroasiatic. Paper presented at the Inaugural Workshop of the International Consortium for Eastern Himalayan Ethnolinguistic Prehistory, Armidale, Australia.
Konnerth, Linda & Amos Teo
2014Acoustic-Statistical and Perceptual Investigations of Karbi Tones: A Peculiar Case of Incomplete Neutralisation of F0. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Linda Konnerth, Stephen Morey & Priyankoo Sarmah (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics, Vol. 61, 13–37. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Kouwenberg, N.J.C
2009Ventive, dative and allative in Old Babylonian. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 92(2). 200–240.
LaPolla, Randy J
2010Hierarchical Person Marking in the Rawang Language. In Dai Zhaoming (ed.), Forty Years of Sino-Tibetan Language Studies: Proceedings of ICSTLL-40, 107–13. Heilongjian University Press.
Matisoff, James A
2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Mithun, Marianne
1996New directions in referentiality. In Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora (Typological Studies in Language 33), 413–35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Peterson, David A
2003 “Hakha Lai.” In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 409–26. London: Routledge.
Phinney, Archie
1934Nez Perce texts, Vol. 251 (Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology). New York: Columbia University Press.
Rude, Noel
1985Studies in Nez Perce grammar and discourse. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon dissertation.
Sharma, H. Surmangol & N. Gopendro Singh
2008Pronominal Markers in Purum and Manipuri. Paper presented at the 3rd annual meeting of the North East Indian Linguistics Society, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Shibatani, Masayoshi
2003Directional verbs in Japanese. In Erin Shay & Uwe Seibert (eds.), Motion, Direction and Location in Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (Typological Studies in Language), 259–86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2018. Hierarchical and accusative alignment of Verbal Person Marking in Trans-Himalayan
. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Guillaume, Antoine
2016. Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20:1
[no author supplied]
2034. Title Pending 10666. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.