There is a functional overlap between motion towards the deictic center and (di-)transitive events directed at speech act participants. Grammatical evidence for this comes from verbal morphemes that are used in motional clauses like ‘come to me!’ and ditransitive clauses like ‘give (it) to me!’ While the literature suggests that such syncretic markers develop through extension from a cislocative (venitive/ventive) to a speech act participant index, the evidence presented here indicates that this development has gone the other way in Karbi (Tibeto-Burman). This suggests that neither cislocative nor non-subject speech act participant indexation is more primary, but that they share an equally basic idea of orientation towards and therefore impact on the deictic center.
Boro, Krishna. 2012. Hierarchical verb agreement in Hakhun Tangsa. Paper presented at the Eighteenth Himalayan Languages Symposium, Benares Hindu University, India.
Burling, Robbins. 2004. The language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo), Vol. 11. Bibliophile South Asia.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1980. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
DeLancey, Scott. 1981a. An Interpretation of Split Ergativity and Related Patterns. Language 57(3). 626–57.
DeLancey, Scott. 1981b. The Category of Direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6(1). 83–101.
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. Lectures on Functional Syntax. Presented at the LSA Summer Institute, UC Santa Barbara. [URL].
DeLancey, Scott. 2013. The history of postverbal agreement in Kuki-Chin. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 61. 1–17.
Ebert, Karen H. 1991. Inverse and pseudo-inverse prefixes in Kiranti languages: Evidence from Belhare, Athpare and Dungmali. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1). 73–92.
Grüßner, Karl-Heinz. 1978. Arleng Alam, die Sprache der Mikir: Grammatik und Texte. Beiträge zur Südasienforschung 39. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2010. The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11(1). 127–57.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2013. Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order.”Linguistic Typology 171. 187–215.
Kansakar, Tej R., Yogendra P. Yadava, Krishna Prasad Chalise, Balaram Prasain, Dubi Nanda Dhakal & Krishna Paudel. 2011. A Grammar of Baram. Linguistic and Ethnographic Documentatation of the Baram Language, Central Department of Linguistics, Tribhuvan University.
Konnerth, Linda. 2014a. A Grammar of Karbi. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon dissertation.
Konnerth, Linda. 2014b. Karbi and Pnar: A case study of the relationship between tibeto-burman and austroasiatic. Paper presented at the Inaugural Workshop of the International Consortium for Eastern Himalayan Ethnolinguistic Prehistory, Armidale, Australia.
Konnerth, Linda & Amos Teo. 2014. Acoustic-Statistical and Perceptual Investigations of Karbi Tones: A Peculiar Case of Incomplete Neutralisation of F0. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Linda Konnerth, Stephen Morey & Priyankoo Sarmah (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics, Vol. 61, 13–37. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Kouwenberg, N.J.C. 2009. Ventive, dative and allative in Old Babylonian. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 92(2). 200–240.
LaPolla, Randy J. 2010. Hierarchical Person Marking in the Rawang Language. In Dai Zhaoming (ed.), Forty Years of Sino-Tibetan Language Studies: Proceedings of ICSTLL-40, 107–13. Heilongjian University Press.
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Mithun, Marianne. 1996. New directions in referentiality. In Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora (Typological Studies in Language 33), 413–35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Peterson, David A. 2003. “Hakha Lai.” In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 409–26. London: Routledge.
Phinney, Archie. 1934. Nez Perce texts, Vol. 251 (Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology). New York: Columbia University Press.
Rude, Noel. 1985. Studies in Nez Perce grammar and discourse. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon dissertation.
Sharma, H. Surmangol & N. Gopendro Singh. 2008. Pronominal Markers in Purum and Manipuri. Paper presented at the 3rd annual meeting of the North East Indian Linguistics Society, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2003. Directional verbs in Japanese. In Erin Shay & Uwe Seibert (eds.), Motion, Direction and Location in Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (Typological Studies in Language), 259–86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sidwell, Paul. 2008. Issues in the morphological reconstruction of Proto-Mon-Khmer. In Claire Bowern, Bethwyn Evans & Luisa Miceli (eds.), Morphology and language history: In honour of Harold Koch, 251–98. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Silver, Shirley. 1966. The Shasta language. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.
Starosta, Stanley. 1985. Relator nouns as a source of case inflection. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 201. 111–33.
Stern, Theodore. 1984. Sizang (Siyin) Chin texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 8(1). 43–58.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2003. Caodeng rGyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.
Van Driem, George. 1991. Tangut verbal agreement and the patient category in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 54 (3). 520–33.
2018. Hierarchical and accusative alignment of Verbal Person Marking in Trans-Himalayan
. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Guillaume, Antoine
2016. Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.