Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 39:1 (2015) ► pp.24–45

A new type of convergence at the deictic center

Second person and cislocative in Karbi (Tibeto-Burman)

| University of Oregon
There is a functional overlap between motion towards the deictic center and (di-)transitive events directed at speech act participants. Grammatical evidence for this comes from verbal morphemes that are used in motional clauses like ‘come to me!’ and ditransitive clauses like ‘give (it) to me!’ While the literature suggests that such syncretic markers develop through extension from a cislocative (venitive/ventive) to a speech act participant index, the evidence presented here indicates that this development has gone the other way in Karbi (Tibeto-Burman). This suggests that neither cislocative nor non-subject speech act participant indexation is more primary, but that they share an equally basic idea of orientation towards and therefore impact on the deictic center.
Keywords: cislocative, spatial deixis, ventive, venitive, hierarchical agreement, speech act participants, deictic center, Northeast India, Karbi, Tibeto-Burman
Published online: 15 June 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.1.02kon
References (36)
Bickel, Balthasar. 2001. On the syntax of agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Studies in Language 24(3). 583–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boro, Krishna. 2012. Hierarchical verb agreement in Hakhun Tangsa. Paper presented at the Eighteenth Himalayan Languages Symposium, Benares Hindu University, India.
Burling, Robbins. 2004. The language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo), Vol. 11. Bibliophile South Asia.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1980. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981a. An Interpretation of Split Ergativity and Related Patterns. Language 57(3). 626–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981b. The Category of Direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6(1). 83–101.Google Scholar
. 1985. The Analysis-Synthesis-Lexis Cycle in Tibeto-Burman: A case study in motivated change.” In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 367–89. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories: Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese.” In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson, (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givon, 51–69. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Lectures on Functional Syntax. Presented at the LSA Summer Institute, UC Santa Barbara. [URL].
. 2013. The history of postverbal agreement in Kuki-Chin. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 61. 1–17.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen H. 1991. Inverse and pseudo-inverse prefixes in Kiranti languages: Evidence from Belhare, Athpare and Dungmali. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1). 73–92.Google Scholar
Grüßner, Karl-Heinz. 1978. Arleng Alam, die Sprache der Mikir: Grammatik und Texte. Beiträge zur Südasienforschung 39. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2013. Reconstructing the category of ‘associated motion’ in Tacanan languages (Amazonian Bolivia and Peru). In Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics , Osaka, 25-30 July 2011, 129–51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume. 2010. The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11(1). 127–57.Google Scholar
. 2013. Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order.” Linguistic Typology 171. 187–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kansakar, Tej R., Yogendra P. Yadava, Krishna Prasad Chalise, Balaram Prasain, Dubi Nanda Dhakal & Krishna Paudel. 2011. A Grammar of Baram. Linguistic and Ethnographic Documentatation of the Baram Language, Central Department of Linguistics, Tribhuvan University.Google Scholar
Koga, Hiroaki & Toshio Ohori. 2008. Reintroducing Inverse Constructions in Japanese: The Deictic Verb Kuru ‘to Come’ in the Paradigms of Argument Encoding. In Robert D. Van Valin (ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface (Studies in Language Companion Series 105), 37–58. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konnerth, Linda. 2014a. A Grammar of Karbi. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2014b. Karbi and Pnar: A case study of the relationship between tibeto-burman and austroasiatic. Paper presented at the Inaugural Workshop of the International Consortium for Eastern Himalayan Ethnolinguistic Prehistory, Armidale, Australia.
Konnerth, Linda & Amos Teo. 2014. Acoustic-Statistical and Perceptual Investigations of Karbi Tones: A Peculiar Case of Incomplete Neutralisation of F0. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Linda Konnerth, Stephen Morey & Priyankoo Sarmah (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics, Vol. 61, 13–37. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, N.J.C. 2009. Ventive, dative and allative in Old Babylonian. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 92(2). 200–240.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. 2010. Hierarchical Person Marking in the Rawang Language. In Dai Zhaoming (ed.), Forty Years of Sino-Tibetan Language Studies: Proceedings of ICSTLL-40, 107–13. Heilongjian University Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1996. New directions in referentiality. In Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora (Typological Studies in Language 33), 413–35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David A. 2003. “Hakha Lai.” In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 409–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phinney, Archie. 1934. Nez Perce texts, Vol. 251 (Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rude, Noel. 1985. Studies in Nez Perce grammar and discourse. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar
Sharma, H. Surmangol & N. Gopendro Singh. 2008. Pronominal Markers in Purum and Manipuri. Paper presented at the 3rd annual meeting of the North East Indian Linguistics Society, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2003. Directional verbs in Japanese. In Erin Shay & Uwe Seibert (eds.), Motion, Direction and Location in Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (Typological Studies in Language), 259–86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2008. Issues in the morphological reconstruction of Proto-Mon-Khmer. In Claire Bowern, Bethwyn Evans & Luisa Miceli (eds.), Morphology and language history: In honour of Harold Koch, 251–98. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silver, Shirley. 1966. The Shasta language. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley. 1985. Relator nouns as a source of case inflection. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 201. 111–33.Google Scholar
Stern, Theodore. 1984. Sizang (Siyin) Chin texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 8(1). 43–58.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2003. Caodeng rGyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Driem, George. 1991. Tangut verbal agreement and the patient category in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 54 (3). 520–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2006. Deixis and alignment: Inverse systems in indigenous languages of the Americas. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Koval, Sergey & Sergey Loesov
2024. The ventive and the deictic shift. Studies in Language DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume & José Andrés Alonso de la Fuente
2022. Associated motion in Manchu in typological perspective. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Genetti, Carol, Kristine Hildebrandt, Nathaniel A. Sims & Alexia Z. Fawcett
2021. Direction and associated motion in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistic Typology 25:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Konnerth, Linda & Andrea Sansò
2021. Towards a diachronic typology of individual person markers. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
DeLancey, Scott
2018. Chapter 10. Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP indexation. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
DeLancey, Scott
2018. Hierarchical and accusative alignment of Verbal Person Marking in Trans-Himalayan . Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Guillaume, Antoine
2016. Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20:1 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2034. Title Pending 10666. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.