Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 39:1 (2015) ► pp. 4684
References
Ahn, J
2006A studying of connecting ending, ‘-myenseo’ in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 451. 179–198.Google Scholar
Ahn, M. & F.H. Yap
2014On the development of Korean ‘say’ evidentials and their extended pragmatic functions. Diachronica 31(3). 299–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R.M.W. Dixon
1998Evidentials and areal typology: A case study from Amazonia. Language Sciences 201. 241–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A.Y. & R.M.W. Dixon
2003Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A.Y. & R.J. LaPolla
2007New perspectives on evidentials: A view from Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 1–12.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A
1988The acquisition of aspect and modality. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ball, J.D
1888Cantonese made easy: A book on simple sentences in the Canton Dialect, 2nd edn. Hong Kong: China Mail Office.Google Scholar
Bisang, W
2007Categories that make finiteness: Discreteness from a functional perspective and some of its repercussions. In Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, I. Nikolaeva (ed.), 115–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and S. Levinson
1987Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, 256–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. & J. Nichols
(eds.) 1986Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chang, M
1998The discourse functions of Taiwanese kong in relation to its grammaticalization. In S-F., Huang (ed.), Selected papers from the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, 111–127. Taipei: Crane Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Chao, Y.R
1947 [1969]Cantonese primer. New York: Greenwood Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, H
2008Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology 121. 45–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chui, K
1994Grammaticalization of the saying verb wa in Cantonese. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 51: 1–13.Google Scholar
Chung, K
2007Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean. Natural Language Semantics 15(3).187–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Korean evidentials and assertion. Lingua 1201. 932–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Space in tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality and speech acts in Korean. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, S
1985Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 65–72.
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 369–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In F.H. Yap, K. Grunow-Hårsta & J. Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, 343–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3).529–564.Google Scholar
Eckardt, R
2006Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, R
2003Searching for structure: The problem of complementation in colloquial Indonesian conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 (ed.). Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N
2007Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Everett, D
2008Wari’ intentional state constructions. In R.D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface, 381–409. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faller, M
2003Propositional- and illocutionary-level evidentiality in Cuzco Quechua. In J. Anderssen, P. Menéndez-Benito & A. Werle (eds.), Proceedings of SULA 2, Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 19–33.Google Scholar
Fox, B.A
2001Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(2). 167–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gipper, S
2011Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit dissertation.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L.R
1981Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology vol. 21, 141–165. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & J.W. Astington
1988Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false-belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development 591. 26–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, T
2008Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grunow-Hårsta, K
2011Innovation in nominalization in Magar: A Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. In F.H. Yap, K. Grunow-Hårsta & J. Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, 215–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, W. & D. Shi
2012Syntactic position and function of ‘hika’ in Shanghainese, paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference of Chinese Linguistic Society, August 2012. Yunnan: Yunnan University.
2013The grammaticalization of modal particles in Shanghainese. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference of Cognitive Linguistics, University of Alberta, June 23-28.
Hengeveld, K. & M. Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher
Higashiizumi, Y
2006From a subordinate clause to an independent clause. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Hill, J. & J. Irvine
1993Introduction. In Jane Hill & Judith Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 1–23. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & E.C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horie, K
2012The convergence of stance-related functions of nominalization in Modern Japanese. Paper presented at the Workshop on Stance and Discourse: Discourse Perspectives, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, May 7-9.
Hsieh, F
2012On the grammaticalization of the Kavalan SAY verb zin . Oceanic Linguistics 51(2). 467–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, S
1993The structure of intonation unit in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Jang, G.H
2012A study on the meaning of the final endings oriented from the connective endings-focus on the discourse-semantical functions of ‘-go’ and ‘-neunde’. Korean Semantics 381: 109–134.Google Scholar
Jeong, J
2013A study of syntactic structures and discourse functions of –ko(yo) functioning as final endings. Discourse and Cognition 20(1). 183–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, L. & B. Utas
(eds.) 2000Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighboring languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamio, A
1990Zyoohoo no nawabari riron: Gengo no kinooteki bunseki [ The theory of territory of information: A functional analysis of language ]. University of Tsukuba dissertation.Google Scholar
1994The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21 (1). 67–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997aTerritory of information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997bEvidentiality and some discourse characteristics in Japanese. In A. Kamio (ed.), Directions in Functional Linguistics, 145–171. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, M.J
2011Grammaticalization in Korean: The evolution of the existential verb. London: Saffron Books (in conjunction with the Centre for Korean Studies, SOAS).Google Scholar
Kim, M.S
2005Evidentiality in achieving entitlement, objectivity, and detachment in Korean conversation. Discourse Studies 7(1). 87–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Evidential strategies in Korean conversation: An analysis of interactional and conversational narrative functions. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
2011Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: An examination of the Korean evidential marker –tamye . Discourse Studies 13(4). 435–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, N
2001Reportative evidential in Korean. Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics 101. 105–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Konoshima, M
1973Kokugo Joshi no Kenkyuu [A study of particle in Japanese]. Tokyo: Oofuusha.Google Scholar
Kwon, I
2012Please confirm what I inferred: On the Korean evidential marker -napo-. Journal of Pragmatics 441. 958–969. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, R.J
2000Review of A grammar of Meithei (Mouton Grammar Library 17), by Shobhana L. Chelliah. Lingua 110(4). 299–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J
2010The Korean evidential –te: a modal analysis. In O. Bonami & P.C. Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, 287–311.Google Scholar
Lee, S
2011An analysis of the declarative ending -tanta on its derivational process and its semantic function. The Study of Korean Language and Literature 391. 209–239.Google Scholar
Leung, W-M
2006On the synchrony and diachrony of sentence-final particles: The Case of wo in Cantonese. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong dissertation. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leung, W
2009A study of the Cantonese hearsay particle wo from a tonal perspective. International Journal of Linguistics 1(1). E1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, D
2010Evidentials and Interrogatives: A Case Study from Korean. University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Lim, D. and C. Lee
2012Perspective shifts in Korean evidentials and the effect of contexts. Proceedings of SALT 221: 26–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loughnane, R
2005Reported speech constructions in Golin. In N. Evans, J. Besold, H. Stoakes & A. Lee (eds.), Materials on Golin: Grammar, texts and dictionary, 131–152. Melbourne: Department of Linguistics and Applied Lingustics, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Matthews, S
1998Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: wo3, wo4, wo5 . In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics , 325–334
McGregor, W.B
1994The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi. Australian Journal of Linguistics 14(1). 63–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miura, A
1974‘To’ to ‘tte’ [ To and tte ]. Nihonggo Kyooiku [Japanese Language Education] 241. 23–28.Google Scholar
Morrison, R
1828 [2001]Vocabulary of the Canton Dialect. London: Ganesha Publishing Limited. [First ed. published in Macao: East India Company’s Press.Google Scholar
Mushin, I
2001Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nam, M
2010The formation and meaning of an ending “-dago” and its kind. Hanmalyenku [Studies on Korean Language] 261. 109–131.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, I
2010Typology of finiteness. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(12). 1176–1189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J
2001Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 383–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohori, T
1995Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In M. Shibatani and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics, 201‐218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F.R
1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, N
2004A Suggestion for the Description of the Sentence Ending Forms in Korean Grammar for Foreign Learners -focusing on the pragmatic meanings of “-eo”, “-ne”, “-chi”, “-da”, “-kuna”, “-danda.”. Bilingualism 261. 91–116.Google Scholar
Park N
2013A study on descriptions of contraction form ‘-dani’ in KFL grammar. Bilingual Research 511: 45–80.Google Scholar
Rhee, S
2012Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: The case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles. Language Sciences 34(3). 284–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, D
1993Getting past politeness: The role of linguistic markers of evidentiality and informational domains in Japanese student-teacher interactions at the graduate level. University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Saegusa, R
1997 Tte no taikei (Syntax of tte). Gengo Bunka [Language and Culture] 341: 21–34.Google Scholar
Saxena, A
1988On syntactic convergence: the case of the verb ‘say’ in Tibeto-Burman. In Berkeley Linguistics Society: proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting, February 13–15, 1988. Berkeley, Calif, edited by Shelley Axmaker et al. 375–388.Google Scholar
Shinzato, R
2015Two types of conditionals and two grammaticalization pathways. In Sylvie Hancil (ed.), Sentence Final Particles. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter 157–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, H.M
1994Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1999The Korean Language. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, S
2011Historical development of quotative constructions in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 181. 126–143.Google Scholar
Song, J.M
1998Anmaycumssikkuth ‘-te-’uy uymi kinungey tayhaye: Yuhyengloncek kwancemeyse [On the semantic function of the pre-final ending -te-: From a typological perspective]. Kwukehak [Korean Linguistics] 321. 135–169.Google Scholar
2002Evidential marker -deo- in Korean: From a typological perspective. In Hee-Don Ahn & Namkil Kim (eds.), Selected papers from the Twelfth International Conference on Korean Linguistics, 457–470. Seoul: Gyungjin Publishing.Google Scholar
Su, L.I
2004Subjectification and the use of the complementizer SHUO. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30(1). 19‒40.Google Scholar
Sun, T.J
1993Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology (63-641). 945–1001.Google Scholar
Suzuki, R
2007(Inter)subjectification in the quotative tte in Japanese conversation: Local change, utterance-ness and verb-ness. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2). 207–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki. S
1998Tte and nante: Markers of psychological distance in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 291. 429–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, S
1999Marker of unexpected statements: An analysis of the quotative particle datte . Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 33(1). 44–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamaji, M. & F.H. Yap
2013aWhere does pragmatic marker tte come from? — Convergence of to ifute, to itte and tote constructions in the diachronic development of ‘say’ constructions in Japanese. Paper presented at the 15th Annual International Conference of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences (JSLS 2013), Nagasaki, June 28-30.
2013bOn the emergence of finite structures from non-finite constructions: Evidence from ‘say’ constructions n Japanese. Paper presented at the 10th Biennual Meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology (ALT-9), University of Leipzig, August 15-18.
Trent, N
1997Linguistic coding of evidentiality in Japanese spoken discourse and Japanese politeness. Austin: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
van der Voort, H
2002The quotative construction in Kwaza and its (de-)grammaticalisation. In M. Crevels, S. van de Kerke, S. Meira & H. van der Voort (eds.), Current Studies on South American Languages: Indigenous Languages of Latin America 31, 307–328.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., A. Katz & Z. Chen
2003Thinking as saying: Shuo (‘say’) in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and BBS talk. Language Sciences 25(5). 457–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willett, T.L
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 121. 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H. & J. Perner
1983Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 131. 103–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, F.H. & M. Ahn
2011Evidentiality and counterexpectation marking strategies in Cantonese and Korean. Paper presented at the Workshop on Evidentiality and Mood, Seoul National University, October 19.
Yap, F.H., K. Grunow-Harsta & J. Wrona
(eds.) 2011Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives. Typological Studies in Language 96. 1–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, F.H., Y. Yang & T.-S. Wong
2014On the development of sentence final particles (and utterance tags) in Chinese. In K. Beeching & U. Detges (eds.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change (Studies in Pragmatics 12). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, K
2006On the status of the complementizer waa6 in Cantonese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 4(1). 1–48.Google Scholar
Yuzawa, K
1954Edokotoba no Kenkyuu [A Study of Language in the Edo Period]. Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Ahn, Mikyung
2016. Emotion in interaction. Studies in Language 40:4  pp. 872 ff. Crossref logo
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2022. On the extended uses of -ki and -m nominalization constructions as face-threat mitigators in Korean. Lingua  pp. 103230 ff. Crossref logo
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2020. “That being so, but …”: An analysis of Korean kunyang as a marker of speaker's attenuated divergent stance. Journal of Pragmatics 160  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Arús-Hita, Jorge, Kazuhiro Teruya, Mohamed Ali Bardi, Abhishek Kumar Kashyap & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru
2018. Quoting and reporting across languages: A system-based and text-based typology. <i>WORD</i> 64:2  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Bernárdez, Enrique
2017.  In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],  pp. 433 ff. Crossref logo
Chad Walker
2018. Sentence Final Particles (SFPs) and Audience Sensitivity in Korean Discourse: A Multimodal Discourse Approach. Language Facts and Perspectives 43:null  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Chor, Winnie
2018. Sentence final particles as epistemic modulators in Cantonese conversations: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 129  pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Gipper, Sonja & Foong Ha Yap
2019.  In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124],  pp. 363 ff. Crossref logo
González-Vázquez, Mercedes
2021. The evidentiality system in Galician and the seica marker. Journal of Pragmatics 178  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Foong Ha Yap
2015. Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 83  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Mary Shin
2015. Stancetaking in the face of incongruity in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 83  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.  In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Crossref logo
Wai, Brian Lap-ming & Foong Ha Yap
2018. Inclusivity and exclusivity in the use of Cantonese ngo5dei6 (‘we’) in evasive replies in Hong Kong political discourse. Discourse & Society 29:6  pp. 691 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.