Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 39:1 (2015) ► pp.118159
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Robert M.W. Dixon
1998Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language 74(1). 56–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso de la Fuente, José Andrés
2011Venjukov’s [1858] 1862/1868 Nanai materials. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 931. 11–35.Google Scholar
2011aTense, voice and Aktionsart in Tungusic: Another case of »analysis to synthesis«? Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
An Jun
1986Hezheyu jianzhi. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Atknine, Victor
1997The Evenki language from the Yenisei to Sakhalin. In Shōji Hiroshi & Juha Janhunen (eds.), Northern minority languages: Problems of survival (Senri Ethnological Studies 44), 109–121. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der
2009The Jespersen Cycles. In Elly van Galderen (ed.), Cyclical Change, 35–71. Benjamins: Amsterdam, Philadelphia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010On the diachrony of negation. In Laurence R. Horn (ed.), The Expression of Negation, 73–109. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der & Ludo Lejeune (with Valentin Goussev
) 2013Feature 71A: The Prohibitive. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. München: Max Planck Digital Library. [URL] (31 October, 2014.)Google Scholar
Baek, Sungyup
2012Tsungūsu shogo no WH sōkan kōbun no bunpu ni taisuru ruikei-teki kōsatsu. Hoppō gengo kenkyū 21. 163–181.Google Scholar
Bang, Willy
1890Mandschurica. T’oung pao 11. 329–334.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes
1955Die tungusischen Sprachen: Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
1958I. A. Lopatin’s “Material on the Orochee Language, the Goldi (Nanai) Language and the Olchi (Nani) Language”. Anthropos 53(3–4). 597–603.Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. Shankara
1999The Prominence of tense, aspect and mood. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulatova, Nadezhda & Grenoble Lenore
1999Evenki: Language of the world/materials 141. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Bulatova, Nadezhda & Stefano Cotrozzi
2004Ewenkische Erzählungen aus der Insel Sachalin. Bonn: Verlag für Kultur und Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Castrén, M. Alexander
1856Grundzüge einer tungusischen Sprachlehre nebst kurzem Wörterverzeichniss. St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Chao Ke
2006Xiandai xiboyu kouyu yanjiu. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
2007Nanmu elunchunyu yanjiu. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
2009Ewenkeyu cankao yufa. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
2014Hezheyu 366 ju huihuaju. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.Google Scholar
Cincius, Vera I. et al.
1975–77Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ tunguso-man’čžurskich jazkov. Materialny etimologičeskomu slovarju, 2 vols1. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Clark, Larry V
1979/80Manchu suffix list. Manchu Studies Newsletter 31. 29–40.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991The Evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27(1). 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Typology and universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2010Typology of negation. In Laurence R. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 9–38. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry
2005On the syntax and semantics of negation in Salish. International Journal of American Linguistics 71(1). 1–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
2012Basic linguistic theory, Vol. 3: Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
2000Introduction. In Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard
1975Ist Kur-Urmiisch ein nanaischer Dialekt? Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 471. 51–63.Google Scholar
1978Classification Problems of Tungus. In Gerhard Doerfer & Michael Weiers (eds.), Tungusica, Band 1: Beiträge zur Nordasiatischen Kulturgeschichte, 1–26. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S
2007Clause Types. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Second edition. Volume I: Clause Structure, 224–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Mathew
2013aFeature 112A: Negative morphemes. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. München: Max Planck Digital Library. [URL] (22 February 2014)Google Scholar
2013bOn the six-way word order typology, again. Studies in Language 37(2). 267–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enhebatu, Merden
1995Manyu kouyu yanjiu. Hohot: Neimonggu daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Fu Yuguang, Guo Shuyun & Juha Janhunen
1990The Kyakala in China: History and present situation. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 881. 248–252.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van
2008Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology 121. 195–243.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1971Historical syntax and synchronic morphology. An archeologist’s field trip. Chicago Linguistic Society 71. 394–415.Google Scholar
Gorelova, Liliya M
2002Manchu grammar. Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore A. & Lindsay J. Whaley
2003The case for dialect continua in Tungusic: Plural morphology. In Dee A. Holisky & Kevin Tuite (eds.), Current trends in Caucasian, East European and Inner Asian linguistics, 97–122. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruzdeva, Ekaterina
1998Nivkh (Languages of the World/Materials 111). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, Jaakko
2012Early contacts between Uralic and Yukaghir. Mémoires de la Societé Finno-Ougrienne 2641. 91–101.Google Scholar
Hauer, Erich
2007Handwörterbuch der Mandschusprache, 2nd edn. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugene
1998Nganasan. In Daniel Abandolo (ed.), The Uralic Languages, 480–515. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hölzl, Andreas
2012Negation und die Stellung des Mandschurischen innerhalb der tungusischen Sprachen. In Daniel Leese (ed.), Hou Han(s’) Shu: Festschrift zum 50. Geburtstag von Hans van Ess, 35–67. München: Institut für Sinologie.Google Scholar
Honti, László
1999Über die Mittel der Negation im Uralischen, insbesondere den „türkischen Typ“ in einigen uralischen Sprachen. In Cornelius Hasselblatt & Paula Jääsalmi- Krüger (eds.), Europa et Sibiria, 191–198. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1980Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Jirô
1973On one verb ending in Proto-Tungus: About *-si- . Acta Asiatica 241. 45– 56.Google Scholar
1974Versuch einer Klassifikation der tungusischen Sprachen. In Georg Hazai & Peter Zieme (eds.), Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur der altaischen Völker, 271–272. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
1983Bemerkungen zu einigen sprachgeographischen und areallinguistischen Problemen in der Erforschung der tungusischen Sprachen. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 31. 170–178.Google Scholar
1995The element -n in the indicative forms of verbs in Tungus languages. Gengô Kenkyû 1071. 1–15.Google Scholar
1999Manshûgo kenkyû. Tokyo: Kyûko Shoin.Google Scholar
2002 Uiruta kôtô bungei genbunshû. Revised and enlarged edition (Publications on Tungus languages and cultures 16; Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim, Publications Series A2–013) Kyoto: Nakanishi.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha
1991Material on Manchurian Khamnigan Evenki. Castrenianiumin Toimitteia 401.Google Scholar
2003aProto-Mongolic. In Juha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic languages, London, 1–29. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2003bKhamnigan Mongol. In Juha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic languages, 83–101. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005Khamnigan Mongol. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2009Proto-Uralic: What, where, and when? Memoires de la Societe Finno- Ougrienne 2581. 57–78.Google Scholar
2012The expansion of Tungusic as an ethnic and linguistic process. In Andrej Malchokov & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Recent Advanced in Tungusic Linguistics, 5–16. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Jettmar, H.M
1937Der Stamm der oberen Golden (Die Sungari-Ussuri-Gruppe). Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 51. 245–276.Google Scholar
Kane, Daniel
1989The Sino-Jurchen vocabulary of the Bureau of Interpreters. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kazama Shinjiro
2002aNegidaarugo tekisuto to bunpôgaisetsu (Publications on Tungus languages and cultures 19; Endangered languages of the Pacific Rim, A2–021). Kyoto: Nakanishi.Google Scholar
2002bUrucha kôshô bungei genbun-shû. (Publications on Tungus languages and cultures 20; Endangered languages of the Pacific Rim, A2–022). Kyoto: Nakanishi.Google Scholar
2003Basic Vocabulary (A) of Tungusic Languages. Kyoto: Nakanishi Printing.Google Scholar
2007Rhetorical questions with interrogative markers in Nanai. In Kawaguchi Yuji, Takagaki Toshihiro, Tomimori Nobuo & Tsuruga Yoichiro (eds.), Corpus-based perspectives in linguistics, 319–335. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Designative case in Tungusic languages. In Andrej Malchokov & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics, 123–152. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Khasanova, Marina & Alexander Pevnov
2003Myths and tales of the Negidals. Kyoto: Nakanishi Printing, 1–22.Google Scholar
Kiyose, Gisaburo N
1977A study of the Jurchen language and script: Reconstruction and decipherment. Kyoto: Shōwado.Google Scholar
Klaproth, Julius von
1817Mandshuisch. In Johann Christoph Adelung (ed.), Mithridates — oder allgemeine Sprachenkunde mit dem Vater Unser als Sprachprobe in bey nahe fünf hundert Sprachen und Mundarten, Vol. 41, 194–224. Berlin: In der Vossischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Ko Dongho & Yurn Gyudong
2011A description of Najkhin Nanai. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
2007Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. 2nd edn., Vol. 1: Clause Structure, 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li Fengxiang
2005Contact, attrition, and structural shift: evidence from Oroqen. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1731. 55–74.Google Scholar
Li Fengxiang & Lindsay J. Whaley
2012The grammaticalization cycle of causatives in Oroqen. In Andrej Malchokov & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics, 165–180. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L
1995Even (Languages of the world/materials 12). München, Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2001Imperative constructions in Even. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of imperative constructions, 159–180. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Majewicz, Alfred F
(ed.) 2011The collected works of Bronisław Piłsudski, Vol. 4: Materials for the study of Tungusic languages and folklore (Trends in Linguistics: Documentation 15.4). Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena
2003Tundra Yukaghir (Languages of the World/Materials 372). München, Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl. H
1964Bemerkungen zum Bikin-Dialekt des Nanaj. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 351. 198–203.Google Scholar
1968Die tungusischen Sprachen. In Walter Fuchs, et al. (eds.), Handbuch der Orientalistik, Vol. 1.5(3): Tungusologie, 21–256. Leiden, Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
1987On Tungus alba- “non posse, не мочь” and other negative auxiliary verbs. Central Asiatic Journal 311. 7–18.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2005Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005aSymmetric and asymmetric standard negation (feature 113). In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 458–461. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011A typological perspective on negation in Finnish dialects. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 341. 83–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mu Yejun
1987Balayu. Manchu Studies 21. 2–31.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor
1994Evenki. In Peter Kahrel & René van den Berg (eds.), Typological Studies in Negation, 1–34. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Evenki. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes
2004Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 81. 149–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Maria Tolskaya
2001A grammar of Udihe. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, Jerry
1974A sketch of Sibe morphology. Central Asiatic Journal 181. 159–174.Google Scholar
1991Review of Kane 1989. T’oung Pao . Second Series 77(1–3). 152–155.
Payne, John R
1985Negation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure, 197–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pevnov, Alexander M
2012On some archaic features of the Jurchen language. Journal of the Center for Northern Humanities 51. 57–69.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, G.J
1924Die Verneinung in den altaischen Sprachen: Eine semasiologische Studie. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 521. 196–215.Google Scholar
Schaaik, Gerjan van
1994Turkish. In Peter Kahrel & René van den Berg (eds.), Typological Studies in Negation, 35–50. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Peter
1923The Language of the Olchas. Acta Universitatis Latviensis 81. 229–288.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang
2000Towards a typology of the accusative ergative continuum. The case of East Caucasian. General Linguistics 371. 71–155.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang & Andreas Hölzl
2013Review of Malchukov & Whaley 2012. Studies in Language 37(2). 454–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinor, Denis
1968La langue Mandjoue. In Walter Fuchs, et al. (eds.), Handbuch der Orientalistik, Vol. 1.5(3): Tungusologie, 257–280. Leiden, Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof
2003Khalkha. In Juha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic languages, 154–176. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsumagari, Toshiro
1997Linguistic diversity and national borders of Tungusic. In Shōji Hiroshi & Juha Janhunen (eds.), Northern minority languages: Problems of survival (Senri Ethnological Studies 44), 175–186. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Tsumagari Toshiro
2003Dagur. In Juha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic languages, 129–153. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009A sketch of Solon grammar. Journal of the Center for Northern Humanities 21. 1–21.Google Scholar
2009aGrammatical outline of Uilta (revised). Journal of the Graduate School of Letters 41. 1–21.Google Scholar
2012A note on Udihe phonology from an areal-typological perspective. In Andrej Malchokov & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Recent advanced in Tungusic linguistics, 79–86. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba
2010Standard and special negators in the Slavonic languages: Synchrony and diachrony. In Björn Hansen & Jasmina Grković-Major (eds.), Diachronic Slavonic syntax: Gradual changes in focus (Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 74), 195–208. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander
2006Why Manchu and Jurchen Look So Non-Tungusic? In Alessandra Pozzi, Juha Janhunen & Michael Weiers (eds.), Tumen jalafun jecen akū — Manchu Studies in Honour of Giovanni Stary, 255–266. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2012Did Wanyan Xiyin invent the Jurchen script? In Andrej Malchokov & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics, 49–58. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wagner-Nagy, Beáta
2011On the typology of negation in Ob-Ugric and Samoyadic languages. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 2621.Google Scholar
Wang Qingfeng
2005Manyu yanjiu. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay J., Lenore A. Grenoble & Li Fengxiang
1999Revisiting Tungusic classification from the bottom up: A comparison of Evenki and Oroqen. Language 75(2). 286–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu Dan
2006Typological change in Chinese syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang Paiyu
2013The Kilen language of Manchuria. Grammar of a moribund Tungusic language. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong thesis.Google Scholar
Zhang Yanchang, Zhang Xi & Dai Shuyan
1989The Hezhen Language. Jilin: Jilin daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhao Jie
1989Xiandai manyu yanjiu. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhao Zhizhong
2003Manyu yu hezheyu zhi bijiao Manchu Studies 371. 47–52.Google Scholar
Zikmundová, Veronika
2013Spoken Sibe morphology of the inflected parts of speech. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Ding, Hongdi
2022. Interrogatives of Liangshan Yi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 45:1  pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Ding, Hongdi & Sicong Dong
2024. Interrogatives of reason in Tibeto-Burman languages of Sichuan. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 25:2  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Dolińska, Joanna
Gruzdeva, Ekaterina
2022. Possessive and Caritive in Nivkh. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 4:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Hölzl, Andreas
2018. Constructionalization areas. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Hölzl, Andreas
2023. Diachronic changes in constructional networks. Constructions and Frames 15:2  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.