Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 39:3 (2015) ► pp.508–554

Syntacticized topics in Kurmuk

A ternary voice-like system in Nilotic

| Aalborg University
This article argues that Kurmuk, a little-described Western Nilotic language, is characterized by a syntacticized topic whose grammatical relation is variable. In this language, declarative clauses have as topic an obligatory preverbal NP which is either a subject, an object, or an adjunct. The grammatical relation of the topic is expressed by a voice-like inflection of the verb, called orientation here. While subject-orientation is morphologically unmarked, object-oriented and adjunct-oriented verbs are marked by a subject suffix or by a suffix indicating that the topic is not subject, and adjunct-orientation differs from object-orientation by a marked tone pattern. Topic choice largely reflects information structure by indicating topic continuity. The topic also plays a crucial role in relative clauses and in clauses with contrastive constituent focus, in that objects and adjuncts can only be relativized or contrastively focalized if they are coded as topics. Moreover, some types of adverbial clauses require adjunct-orientation.
Keywords: Kurmuk, grammatical relations, voice, topic, Western Nilotic, Northern Burun
Published online: 29 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.3.01and
References (24)
Andersen, Torben. 1991. Subject and topic in Dinka. Studies in Language 151. 265–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992–1994. Morphological stratification in Dinka: On the alternations of voice quality, vowel length and tone in the morphology of transitive verbal roots in a monosyllabic language. Studies in African Linguistics 231. 1–63.Google Scholar
. 1999. Consonant alternation and verbal morphology in Mayak (Northern Burun). Afrika und Übersee 821. 65–97.Google Scholar
. 2007. Kurmuk phonology. Studies in African Linguistics 361. 29–90.Google Scholar
. 2009. Verbal suffixes and suffix reduction in Surkum and other Northern Burun languages: Interaction with focus. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 301. 147–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D. 2007. The major functions of the noun phrase. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edn. Volume I: Clause structure, 132–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Patrick R. 1974. Tone and the Nilotic case system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 371. 19–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 2009. Datives in Nilotic in a typological perspective. Afrikanistik-Aegyptologie-Online, [URL] (October 27, 2014).Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 551. 59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Basic linguistic theory. Volume 1:Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. Basic linguistic theory. Volume 3: Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2003. Present progressive vis-à-vis predication focus in Bantu. Studies in Language 271. 323–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1975. Some functional relationships in grammar. Language 511. 89–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & John Robert Watters. 1984. Auxiliary focus. Studies in African Linguistics 151. 233–273.Google Scholar
König, Christa. 2006. Marked nominative in Africa. Studies in Language 301. 655–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David A. 2007. Applicative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above? In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 491–518. New York, et al.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, A.N. & J. Tompo Ole Mpaayei. 1955. A Maasai grammar with vocabulary. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax–semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Andersen, Torben
2017. Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb derivation: The Agar variety. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Andersen, Torben
2018. The encoding of subjects and objects in Jumjum, a Nilotic OV language. Lingua 204 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.