Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 39:3 (2015) ► pp. 508–554

Syntacticized topics in Kurmuk

A ternary voice-like system in Nilotic

| Aalborg University
This article argues that Kurmuk, a little-described Western Nilotic language, is characterized by a syntacticized topic whose grammatical relation is variable. In this language, declarative clauses have as topic an obligatory preverbal NP which is either a subject, an object, or an adjunct. The grammatical relation of the topic is expressed by a voice-like inflection of the verb, called orientation here. While subject-orientation is morphologically unmarked, object-oriented and adjunct-oriented verbs are marked by a subject suffix or by a suffix indicating that the topic is not subject, and adjunct-orientation differs from object-orientation by a marked tone pattern. Topic choice largely reflects information structure by indicating topic continuity. The topic also plays a crucial role in relative clauses and in clauses with contrastive constituent focus, in that objects and adjuncts can only be relativized or contrastively focalized if they are coded as topics. Moreover, some types of adverbial clauses require adjunct-orientation.
Keywords: Kurmuk, grammatical relations, voice, topic, Western Nilotic, Northern Burun
Published online: 29 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.3.01and
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Andersen, Torben
2017. Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb derivation: The Agar variety. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Andersen, Torben
2018. The encoding of subjects and objects in Jumjum, a Nilotic OV language. Lingua 204 ► pp. 78 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Andersen, Torben
1991 Subject and topic in Dinka. Studies in Language 15. 265–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992–1994 Morphological stratification in Dinka: On the alternations of voice quality, vowel length and tone in the morphology of transitive verbal roots in a monosyllabic language. Studies in African Linguistics 23. 1–63.Google Scholar
1999 Consonant alternation and verbal morphology in Mayak (Northern Burun). Afrika und Übersee 82. 65–97.Google Scholar
2007 Kurmuk phonology. Studies in African Linguistics 36. 29–90.Google Scholar
2009 Verbal suffixes and suffix reduction in Surkum and other Northern Burun languages: Interaction with focus. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 30. 147–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.
2007 The major functions of the noun phrase. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edn. Volume I: Clause structure, 132–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Patrick R.
1974 Tone and the Nilotic case system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 37. 19–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999 Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
2009 Datives in Nilotic in a typological perspective. Afrikanistik-Aegyptologie-Online, http://​www​.afrikanistik​-aegyptologie​-online​.de​/archiv​/2009​/2355/ (October 27, 2014).Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W.
1979 Ergativity. Language 55. 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Basic linguistic theory. Volume 1:Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012 Basic linguistic theory. Volume 3: Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
1984 Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1983 Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom
2003 Present progressive vis-à-vis predication focus in Bantu. Studies in Language 27. 323–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1975 Some functional relationships in grammar. Language 51. 89–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & John Robert Watters
1984 Auxiliary focus. Studies in African Linguistics 15. 233–273.Google Scholar
König, Christa
2006 Marked nominative in Africa. Studies in Language 30. 655–732. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David A.
2007 Applicative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976 The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above? In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 491–518. New York, et al.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, A.N. & J. Tompo Ole Mpaayei
1955 A Maasai grammar with vocabulary. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
2005 Exploring the syntax–semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar