Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 39:3 (2015) ► pp. 508554
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Andersen, Torben
2017. Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb derivation: The Agar variety. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 38:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Andersen, Torben
2018. The encoding of subjects and objects in Jumjum, a Nilotic OV language. Lingua 204  pp. 78 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Andersen, Torben
1991Subject and topic in Dinka. Studies in Language 15. 265–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992–1994Morphological stratification in Dinka: On the alternations of voice quality, vowel length and tone in the morphology of transitive verbal roots in a monosyllabic language. Studies in African Linguistics 23. 1–63.Google Scholar
1999Consonant alternation and verbal morphology in Mayak (Northern Burun). Afrika und Übersee 82. 65–97.Google Scholar
2007Kurmuk phonology. Studies in African Linguistics 36. 29–90.Google Scholar
2009Verbal suffixes and suffix reduction in Surkum and other Northern Burun languages: Interaction with focus. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 30. 147–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.
2007The major functions of the noun phrase. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edn. Volume I: Clause structure, 132–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Patrick R.
1974Tone and the Nilotic case system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 37. 19–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
2009Datives in Nilotic in a typological perspective. Afrikanistik-Aegyptologie-Online, http://​www​.afrikanistik​-aegyptologie​-online​.de​/archiv​/2009​/2355/ (October 27, 2014).Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W.
1979Ergativity. Language 55. 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Basic linguistic theory. Volume 1:Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012Basic linguistic theory. Volume 3: Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
1984Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1983Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom
2003Present progressive vis-à-vis predication focus in Bantu. Studies in Language 27. 323–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1975Some functional relationships in grammar. Language 51. 89–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & John Robert Watters
1984Auxiliary focus. Studies in African Linguistics 15. 233–273.Google Scholar
König, Christa
2006Marked nominative in Africa. Studies in Language 30. 655–732. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David A.
2007Applicative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above? In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 491–518. New York, et al.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, A.N. & J. Tompo Ole Mpaayei
1955A Maasai grammar with vocabulary. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
2005Exploring the syntax–semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar