Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 39:3 (2015) ► pp.593–633

A comparative study of semantic change in grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese and Germanic languages

| Western Washington University,
This study explores the typological regularity of semantic change in grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese and Germanic languages. Earlier studies, mostly done on Indo-European languages (e.g. Heine et al. 1991, Traugott & Dasher 2002), suggest that semantic change follows the cline A>A, B>B. Based on numerous case studies of semantic change in grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, this paper provides evidence that semantic change in Chinese follows a somewhat different pattern: A>A, B>A,B,C. The key factors responsible for this, as it will be argued, are twofold: Chinese grammar is typologically structured without inflections and Chinese words have become increasingly disyllabic. Indo-European languages, which exhibit quite different grammatical and morphological structures and diachronic evolution, therefore show a different tendency.
Keywords: typology, semantic change, lexicalization, grammaticalization
Published online: 29 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.3.03xin
References (79)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L. 1995. Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to early ModE. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara H. Partee. 1995. Quantification in natural languages. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Bader, Markus. 2012. The German bekommen passive: A case study on frequency and grammaticality. Linguistische Berichte 2311.249–298.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2009. Typology of compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, 343–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Thomas Cable. 2002. A History of the English Language [Reprint of 4th edn., 1993]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennett, Paul. 1981. The evolution of passive and disposal sentences. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 91. 61–90.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2008. Precategoriality and syntax-based parts of speech – the case of Late Archaic Chinese. Studies in Language 321. 568–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Li-li. 2006. The semantic development from causatives to passives in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 7(1). 139–174.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary. 1991. Causativity and the bă-construction in Chinese. In Hansjakob Seiler & Waldfried (eds.), Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, 509–530. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke. 2012. What you give is what you GET? On reanalysis, semantic extension and functional motivation with the German bekommen-passive construction. Linguistics 50(6). 1163–1204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 1999. Die Modalverben im Deutschen: Grammatikalisierung und Polyfunktionalität (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 208). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Xiufang. 2011. Lexicalization: The origin and evolution of Chinese disyllabic words(Revised Edition) [Cihuihua: Hanyu Shuangyinci de Yansheng he Fazhan]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils E. & Brita Wårvik. 1987. Old English Þa, temporal chains, and narrative structure. In A.G. Ramat et al. (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 221–237. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 2005. Studies on Chinese Prosodic Grammar [Hanyu Yunlu Yufa Yanjiu]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Fennell, Barbara. 2001. A History of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change – functional and formal perspectives. New York/London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas. 2006. The origin of passive get . English Language and Linguistics 101. 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy & Lynne Yang. 1994. The Rise of the English GET-passive. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 119–49. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. Diachronic sources of ‘all’ and ‘every’. In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in natural languages, 263–382. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2002. Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Her, One-Soon. 1991. Historical Development of bă and jiāng in the Tang Dynasty. Language Variation and Change 2(3). 277–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohenhaus, Peter. 2005. Lexicalization and institutionalization. In Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation, 353–370. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honda, Shoko. 2012. On the origin and development of the get-passive with special reference to grammaticalization. English Linguistics 29(1).69–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I1, 17–36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2001. What corpora tell us about the grammaticalization of voice inget-constructions. Studies in Language 25(1). 49–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Shaoyu. 2003. The origin of gei and jiao’s passive function [Bèidòngshì gĕi hé jiáo de láiyuán]. In Fuxiang Wu & Bo Hong (eds.), Grammaticalization and grammatical studies [Yufahua yu yufa yanjiu], Vol. 11, 202–223. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2003. Morphologization from syntax. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard Janda (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics, 472–492. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1982. Word-formation: A functional view. Folia Linguistica 161. 191–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Typological changes in derivational morphology. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 151–176. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese – A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer (eds.). 2009. The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2005. English word-formation processes. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (eds.), Handbook of word-formation, 375–428. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. A lexical semantic approach to compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 78–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. On the lexical semantics of compounds; Non-affixal (de)verbal compounds. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 127–44. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Danqing. 2010. Hànyŭ shì yīzhŏng dòngcí xìng yŭyán [Chinese as a verby language: On the typological difference between verby languages and nouny languages]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the World] 24(1). 1–17.Google Scholar
Liu, Mei-chun. 1994. Discourse explanations for choice of jiù and cái in Mandarin conversation. In P. Li, C.R. Huang & C.-C. Tang (eds.), Chinese languages and linguistics, Vol. 2: Historical linguistics, 671–709. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Lowrey, Brian. 2012. Grammaticalisation and the Old English modals. Quaderna 11. 1–29.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1955. A study of the usage of ba [Ba-zi yongfa de yanjiu]. In Shuxiang Lü (ed.), Papers on Chinese grammar [Hanyu yufa lunwenji], 125–144. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marchard, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word formation. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2015. Tense and aspect in Han Period Chinese: A linguistic analysis of the ‘Shiji’. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 151. 1–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2009. Indo-European, Germanic: German. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 386–399. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, Susan. 2000. Composition. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie/Morphology, 897–916. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Packard, Jerome L. 2000. The morphology of Chinese – A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 1989. History of the passive constructions in Chinese until the 10th century. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17(2). 335–372.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priebsch, R. & W.E. Collinson. 1962. The German Language. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Davide Ricca. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the language of Europe. In J. van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, 187–275. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Irene Vogel (eds.). 2010. Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 2002. How to dispose of disposal constructions [Rúhé chǔzhì ‘chǔzhìshì’]. Chinese Language [Zhongguo Yuwen] 51. 387–399.Google Scholar
. 2012. Relections on nouny verbs: Problems and solutions [Míngdòng cí de fănsī: Wèntí hé duìcè]. Chinese Teaching in the World [Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue] 26(1). 3–17.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tai, James H-Y. 1994. Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In S.-Y. Wang, M.Y. Chen, & J.L. Tzeng, In honor of William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change. Taipei: Pyramid Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Claire. 2013. Lexicalization in generative morphology and conceptual structure. In Pius ten Hacken & Claire Thomas, The semantics of word formation and lexicalization, 45–65. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 181. 523–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trips, Carola & Eric Fuß. 2009. The syntax and semantics of the temporal anaphor “then” in Old and Middle English. In Artemis Alexiadou, et al. (eds.), Advances in comparative Germanic syntax, 171–218. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Geleren, Elly. 2014. A history of the English language (Revised edition). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Bettelou Los (eds.). 2006. The handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Huan. 1957 The ba construction and the bei construction [Bă zì jù hé bèi zì jù] ( Chinese Language Series [Hanyu Zhishi Jiangzuo] 14). Shanghai: Xin Zhishi Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Wang, Li. 1957. Development of Chinese passive constructions [Hànyǔ bèidòngshì de fāzhăn]. Linguistic Studies [Yuyanxue Luncun] 11. 1–16. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike, 2003. Numbers, language, and the human mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Yunji. 1999. An etymological study of disposal and passive markers in Hunan dialects. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 27(2). 90–123.Google Scholar
Xing, Janet Z. 2003. Grammaticalization of verbs in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 31(1). 101–144.Google Scholar
. 2004. Grammaticalization of the scalar focus particle lián in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(1). 81–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Subjectification in grammaticalization of jiù in Mandarin Chinese [Cóng jiù de yŭfă huà kàn hànyŭ yŭyì yŭnbiàn de zhŭguān huà]. Grammaticalization and Grammatical Studies [Yufahua Yu Yufa Yanjiu] 21. 324–339. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
. 2013. Semantic reanalysis in grammaticalization in Chinese. In Zhuo Jing-Schmidt (ed.), Increased empiricism: New advances in Chinese linguistics, 223–246. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xing, Janet. Z. 2014. Semantic change and grammaticalization of the universal quantifier mĕi in Chinese. In Dan Xu & Jingqi Fu (eds.), Space and quantification in languages of China, 95–116. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Xu, Dan. 2006. Typological change in Chinese syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1985. Grammaticalized verbs and nouny verbs in modern written Chinese. Journal of Peking University 51.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Debra. 2003. Redefining unidirectionality: Insights from demodalisation. Folia Linguistica Historica XXIV1. 225–266.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

付, 娇娇
2024. The Polysemy and Dynamic Mechanism of the “给我 VP” Structure. Modern Linguistics 12:04 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Li, Fanxi
2021. On the conditional marker “zhě”(者). International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Bisang, Walter
2020. Radical analyticity and radical pro-drop scenarios of diachronic change in East and mainland Southeast Asia, West Africa and Pidgins and Creoles. Asian Languages and Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Linlin & David Correia Saavedra
2020. Measuring grammatical status in Chinese through quantitative corpus analysis. Corpora 15:3 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Sun, Linlin & Kasper Boye
2019. The grammatical-lexical distinction in Chinese aspectual markers. Studies in Language 43:3 ► pp. 668 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.