Article published in:
The Why and How of Total Reduplication: Current Issues and New Perspectives
Edited by Daniela Rossi
[Studies in Language 39:4] 2015
► pp. 946970
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

Akita, Kimi
2019.  In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16],  pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Akita, Kimi
2020.  In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17],  pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Akita, Kimi
2020. A typology of depiction marking. Studies in Language Crossref logo
Akita, Kimi & Prashant Pardeshi
2019.  In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
BERENT, IRIS, OUTI BAT-EL, DIANE BRENTARI, QATHERINE ANDAN & VERED VAKNIN-NUSBAUM
2021. Amodal phonology. Journal of Linguistics 57:3  pp. 499 ff. Crossref logo
Bonacchi, Silvia
2017.  In Exploring Intensification [Studies in Language Companion Series, 189],  pp. 289 ff. Crossref logo
Dingemanse, Mark
2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu . STUF - Language Typology and Universals 70:2  pp. 363 ff. Crossref logo
Dingemanse, Mark
2018. Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo
Duggirala, Vasanta & Lalita Murty
2020.  In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17],  pp. 40 ff. Crossref logo
Ferrara, Lindsay & Rolf Piene Halvorsen
2017. Depicting and describing meanings with iconic signs in Norwegian Sign Language. Gesture 16:3  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Ferrara, Lindsay & Gabrielle Hodge
2018. Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Hodge, Gabrielle & Kearsy Cormier
2019. Reported speech as enactment. Linguistic Typology 23:1  pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2021. When Gesture “Takes Over”: Speech-Embedded Nonverbal Depictions in Multimodal Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Kawahara, Shigeto & Jeff Moore
2021. How to express evolution in English Pokémon names. Linguistics 59:3  pp. 577 ff. Crossref logo
Kuhn, Jeremy, Carlo Geraci, Philippe Schlenker & Brent Strickland
2021. Boundaries in space and time: Iconic biases across modalities. Cognition 210  pp. 104596 ff. Crossref logo
Kwon, Nahyun
2018. Iconicity correlated with vowel harmony in Korean ideophones. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 9:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kwon, Nahyun
2020.  In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17],  pp. 22 ff. Crossref logo
Kwon, Nahyun & Shaoyun Yu
2018. Experimental evidence for the productivity of total reduplication in Japanese ideophones and ordinary vocabulary. Language Sciences 66  pp. 166 ff. Crossref logo
Lindstromberg, Seth
2020. Surplus interword phonological similarity in English multiword units. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Mattes, Veronika
2017. Iconicity in the lexicon. Studies in Language 41:4  pp. 813 ff. Crossref logo
Ponsonnet, Maïa
2018. Expressive values of reduplication in Barunga Kriol (northern Australia). Studies in Language 42:1  pp. 226 ff. Crossref logo
Ponsonnet, Maïa & Marine Vuillermet
2018. Introduction. Studies in Language 42:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Schwaiger, Thomas
2018. The derivational nature of reduplication: Towards a Functional Discourse Grammar account of a non-concatenative morphological process. Word Structure 11:1  pp. 118 ff. Crossref logo
SLONIMSKA, ANITA, ASLI ÖZYÜREK & OLGA CAPIRCI
2021. Using depiction for efficient communication in LIS (Italian Sign Language). Language and Cognition 13:3  pp. 367 ff. Crossref logo
Stanlaw, James
2020.  In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Taitz, Alan, M. Florencia Assaneo, Natalia Elisei, Mónica Trípodi, Laurent Cohen, Jacobo D. Sitt, Marcos A. Trevisan & Niels O. Schiller
2018. The audiovisual structure of onomatopoeias: An intrusion of real-world physics in lexical creation. PLOS ONE 13:3  pp. e0193466 ff. Crossref logo
Toratani, Kiyoko
2018. Particle drop of mimetics in Japanese. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:1  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Willemsen, Jeroen & Ehm Hjorth Miltersen
2020. The expression of vulgarity, force, severity and size. Studies in Language 44:3  pp. 659 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Akita, Kimi
2009A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Japanese Mimetics. Kobe: Kobe University dissertation. http://​www​.lib​.kobe​-u​.ac​.jp​/handle​_gakui​/D1004724.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K.
2001Ideophones and the Nature of the Adjective Word Class in Ewe. In F.K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 25–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
1955A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports 2(39). 39–51.Google Scholar
Beck, David
2008Ideophones, adverbs, and predicate qualification in Upper Necaxa Totonac. International Journal of American Linguistics 74(1). 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Brita & Östen Dahl
1994Ideophones in Sign Language? The place of reduplication in the tense-aspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In Carl Bache, Hans Basbøll & Carl-Erik Lindberg (eds.), Tense, aspect and action: Empirical and theoretical contributions to language typology, 397–422. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1961Generality, gradience, and the all-or-none. The Hague: Mouton & co.Google Scholar
1968Aspects of language. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Casati, Roberto
2006The cognitive science of holes and cast shadows. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(2). 54–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker
1988The phonology and morphology of Kisi. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
1989Where do ideophones come from? Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19(2). 55–76.Google Scholar
1994African Ideophones. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism,178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2014Constraints on violating constraints: How languages reconcile the twin dicta of ‘Be different’ and ‘Be recognizably language’. Pragmatics and Society 5(3). 341–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
1990Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66(4). 764–805. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Eva van Lier
2012Language universals without universal categories. Theoretical Linguistics 38 (1-2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C.
1979Hixkaryana. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Dhoorre, Cabdulqaadir Salaad & Mauro Tosco
1998111 Somali ideophones. Journal of African Cultural Studies 11(2). 125–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard
1976Expressives in Semai. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 13. 249–264.Google Scholar
1980Expressive phonology and prosaic phonology in Mon-Khmer. In Theraphan L. Thongkum (ed.), Studies in Mon-Khmer and Thai phonology and phonetics in honor of E. Henderson, 49–59. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark
2012Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10). 654–672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Ideophones and gesture in everyday speech. Gesture 13(2). 143–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Making new ideophones in Siwu: A case study of creative depiction. Pragmatics and Society 5(3). 384–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1997Are grammatical relations universal? In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 115–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbokhare, Francis O.
2001Phonosemantic correspondences in Emai attributive ideophones. In F.K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz, Ideophones, 87–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Simeon
2012Four types of reduplication in the Cha’palaa language of Ecuador. In Hein van der Voort & Gale Goodwin Gómez (eds.), Reduplication in South American Indian languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gil, David
2005From repetition to reduplication in Riau Indonesian. In Bernhard Hurch & Veronika Mattes (eds.), Studies on reduplication. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, E.H.
2002Art & illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation, 6th edn. London/New York: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Gómez, Gale Goodwin
2009Reduplication, ideophones, and onomatopoeic repetition in the Yanomami languages. Grazer Linguistische Studien 71. 21–38.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson
1968Languages of art: An approach to the theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1981Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos
2004The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamano, Shoko Saito
1998The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav
1964The functional differentiation of the standard language. In Paul L. Garvin (ed.), A Prague School reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style, 3–16. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hodge, Gabrielle, and Lindsay Ferrara
2014“Showing the Story: Enactment as Performance in Auslan Narratives.” In L. Gawne and J. Vaughan (eds.), Selected Papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society , 372–97. Melbourne, Australia. http://​minerva​-access​.unimelb​.edu​.au​/handle​/11343​/40973.
Hodge, Gabrielle & Trevor Johnston
2014Points, depictions, gestures and enactment: Partly lexical and non-lexical signs as core elements of single clause-like units in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(2). 262–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hurch, B., M. Kajitani, V. Mattes, U. Stangel & R. Vollmann
Hutchinson, John & Gerd Gigerenzer
2005Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural processes 69(2). 97–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon
2008The dual theory of reduplication. Linguistics 46(2). 351–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Cheryl Zoll
2005Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2013Ideophones in Japhug Rgyalrong. Anthropological Linguistics 55(3). 256–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960Linguistics and Poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kadooka, Ken-Ichi
2007Nihongo onomatope-goi-ni-okeru keitaiteki-on’inteki-taikeisei-ni-tuite [On morphological and phonological systematicity in Japanese onomatopoeic vocabularies]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1980Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Mary Ritchie Key (ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication, 207–227. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, Stephen M.
1980Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité
2001The iconic interpretations of reduplication: Issues in the study of reduplication in Caribbean Creole languages. European Journal of English Studies 5(1). 59–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kunene, Daniel P.
1965The ideophone in Southern Sotho. Journal of African Languages 4. 19–39.Google Scholar
2001Speaking the act: The ideophone as a linguistic rebel. In F.K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 183–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jin-Seong
1992Phonology and sound symbolism of Korean ideophones. Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1995Interactional biases in human thinking. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence, 221–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Magritte, René
1929Les mots et les images. La Révolution surréaliste 12. 32–33.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E.
1962Phonetic symbolism in Korean. In Nicholas Poppe (ed.), American studies in Altaic linguistics, 177–189. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2003Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay Peninsula. Mon-Khmer Studies: 1–58.Google Scholar
McGregor, William
2001Ideophones as the source of verbs in Northern Australian languages. In F.K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 205–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mihas, Elena
2012Ideophones in Alto Perene (Arawak) from Eastern Peru. Studies in Language 36(2). 300–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul
1989Reduplication and tone in Hausa ideophones. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 15. 248–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Are ideophones really as weird and extra-systematic as linguists make them out to be? In F.K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 251–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1992Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68(4). 756–796. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B.
1995Quechua texts of perception. Semiotica 103(1/2). 145–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich
1862Doppelung (Reduplikation, Gemination): als eines der wichtigsten Bildungsmittel der Sprache, beleuchtet aus Sprachen aller Welttheile. Lemgo & Detmold: Meyer.Google Scholar
Rai, Novel Kishore, Balthasar Bickel, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra Paudyal, Ichchha Rai & Sabine Stoll
2005Triplication and ideophones in Chintang. In Yogendra Yadava, Govinda Bhattarai, Ram Raj Lohani, Balaram Prasain & Krishna Parajuli (eds.), Contemporary issues in Nepalese linguistics, 205–209. Kathmandu: Linguistic Society of Nepal.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J.
1965Perspective on African ideophones. African Studies 24(2). 117–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwaiger, Thomas
2013On the structure of reduplicants: Iconicity and preferred form in reduplication. In Nabil Hathout, Fabio Montermini & Jess Tseng (eds.), Morphology in Toulouse: Selected Proceedings of Décembrettes 7, 211–229. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Shintel, Hadas, Howard C. Nusbaum & Arika Okrent
2006Analog acoustic expression in speech communication. Journal of Memory and Language 55(2). 167–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sien, Nam-Cheol
1997An autosegmental analysis of ideophones in Korean. University of Washington dissertation.Google Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana
1976Nonverbal components in message sequence:‘Mixed syntax’. In W.C. McCormack & S.A. Wurm (eds.), Language and man: Anthropological issues: 217–227. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran
1997The ecological foundations of iconicity. In Irmengard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (eds.), Semiotics around the world: Synthesis in diversity. Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of the IASS, Berkeley , June 12-18, 1994, 739–742. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stolz, Thomas
2007Re: duplication; Iconic vs counter-iconic principles (and their areal correlates). In Paolo Ramat & E. Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean as linguistic areas; Convergencies from a historical and typological perspective, 317–350. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze
2011Total reduplication: The areal linguistics of a potential universal. Oldenbourg: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thun, Nils
1963Reduplicative words in English; a study of formations of the types tick-tick, hurly-burly, and shilly-shally. Uppsala: Carl Bloms Boktryckeri.Google Scholar
Tufvesson, Sylvia
2011Analogy-making in the Semai sensory world. The Senses and Society 6(1). 86–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall L.
1973Pictures and Make-Believe. The Philosophical Review 82(3). 283–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Shih-ping
2005Corpus-based approaches and discourse analysis in relation to reduplication and repetition. Journal of Pragmatics 37(4). 505–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich Hermann
1927Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen. In Franz Boas (ed.), Festschrift Meinhof, 315–328. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1874Physei or thesei - natural or conventional? Transactions of the American Philological Association 6. 95–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum
1987Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In John Aske, Beery, Natasha, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, VII:330–340. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar