Cover not available
Article published In:
The Why and How of Total Reduplication: Current Issues and New Perspectives
Edited by Daniela Rossi
[Studies in Language 39:4] 2015
► pp. 795–834

When some dots turn a different color…

Thoughts on how (not) to determine whether or not reduplication is universal

 | University of Bremen
This paper examines some of the problems which arise in connection with the question of whether or not reduplication is a language universal. The point of departure of the study is Moravcsik’s (1978) seminal paper on reduplicative constructions in cross-linguistic perspective. In the main body of the paper, the picture of the geo-linguistic distribution of reduplication that is painted in the World Atlas of Language Structures (Haspelmath et al. 2005) is critically evaluated. The results of the evaluation serve as background for the discussion of the current stalemate of opinions in the ongoing discussion of the supposed universality of reduplication. To resolve the impasse, a prototype-based approach is sketched which may allow us to recommence the collection of empirical data on an unprejudiced basis.
Keywords: reduplication, universality, prototype
Published online: 3 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.4.07sto
References (107)
Abbi, Anvita. 1992. Reduplication in South Asian languages: An areal, typological and historical study. New Dehli: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O., Norval Smith & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.). 2012. Reduplication beyond the word level: A cross-linguistic view. In Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.), Aboh/Smith/Zribi-Hertz 2012b, The morphosyntax of reiteration in creole and non-creole languages, 1–26. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alhoniemi, Alho. 1993. Grammatik des Tscheremissischen (Mari). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Ammann, Andreas & Aina Urdze (eds.). 2007. Wiederholung, Parallelismus, Reduplikation: Strategien der multiplen Strukturanwendung. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Avrorin, Valentin A. 1959. Grammatika nanajskogo jazyka, Tom pervyj. Moskva, Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademij Nauk SSR.Google Scholar
Avrorin, Valentin & B.V. Boldyrev. 2001. Grammatika oročskogo jazyka. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo So Ran.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes. 1985. Kalmückische Grammatik zum Nachschlagen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2010. Absolute and statistical universals. In P.C. Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge encycolpedia of the language sciences, 77–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bollée, Annegret. 1978. Reduplikation und Iteration in den romanischen Sprachen. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 2151. 318–336.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio, et al. 2009. Real Academia Española. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Morfología, sintaxis I. Madrid: Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española.Google Scholar
Brandstetter, Renward. 1917. Die Reduplikation in den indianischen, indonesischen und indogermanischen Sprachen. Luzern: Kantonatsschule.Google Scholar
Bulatowa, Nadeshda J. & Cotrozzi, Stefano. 2004. Ewenkische Erzählungen aus der Insel Sachalin. Grammatische Besonderheiten, Texte, Übersetzung und Wörterbuch. Bonn: VKW.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cincius, Vera. 1982. Negidalskij jazyk: Issledovanija i materialy. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Conradie, Jac. 2003. The iconicity of Afrikaans reduplication. In Wolfgang G. Müller & Olga Fischer (eds.), From sign to signing, 203–223. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 25–49. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2008. Using the World Atlas of Language Structures. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 61 (3). 181–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael, Mihai Albu & Andreas Dress. 2008. Analyzing feature consistency using dissimilarity marices. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 61 (3). 263–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Rijk, Rudolf P.G. 2008. Standard Basque – a Progressive Grammar. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dezső, Pais, et al. 1961. A mai magyar nyelv rendszere. Leíró nyelvtan. I. Kötet: Bevezetés – Hangtan – Szótan. Budapest: Amkaémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 1997. Why statistical universals are better than absolute universals. Chicago Linguistic Society 331. 123–145.Google Scholar
El Zarka, Dina. 2005. On the borderline of reduplication: Gemination and other consonant doubling in Arabic morphology. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 369–394. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erelt, Matti. 1997. Reduplication in Estonian. In Matti Erelt (ed.), Estonian: Typological studies II1, 9–41. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Steven C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 321. 429–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, Anne H. 1998. A comparative survey of reduplication in Australian languages. München, Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2011. Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Pascal Michelucci, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Semblance and Signification, 55–82. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garry, Jane & Carl Rubino (eds.). 2001. Facts about the world’s languages: An encyclopedia of the world’s major languages, past and present. New York, Dublin: Wilson.Google Scholar
Ghomeishi, Jila, Ray Jackendoff, Nicole Rosen & Kevin Russell. 2004. Contrastive focus reduplication in English (the SALAD-salad paper). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 221. 307–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, David. 2005a. Distributive numerals. In Martin Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, 222–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005b. From repetition to reduplication in Riau Indonesian. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 31–64. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez, Gale Goodwin & Hein Van der Voort. 2014. Reduplication in South America: An introduction. In Gale Goodwin Gómez & Hein Van der Voort (eds.), Reduplication in indigenous languages of South America, 1–16. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorgoniev, Yu. A. 1976. The relationship between reduplication and some other grammatical means in Khmer. In Stanley Starosta (ed.), Austrasiatic Studies, Part I, 309–321. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45 (1). 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, et al. (eds.). 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & ApiCS Consortium. 2013. Functions of reduplication. In Susanne Michaelis, et al. (eds.), Atlas of pidgin and creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [[URL]]Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. 2009. Enhancement and diachrony in reduplication. Grazer Linguistische Studien 711. 39–58.Google Scholar
Hetzron, Robert. 2001. Hungarian. In Jane Garry & Carl Rubino (eds.), Facts about the world’s languages: An encyclopedia of the world’s major languages, past and present, 314–316. New York, Dublin: Wilson.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2000. Towards a typology of typologies. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 53 (1). 5–12.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio & Jon Ortiz de Urbina. 2003. A grammar of Basque. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurch, Bernhard. 2002. Die sogenannte expletive Reduplikation im Tarahumara. Rehabilitation eines verpönten Begriffs: Euphonie. In M. Bommes, C. Noack & Doris Tophinke (eds.), Sprache als Form: Festschrift für Utz Maas zum 60. Geburtstag, 51–62. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2005a. Introduction. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 1–10. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2005b. Studies on reduplication. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurch, Bernhard & Veronika Mattes. 2005. Über die Entstehung von partieller Reduplikation. In Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud & Winkler, Christian (eds.), Sprache und Natürlichkeit: Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler, 137–156. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 2007. The Graz database on reduplication. Faits de langues 291. 191–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Typology of reduplication: The Graz database. In Simon Musgrave, Martin Everaert & Alexis Dimitriades (eds.), The use of databases in cross-linguistic studies, 301–328. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Cheryl Zoll. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallergi, Haritini. 2015. Reduplication at the Word Level. The Greek Facts in Typological Perspective. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katzschmann, Michael. 2008. Chrestomathia Nganasanica: Texte – Übersetzung – Glossar – Grammatik. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.Google Scholar
Kim, Yuni. 2012. Review of Total Reduplication, by Thomas Stolz, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. Studies in Language 36 (2). 440–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiyomi, Setsuko. 1995. A new approach to reduplication: A semantic study of noun and verb reduplication in the Malayo-Polynesian languages. Linguistics 331. 1145–1167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 2003. Introduction. In Silvia Kouwenberg (ed.), Twice as meaningful: Reduplication in pidgins, creoles and other contact languages, 1–6. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité. 2013a. Review of Wiederholung, Parallelismus, Redupliation, edited by Andreas Ammann & Aina Urdze and The morphosyntax of reiteration in creole and non-creole languages, edited by Enoch Aboh, Norval Smith & Anne Zribi-Hertz. Linguistic Typology 17 (3). 476–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Review of Total Reduplication, by Thomas Stolz, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. Linguistic Typology 17 (3). 485–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lafitte, Pierre. 1998. Grammaire basque (navarro-labourdin littéraire). Donostia: Elkarlanean.Google Scholar
Li, Fengxiang & Lindsay J. Whaley. 1998. The rise and fall of derivational morphology: The case of reduplication in Oroqen. Chicago Linguistic Society 34 (1). 259–268.Google Scholar
. 2000. Emphatic reduplication in Oroqen and its Altaic context. Linguistics 38 (2). 355–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maas, Utz. 2005. Syntactic reduplication in Arabic. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 395–430. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrei L. 1995. Even. München, Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 2003. A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattes, Veronika. 2014. Types of reduplication: A case study of Bikol. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattes, Veronika & Thomas Schwaiger. 2013. Review of Total Reduplication, by Thomas Stolz, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. Folia Linguistica 47 (2). 584–593.Google Scholar
Mattissen, Johanna. 2001. Nivkh. In Jane Garry & Carl Rubino (eds.), Facts about the world’s languages: An encyclopedia of the world’s major languages, past and present, 515–519. New York, Dublin: Wilson.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor. 1996. Cours de morphologie générale. Vol. 3: Troisième partie: Moyens morphologiques. Quatrième partie: Syntactiques morphologiques. Montréal: Presse de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis & Aliyah Morgenstern. 2007. Présentation générale. Faits de langues 291. 5–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language. Vol. 3: Word Structure, 297–334. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Explaining language universals. In Jae Jong Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 69–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Introducing language typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Hans-Georg. 2004. Reduplikationen im Türkischen: Morphonologische Untersuchungen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Nedyalkov, Igor. 1997. Evenki. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2014. A grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Maria Tolskaya. 2001. A grammar of Udihe. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1992. A grammar of Lango. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ourn, Noeurng & John Haiman. 2000. Symmetrical compounds in Khmer. Studies in Language 241. 483–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozolinja, Larisa. 2001. Oroksko-russkij slovar’. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo Soran.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2008. Which parts of language are the most stable? STUF – Language Typology and Universals 61 (3). 234–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2009. WALS values evaluated. Linguistic Typology 13 (1). 41–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich. 1862. Doppelung (Reduplikation, Gemination) als eines der wichtigsten Bildungsmittel der Sprache, beleuchtet aus Sprachen aller Welttheile. Lemgo, Detmold: Meyer’sche Hofbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Raimy, Eric. 2000. The phonology and morphology of reduplication. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reh, Mechthild. 1985. Die Krongo-Sprache (Nìinò Mó-Dì). Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Rennison, John. 1997. Koromfe. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Renzi, Lorenzo, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti. 1995. Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Repetti, Lori. 2001. Italian. In Jane Garry & Carl Rubino (eds.), Facts about the world’s languages: An encyclopedia of the world’s major languages, past and present, 341–344. New York, Dublin: Wilson.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise. 2014. When vowel deletion blurs reduplication in Mojeño Trinitario. In Gale Goodwin Gómez & Hein Van der Voort (eds.), Reduplication in indigenous languages of South America, 375–400. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rožanskij, Fedor I. 2011. Reduplikacija: Opyt tipologičeskogo issledovanija. Moskva: Rossijskaja Adameija Nauk. Institut Jazykoznanija.Google Scholar
Rubino, Carl. 2005a. Reduplication: Form, function and distribution. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 11–30. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. Reduplication. In Martin Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, 114–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Reduplication. In WALS online [[URL] – accessed 19 August 2014].Google Scholar
Saltarelli, Mario. 1988. Basque. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Thomas. 2011. The relation between prototypical and marginal morphology: The case of reduplicative constructions. Linguistica 511.121–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Southern, Mark R.V. 2005. Contagious couplings: Transmission of expressives in Yiddish echo phrases. Westport, London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Nataliya Levkovych & Barbara Dewein. 2009. Reduplicative stem-formation: A comparative look at Maltese and Chamorro. ILSIENNA – Our Language 11. 87–133.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. 2005. Comitatives and instrumentals. In Martin Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, 214–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Total reduplication: The areal linguistics of a potential universal. Berlin: Akademie. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas & Ljuba Veselinova. 2005. Ordinal numerals. In Martin Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, 218–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunik, Orest. 1985. Ul’čskij jazyk: issledovanija i materialy. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Tamanji, Pius N. & Gabriel M. Mba (eds.). 2012. Aspects of reduplication in languages of Cameroon and Senegal. München, Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Tompa, József. 1968. Ungarische Grammatik. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1972. Kleine ungarische Grammatik. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Topping, Donald. 1973. Chamorro reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Trask, R. Larry. 2001. Basque. In Jane Garry & Carl Rubino (eds.), Facts about the world’s languages: An encyclopedia of the world’s major languages, past and present, 72–76. New York, Dublin: Wilson.Google Scholar
Tucker, A.N. 1994. A grammar of Kenya Luo (Dholuo). Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernahard. 2007. Ko-Komposita (im Vergleich mit Parellelismus und Reduplikation). In Andreas Ammann & Aina Urdze (eds.), Wiederholung, Parallelismus, Reduplikation: Strategien der multiplen Strukturanwendung, 81–108. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren & David Kamholz. 2008. A stability metric for typological features. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 61 (3).251–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1986. Italian reduplication: Cross-cultural pragmatics and illocutionary semantics. Linguistics 24 (2). 287–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2013. Review of Total Reduplication, by Thomas Stolz, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. Language 89 (2). 375–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Masini, Francesca & Simone Mattiola
2022. Syntactic discontinuous reduplication with antonymic pairs: a case study from Italian. Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Paschen, Ludger
2022. Trigger poverty and reduplicative identity in Lakota. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40:3 ► pp. 837 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.