Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 4:1 (1980) ► pp.158164
References (12)
References
Bresnan, J. 1970. “On Complementizers: Toward a Syntactic Theory of Complement Types”. Foundations of Language, 61. Pp. 297–321.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1973. “Conditions on Transformations” in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, N.Y.Google Scholar
1977. “On WH-Movement” in P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds) Formal Syntax, Academic Press, N. Y.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. 1972. “A Reformulation of Certain Syntactic Transformations” in Peters. (1972).Google Scholar
1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving and Local Transformations. Academic Press, N. Y.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1972. “On Generativity” in Peters. (1972).Google Scholar
Horn, L. 1971. “Negative Transportation: Unsafe at any speed?”. Chicago Linguistic Society, Volume 71, Pp. 120–133.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. and Kiparsky, C. 1970. “Fact” in M. Bierwisch and K. Heidolph (eds) Progress in Linguistics. Mouton, The Hague. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. 1968. Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation. M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Peters, S. (ed.) 1972. Goals of Linguistic Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. 1967. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Ross, J. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. M. I. T. Ph. D. dissertation.Google Scholar