Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 4:3 (1980) ► pp.333–377
The Binding Hierarchy and the Typology of Complements
T. Givón | Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles and Ute Language Program, Southern Ute Tribe, Ignacio, Colorado
Cited by
Cited by 141 other publications
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2020. (Non)finiteness, constructions and participles in Lithuanian. Linguistics 58:2 ► pp. 379 ff. 
Barton, Ellen L., A. L. Becker & Barbara F. Grimes
1987. Reviews. <i>WORD</i> 38:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Ben Gharbia, Abdeljabbar
2011. L'expression de la causation en français et en arabe : une comparaison à la lumière de la linguistique cognitive. Travaux de linguistique n°61:2 ► pp. 31 ff.
Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2013. Diachronic Probabilistic Grammar. English Language and Linguistics 19:3 ► pp. 41 ff.
Bentein, Klaas
2015. Minor Complementation Patterns in Post-classical Greek (I–VI AD): A Socio-historical Analysis of a Corpus of Documentary Papyri. Symbolae Osloenses 89:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Bentein, Klaas
2018. The decline of infinitival complementation in Ancient Greek. Glotta 94:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
Bikina, Daria, Denis Rakhman, Vsevolod Potseluev, Aleksey Starchenko & Svetlana Toldova
2022. Non-finite constructions in Khanty: their unity and diversity. Folia Linguistica 56:3 ► pp. 625 ff.
Boas, Hans C. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García
2014. Chapter 1. Applying constructional concepts to Romance languages. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 1 ff.
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Robert D. Van Valin
2017. The macro-event property and the layered structure of the clause. Studies in Language 41:1 ► pp. 142 ff.
Broccias, Cristiano & Willem B Hollmann
2007. Do we need summary and sequential scanning in (Cognitive) grammar?. Cognitive Linguistics 18:4
Butler, Christopher S. & Miriam Taverniers
2008. Layering in structural-functional grammars. Linguistics 46:4
Buysse, Manon
Cacoullos, Rena Torres & James A. Walker
2009. On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: a variationist study of that. Linguistics 47:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cai, Yingying & Hendrik De Smet
2024. In alternations, not all semantic motivation comes from semantic contrast. Linguistics Vanguard 0:0
CAMACHO, Roberto Gomes
2017. Alinhamento e estratégias de relativização. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 33:1 ► pp. 243 ff.
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
2010. What to Expect in Morphosyntactic Typology and Terminology. In Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork, ► pp. 279 ff.
Colonna, Saveria, Brenda Laca, Leticia López & Eduardo Correa Soares
2022. When the present lies in the past: [Present under Past] in subjunctive clauses in Uruguayan Spanish. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1
Craig, Colette G.
1986. Jacaltec noun classifiers. Lingua 70:4 ► pp. 241 ff.
Cristofaro, S.
2006. Linguistic Universals, Greenbergian. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 225 ff.
Cristofaro, Sonia
2008. A constructionist approach to complementation: evidence from Ancient Greek. Linguistics 46:3
Cuyckens, Hubert & Frauke D’hoedt
2015. Variability in Clausal Verb Complementation: the Case of Admit. In Perspectives on Complementation, ► pp. 77 ff.
De Smet, Hendrik
2015. Participle clauses between adverbial and complement. <i>WORD</i> 61:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Smet, Hendrik De
2007. For … to-infinitives as verbal complements in Late Modern and Present-Day English: Between motivation and change. English Studies 88:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Dobrushina, Nina
2012. Subjunctive complement clauses in Russian. Russian Linguistics 36:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
Duffley, Patrick J.
2018. Talk into vs convince to. In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195], ► pp. 15 ff.
Enghels, Renata & Eugeen Roegiest
2014. Contrasting the syntax and semantics of negative causation. Languages in Contrast 14:2 ► pp. 278 ff.
Fanego, Teresa
1996. English remember and role and reference grammar: On Van Valin and Wilkins (1993). Lingua 99:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Field, Margaret
1997. The role of factive predicates in the indexicalization of stance: A discourse perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 27:6 ► pp. 799 ff.
Frenda, Alessio S.
2017. Non-conventional arguments. In Argument Realisation in Complex Predicates and Complex Events [Studies in Language Companion Series, 180], ► pp. 117 ff.
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2018. Taming iconicity in the Spanish and Italian translations of Shakespeare’sSonnets. English Text Construction 11:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Green, Melanie & Chris H. Reintges
2004. Hausa.. Lingua 114:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Haiman, J.
2001. Linguistics: Iconicity. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ► pp. 8932 ff.
Haiman, John
2015. Iconicity in Linguistics. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ► pp. 512 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Heal, Jane
2001. On Speaking Thus: the Semantics of Indirect Discourse. The Philosophical Quarterly 51:205 ► pp. 433 ff.
Heal, Jane
2003. Mind, Reason and Imagination,
HORIE, KAORU
1997. FORM-MEANING INTERACTION IN DIACHRONY: A CASE STUDY FROM JAPANESE. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 14:0 ► pp. 428 ff.
Huang, C.-T. James
2022. Finiteness, opacity, and Chinese clausal architecture. In New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 272], ► pp. 17 ff.
Huelva Unternbäumen, Enrique
2010. Da que pensar: sobre algunas construcciones causales con el verbodaren la lengua española. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies 16:2-3 ► pp. 143 ff.
Unternbäumen, Enrique Huelva
2013. Construcciones causativas con la preposiciónanteen la lengua española. zrph 129:3 ► pp. 673 ff.
Jankovic, Marija
2020. Ascribing practical knowledge. Linguistics and Philosophy 43:3 ► pp. 247 ff.
Jin, Dawei
Kaleta, Agnieszka
2016. The binding hierarchy and infinitival complementation in English and in Polish. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 143 ff.
Kaleta, Agnieszka
2020. The Infinitive or the Gerund? Cognitive Linguistics in Teaching English Post-verbal Complementation. In Foreign Language Pedagogy in the Light of Cognitive Linguistics Research [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 51 ff.
Kawaguchi, Satomi
2009. Acquiring Causative Constructions in Japanese as a Second Language. Japanese Studies 29:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
KEMP, LOIS
2023. When English complement clauses meet evidential adverbs. English Language and Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 749 ff.
Klaiman, M.H.
1986. Clause linkage in Bengali∗. Australian Journal of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kockelman, Paul
2003. The Interclausal Relations Hierarchy in Q’eqchi’ Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics 69:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
KOCKELMAN, PAUL
2004. Stance and Subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Kockelman, Paul
2006. Representations of the world: Memories, perceptions, beliefs, intentions, and plans. Semiotica 2006:162
Koyama, Wataru
2001. How to do pragmatics with Japanese complementizers. Journal of Pragmatics 33:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Koyama, Wataru
2009. Indexically anchored onto the deictic center of discourse: Grammar, sociocultural interaction, and ‘emancipatory pragmatics’. Journal of Pragmatics 41:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Lambert-Brétière, Renée
2017. La multifonctionnalité des conjonctions bó et bɔ̀ en fon. Linguistique et langues africaines :3 ► pp. 5584 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. Sequential and summary scanning: A reply. Cognitive Linguistics 19:4
Levshina, Natalia
2015. European analytic causatives as a comparative concept: Evidence from a parallel corpus of film subtitles. Folia Linguistica 49:2
Levshina, Natalia
2016. Finding the best fit for direct and indirect causation: a typological study. Lingua Posnaniensis 58:2 ► pp. 65 ff.
Levshina, Natalia
Levshina, Natalia
2016. When variables align: A Bayesian multinomial mixed-effects model of English permissive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Levshina, Natalia
Li, Charles N.
1986. Direct speech and indirect speech: A functional study. In Direct and Indirect Speech,
Li, Wendan
2016. The many faces of adverbial margins. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Liu, Na & Fuyin Thomas Li
2023. Event integration as a driving force of language change: evidence from Chinese 使-shǐ-make. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.
Long, Haiping & Chuanlin Deng
2023. Do ‘say’ verbs really grammaticalize into complementizers through clause combination?. Functions of Language 30:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Long, Haiping, Xianhui Wang & Lei Wang
2022. Formation of Modern Chinese speech-quotativenǐ shuō‘you say’ and feedback-seekingnǐ shuō‘you tell me’. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 23:4 ► pp. 743 ff.
Lorenz, Johanna
2019. Complement clauses in Caucasian Urum. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:2 ► pp. 255 ff.
Los, Bettelou
1998. The rise of theto-infinitive as verb complement. English Language and Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lühr, Rosemarie
2012. Komplementsätze im Indoiranischen. Historical Linguistics 125:1 ► pp. 227 ff.
Lǐ, Yuèyuán & Dan Ponsford
2018. Predicative reduplication: Functions, their relationships and iconicities. Linguistic Typology 22:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Magni, Elisabetta
2009. The Evolution of Latin Word (Dis)order. In Universals of Language Today [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 76], ► pp. 225 ff.
Malchukov, Andrej L
2006. Constraining nominalization: function/form competition. Linguistics 44:5
McGregor, William
1994. The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi. Australian Journal of Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
McGregor, William B.
2008. Complementation as interpersonal grammar. <i>WORD</i> 59:1-2 ► pp. 25 ff.
McGregor, William B.
2017. There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage. English Text Construction 10:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Molnár, Krisztina & Tímea Berényi-Nagy
2022. Zum Ertrag der sprachtypologisch-kontrastiven Sprachbeschreibung für den DaF-/DaFnE-Unterricht am Beispiel der Infinitivkonstruktionen. In Wissenschaften und ihr Dialog, ► pp. 273 ff.
Mueller, Charles M. & Yasuhiro Tsushima
2019. Effectiveness of force dynamic explanations of English causative verbs and the role of imagery. Cognitive Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 439 ff.
Mufwene, Salikoko S. & Marta B. Dijkhoff
1989. On the so-called ‘infinitive’ in Atlantic creoles. Lingua 77:3-4 ► pp. 297 ff.
Nir, Bracha
Nir, Bracha
Nir, Bracha & Ruth A. Berman
2010. Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics 42:3 ► pp. 744 ff.
NOMURA, MASUHIRO
1993. THE SEMANTICS OF THE CONTENT CLAUSE CONSTRUCTION IN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 10:0 ► pp. 184 ff.
Nylander, Dudley K.
1985. Serial Verbs and the Empty Category Principle in Krio. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 30:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
O'Dowd, Elizabeth
1992. The syntactic metaphor of subordination: A typological study. Lingua 86:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Ojanguren López, Ana Elvira
PALACAS, ARTHUR L.
1989. Parentheticals and Personal Voice. Written Communication 6:4 ► pp. 506 ff.
Palacas, Arthur L.
1993. Attribution semantics: Linguistic worlds and point of view. Discourse Processes 16:3 ► pp. 239 ff.
Park, Sunyoung
2022. Typological Analysis of Articles in World Languages. Journal of Universal Language 23:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Pawley, Andrew & Frances Hodgetts Syder
1983. Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 7:5 ► pp. 551 ff.
Peng, Rui
2013. A diachronic construction grammar account of the Chinese cause-complement pivotal construction. Language Sciences 40 ► pp. 53 ff.
Pinson, Mathilde
2017. Grammaticalité et changement d’acceptabilité : le cas de help. Anglophonia :23
Polo Arrondo, Jesús F.
2016. Substitution Clauses in Ancient Greek. Glotta 92:1 ► pp. 210 ff.
Pons Rodríguez, Lola
2008. Las construcciones imitativas del "accusativus cum infinitivo": modelos latinos y consecuencias romances. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española :3 ► pp. 117 ff.
Ponsford, Dan
2023. Meaning differences between the inputs to syntactic blends. Linguistics 61:3 ► pp. 593 ff.
Prince, Kilu von & Anna Margetts
Putnam, Michael T. & Åshild Søfteland
2022. Mismatches at the syntax-semantics interface: The case of non-finite complementation in American Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 45:3 ► pp. 310 ff.
Reed, Lisa A.
1999. Necessary versus Probable Cause. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28:3 ► pp. 289 ff.
Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida
2021. Review of W. NEY (1981): Semantic Structures for the Syntax of Complements and Auxiliaries in English. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics ► pp. 94 ff.
Rumsey, Alan
1994. On the transitivity of ‘say’ constructions in Bunuba1. Australian Journal of Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Rumsey, Alan
2010. ‘Optional’ ergativity and the framing of reported speech. Lingua 120:7 ► pp. 1652 ff.
Sarda, Laure & Benjamin Fagard
2022. Chapter 1. Introduction: The description of motion events. In Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72], ► pp. 1 ff.
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten & Holger Diessel
2017. Cross-linguistic patterns in the structure, function, and position of (object) complement clauses. Linguistics 55:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Shagal, Ksenia, Pavel Rudnev & Anna Volkova
2022. Multifunctionality and syncretism in non-finite forms: an introduction. Folia Linguistica 56:3 ► pp. 529 ff.
Shank, Christopher, Julie Van Bogaert & Koen Plevoets
2016. The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1
Shank, Christopher & Koen Plevoets
2018. Investigating the impact of structural factors upon that/zero complementizer alternation patterns in verbs of cognition: a diachronic corpus-based multifactorial analysis. Research in Corpus Linguistics ► pp. 83 ff.
Shank, Christopher, Koen Plevoets & Julie Van Bogaert
2016. A multifactorial analysis of that/zero alternation. In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19], ► pp. 201 ff.
Smith, Michael B.
2009. The semantics of complementation in English: A cognitive semantic account of two English complement constructions. Language Sciences 31:4 ► pp. 360 ff.
Song, Zuoyan
2020. Fang Mei [方梅](2018)《浮现语法：基于汉语口语和书面语的研究》. [Emergent grammar: Studies based on spoken and written
Chinese]. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:1 ► pp. 150 ff.
Suzuki, Satoko
2000. Japanese complementizers: Interactions between basic characteristics and contextual factors. Journal of Pragmatics 32:11 ► pp. 1585 ff.
Thoma, Chrystalla A.
2011. The function of the Historical Present tense: Evidence from Modern Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 43:9 ► pp. 2373 ff.
Thrane, Torben
1986. Review of Allerton (1982): Valency and the English Verb. Studies in Language 10:2 ► pp. 485 ff.
Torrego, M. Esperanza
2016. Variantes de complémentation : infinitif complétif / proposition complétive à conjonction après les verbes de manipulation. Pallas :102 ► pp. 47 ff.
Torrego, M.ª Esperanza
2016. Verbos y argumentos: las combinaciones sintáctico-semánticas del verbo latino <em>cogo</em>. Emerita 84:2 ► pp. 291 ff.
Uljas, Sami
2021. Iconicity and Semantic-Structural Mapping in Earlier Egyptian Complementation. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :29 ► pp. 215 ff.
Valin, Jr., Robert D. van
2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface,
Vallejos, Rosa
2014. Reference Constraints and Information Structure Management in Kokama Purpose Clauses: A Typological Novelty?. International Journal of American Linguistics 80:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
VAN LINDEN, AN
2010. The rise of theto-infinitive: evidence from adjectival complementation. English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Van linden, An & Kristin Davidse
2009. The clausal complementation of deontic-evaluative adjectives in extraposition constructions: a synchronic-diachronic approach. FLIN 43:1 ► pp. 171 ff.
Van Valin, R.D.
2006. Semantics in Role and Reference Grammar. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 158 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2008. Dependency, framing, scope? The syntagmatic structure of sentences of speech or thought representation.. <i>WORD</i> 59:1-2 ► pp. 55 ff.
Verspoor, Marjolijn
1996. The story of -ing: A subjective perspective. In The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, ► pp. 417 ff.
Verspoor, Marjolijn
1999. To infinitives. In Issues in Cognitive Linguistics,
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2004. Initial and final position for adverbial clauses in English: the constructional basis of the discursive and syntactic differences. Linguistics 42:4
Viti, Carlotta
2013. Forms and functions of subordination in Indo-European. Historical Linguistics 126:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Watanabe, Yasuko
1984. A study of complementization in Japanese: To, Koto, and no. Paper in Linguistics 17:4 ► pp. 351 ff.
Weifeng, Han & Shi Dingxu
2014. The Evolution ofɦi23kã34(‘he says’) in Shanghainese. Language and Linguistics 15:4 ► pp. 479 ff.
Wiemer, Björn
2024. Clause-Initial Connectives, Bound and Unbound: Indicators of Mood, of Subordination, or of Something More Fundamental?. Slavia Meridionalis 23
Winters, Margaret E. & Geoffrey S. Nathan
2020. Case Studies. In Cognitive Linguistics for Linguists [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ], ► pp. 43 ff.
Ziegeler, Debra
2008. Grammaticalisation under Control: towards a functional analysis of same-subject identity-sharing. Folia Linguistica 42:3-4
Забелина, Елизавета Александровна
2022. DISTRIBUTION OF COMPLEMENTIZERS IN THE URMI VARIETIES OF URMIYA. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology :2(36) ► pp. 22 ff.
이서윤
2016. An Analysis of the Clausal Complement of English Verbs Used in High School English Textbooks. The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 58:4 ► pp. 211 ff.
이서윤 & Kyu-Hong Hwang
2012. Iconicity in the Omission of to, for and that in Verb Complement Clauses in English. The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 54:4 ► pp. 203 ff.
한정한
2010. Interclausal Relations Hierarchy between Semantic and Syntactic Relations in Korean V+e+V Constructions. Korean Journal of Linguistics 35:4 ► pp. 1149 ff.
[no author supplied]
1998. REFERENCES. In Representation of Cognitive Structures,
[no author supplied]
1999. References. In A Grammar of Tukang Besi,
[no author supplied]
2003. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Linguistics, ► pp. 714 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.