Arkadiev, Peter M.
2020.
(Non)finiteness, constructions and participles in Lithuanian.
Linguistics 58:2
► pp. 379 ff.

Barton, Ellen L., A. L. Becker & Barbara F. Grimes
1987.
Reviews.
<i>WORD</i> 38:1
► pp. 57 ff.

Ben Gharbia, Abdeljabbar
2011.
L'expression de la causation en français et en arabe : une comparaison à la lumière de la linguistique cognitive.
Travaux de linguistique n°61:2
► pp. 31 ff.

Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2013.
Diachronic Probabilistic Grammar.
English Language and Linguistics 19:3
► pp. 41 ff.

Bentein, Klaas
2015.
Minor Complementation Patterns in Post-classical Greek (I–VI AD): A Socio-historical Analysis of a Corpus of Documentary Papyri.
Symbolae Osloenses 89:1
► pp. 104 ff.

Bentein, Klaas
2018.
The decline of infinitival complementation in Ancient Greek.
Glotta 94:1
► pp. 82 ff.

Bikina, Daria, Denis Rakhman, Vsevolod Potseluev, Aleksey Starchenko & Svetlana Toldova
2022.
Non-finite constructions in Khanty: their unity and diversity.
Folia Linguistica 56:3
► pp. 625 ff.

Boas, Hans C. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Robert D. Van Valin
Broccias, Cristiano & Willem B Hollmann
2007.
Do we need summary and sequential scanning in (Cognitive) grammar?.
Cognitive Linguistics 18:4

Butler, Christopher S. & Miriam Taverniers
2008.
Layering in structural-functional grammars.
Linguistics 46:4

Cacoullos, Rena Torres & James A. Walker
2009.
On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: a variationist study of that.
Linguistics 47:1
► pp. 1 ff.

CAMACHO, Roberto Gomes
2017.
Alinhamento e estratégias de relativização.
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 33:1
► pp. 243 ff.

Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
2010.
What to Expect in Morphosyntactic Typology and Terminology. In
Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork,
► pp. 279 ff.

Colonna, Saveria, Brenda Laca, Leticia López & Eduardo Correa Soares
2022.
When the present lies in the past: [Present under Past] in subjunctive clauses in Uruguayan Spanish.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1

Craig, Colette G.
1986.
Jacaltec noun classifiers.
Lingua 70:4
► pp. 241 ff.

Cristofaro, S.
2006.
Linguistic Universals, Greenbergian. In
Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,
► pp. 225 ff.

Cristofaro, Sonia
2008.
A constructionist approach to complementation: evidence from Ancient Greek.
Linguistics 46:3

Cuyckens, Hubert & Frauke D’hoedt
2015.
Variability in Clausal Verb Complementation: the Case of Admit. In
Perspectives on Complementation,
► pp. 77 ff.

De Smet, Hendrik
2015.
Participle clauses between adverbial and complement.
<i>WORD</i> 61:1
► pp. 39 ff.

Smet, Hendrik De
2007.
For … to-infinitives as verbal complements in Late Modern and Present-Day English: Between motivation and change.
English Studies 88:1
► pp. 67 ff.

Dobrushina, Nina
2012.
Subjunctive complement clauses in Russian.
Russian Linguistics 36:2
► pp. 121 ff.

Enghels, Renata & Eugeen Roegiest
Fanego, Teresa
1996.
English remember and role and reference grammar: On Van Valin and Wilkins (1993).
Lingua 99:1
► pp. 1 ff.

Field, Margaret
1997.
The role of factive predicates in the indexicalization of stance: A discourse perspective.
Journal of Pragmatics 27:6
► pp. 799 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
Green, Melanie & Chris H. Reintges
2004.
Hausa..
Lingua 114:1
► pp. 77 ff.

Haiman, J.
2001.
Linguistics: Iconicity. In
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences,
► pp. 8932 ff.

Haiman, John
2015.
Iconicity in Linguistics. In
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences,
► pp. 512 ff.

Haspelmath, Martin
2008.
Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries.
Cognitive Linguistics 19:1
► pp. 1 ff.

Heal, Jane
2001.
On Speaking Thus: the Semantics of Indirect Discourse.
The Philosophical Quarterly 51:205
► pp. 433 ff.

Heal, Jane
2003.
Mind, Reason and Imagination,

HORIE, KAORU
1997.
FORM-MEANING INTERACTION IN DIACHRONY: A CASE STUDY FROM JAPANESE.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 14:0
► pp. 428 ff.

Huelva Unternbäumen, Enrique
2010.
Da que pensar: sobre algunas construcciones causales con el verbodaren la lengua española.
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies 16:2-3
► pp. 143 ff.

Unternbäumen, Enrique Huelva
2013.
Construcciones causativas con la preposiciónanteen la lengua española.
zrph 129:3
► pp. 673 ff.

Jankovic, Marija
2020.
Ascribing practical knowledge.
Linguistics and Philosophy 43:3
► pp. 247 ff.

Kaleta, Agnieszka
2020.
The Infinitive or the Gerund? Cognitive Linguistics in Teaching English Post-verbal Complementation. In
Foreign Language Pedagogy in the Light of Cognitive Linguistics Research [
Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 51 ff.

Kawaguchi, Satomi
2009.
Acquiring Causative Constructions in Japanese as a Second Language.
Japanese Studies 29:2
► pp. 273 ff.

KEMP, LOIS
2023.
When English complement clauses meet evidential adverbs.
English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.

Klaiman, M.H.
1986.
Clause linkage in Bengali∗.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 6:1
► pp. 1 ff.

Kockelman, Paul
2003.
The Interclausal Relations Hierarchy in Q’eqchi’ Maya.
International Journal of American Linguistics 69:1
► pp. 25 ff.

KOCKELMAN, PAUL
2004.
Stance and Subjectivity.
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14:2
► pp. 127 ff.

Kockelman, Paul
2006.
Representations of the world: Memories, perceptions, beliefs, intentions, and plans.
Semiotica 2006:162

Koyama, Wataru
2001.
How to do pragmatics with Japanese complementizers.
Journal of Pragmatics 33:2
► pp. 317 ff.

Koyama, Wataru
2009.
Indexically anchored onto the deictic center of discourse: Grammar, sociocultural interaction, and ‘emancipatory pragmatics’.
Journal of Pragmatics 41:1
► pp. 79 ff.

Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,

Lambert-Brétière, Renée
2017.
La multifonctionnalité des conjonctions bó et bɔ̀ en fon.
Linguistique et langues africaines :3
► pp. 5584 ff.

Langacker, Ronald W.
2008.
Sequential and summary scanning: A reply.
Cognitive Linguistics 19:4

Levshina, Natalia
2015.
European analytic causatives as a comparative concept: Evidence from a parallel corpus of film subtitles.
Folia Linguistica 49:2

Levshina, Natalia
2016.
Finding the best fit for direct and indirect causation: a typological study.
Lingua Posnaniensis 58:2
► pp. 65 ff.

Levshina, Natalia
2016.
When variables align: A Bayesian multinomial mixed-effects model of English permissive constructions.
Cognitive Linguistics 27:2
► pp. 235 ff.

Li, Charles N.
1986.
Direct speech and indirect speech: A functional study. In
Direct and Indirect Speech,

Liu, Na & Fuyin Thomas Li
2023.
Event integration as a driving force of language change: evidence from Chinese 使-shǐ-make.
Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.

Long, Haiping & Chuanlin Deng
Long, Haiping, Xianhui Wang & Lei Wang
Lorenz, Johanna
2019.
Complement clauses in Caucasian Urum.
STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:2
► pp. 255 ff.

Los, Bettelou
1998.
The rise of theto-infinitive as verb complement.
English Language and Linguistics 2:1
► pp. 1 ff.

Lühr, Rosemarie
2012.
Komplementsätze im Indoiranischen.
Historical Linguistics 125:1
► pp. 227 ff.

Lǐ, Yuèyuán & Dan Ponsford
2018.
Predicative reduplication: Functions, their relationships and iconicities.
Linguistic Typology 22:1
► pp. 51 ff.

Magni, Elisabetta
2009.
The Evolution of Latin Word (Dis)order. In
Universals of Language Today [
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 76],
► pp. 225 ff.

Malchukov, Andrej L
2006.
Constraining nominalization: function/form competition.
Linguistics 44:5

McGregor, William
1994.
The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 14:1
► pp. 63 ff.

McGregor, William B.
2008.
Complementation as interpersonal grammar.
<i>WORD</i> 59:1-2
► pp. 25 ff.

Molnár, Krisztina & Tímea Berényi-Nagy
2022.
Zum Ertrag der sprachtypologisch-kontrastiven Sprachbeschreibung für den DaF-/DaFnE-Unterricht am Beispiel der Infinitivkonstruktionen. In
Wissenschaften und ihr Dialog,
► pp. 273 ff.

Mueller, Charles M. & Yasuhiro Tsushima
2019.
Effectiveness of force dynamic explanations of English causative verbs and the role of imagery.
Cognitive Linguistics 30:3
► pp. 439 ff.

Mufwene, Salikoko S. & Marta B. Dijkhoff
1989.
On the so-called ‘infinitive’ in Atlantic creoles.
Lingua 77:3-4
► pp. 297 ff.

Nir, Bracha & Ruth A. Berman
2010.
Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric.
Journal of Pragmatics 42:3
► pp. 744 ff.

NOMURA, MASUHIRO
1993.
THE SEMANTICS OF THE CONTENT CLAUSE CONSTRUCTION IN ENGLISH.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 10:0
► pp. 184 ff.

Nylander, Dudley K.
1985.
Serial Verbs and the Empty Category Principle in Krio.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 30:1
► pp. 15 ff.

O'Dowd, Elizabeth
1992.
The syntactic metaphor of subordination: A typological study.
Lingua 86:1
► pp. 47 ff.

Ojanguren López, Ana Elvira
PALACAS, ARTHUR L.
1989.
Parentheticals and Personal Voice.
Written Communication 6:4
► pp. 506 ff.

Palacas, Arthur L.
1993.
Attribution semantics: Linguistic worlds and point of view.
Discourse Processes 16:3
► pp. 239 ff.

Park, Sunyoung
2022.
Typological Analysis of Articles in World Languages.
Journal of Universal Language 23:1
► pp. 109 ff.

Pawley, Andrew & Frances Hodgetts Syder
1983.
Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar.
Journal of Pragmatics 7:5
► pp. 551 ff.

Peng, Rui
2013.
A diachronic construction grammar account of the Chinese cause-complement pivotal construction.
Language Sciences 40
► pp. 53 ff.

Pinson, Mathilde
2017.
Grammaticalité et changement d’acceptabilité : le cas de help.
Anglophonia :23

Polo Arrondo, Jesús F.
2016.
Substitution Clauses in Ancient Greek.
Glotta 92:1
► pp. 210 ff.

Pons Rodríguez, Lola
2008.
Las construcciones imitativas del "accusativus cum infinitivo": modelos latinos y consecuencias romances.
Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española :3
► pp. 117 ff.

Ponsford, Dan
2023.
Meaning differences between the inputs to syntactic blends.
Linguistics 61:3
► pp. 593 ff.

Prince, Kilu von & Anna Margetts
Putnam, Michael T. & Åshild Søfteland
2022.
Mismatches at the syntax-semantics interface: The case of non-finite complementation in American Norwegian.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 45:3
► pp. 310 ff.

Reed, Lisa A.
1999.
Necessary versus Probable Cause.
Journal of Philosophical Logic 28:3
► pp. 289 ff.

Rumsey, Alan
1994.
On the transitivity of ‘say’ constructions in Bunuba1.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 14:2
► pp. 137 ff.

Rumsey, Alan
2010.
‘Optional’ ergativity and the framing of reported speech.
Lingua 120:7
► pp. 1652 ff.

Sarda, Laure & Benjamin Fagard
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten & Holger Diessel
2017.
Cross-linguistic patterns in the structure, function, and position of (object) complement clauses.
Linguistics 55:1
► pp. 1 ff.

Shagal, Ksenia, Pavel Rudnev & Anna Volkova
2022.
Multifunctionality and syncretism in non-finite forms: an introduction.
Folia Linguistica 56:3
► pp. 529 ff.

Shank, Christopher, Julie Van Bogaert & Koen Plevoets
2016.
The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1

Shank, Christopher & Koen Plevoets
2018.
Investigating the impact of structural factors upon that/zero complementizer alternation patterns in verbs of cognition: a diachronic corpus-based multifactorial analysis.
Research in Corpus Linguistics ► pp. 83 ff.

Shank, Christopher, Koen Plevoets & Julie Van Bogaert
Smith, Michael B.
2009.
The semantics of complementation in English: A cognitive semantic account of two English complement constructions.
Language Sciences 31:4
► pp. 360 ff.

Suzuki, Satoko
2000.
Japanese complementizers: Interactions between basic characteristics and contextual factors.
Journal of Pragmatics 32:11
► pp. 1585 ff.

Thoma, Chrystalla A.
2011.
The function of the Historical Present tense: Evidence from Modern Greek.
Journal of Pragmatics 43:9
► pp. 2373 ff.

Torrego, M. Esperanza
2016.
Variantes de complémentation : infinitif complétif / proposition complétive à conjonction après les verbes de manipulation.
Pallas :102
► pp. 47 ff.

Torrego, M.ª Esperanza
2016.
Verbos y argumentos: las combinaciones sintáctico-semánticas del verbo latino <em>cogo</em>.
Emerita 84:2
► pp. 291 ff.

Uljas, Sami
2021.
Iconicity and Semantic-Structural Mapping in Earlier Egyptian Complementation.
Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :29
► pp. 215 ff.

Valin, Jr., Robert D. van
2005.
Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface,

Vallejos, Rosa
2014.
Reference Constraints and Information Structure Management in Kokama Purpose Clauses: A Typological Novelty?.
International Journal of American Linguistics 80:1
► pp. 39 ff.

VAN LINDEN, AN
2010.
The rise of theto-infinitive: evidence from adjectival complementation.
English Language and Linguistics 14:1
► pp. 19 ff.

Van linden, An & Kristin Davidse
2009.
The clausal complementation of deontic-evaluative adjectives in extraposition constructions: a synchronic-diachronic approach.
FLIN 43:1
► pp. 171 ff.

Van Valin, R.D.
2006.
Semantics in Role and Reference Grammar. In
Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,
► pp. 158 ff.

Vandelanotte, Lieven
2008.
Dependency, framing, scope? The syntagmatic structure of sentences of speech or thought representation..
<i>WORD</i> 59:1-2
► pp. 55 ff.

Verspoor, Marjolijn
1996.
The story of -ing: A subjective perspective. In
The Construal of Space in Language and Thought,
► pp. 417 ff.

Verspoor, Marjolijn
1999.
To infinitives. In
Issues in Cognitive Linguistics,

Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2004.
Initial and final position for adverbial clauses in English: the constructional basis of the discursive and syntactic differences.
Linguistics 42:4

Viti, Carlotta
2013.
Forms and functions of subordination in Indo-European.
Historical Linguistics 126:1
► pp. 89 ff.

Watanabe, Yasuko
1984.
A study of complementization in Japanese: To, Koto, and no.
Paper in Linguistics 17:4
► pp. 351 ff.

Weifeng, Han & Shi Dingxu
2014.
The Evolution ofɦi23kã34(‘he says’) in Shanghainese.
Language and Linguistics 15:4
► pp. 479 ff.

Winters, Margaret E. & Geoffrey S. Nathan
2020.
Case Studies. In
Cognitive Linguistics for Linguists [
SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ],
► pp. 43 ff.

Ziegeler, Debra
2008.
Grammaticalisation under Control: towards a functional analysis of same-subject identity-sharing.
Folia Linguistica 42:3-4

Забелина, Елизавета Александровна
2022.
DISTRIBUTION OF COMPLEMENTIZERS IN THE URMI VARIETIES OF URMIYA.
Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology :2(36)
► pp. 22 ff.

이서윤
2016.
An Analysis of the Clausal Complement of English Verbs Used in High School English Textbooks.
The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 58:4
► pp. 211 ff.

이서윤 & Kyu-Hong Hwang
2012.
Iconicity in the Omission of to, for and that in Verb Complement Clauses in English.
The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 54:4
► pp. 203 ff.

한정한
2010.
Interclausal Relations Hierarchy between Semantic and Syntactic Relations in Korean V+e+V Constructions.
Korean Journal of Linguistics 35:4
► pp. 1149 ff.

[no author supplied]
1998.
REFERENCES. In
Representation of Cognitive Structures,

[no author supplied]
1999.
References. In
A Grammar of Tukang Besi,

[no author supplied]
2003.
Bibliography. In
The Handbook of Linguistics,
► pp. 714 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.