Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp. 26–62

The road already traveled

Constructional analogy in lexico-syntactic change

Usage-based models of language have proposed a dynamic, organized system based on analogy, or the recognition of similarity. The potential role of analogy between similar forms or constructions, however, is not often discussed. If we aim to illustrate grammaticalization and other diachronic processes not through one construction at a time — but by quantitatively assessing the relationship between constructions — we may better address the role of analogy as a mechanism of change. This quantitative, diachronic, corpus-based examination of language-internal constructional analogy is based on four forms in Spanish: altamente ‘highly’, enormemente ‘enormously’, extraordinariamente ‘extraordinarily’, and extremadamente ‘extremely’. These forms all occur in at least two basic constructions, in which they function as modifiers of verbs and as modifiers of modifiers. Analogical “transference” of paths of change between forms is proposed as a cross-linguistic language-internal process. Not only do forms compete with each other, but they also may borrow the path another has taken.
Keywords: analogy, constructions, intensifiers, language change, Spanish
Published online: 29 April 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.02aar
References
Aaron, Jessi Elana
2010 Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context. Language Variation and Change 22(1). 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, Jean
1991 Language change: Progress or decay? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1991 Amplifier collocations in spoken English. In Stig Jihansson & Anna-Brita Stenström (eds.), English computer corpora: Selected papers and research guide, 127–147. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude
2009 Des adverbes d’énonciation aux marqueurs d’attitude énonciative: Le cas de la construction tout + Adjectif. Langue Française 1611. 59–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arce Castillo, Angela
1999 Intensificadores en español coloquial. Anuario de Estudios Filológicos 221. 37–48.Google Scholar
Arjona, Marina
1990 El adverbio muy y otros intensificadores en el habla popular de México. Anuario de Letras 281. 75–96.Google Scholar
Axenti, Eufrosinia
2002 El papel de la polisemia de unas estructuras morfosintácticas en el campo semántico-funcional de la intensidad absoluta. Estudios de Lingüística 161. 385–389.Google Scholar
Bäcklund, Ulf
1973 The collocation of adverbs of degree in English. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Federica
2008 Patterns of age-based linguistic variation in American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1). 58–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas
1998 Linguistic structure and change: An explanation from language processing. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L
1972 Degree words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borst, Eugene
1902 Die Gradadverbien im Englischen (Anglistische Forschungen 10). Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2012 A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1). 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradac, J., A. Mulac & S. Thompson
1995 Men’s and women’s use of intensifiers and hedges in problem-solving interaction: Molar and molecular analyses. Research on Language & Social Interaction 28(2). 93–116. Crossref.Google Scholar
Brown, Esther & Mayra Cortés-Torres
2013 Puerto Rican intensifiers: Bien/muy variables. In Ana M. Carvalho & Sara Beaudrie (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 1–19. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & John L. McClelland
2005 Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review 221. 381–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Dan I. Slobin
1982 Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 581. 265–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cegala, D.J
1989 A study of selected linguistic components of involvement in interaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication 531. 311–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2003 Una funzione del tutto particolare, quella di assolutamente e simili. Revue Romane 38(2). 179–214.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2012a The course of actualization. Language 88(3). 601–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Defour, Tine
2012 The pragmaticalization and intensification of verily, truly and really: A corpus-based study on the developments of three truth-identifying adverbs. In Manfred Markus, Yoko Iyeiri, Reinhard Heuberger & Emil Chamson (eds.), Middle and Modern English corpus linguistics: A multi-dimensional approach, 75–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
1977 Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 1(1). 19–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fettig, Adolf
1934 Die Gradadverbien im Mittelenglischen (Anglistische Forschungen 79). Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2007 Morphosyntactic change: Formal and functional perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013 An inquiry into unidirectionality as a foundational element of grammaticalization: On the role played by analogy and the synchronic grammar system in processes of language change. Studies in Language 37(3). 515–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, C
2008 Operadores de intensificación del adjetivo: Cantidad y evaluación. RILCE: Revista de filología hispánica 24(1). 1–24.Google Scholar
Gaarder, A.B
1966 Los llamados diminutivos y aumentativos en el español de México. PMLA 81(7). 585–595. http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/461214. (8 Dec 2015). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Z.C. & A.C. Muñoz
1997 Morfosintaxis de “la exageración” en el habla coloquial antioqueña. Lingüística y Literatura 18(32). 115–128.Google Scholar
Giancole Ramat, Anna & Caterina Mauri
2012 Gradualness and pace in grammaticalization: The case of adversative connectives. Folia Linguistica 4621. 483–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1991 The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization Volume II1, 257–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E
2006 Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
González-Díaz, V
2008 Recent developments in English intensifiers: The case of very much . English Language and Linguistics 12(02). 221–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1994 Ritualization and the development of language. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2003 On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27(3). 529–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hosman, L.A
2006 Powerful and powerless language forms: Their consequences for impression formation, attributions of control of self and control of others, cognitive responses, and message memory. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 25(1). 33–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1975 Review: Degree words. Journal of Linguistics 11(2). 316–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum et al.
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, R. & S. Tagliamonte
2003  Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32(2). 257–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D
1976 Review: Intensification and semantic analysis. Foundations of Language 14(3). 377–398.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G
2003 Amplifier collocations in the British National Corpus: Implications for English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 37(3). 467–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, H
1998 Adverbs of degree in Dutch and related languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuha, M
2005 Investigating the Spread of “so” as an intensifier: Social and structural factors. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium about Language and Society – Austin April 16-18, 2004, 217–227. Texas Linguistic Forum. http://​studentorgs​.utexas​.edu​/salsa​/proceedings​/2004​/Kuha​.pdf. (8 Dec 2015).Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973 Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 21. 45–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975 Language and woman’s place. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
1990 Talking power. New York, NY: Basic.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
2000 A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2008 Booster prefixes in Old English – an alternative view of the roots of ME forsooth . English Language and Linguistics 12(02). 245–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1984 Intensity. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications, 43–70. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter
1999 Adjective intensification—learners versus native speakers: A corpus study of argumentative writing. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R
2006 Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier. Language Variation and Change 18(3). 267–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mancera Rueda, A
2009 Una aproximación al estudio de los procedimientos de intensificación presentes en el discurso periodístico. Revista de Estudios Filológicos 171. http://​www​.tonosdigital​.es​/ojs​/index​.php​/tonos​/article​/view​/307​/218. (8 Dec 2015).Google Scholar
Mehedindţi, T.S
2013 El español coloquial: La expresión del valor superlativo. Annals of “Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University: Linguistics, Literature and Methodology of Teaching 12(1). 53–63. http://​limbi​-straine​.ucdc​.ro​/doc​/anale1​_2013​.pdf#page​=53. (8 Dec 2015).Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2008a Special issue on English intensifiers. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 213–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008b On the history of downright . English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 267–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Bróna
2010 Corpus and sociolinguistics: Investigating age and gender in female talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, T
2008 Social variation in intensifier use: Constraint on -ly adverbialization in the past? English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 289–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Barr, W.M
1982 Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
Ogura, Mieko & William S.-Y. Wang
1996 Snowball effect in lexical diffusion: The development of -s in the third person singular present indicative in English. In Derek Britton (ed.), English historical linguistics, 119–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pahta, P
2006a This is very important: A corpus study of amplifiers in medical writing. In M. Gotti & F. Salager-Meyer F. (eds.), Advances in medical discourse analysis: Oral and written contexts, 357–381. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2006b  Ful holsum and profetable for the bodi: A corpus study of amplifiers in Medieval English medical texts. Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-specific English 401. 207–228.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2000  It’s well weird: Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited: The nineties. In John M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English, 147–160. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2008 Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics 12(02). 317–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin
2013 Analogy, automation and diagrammatic causation: The evolution of Tibeto-Burman *lak*. Studies in Language 37(1). 144–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Hans
1994 Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in early Modern English, 269–288. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Elisabete Malvar
2007 Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change: The expression of the future in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 19(1). 121–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik
1972 A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M
2008 From ‘quickly’ to ‘fairly’: on the history of rather . English Language and Linguistics 12(02). 345–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salazar-García, V
2008 Degree words, intensification, and word class distinctions in Romance languages. Studies in Language 32(3). 701–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sancho Cremades, P
2008 La sintaxis de algunas construcciones intensificadoras en español y en catalán coloquiales. Verba 351. 199–233.Google Scholar
Sawada, O
2010 Pragmatic aspects of scalar modifiers. Chicago: University of Chicago PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Serradilla Castaño, Ana
2006  Bien + adjectivo como perífrasis de superlativo en español: Particularidades semánticas y sintácticas. Verba 331. 215–233.Google Scholar
Sowa, J
2009 “Sweet as!”: The intensifier as in New Zealand and Australian English. English Today 25(02). 58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita
1987 What does really really do? In James Monaghan (ed.), Grammar in the construction of texts, 65–79. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
1999  He was really gormless—she’s bloody crap: Girls, boys and intensifiers. In Hilde Hasselgård & Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson, 69–78. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2000  It’s enough funny, man: Intensifiers in teenage talk. In John M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English, 177–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stoffel, Cornelis
1901 Intensives and downtoners (Anglistische Forchungen 1). Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.A
2008 So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanghe, S
2013 Acerca de los intensificadores vaya y qué: Un estudio comparativo. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 90(7). 751–770. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2002  Le: From pronoun to intensifier. Linguistics 40(2). 285–318.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker
2009 The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language 85(2). 321–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2008 Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger, & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Variation, selection, development—Probing the evolutionary model of language change, 219–250. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2010 Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2012 Grammaticalization, constructions and the grammaticalization of constructions. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems, & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections, 167–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, N
2001 Degree words and scalar structure in Japanese. Lingua 111(1). 29–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Antony
1993 English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

De Troij, Robbert & Freek Van de Velde
2020. Beyond Mere Text Frequency: Assessing Subtle Grammaticalization by Different Quantitative Measures. A Case Study on the Dutch Soort Construction. Languages 5:4 ► pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Flórez, Carmen Fernández
2022. The use of the intensifier bien among bilinguals in Southern Arizona Spanish and its grammaticalization process. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics Crossref logo
Kanwit, Matthew, Virginia Terán & Silvia Pisabarro Sarrió
2017.  Un fenómeno bien curioso: New methods for analyzing variable intensification across four dialects of Spain and Argentina . Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Smet, Hendrik De, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel Van Goethem
2018. The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 197 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.