Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp.204–234

Clausal coordination in Finnish Sign Language

| University of Jyväskylä

This paper deals with the coordination of clauses in Finnish Sign Language (FinSL). Building on conversational data, the paper first shows that linking in conjunctive coordination in FinSL is primarily asyndetic, whereas in adversative and disjunctive coordination FinSL prefers syndetic linking. Secondly, the paper investigates the nonmanual prosody of coordination: nonmanual activity is shown both to mark the juncture of the coordinand clauses and to draw their contours. Finally, the paper addresses certain forms of clausal coordination in FinSL that are sign language-specific. It is suggested that the sign language-specific properties of coordination are caused both by the fact that signers can use two manual articulators in the production of sentences and by the pervasive iconicity of sign language structure.

Keywords: coordination, modality-difference, Finnish Sign Language, clause, prosody, nonmanual element
Published online: 29 April 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.07jan
References
Ala-Sippola, Sanna
2012 Agentin ilmaiseminen suomalaisella viittomakielellä tuotetussa asiatekstissa [Expressing agent in a formal FinSL narrative]. Helsinki: MA thesis in General Linguistics, Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2010 Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 51–101. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bril, Isabelle
2010 The syntax and pragmatics of clause linkage and clause hierarchy: Some new perspectives (Editor’s introduction). In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 1–23. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Sloetjes Han
2008 Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In the Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora , 39–43. Paris: ELRA.
Davidson, Kathryn
2013 ‘And’ or ‘or’: General use coordination in ASL. Semantics & Pragmatics 6(4). 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker & Holger Diessel
2012 The typology of clause linkage: Status quo, challenges, prospects. In Volker Gast & Diessel Holger (eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective: Data-driven approaches to cross-clausal syntax, 1–36. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In R.M.W. Dixon & A. Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010 Basic Linguistic Theory. Vol. 1, Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald Alexandra Y
2000 Introduction. In Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Mathew S
2001 What is basic linguistic theory? [URL]. (14 April 2014).
2006 Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: Issues in grammar writing, 207–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Foley, William A
2010 Clause linkage and nexus in Papuan languages. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 27–50. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho
(2004) ISO suomen kielioppi [BIG Finnish grammar]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004 Coordinating constructions: An overview. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 3–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Coordination. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions. Volume 2, 2nd edn, 1–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Gabrielle
Trevor Johnston. 2013. Patterns from a signed language corpus: Clause-level units in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Paper presented at the Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference 11 . University College London, 13 July 2013.
Hoyer, Karin
2012 Dokumentation och beskrivning som språkplanering: perspektiv från arbete med tre tecknade minoritetsspråk [Language documentation and description as language planning – Working with three signed minority languages]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Doctoral dissertation in General Linguistics, Department of Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan
2000 Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi
2007 The equative sentence in Finnish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 10(2). 113–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Fixed and free: order of the verbal predicate and its core arguments in declarative transitive clauses in Finnish Sign Language. SKY Journal of Linguistics 21(2008). 83–123.Google Scholar
2009 Tavu ja lause: tutkimuksia kahden sekventiaalisen perusyksikön olemuksesta suomalaisessa viittomakielessä [Syllable and sentence: Studies on the nature of two sequential basic units in FinSL] (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 117). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
2010 Suomalaisen viittomakielen pääsanaluokat [The main parts of speech in FinSL]. In Tommi Jantunen (ed.), Näkökulmia viittomaan ja viittomistoon [Perspectives on sign and lexicon], 57–78. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
2013 Ellipsis in Finnish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36(3). 303–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi, Birgitta Burger, Danny De Weerdt, Irja Seilola & Tuija Wainio
2012 Experiences collecting motion capture data on continuous signing. In the Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Interactions Between Corpus and Lexicon , 75–82. Paris: ELRA.
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
2007 Australian Sign Language. An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karppa, Matti, Ville Viitaniemi, Marcos Luzardo, Jorma Laaksonen & Tommi Jantunen
2014 SLMotion - An extensible sign language oriented video analysis tool. In the Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014) , 1886–1891. Paris: ELRA.
Liddell, Scott K
1980 American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
2003 Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luzardo, Marcos, Matti Karppa, Jorma Laaksonen & Tommi Jantunen
2013 Head pose estimation for Sign Language video. In J.-K. Kamarainen & M. Koskela (eds.), Image analysis, 349–360. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McShane, Marjorie J
2005 Theory of ellipsis. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2010 Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puupponen, Anna, Tommi Jantunen, Ritva Takkinen, Outi Pippuri & Tuija Wainio
2014 Taking non-manuality into account in collecting and analyzing Finnish Sign Language video data. In the Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Beyond the Manual Channel [organized as a part of LREC 2014 at Reykjavik, Iceland, 31 May, 2014], 143–148. Paris: ELRA.
Puupponen, Anna, Tuija Wainio, Birgitta Burger & Tommi Jantunen
2015 Head movements in Finnish Sign Language on the basis of Motion Capture data: a study of the form and function of nods, nodding, head thrusts, and head pulls. Sign Language & Linguistics 18(1). 41–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reintges, Chris H
2010 Coordination, converts and clause chaining in Coptic Egyptian: Typology and structural analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 203–265. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, Terhi
1985 Viittomakielen perusrakenne [The basic structure of sign language]. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki No. 12. Helsinki.Google Scholar
1998 The categories of nominals and verbals and their morphology in Finnish Sign Language. Turku: University of Turku Licentiate Thesis in General Linguistics, Department of Finnish and General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
2012 Visual prosody. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 55–76. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Savolainen, LeenaIshara Press
2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Finnish Sign Language: An overview. In Ulrike Zeshan. (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 284–302. Nijmegen: Google Scholar
Suvi = Suvi, the Online Dictionary of FinSL
[URL]. (14 April 2014).
Takkinen, Ritva, Tommi Jantunen & Outi Ahonen
2015 Finnish Sign Language. In Julie Bakken Jepsen, Goedele De Clerck, Sam Lutalo Kiingi & William B. McGregor (eds.), Sign languages of the world: A comparative handbook, pp. 253–272. De Gruyter Handbook Series. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Gladys & Prudence Lau
2012 Coordination and subordination. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 340–365. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D
2005 Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997 Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka
2012 An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B
2000 Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in ASL. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 215–244. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004 Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 81. 1–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

ASADA, Yuko
2019. Properties of Coordination in Japanese Sign Language. Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies 28:1 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Jantunen, Tommi
2017. Constructed Action, the Clause and the Nature of Syntax in Finnish Sign Language. Open Linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
Puupponen, Anna
2019. Towards understanding nonmanuality: A semiotic treatment of signers’ head movements. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Puupponen, Anna, Laura Kanto, Tuija Wainio & Tommi Jantunen
2022. Variation in the use of constructed action according to discourse type and age in Finnish Sign Language. Language & Communication 83 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.