Book review
Vyvyan Evans. The language myth: Why language is not an instinct Cambridge University Press, 2014. xi, 304 pp. ISBN 978-1-107-61975-3 978-1-107-04396-1
References
Adger, David
2015 Mythical myths: Comments on Vyvyan Evan’s “The language myth”.
Lingua 1581: 76–80.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Alun
2014 Why language is neither an instinct nor innate. Review of The language myth: Why language is not an instinct, by Vyvyan Evans.
The New Scientist,
October 18 2014
[URL]
Anderson, Michael
. in press.
Précis of After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain
.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2015.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auer, Peter
2005 Projection in interaction and projection in grammar.
Text 25.1: 7–36.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark C.
2003 Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Behme, Christina
2014 A ‘Galilean’ science of language (Review article of
The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray, by
Noam Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012)
Journal of Linguistics 501: 671–704.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Behme, Christina & Vyvyan Evans
2015 Leaving the myth behind: A reply to Adger (2015).
Lingua, 1621: 149–159.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowerman, Melissa
2004 From universal to language-specific in early grammatical development [Reprint]. In
K. Trott,
S. Dobbinson, &
P. Griffiths (eds.),
The child language reader, 131–146. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowerman, Melissa, & Soonja Choi
2003 Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In
D. Gentner, &
S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.),
Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, 387–427. Cambridge: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan
2006 From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition.
Language 82.4: 711–733.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan
2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chao, Yuen Ren
1934 On the non-uniqueness of phonemic solutions of phonetic systems.
Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 41: 363–397.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1959 A review of BF Skinner’s Verbal behavior
.
Language 351: 26–58.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1966 Cartesian linguistics: a chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
2012 The science of language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Couper-Kuhlen, E. and M. Selting
Chung, Sandra
2012 Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro.
Theoretical Linguistics 38 (1–2): 1–56.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Busser, Rik & Randy J. LaPolla
Dryer, Matthew S.
2006 Functionalism and the Theory – Metalanguage confusion. In
Phonology, morphology, and the empirical imperative: Papers in honour of Bruce Derwing, edited by
Grace Wiebe,
Gary Libben,
Tom Priestly,
Ron Smyth, and
Sam Wang, pp. 27–59. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dunbar, Ewan, Dave Kush, Norbert Hornstein, & David Adger
2015 3 reasons why Evans’s Aeon piece is wrong and largely begs the questions that generative linguists have been trying to address for over 60 years (A short series of posts) [URL]
Engh, A. E., Hoffmeier, R. R., Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M.
2006 Who, me? Can baboons infer the target of vocalisations? Animal Behaviour 711: 381–387.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson
2009 The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 321: 429–492.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Vyvyan
2014 Real talk: There is no language instinct.
Aeon [URL]
Evans, Vyvyan
2015a The shape-shifting malleability of ‘universals’ in
UG. Language in the Mind blog, Psychology Today [URL]
Evans, Vyvyan
2015b The structure of scientific revolutions: reflections on radical fundamentalism in language science.
Language in the Mind blog, Psychology Today [URL]
Evans, Vyvyan
2015c Joining the dodo.
Language in the Mind blog, Psychology Today [URL]
Everett, Daniel
2005 Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: another look at the design features of human language.
Current Anthropology 461: 621–646.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, Ray W. & Guy Van Orden
2010 Adaptive cognition without massive modularity.
Language and Cognition 21: 149–176.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gray, Bennison
1980 The impregnability of American linguistics: An historical sketch.
Lingua 501: 5–23.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994 An introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Roy
1981 The language myth. London: Duckworth.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2002 Formal and functional explanation.
Handout for lectures at Düsseldorf Summer School 2002 Available from
[URL]
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 Framework-free grammatical theory. In
Heine, Bernd &
Narrog, Heiko (eds.)
The Oxford handbook of grammatical analysis, 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky, & W. Tecumseh Titch
2002 The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 2981: 1569–1579.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, Charles F.
1960 The origin of speech.
Scientific American 2031: 89–97.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, Charles F.
1967 Where the tongue slips, there slip I. In:
To honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday 11 October 1966, 910–36. The Hague: Mouton. [Reprinted in Hockett 1977, 226–56.]
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, Charles F.
1968 The state of the art. The Hague: Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, Charles F.
1977 The view from language. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, Janet
2008 An introduction to sociolinguistics, 3rd edition. London: Pearson Education ESL.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul
2011 Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In
P. Auer &
S. Pfänder (eds.),
Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, 22–44. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul
2012 Emergent grammar. In
James Paul Gee &
Michael Handford (eds.),
The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, 301–314. London & New York: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornstein, Norbert
2014 The verdict is in regarding Evans’ book.
[URL]
Hornstein, Norbert
2015a Quotational dyslexia: Thank you Masked Man.
[URL]
Hornstein, Norbert
2015b Does the LSA and its flagship journal ‘Language’ have any regard for Generative Grammar? [URL]
Itkonen, Esa
1996 Concerning the generative paradigm.
Journal of Pragmatics 251: 471–501.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray
2002 Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
James, William
1907 Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking.
Project Gutenberg EBook.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1970 The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [
International encyclopedia of Unified Science
Vol. 2, No. 2]
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, Robin
1989 The way we were; or; the real actual truth about generative semantics: a memoir.
Journal of Pragmatics 131: 939–988.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
2000 A dynamic usage-based model. In
M. Barlow &
S. Kemmer (eds.),
Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
2002 Concept, image, and symbol, 2nd edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen C.
2006 On the human ‘interaction engine’. In
N. J. Enfield &
S. C. Levinson (eds.),
Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction, 39–69. Oxford: Berg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieberman, Philip
2015 Review of The science of language: Interviews with James McGilvray
, by
Noam Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012
Modern Language Review 110.1: 222–224.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Love, Nigel
2004 Cognition and the language myth.
Language Sciences 261: 525–544.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick
1998 The irrelevance of typology for grammatical theory.
Syntaxis 11: 161–197.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Onnis, Luca & Michael J. Spivey
2012 A new model visualization for the language sciences. In
L. Onnis &
M. J. Spivey (eds.)
Information, Special issue on Cognition and Communication 3(1): 124–150.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Partan, S. R. & Marler, P.
1999 Communication goes multimodal.
Science 2831: 1272–1273.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Passos, Maria de Lourdes R. da F. & Maria Amelia Matos
2007 The influence of Bloomfield’s linguistics on Skinner.
The Behavior Analyst 30.2: 133–151.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Steven
1994 The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sampson, Geoffrey
2001 Empirical linguistics. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sampson, Geoffrey
1997 [2005] Educating Eve: The ‘language instinct’ debate (Second revised edition published in 2005 as
The ‘language instinct’ debate). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seikel, J. A., D. W. King, & D. G. Drumright
2010 Anatomy & physiology for speech, language, and hearing (4th ed.). Delmar, NY: Cengage Learning.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seyfarth, Robert M. & Dorothy L. Cheney
2008 Primate social knowledge and the origins of language.
Mind & Society 71:129–142.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seyfarth, Robert M. & Dorothy L. Cheney
2015 Social cognition.
Animal Behaviour 1031: 191–202.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slocombe, Katie E., Bridget M. Waller, & Katja Liebal
2011 The language void: the need for multimodality in primate communication research.
Animal Behaviour 811: 919–924.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005 The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction.
Language and Linguistics 6.4: 807–837.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Sandra A. & Paul Hopper
Tomasello, Michael
1995 Language is not an instinct.
Cognitive Development 101: 131–156.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trudgill, Peter
2011 Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wardaugh, Ronald
2002 An introduction to sociolinguistics, 4th edition. London: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whiten, Andrew
2013 Humans are not alone in computing how others see the world.
Animal Behaviour 861: 213–221.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
1956 Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, ed. by
John B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.