Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:3 (2016) ► pp.681–704

Beyond structuralism

Exorcizing Saussure’s ghost

| Linguistics Department, University of Oregon and White Cloud Ranch, Ignacio, Colorado
Published online: 18 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.3.08giv
References
Ackrill, J.L
(ed.) 1963 Aristotle Categories and de Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristotle
. The Categories. In J.L. Ackrill (ed.) 1963 Aristotle Categories and de Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. De Generationem Animalium. In J. Barnes (ed.) 1984 The Complete Works of Aristotle (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1963  De Interpretatione . In J.L. Ackrill (ed.), Aristotle Categories and de Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984  De Partibus Animalium . In J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1984  Posterior Analytic . In J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J
(ed.) 1984 The Complete Works of Aristotle (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L
1922 Review of Sapir’s language. The Classical Weekly 181.Google Scholar
1933 Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D
1977 The forms of language. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Bopp, F
1816 Uber des Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit Jenem der Griechischen, Lateinischen, Persischen und Germanischen Sprache.Google Scholar
Bostock, D
1994 Plato on understanding language. In S. Everson (ed.), Language, (Companion to Ancient Thought 3), 10–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R
1963 The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap, P.A. Schillp (ed.), LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N
1965 Aspect of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B
2004 English and Russian passives revisited. Segundo Seminario de Voz, Cambio de Valencia y Formación de Palabras, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo.Google Scholar
2008 What is a passive? In Z. Estrada-Fernandez, S. Wichman, C. Chamoreau & A. Alvarez-Gonzalez (eds.), Studies in voice and transitivity, 1–18. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Crouch, J.E
1978 Functional Human Anatomy (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea and FabigerGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C
1859 On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Everson, S
(ed.) 1994 Language, companion to ancient thought 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fernald, R.D. & S.A. White
2000 Social control of brain: From behavior to genes. In M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New cognitive neuroscience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fox, B. & P. Hopper
(eds.) 1994 Voice, form and function (Typological Studies in Language 27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Futuyma, D.J
1986 Evolutionary Biology (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Assoc.Google Scholar
Givón, T
1971 Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field Trip. Chicago Linguistic Society 71, 394–415. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
1975 Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981 Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language 5(2). 163–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1983 Topic continuity in discourse: Quantified cross-language studies. (Typological Studies in Language 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 The pragmatics of word-order: Predictability, importance and attention. In Hammond et al. (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (Typological Studies in Language 17), 243–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1994 Voice and inversion (Typological Studies in Language 28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1997 Grammatical relations: A functionalist perspective (Typological Studies in Language 35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Context as other minds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Ute reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Beyond structuralism: Should we set apriori limits on our curiosity? Studies in Language 37(2). 413–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 The diachrony of grammar, 2 vols1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. & B. Kawasha
2001 Indiscrete grammatical relations: The Lunda passive [TR 01-05]. Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Givón, T. & M. Shibatani
(eds.) 2009 Syntactic complexity (Typological Studies in Language 85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. & L. Yang
1994 The rise of the English GET-passive. In B. Fox & P. Hopper (eds.), Voice, form and function (Typological Studies in Language 27), 119–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J
1969 Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In J. Puhvel (ed.), Substance and structure of language, 147–203. Berkeley: U.C. Press.Google Scholar
1978 Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. In J. Greenberg et al. (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 11, 61–91. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1979 Rethinking linguistic diachrony. Language 551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., C. Ferguson & E. Moravcsik
(eds.) 1978 Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, E. & H. Cairns
(eds.) 1961 Plato: The collected dialogues (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, M., E. Moravcsik & J. Wirth
(eds.) 1988 Studies in syntactic typology (Typological Studies in Language 17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R.N
1958 Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M
1990 The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1). 25–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 111. 119–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Framework-free grammatical theory. In B. Heine &H. Narong (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva
2007 The genesis of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & H. Narong
(eds.) 2010 The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & E. Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von
1836 Linguistic variation and intellectual development, Trans. by G.C. Buck. Coral Gables, FL: University of Florida press [1971].Google Scholar
Itkonen, E
2010 Philosophy of linguistics. Oxford Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
1921 Language: Its nature, development and origin. NY: Modern Library.Google Scholar
1924 The philosophy of grammar. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Co [1965].Google Scholar
Kawasha, B
1999 Some aspects of Lunda grammar. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon MA Thesis (ms).Google Scholar
Keenan, E
1975 Some universals of passive in relational grammar. Chicago Linguistic Society 111. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
1976 Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 303–333. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kirsner, R
1976 On the subjectless pseudo-passive in standard Dutch and the problem of background agent. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 384–415. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T
1962 The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lazard, G
2012 The case for pure linguistics. Studies in Language 36(2). 241–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C
(ed.) 1976 Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Li, C. & S. Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: U.C. Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E
1976 Evolution and the diversity of life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1982 The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, M
2006 Structural parameters of clause integration: Elusive complementation. Seminario de Complexidad Syntáctica, University of Sonora, Hermosillo, November 2006 (ms).Google Scholar
2007a Threads in the tapestry of syntax: Complementation and Mohawk. UC Santa Barbara (ms).Google Scholar
2007b Alternative pathways to relativization. Seminario de Complexidad Syntáctica, University of Sonora, Hermosillo, November 2007 (ms).Google Scholar
2009 Re(e)volving complexity: Adding intonation. In T. Givon & M. Shibatani (eds.), Syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, H
1890 Principles of the history of language, trans. by H.A. Strong, London: Swann, Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S
1934 Collected writings, vol. V1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1940 The philosophy of Peirce, J. Buchler (ed.), NY: Harcourt, Brace. Google Scholar
Plato
1961  Cratylus . In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (eds.), Plato: The collected dialogues (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K
1934/1959 The logic of scientific discovery. NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Rabi, I.I
1975 Interview in The New Yorker, Oct 20 1975.Google Scholar
Russell, B
1956 Logic and knowledge: Selected essays, 1901-1950, E.C. Marsh (ed.), London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
Sapir, E
1921 Language. NY: Harcourt, Brace & World [1929].Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de
1915 Course in general linguistics, ed. by C. Bally &S. Sechehaye , Trans. by W. Baskin,NY: Philosophical Library [19591].Google Scholar
Shibatani, M
1988 Voice in Philippine languages. In M. Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, (Typological Studies in Language 8), 85–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1988 Passive and voice (Typological Studies in Language 8). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. & B. Heine
(eds.) 1991 Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 11 (Typological Studies in Language 19.1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
West-Eberhard, M.J
2003 Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B
1994 Cratylus theory of names and its refutation. In S. Everson (ed.), Language (Companion to Ancient Thought 3), 28–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, G
1935 The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Givón, T.
2019. Song of Songs and Ecclesiastes, DOI logo
Karstens, Bart
2017. “The Lonely Form Dies”: How Epistemic Virtues Connect Roman Jakobson’s New Science of Language and His Personality. In Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities [Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 321], ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Welke, Klaus
2020. Konstruktionsgrammatik: Konstruktionen ohne Grammatik?. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 48:2 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.