Review published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:3 (2016) ► pp. 713721
References

References

Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2001Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1983The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17(3). 365–92.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon
1997The theory of functional grammar. Part 1: the structure of the clause (2nd ed.), Kees Hengeveld (ed.), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1992 [1924]The philosophy of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1981The notional category of modality. Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics, Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds.), 38–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2006Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text and Talk 26(2). 699–731.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1990Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 5–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2003Extreme subjectification: English tense and modals. In Hubert Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, René Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2009Modality in Japanese: The layered structure of clause and hierarchies of functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The order of meaningful elements in the Japanese verbal complex. Morphology 20(1): 205–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001aEpistemic modality, language, and conceptualization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001bSubjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 383–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
1986Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1990 [1979]Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul
2009Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Dieter & Susan Wright
(eds.) 1995Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian
1998Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2004Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2001Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1505–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Von Wright, Georg Henrik
1951An essay in modal logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar