Review published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:3 (2016) ► pp. 722731
References
Eliasson, Stig
In press. When do languages refrain from copying morphology? On structural obstacles to morphological borrowing. In Hans Götzsche ed. The meaning of language Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Gardani, Francesco
2016Allogenous exaptation. In Muriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Exaptation and language change, 227–260 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 3361). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasselblatt, Cornelius
1992Grammatisches Wörterbuch des Estnischen (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 351). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Martine Robbeets
(eds.) 2010Transeurasian verbal morphology in a comparative perspective: Genealogy, contact, chance (Turcologica 781). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
(eds.) 2012Copies versus cognates in bound morphology. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Menzel, Thomas & Gerd Hentschel
2015Zum Einfluss des Russischen auf die Flexionsmorphologie der weißrussisch-russischen gemischten und ukrainisch-russischen gemischten Rede. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 751. 123–158.Google Scholar
Raag, Raimo
1999Från allmogemål till nationalspråk: Språkvård och språkpolitik i Estland från 1857 till 1999 (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Muliethnica Upsaliensia 121). (From peasant idioms to a national language: Language planning in Estonia from 1857 to 1999). Uppsala.Google Scholar
Raag, Virve
1998The effects of planned change on Estonian morphology (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 291). Uppsala.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine
2015Diachrony of verb morphology: Japanese and the Transeurasian languages (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 2911). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tauli, Valter
1973Standard Estonian grammar. Part I. Phonology, morphology, word-formation (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Uralica et Altaica Upsaliensia 81). Uppsala.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G.
2001Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhove, Martine, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze & Hitomi Otsuka
(eds.) 2012Morphologies in contact (Studia Typologica 101). Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar