The present paper investigates how the Korean sentence-final particle -tani is used to mark mirativity. More interestingly, this paper discusses how Korean speakers or writers employ this mirative marker -tani (i) to often express their negative emotions and satisfy their face needs and (ii) to elicit the reader’s engagement, using data from the Sejong Contemporary Spoken and Written Corpus. This paper also examines the development of -tani: The non-subjective complementations, in this case involving constructions with the quotative -tani, come to be reinterpreted as subjective constructions with sentence-final -tani, syntactically and pragmatically reanalyzed as a mirative marker. In addition, the findings from this study have broader theoretical and cross-linguistic implications for the existence of mirativity as distinct from evidentiality and the interaction of mirativity with the expression of emotional attitudes (see DeLancey 2001, 2012).
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexander Y. & Randy J. LaPolla
2007New perspectives on evidentials: a view from Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2): 1–12.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2012The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 161: 435–485.
Aksu, Ayhan & Dan Slobin
1986A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 159–167. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Anderson, Lloyd B
1986Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Aune, Krystyna Strzyzewski, R. Kelly Aune & David B. Buller
1994The experience, expression, and perceived appropriateness of emotions across levels of relationship development. Journal of Social Psychology 1341: 141–150.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chafe, Wallace L. & Johanna Nichols
(eds.)1986Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. New Jersey: Ablex.
2012bThe Semantics of the Korean Sentence-Final Suffix -ney: in Relation to Evidentiality and Mirativity. Korean Journal of Linguistics 37(4): 995–1016.
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 11: 33–52.
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(2): 369–382.
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3): 529–564.
Ekman, Paul & Wallace V. Friesen
1975Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
1980Asymmetry in facial expression. Science 2091: 833–834.
1984Expression and the nature of emotion. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (eds.), Approaches to Emotion, 319–344. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2003Propositional- and illocutionary-level evidentiality in Cuzco Quechua. In J. Anderssen, P. Menéndez-Benito, & A. Werle (eds.), Proceedings of SULA 2, 19–33. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
2011Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakará: An interactional account. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institut für Psycholinguistik.
2012Didn’t you know?Mirativity does exist! Linguistic Typology 16(3): 487–503.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2013The study on Historical Change of Conjoined Endings ‘keoniwa’ and ‘-dani’. The Korean Language and Literature 31: 1–26.
1999Cwungseykwuke-uy Emi -ni-ey Tayhan Yenkwu [A Study on the ending -ni in Middle Korean]. Seoul: Cheongtongkewul Publishing.
Johanson, Lars & Bo Utas
2000Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kim, Hee Kyong
2011A study on the structural features of Indirect Quotation of Korean. Korean Linguistics 521. 51–82.
1989The integrated/new knowledge markers in Korean. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon M.A. thesis.
2013The Semantics of the Korean Sentence-Final Suffix -Ney Revisited: Response to Chung (2012). Korean Journal of Linguistics 38(1): 53–66.
1989The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua 81: 101–129.
1976Cases for Psychological Verbs in Korean. Ene (Language) 1(1): 256–296.
1980Syntax and Semantics of Conditional and Causal Constructions in Korean. Selected Papers from the
1st International Conference on Korean Studies
, 644–656. Seoul: The Korea Academy of Korea Studies.
2011/2012Evidentials and modals: What makes them unique. International Journal of Language Data Processing (SDV) 35/361: 71–98.
Lee, Hyo Sang
1985Consciously-known but unassimilated information: A pragmatic analysis of the epistemic modal -kwun in Korean. Proceedings of the
First Pacific Linguistics Conference
, 183–210. Eugene: Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.
Lee, Hyo Sang
1993Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics 4(2): 135–167.
Lim, Dong Sik
2010Evidentials and Interrogatives: A Case Study from Korean. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Ph.D. dissertation.
Metts, Sandra & Sally Planalp
2002Emotional communication. In M. Knapp & J.A. Daly (eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed.), 339–373. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Park, Jin Ho
2011Grammatical Elements Containing Evidential or Mirative Components in Korean. Language & Information Society 151: 1–25.
2013A study on descriptions of contraction form ’dani’ in KFL grammar. Bilingual Research 511: 45–80.
2012Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: the case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles. Language Sciences 34(3): 284–300.
2009A descriptive grammar of Daai Chin (STEDT Monograph 7). Berkeley, CA: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project.
1994Korean. London: Routledge.
1999The Korean Language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
2011Historical development of quotative constructions in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 181: 126–143.
2012Development of stance markers in Korean: diachronic and discourse perspectives. Paper presented at the
Tutorial on Discourse Analysis, Workshop on Epistemicity, Evidentiality and Attitude
. HongKong Polytech University, Sept 2.
2005Cognitive realization markers: A discourse-pragmatic study of the sentence ending particles -kwun, -ney, and -tela. Language Sciences 21: 437–480.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 651: 31–55.
2013Expressing surprise by particles. In Daniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Beyond expressives: Explorations in use conditional meaning (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 28), 297–320. Leiden: Brill.
Cited by 8 other publications
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2022. On the extended uses of -ki and -m nominalization constructions as face-threat mitigators in Korean. Lingua 274 ► pp. 103230 ff.
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2020. “That being so, but …”: An analysis of Korean kunyang as a marker of speaker's attenuated divergent stance. Journal of Pragmatics 160 ► pp. 31 ff.
González Vázquez, Mercedes
2022. Unhas notas sobre o sistema evidencial galego. Estudos de Lingüística Galega► pp. 33 ff.
2021. The evidentiality system in Galician and the seica marker. Journal of Pragmatics 178 ► pp. 83 ff.
2018. Unexpectedness Effect: The Emphatic Determiner with Gradable NPs in Korean. The Journal of Studies in Language 33:4 ► pp. 595 ff.
2023. Another’s voice. East Asian Pragmatics 8:2 ► pp. 217 ff.
Rhee, Seongha & Hyun Jung Koo
2020. From quotation to surprise: The case in Korean. Journal of Pragmatics 155 ► pp. 83 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.