Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:4 (2016) ► pp.894–954

Agent-defocusing constructions from nominalized VPs

A cross-linguistic type?

| University of Insubria, Como (Italy)

Nominalized verb phrases have been identified as a possible source of passive and impersonal constructions by Langacker & Munro (1975), Langacker (1976), and Givón (1981), with exemplification drawn almost exclusively from Uto-Aztecan languages, but have received relatively less attention than other sources (reflexive markers, generalized subject constructions, 3rd person plural constructions, inactive auxiliaries + resultative participles, etc.). The aim of this article is to review the available evidence concerning passive and impersonal constructions derived from nominalized VPs, with a view to establishing whether they are cross-linguistically recurrent and robust as a type. Such a review reveals that there are overall a few instances of passive/impersonal constructions that are likely to derive from nominalized VPs. In many of the other cases in which a nominalized VP has been hypothesized to be the source of a given passive or impersonal construction there is no conclusive evidence for reconstructing such a source, and in some cases even an alternative source can be posited. Even in this unfavourable situation, however, a tentative scenario of how nominalized VPs might evolve into passive and impersonal constructions may be sketched, in order to account for the few cases in which such a development is likely to have taken place. The onset stage of this development, in particular, capitalizes on the possibility offered by nominalized VPs to manipulate the argument structure of the verb by keeping the initiator of the event off the stage.

Keywords: nominalization, agent defocusing, inverse constructions, impersonal constructions, passive constructions
Published online: 2 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.4.05san
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2011 Word-class changing derivation in typological perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds.), Language at large. Essays on syntax and semantics, 221–289. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armendáriz, Rolando Gpe. Félix
2005 A grammar of River Warihío. PhD Dissertation, Houston, Rice University.Google Scholar
van den Berg, René
2008 Integration and interdependence in Oceanic research: An SIL perspective. Paper presented at the Conference on Directions in Oceanic Research , Newcastle, Australia, December 9-11.
van den Berg, René & Brenda H. Boerger
2011 A Proto-Oceanic passive? Evidence from Bola and Natügu. Oceanic Linguistics 50(1): 221–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, Ben
2003 Syntactic approaches to possessive constructions in Nuuchahnulth. In J.C. Brown & Michele Kalmar (eds.), Papers for the 38th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, 7–22. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bugaeva, Anna
2011 A diachronic study of the impersonal passive in Ainu. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal Constructions. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 517–546. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Don
1984 Western Tarahumara. In Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 4: Southern Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Sketches, 1–150. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Caballero, Gabriela
2008 Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) Phonology and Morphology. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2014 Uto-Aztecan. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 724–742. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Casad, Eugene H
1984 Cora. In Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 4: Southern Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Sketches, 151–459. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chapman, Shirley & Desmond C. Derbyshire
1991 Paumarí. In Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 31, 161–352. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chen, Cheng-Fu
2005 Object voice and nominalization in Rukai. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 121: 35–47.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson
2007 Lexical nominalization. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 334–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupe, Alexander
2007 A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crevels, Mily
2011 Who did what to whom in Magdalena (Itonama). International Journal of American Linguistics 77 (4): 577–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2011 Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Foong >Ha Yap, Karen >Grunow-Hårsta & Janick >Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, 343–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dienst, Stefan
2014 A grammar of Kulina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
1999 The Amazonian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004 The Jarawara Language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
1997 A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Dedicated to T. Givón, 71–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrich, Veronika & Irene Rapp
2000 Sortale Bedeutung und Argumentstruktur: ung-Nominalisierungen im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 19 (2): 245–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escalante, Fernando
1990 Setting the record straight on Yaqui passives. International Journal of American Linguistics 56 (2): 289–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
1989 A grammar of Pero. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Andrea Sansò
2007 The spread and decline of indefinite man-constructions in European languages. An areal perspective. In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean as Linguistic Areas. Convergences from a Historical and Typological Perspective, 95–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 From passive to impersonal. A case study from Italian and its implications. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 189–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014  Venire (‘come’) as a passive auxiliary in Italian. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), COME and GO off the beaten grammaticalization path, 21–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1994 Semantic and pragmatic inverse: ‘Inverse alignment’ and ‘inverse voice’ in Carib of Surinam. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Voice and inversion, 187–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 On reconstructing grammar. Comparative Cariban morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1981 Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language 5(2): 163–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 Tale of two passives in Ute. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 417–440. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994a The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Voice and Inversion, 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Grammatical relations in passive clauses: A diachronic perspective. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, 337–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Ute Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy & Boniface Kawasha
2006 Indiscrete grammatical relations. The Lunda passive. In Tasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations. In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani, 15–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerrero Valenzuela, Lilián Graciela
2004 The syntax-semantic interface in Yaqui complex sentences: A Role and Reference Grammar analysis. Buffalo, NY: SUNY, Buffalo PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1990 The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Jason D
2008 Denominal verbs in Uto-Aztecan. International Journal of American Linguistics 74(4): 439–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1977 Review of Non-Distinct Arguments in Uto-Aztecan by Ronald W. Langacker. Language 53(2): 457–461.Google Scholar
1998 Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution. Language 741: 728–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1992 Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H
2005 A grammar of Cupeño. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horie, Kaoru
2008 The grammaticalization of nominalizers in Japanese and Korean: A contrastive study. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking Grammaticalization: New perspectives, 169–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2014 Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 1381: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Anton Antonov
2014 Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8/71: 301–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Eun-Sook
2004 The Morphological Status of -ʔat in Nuu-chah-nulth. Berkeley Linguistics Society 30(2): 61–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
1993 Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin & John Whitman
2011 Afterword: Nominalizations in syntactic theory. Lingua 121(7): 1297–1313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1976 Non-Distinct Arguments in Uto-Aztecan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. & Pamela Munro
1975 Passives and their meaning. Language 51(4): 789–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langdon, Margaret
1992 Yuman Plurals: From Derivation to Inflection to Noun Agreement. International Journal of American Linguistics 58(4): 405–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J
2008 Nominalization in Rawang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2): 45–65.Google Scholar
Lynch, John, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley
2002 The Oceanic languages. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2006 Constraining nominalization: Function/form competition. Linguistics 44(5): 973–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Anna Siewierska
2011 Introduction. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A
1972 Lahu nominalization, relativization, and genetivization. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 11, 237–257. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio & Sebastian Drude
2013 Sobre a origem histórica dos “prefixos relacionais” das línguas Tupí-Guaraní. Cadernos de Etnolingüística 5(1). [URL]Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio, Spike Gildea & Berend J. Hoff
2010 On the origin of Ablaut in the Cariban Family. International Journal of American Linguistics 76(4): 477–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela
1974 Topics in Mojave syntax. San Diego, CA: University of California at San Diego PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Nakayama, Toshihide
1997 Functions of the Nootka (Nuu-chah-nulth) “Passive” Suffix. International Journal of American Linguistics 63(3): 412–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1992 A grammar of Lango. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Nominalization in Bodic languages. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking Grammaticalization: New perspectives, 219–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olawsky, Knut J
2006 A grammar of Urarina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardeshi, Prashant
2007 No smoke without fire: Invisible agent constructions in South Asian languages. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 51: 175–191.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris
1994 The Tupí-Guaraní inverse. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice. Form and Function, 313–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W
2011 Nominalization-based constructions in Tibeto-Burman: Typology and evolution. Paper presented at the 9th Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology , University of Hong Kong, July 22, 2011.
Ravinski, Christine
2005 Grammatical possession in Nuu-chah-nulth. Vancouver: University of British Columbia MA thesis.Google Scholar
Refsing, Kirsten
1986 The Ainu language: The morphology and syntax of the Shizunai Dialect. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Riehl, Claudia Maria
2001 Zur Grammatikalisierung der deutschen werden-Periphrasen (vom Germanischen zum Frühneuhochdeutschen). In Birgit Igla & Th. Stolz (eds.), “Was ich noch sagen wollte…” – A multilingual Festschrift for Norbert Boretzky on occasion of his 65th birthday, 469–487. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise
2009 A hierarchical indexation system: The example of Emerillon (Teko). In Patience Epps & Alexander Arkhipov (eds.), New challenges in typology. Transcending the borders and refining the distinctions, 63–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm
2002 The history and transitivity of western Austronesian voice and voice-marking. In Fay Wouk & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The history and typology of Western Austronesian voice systems, 17–62. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2009 Proto-Austronesian verbal morphology: A reappraisal. In Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A Festschrift for Robert Blust, 295–326. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2003 Degrees of event elaboration. Passive constructions in Italian and Spanish. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
2015 Where do antipassives come from? A study in diachronic typology. Paper presented at the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics . Naples (Italy), July 2015.
Sansò, Andrea & Anna Giacalone Ramat
2016 Deictic motion verbs as passive auxiliaries. The case of Italian andare ‘go’ (and venire ‘come’). Transactions of the Philological Society 114(1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1930 Southern Paiute, A Shoshonean Language. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 651: 1–296.
Schneider, Cynthia
2011  Na passive and na- associative in Abma: Shared properties; Shared origin? Oceanic Linguistics 50(2): 380–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2008 Introduction: Impersonalization from a subject-centered vs. agent-centered perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society (Special issue: Impersonal Constructions in Grammatical Theory) 106(2): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 From 3pl to passive: Incipient, emergent and established passives. Diachronica 27(3): 73–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals. Man-constructions vs. third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 57–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Passive Constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL]).Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min
2001 The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sridhar, Shikaripur R
1990 Kannada. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley, Andrew K. Pawley & Lawrence A. Reid
1982 The evolution of focus in Austronesian. In Amran Halim, Lois Carrington & Stephen A. Wurm (eds.), Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Vol. 2: Tracking the Travellers, 145–170. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2009[1982] The evolution of focus in Austronesian. [Unabridged version of Starosta, et al. 1982.] In Elizabeth Zeitoun (ed.), Formosan Linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s Contributions, Vol. 21, 329–481. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Sung, Li-May
2011 Clausal nominalization in Budai Rukai. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, 523–559. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toosarvandani, Maziar
2010 Patterns of nominalization in Numic. International Journal of American Linguistics 76(1): 71–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vajda, Edward, Andrey Nefedov & Andrej Malchukov
2011 Impersonal constructions in Ket. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 439–458. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, René (see Berg)
Van Dijk, Teun A
2008 Critical discourse analysis and nominalization: problem or pseudo-problem? Discourse and Society 19(6): 821–828. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velázquez-Castillo, Maura
2008 Voice and transitivity in Guaraní. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 380–395. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Petra Maria
2006 Das unpersönliche Passiv. Eine funktionale Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Deutschen und seiner historischen Entwicklung. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vries, Lourens de
1995 Demonstratives, referent identification and topicality in Wambon and some other Papuan languages. Journal of Pragmatics 241: 513–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, David John
1989 A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Bjorn
2004 The evolution of passives as grammatical constructions in Northern Slavic and Baltic languages. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Bjorn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and components, 271–331. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Huiling & Stephen Matthews
2011 On the polyfunctionality and grammaticalization of the morpheme kai in the Chaoxhou dialect. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona et al. (eds.), Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, 109–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Stephen Matthews
2008 The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking Grammaticalization: New perspectives, 309–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ya, Fanny Pik-ling Choi & Kam-siu Cheung
2010 Delexicalizing di: How a Chinese noun has evolved into an attitudinal nominalizer. In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds.), Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research, 63–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona
2011 Introduction: Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In F. Yap, et al. (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, 1–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zigmond, Maurice L., Curtis G. Booth & Pamela Munro
1990 Kawaiisu: A grammar and dictonary with texts. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Auderset, Sandra
2021. Chapter 12. The antipassive and its relationship to person markers. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo
2023. The rise of middle voice systems. Diachronica 40:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Meluzzi, Chiara, Erica Pinelli, Elena Valvason & Chiara Zanchi
2021. Responsibility attribution in gender-based domestic violence: A study bridging corpus-assisted discourse analysis and readers' perception. Journal of Pragmatics 185 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Sansò, Andrea
2017. Where do antipassive constructions come from?. Diachronica 34:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.