Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:4 (2016) ► pp. 894954
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2011Word-class changing derivation in typological perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds.), Language at large. Essays on syntax and semantics, 221–289. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Armendáriz, Rolando Gpe. Félix
2005A grammar of River Warihío. PhD Dissertation, Houston, Rice University.Google Scholar
van den Berg, René
2008Integration and interdependence in Oceanic research: An SIL perspective. Paper presented at the Conference on Directions in Oceanic Research , Newcastle, Australia, December 9-11.
van den Berg, René & Brenda H. Boerger
2011A Proto-Oceanic passive? Evidence from Bola and Natügu. Oceanic Linguistics 50(1): 221–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, Ben
2003Syntactic approaches to possessive constructions in Nuuchahnulth. In J.C. Brown & Michele Kalmar (eds.), Papers for the 38th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, 7–22. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bugaeva, Anna
2011A diachronic study of the impersonal passive in Ainu. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal Constructions. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 517–546. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Don
1984Western Tarahumara. In Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 4: Southern Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Sketches, 1–150. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Caballero, Gabriela
2008Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) Phonology and Morphology. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2014Uto-Aztecan. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 724–742. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Casad, Eugene H.
1984Cora. In Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 4: Southern Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Sketches, 151–459. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chapman, Shirley & Desmond C. Derbyshire
1991Paumarí. In Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 3, 161–352. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chen, Cheng-Fu
2005Object voice and nominalization in Rukai. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 35–47.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson
2007Lexical nominalization. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 334–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coupe, Alexander
2007A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crevels, Mily
2011Who did what to whom in Magdalena (Itonama). International Journal of American Linguistics 77 (4): 577–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2011Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Foong >Ha Yap, Karen >Grunow-Hårsta & Janick >Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, 343–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dienst, Stefan
2014A grammar of Kulina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1999The Amazonian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004The Jarawara Language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
1997A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Dedicated to T. Givón, 71–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehrich, Veronika & Irene Rapp
2000Sortale Bedeutung und Argumentstruktur: ung-Nominalisierungen im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 19 (2): 245–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escalante, Fernando
1990Setting the record straight on Yaqui passives. International Journal of American Linguistics 56 (2): 289–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
1989A grammar of Pero. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Andrea Sansò
2007The spread and decline of indefinite man-constructions in European languages. An areal perspective. In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean as Linguistic Areas. Convergences from a Historical and Typological Perspective, 95–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011From passive to impersonal. A case study from Italian and its implications. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 189–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Venire (‘come’) as a passive auxiliary in Italian. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), COME and GO off the beaten grammaticalization path, 21–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1994Semantic and pragmatic inverse: ‘Inverse alignment’ and ‘inverse voice’ in Carib of Surinam. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Voice and inversion, 187–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998On reconstructing grammar. Comparative Cariban morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1981Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language 5(2): 163–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Tale of two passives in Ute. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 417–440. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994aThe pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Voice and Inversion, 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Grammatical relations in passive clauses: A diachronic perspective. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, 337–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Ute Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy & Boniface Kawasha
2006Indiscrete grammatical relations. The Lunda passive. In Tasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations. In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani, 15–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero Valenzuela, Lilián Graciela
2004The syntax-semantic interface in Yaqui complex sentences: A Role and Reference Grammar analysis. Buffalo, NY: SUNY, Buffalo PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1990The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Jason D.
2008Denominal verbs in Uto-Aztecan. International Journal of American Linguistics 74(4): 439–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1977Review of Non-Distinct Arguments in Uto-Aztecan by Ronald W. Langacker. Language 53(2): 457–461.Google Scholar
1998Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution. Language 74: 728–750. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1992Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H.
2005A grammar of Cupeño. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horie, Kaoru
2008The grammaticalization of nominalizers in Japanese and Korean: A contrastive study. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking Grammaticalization: New perspectives, 169–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2014Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Anton Antonov
2014Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8/7: 301–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Eun-Sook
2004The Morphological Status of -ʔat in Nuu-chah-nulth. Berkeley Linguistics Society 30(2): 61–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
1993Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin & John Whitman
2011Afterword: Nominalizations in syntactic theory. Lingua 121(7): 1297–1313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1976Non-Distinct Arguments in Uto-Aztecan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. & Pamela Munro
1975Passives and their meaning. Language 51(4): 789–830. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langdon, Margaret
1992Yuman Plurals: From Derivation to Inflection to Noun Agreement. International Journal of American Linguistics 58(4): 405–424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2008Nominalization in Rawang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2): 45–65.Google Scholar
Lynch, John, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley
2002The Oceanic languages. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2006Constraining nominalization: Function/form competition. Linguistics 44(5): 973–1009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Anna Siewierska
2011Introduction. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1972Lahu nominalization, relativization, and genetivization. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 1, 237–257. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio & Sebastian Drude
2013Sobre a origem histórica dos “prefixos relacionais” das línguas Tupí-Guaraní. Cadernos de Etnolingüística 5(1). http://​www​.etnolinguistica​.org​/issue:vol5n1Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio, Spike Gildea & Berend J. Hoff
2010On the origin of Ablaut in the Cariban Family. International Journal of American Linguistics 76(4): 477–515. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela
1974Topics in Mojave syntax. San Diego, CA: University of California at San Diego PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Nakayama, Toshihide
1997Functions of the Nootka (Nuu-chah-nulth) “Passive” Suffix. International Journal of American Linguistics 63(3): 412–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1992A grammar of Lango. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Nominalization in Bodic languages. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking Grammaticalization: New perspectives, 219–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olawsky, Knut J.
2006A grammar of Urarina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pardeshi, Prashant
2007No smoke without fire: Invisible agent constructions in South Asian languages. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 5: 175–191.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris
1994The Tupí-Guaraní inverse. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice. Form and Function, 313–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W.
2011Nominalization-based constructions in Tibeto-Burman: Typology and evolution. Paper presented at the 9th Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology , University of Hong Kong, July 22, 2011.
Ravinski, Christine
2005Grammatical possession in Nuu-chah-nulth. Vancouver: University of British Columbia MA thesis.Google Scholar
Refsing, Kirsten
1986The Ainu language: The morphology and syntax of the Shizunai Dialect. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Riehl, Claudia Maria
2001Zur Grammatikalisierung der deutschen werden-Periphrasen (vom Germanischen zum Frühneuhochdeutschen). In Birgit Igla & Th. Stolz (eds.), “Was ich noch sagen wollte…” – A multilingual Festschrift for Norbert Boretzky on occasion of his 65th birthday, 469–487. Berlin: Akademie.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Françoise
2009A hierarchical indexation system: The example of Emerillon (Teko). In Patience Epps & Alexander Arkhipov (eds.), New challenges in typology. Transcending the borders and refining the distinctions, 63–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm
2002The history and transitivity of western Austronesian voice and voice-marking. In Fay Wouk & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The history and typology of Western Austronesian voice systems, 17–62. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2009Proto-Austronesian verbal morphology: A reappraisal. In Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A Festschrift for Robert Blust, 295–326. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2003Degrees of event elaboration. Passive constructions in Italian and Spanish. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
2015Where do antipassives come from? A study in diachronic typology. Paper presented at the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics . Naples (Italy), July 2015.
Sansò, Andrea & Anna Giacalone Ramat
2016Deictic motion verbs as passive auxiliaries. The case of Italian andare ‘go’ (and venire ‘come’). Transactions of the Philological Society 114(1): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1930Southern Paiute, A Shoshonean Language. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 65: 1–296.
Schneider, Cynthia
2011 Na passive and na- associative in Abma: Shared properties; Shared origin? Oceanic Linguistics 50(2): 380–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2008Introduction: Impersonalization from a subject-centered vs. agent-centered perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society (Special issue: Impersonal Constructions in Grammatical Theory) 106(2): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010From 3pl to passive: Incipient, emergent and established passives. Diachronica 27(3): 73–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals. Man-constructions vs. third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 57–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Passive Constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology. (http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/107).Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min
2001The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sridhar, Shikaripur R.
1990Kannada. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley, Andrew K. Pawley & Lawrence A. Reid
1982The evolution of focus in Austronesian. In Amran Halim, Lois Carrington & Stephen A. Wurm (eds.), Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Vol. 2: Tracking the Travellers, 145–170. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2009[1982]The evolution of focus in Austronesian. [Unabridged version of Starosta, et al. 1982.] In Elizabeth Zeitoun (ed.), Formosan Linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s Contributions, Vol. 2, 329–481. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Sung, Li-May
2011Clausal nominalization in Budai Rukai. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, 523–559. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toosarvandani, Maziar
2010Patterns of nominalization in Numic. International Journal of American Linguistics 76(1): 71–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vajda, Edward, Andrey Nefedov & Andrej Malchukov
2011Impersonal constructions in Ket. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 439–458. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, René (see Berg)
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2008Critical discourse analysis and nominalization: problem or pseudo-problem? Discourse and Society 19(6): 821–828. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velázquez-Castillo, Maura
2008Voice and transitivity in Guaraní. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 380–395. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Petra Maria
2006Das unpersönliche Passiv. Eine funktionale Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Deutschen und seiner historischen Entwicklung. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Lourens de
1995Demonstratives, referent identification and topicality in Wambon and some other Papuan languages. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 513–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, David John
1989A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Bjorn
2004The evolution of passives as grammatical constructions in Northern Slavic and Baltic languages. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Bjorn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and components, 271–331. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Huiling & Stephen Matthews
2011On the polyfunctionality and grammaticalization of the morpheme kai in the Chaoxhou dialect. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona et al. (eds.), Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, 109–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Stephen Matthews
2008The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking Grammaticalization: New perspectives, 309–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ya, Fanny Pik-ling Choi & Kam-siu Cheung
2010Delexicalizing di: How a Chinese noun has evolved into an attitudinal nominalizer. In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds.), Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research, 63–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona
2011Introduction: Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In F. Yap, et al. (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, 1–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zigmond, Maurice L., Curtis G. Booth & Pamela Munro
1990Kawaiisu: A grammar and dictonary with texts. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Auderset, Sandra
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 385 ff. Crossref logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.  In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Crossref logo
Sansò, Andrea
2017. Where do antipassive constructions come from?. Diachronica 34:2  pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.