Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 41:1 (2017) ► pp. 132


Constructions, grammatical status and morphologization


Ackerman, Farrell & Gregory Stump
2004Paradigms and periphrastic expressions. In Louisa Sadler & Andrew Spencer (eds.), Projecting morphology [Stanford Studies in Morphology and the Lexicon], 111–157. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Mark Lindsay
2015Partial organization in languages: la langue est un système où la plupart se tient. In Sandra Augendre, Graziella Couasnon-Torlois, Déborah Lebon, Clément Michard, Gilles Boyé & Fabio Montermini (eds.), Proceedings of the Décembrettes 8th International Conference on Morphology, CNRS & Université Toulouse.Google Scholar
Askedal, John Ole
2008‘Degrammaticalization’ versus typology. In Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, 45–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avgustinova, Tania
1994On Bulgarian verbal clitics. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 2.29–47.Google Scholar
Banova, Savelina
2005Bălgarskijat glagol: praktičesko pomagalo. Sofia: Sofijski universitet “Kliment Oxridski”, Departament za ezikovo obučenie -ICS, Izdatelstvo D-r Ivan Bogorov.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier
2015Periphrasis as collocation. Morphology 25(1). 63–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Pollet Samvellian
2015The diversity of inflectional periphrasis in Persian. Journal of Linguistics 51(2). 327–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Gert Webelhuth
2013The phrase-structural diversity of periphrasis: A lexicalist account. In Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms, 141–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent & Carol Chapman
1997Paradigms, periphrases and pronominal inflection. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996, 155–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1). 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina, Greville Corbett, Gergana Popova & Andrew Spencer
2002Defining ‘periphrasis’: Key notions. Morphology 233–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Čakărova, Krasimira
2001On the issue of the paradigmatic nature of some disputable analytical verbal structures in the Modern Bulgarian language or “boundary areas” in grammar. In 10 godini burgaski svoboden universitet. jubilejna naučna konferencija s meždunarodno učastie “universitetât prez tretoto xiljadoletie”, vol. 4, 139–154. Burgas. Available at http://​www​.belb​.net​/personal​/chakyrova​/Burgas01​.htm (accessed July 7, 2009).Google Scholar
2009Imperativăt v săvremennija bălgarski ezik. Plovdiv: Izdatelstvo “Pigmalion”.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2007Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83(1). 8–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems. Morphology 21(2). 445–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2004The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Elisabeth M.
2004Imam (‘have’) plus past passive participle in the Bulgarian Erkeč dialect. In Ronelle Alexander & Vladimir Zhobov (eds.), Revitalizing Bulgarian dialectology, vol. 2 University of California International and Area Studies Collection, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J.
2003Linguistic epidemiology: Semantics and grammar of language contact in mainland Southeast Asia. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven
2008Clitic placement, prosody, and the Bulgarian verbal complex. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 16(1). 91–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgiev, Vladimir
1976Vâznikvane na novi složni glagolni formi sâs spomagatelen glagol ‘imam’. In Petâr Pašov & Ruselina Nicolova (eds.), Pomagalo po bălgarska morfologija. Glagol., 294–311. Sofia: Izdatelstvo “Nauka i izkustvo”. Abridged and reprinted from Izvestija na Instituta po bâlgarski ezik, vol. 5 1957.Google Scholar
Harris, A. C. & L. Campbell
1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2003Grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
2004Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization ‘theory’. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline – the nature of grammaticalization, 45–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2004Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 113–135. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kramer, Christina E.
2003Macedonian: A course for beginning and intermediate students, 2nd edn. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2004Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32(2). 152–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Cecilia Robustelli
2000A reference grammar of modern Italian. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Manova, Stela
2006Paradigm linkage and Bulgarian verb inflection. Paper presented at the First Meeting of the Slavic Linguistics Society , September 2006, University of Indiana, Bloomington.
Migdalski, Krzysztof
2006The syntax of compound tenses in Slavic. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics dissertation.Google Scholar
Mirčev, Kiril
1976Za sâčetanijata na glagol imam + minalo stradatelno pričastie v balgarski ezik. In Petâr Pašov & Ruselina Nicolova (eds.), Pomagalo po balgarska morfologija. Glagol., 565–567. Sofia: Izdatelstvo ‘Nauka i izkustvo’. First published in Balgarski ezik, vol. 23, no. 6, 1973.Google Scholar
Nicolova, Ruselina
2008Bălgarska gramatika: Morfologija. Sofia: Universitetsko izdatelstvo “Sv. Kliment Oxridski”.Google Scholar
Pitsch, Hagen 2010Complex verbs between syntax and morphology in Bulgarian. Russian Linguistics 34(3). 307–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popova, Gergana
2010Features in periphrastic constructions. In Anna Kibort & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics, 166–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popova, Gergana & Andrew Spencer
2013Relatedness in periphrasis: A paradigm-based perspective. In Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms, vol. 180 Proceedings of the British Academy, 191–225. Oxford University Press/British Academy.Google Scholar
Rudin, Catherine
1986Aspects of Bulgarian syntax: Complementizers and WH constructions. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa & Andrew Spencer
2001Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2000, 71–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simov, Kiril & Sia Kolkovska
2002Interpretacija na da-konsktrukciite v oporna frazova gramatika, vol. Proceedings of the 6th National Slavistic Readings: Slavic studies at the beginning of the 21st century. Traditions and expectations . Sofia, 26–27 April 2002, Sofia.
Smirnickij, A. I.
1959Morfologija anglijskogo jazyka. Moscow: Izkatel’stvo literatury na inostrannyx jazykax.Google Scholar
Smirnickij, Aleksandr I.
1956Analitičeskie formy. Voprosy jazykoznanija 2. 41–52.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
2001The paradigm-based model of morphosyntax. Transactions of the Philological Society 99(2). 279–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Periphrastic paradigms in Bulgarian. In Uwe Junghanns & Luka Szucsich (eds.), Syntactic structures and morphological information, vol. 7 Interface Explorations, 249–282. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Sentence negation and periphrasis. In Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms, vol. 180 Proceedings of the British Academy, 227–266. Oxford: Oxford University Press/British Academy. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Anna Luís
2012aThe canonical clitic. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 123–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Anna Luis
2012bClitics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna M.
2011Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldback & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from romance inflectional morphology, 358–81. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Reduction and maintenance of overabundance. a case study on Italian verb paradigms. Word Structure 5(2). 183–2017. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomič, Olga Mišeska
2004The syntax of the Balkan Slavic future tenses. Lingua 114(4). 517–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012A grammar of Macedonian. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2003Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 19–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Paul J. Hopper
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trifonov, Ju
1908Značenie na složnite (opisatelni) bădešti vremena v novobălgarskija ezik. Periodičesko spisanie 9(10). 1–40.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2012Grammaticalization, constructions and the grammaticalization of constructions. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], 167–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2010Preface. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Nigel & Kersti Börjars
2010Grammaticalization and models of language. In Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 279–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2014Quo Vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 425–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xaralampiev, Ivan
2001Istoričeska gramatika na bâlgarskija ezik. Veliko Târnovo: Faber.Google Scholar