Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 41:1 (2017) ► pp. 3375

Full-text

The epistemization of person markers in reported speech
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Antonov, Anton & Guillaume Jacques
2014 Semi-direct speech in Rtau . Paper presented at the conference Syntax of the World’s Languages VI, University of Pavia, September 8–10.
Atlas, Jay David & Stephen C. Levinson
1981 It-clefts, informativeness, and logial form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version). In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 1–61. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Henrik
2012Epistemic marking in Ika (Arwako). Studies in Language 36(1). 154–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2007Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn., 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2008Verb agreement and epistemic marking: A typological journey from the Himalayas to the Caucasus. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer (eds.), Chomolongma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 1–14. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Borchers, Dörte
2008A grammar of Sunwar: Descriptive grammar, paradigms, texts and glossary (Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library. Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 5.7). Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Cann, Ronnie
1993Formal semantics. An introduction (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
1986Reported speech: Some general issues. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 31), 1–28. de Gruyter: Berlin, New York & Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis 2008 Remarks on so-called “egophoric/allophoric” systems . Paper presented at the conference Syntax of the World’s Languages III, Free University of Berlin, September 25–28. http://​www​.deniscreissels​.fr​/public​/Creissels​-conj​.disj​.pdf (accessed July 7 2016)
Croft, William
2003Typology and universals (2003 edn.) (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy J.
1997A grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An indigenous language of south-western Colombia. Canberra: Australian National University dissertation.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2000Egophoricity in discourse and syntax. Functions of Language 7(1). 37–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte
2014A grammar of Wadu Pumi. Melbourne: La Trobe University dissertation.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1990Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3). 289–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992The historical status of the egophoric/allophoric pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25. 39–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16. 529–564.Google Scholar
2014Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1). 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Connie
2000Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(2). 379–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Complex predicates in Tsafiki. Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2012Some problems in the typology of quotation: A canonical approach. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 66–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francke, August H.
1909Tabellen der Pronomina und Verba in den drei Sprachen Lahoul’s: Bunan, Manchad und Tinan. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 63. 65–97.Google Scholar
1926Antiquities of Indian Tibet, Part II. The chronicles of Ladakh and minor chronicles. Calcutta: Superintenden Government Printing.Google Scholar
1998A history of western Tibet: One of the unknown empires. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (Original work published 1907).Google Scholar
2008Die historischen und mythologischen Erinnerungen der Lahouler. In Tshering, Dorje & Tobdan (eds.), Moravian missionaries in western Trans-Himalaya (Lahul, Ladakh and Kinnaur), 155–179. New Delhi: Kaveri Books. (Original work published in 1907)Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol
1988Notes on the structure of the Sunwari transitive verb. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11(2). 62–92.Google Scholar
1994A descriptive and historical account of the Dolakha Newari dialect (Monumenta Serindica 24). Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
2007A grammar of Dolakha Newar (Mouton Grammar Library 40). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2000Internal reconstruction: As method, as theory. In Spike Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 43), 107–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grierson, George A.
(ed.) 1909Linguistic survey of India: Vol. III, Part I, Tibeto-Burman family: Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects, and the North Assam group. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin & David Watters 1973A survey of clause patterns. In Austin Hale & David Watters.(eds.), Clause, sentence, and discourse patterns in the languages of Nepal, Part II, Clause, 175–249. Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin
1980Person markers: Finite egophoric and allophoric verb forms in Newari. In Stephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papers in South East Asian Linguistics 7 (Pacific Linguistics A 53), 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Haller, Felix & Chungda Haller
2007Einführung in das moderne Zentraltibetische. Auf Basis des Dialektes von Shigatse / westliches Zentraltibet ( Tsang ). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Haller, Felix
2000Dialekt und Erzählungen von Shigatse (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung, 13). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
2004Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen: sprachwissenschaftliche Beschreibung eines Nomadendialekts aus Nord-Amdo (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung, 14). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David J.
1991The concept of intentional action in the grammar of Kathmandu Newari. Eugene: University of Oregon Dissertation.Google Scholar
2005Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newari. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 5. 1–48.Google Scholar
Häsler, Kartin L.
1999A Grammar of the Tibetan Sde.dge Dialect. Berne: University of Berne dissertation.Google Scholar
Hein, Veronika
2001The role of the speaker in the verbal system of the Tibetan dialect of Tabo / Spiti. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(1). 35–48.Google Scholar
2007The mirative and its interplay with evidentiality in the Tibetan dialect of Tabo (Spiti). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 195–214.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2012Epistemics in action. Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Brigitte
2005The Tibetan dialect of Lende: A grammatical description with historical annotations (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung, 15). Bonn: VGH Wissen-schaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Huber, Christian
2013Subject and object agreement in Shumcho. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 266), 221–274. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2007Hybrid indirect speech in Rgyalrong. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Jäschke, Heinrich A.
1865Note on the pronunciation of the Tibetan language. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 34(1). 91–100.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio
1997Territory of Information (Pragmatics & Beyond. New Series 48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koshal, Sanyukta
1979Ladakhi grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Ping, Dicus Shizi
2014A grammar of Prinmi: Based on the dialect of northwest Yunnan, China (Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library. Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 5.14). Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W.
2013Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivation. In Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop & Joana Jansen (eds.), Functional-historical approaches to explanation: In honor of Scott DeLancey (Typological Studies in Language 103), 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Preiswerk, Thomas
2011 Evidentiality as a grammatical category in the Tibetan dialect of Zanskar . Paper presented at the 17th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies, 6–9 September.
San Roque, Lila & Robyn Loughnane 2012The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16. 111–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Suhnu Ram
1996Pronouns and agreement in West Himalayan Tibeto-Burman languages. Indian Linguistics 57. 81–104.Google Scholar
Slusser, Mary Shepherd
1982Nepal Mandala: A cultural study of the Kathmandu Valley, 2 vols Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
1993Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 63. 945–1001.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Yoshiharu
2001A descriptive study of Kinnauri (Pangi dialect): A preliminary report. In Yasuhiko Nagano & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), New research on Zhangzhung and related Himalayan languages (Bon Studies 3), 97–119. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicholas & Sange Dorje
2003Manual of Standard Tibetan: Language and civilization. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
1991The rhetorical use of the Tibetan ergative. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1). 93–107.Google Scholar
2008Arguments against the concept of “egophoric” / “allophoric” in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer (eds.), Chomolongma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281–308. Halle: International Insitute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
van Driem, George
2001Languages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the greater Himalayan region: Containing an introduction to the symbiotic theory of language, 2 vols. (Handbuch der Orientalistik, Abt. 2, Indien 10). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
David, E. Watters
2006The conjunct-disjunct distinction in Kaike. Nepalese Linguistics 22. 300–319.Google Scholar
Widmer, Manuel
2015The transformation of verb agreement into epistemic marking: Evidence from Tibeto-Burman. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 287), 53–74. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. A grammar of Bunan (Mouton Grammar Library 71). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Zemp, Marius
2014A historical grammar of the Tibetan dialect spoken in Kargil (Purik). Berne: University of Berne dissertation.Google Scholar
Zoller, Claus P.
1983Die Sprache der Rang pas von Garhwal (Raṅ Pɔ Bhāsa). Grammatik, Texte, Wörterbuch. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Grollmann, Selin
2020. Diachronic aspects of Bjokapakha epistemic verbal morphology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2019. Egophoric marking and person indexation in Japhug. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 20:4  pp. 515 ff. Crossref logo
Song, Na
2019. Egophoric marking in a sinitic language: The case of baoding. Journal of Pragmatics 148  pp. 88 ff. Crossref logo
Spronck, Stef & Tatiana Nikitina
2019. Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology 23:1  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Widmer, Manuel
2017. The evolution of egophoricity and evidentiality in the Himalayas. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Widmer, Manuel
2018. Transitivity markers in West Himalayish. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:1  pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Widmer, Manuel & Fernando Zúñiga
2017. Egophoricity, Involvement, and Semantic Roles in Tibeto-Burman Languages. Open Linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo
Zemp, Marius
2017. The Origin and Evolution of the Opposition between Testimonial and Factual Evidentials in Purik and Other Varieties of Tibetan. Open Linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo
Zemp, Marius
2020. Evidentials and their pivot in Tibetic and neighboring Himalayan languages. Functions of Language 27:1  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.