Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 41:1 (2017) ► pp.142197
References
Ameka, Felix K.
1991Ewe: Its grammatical constructions and illocutionary devices. Canberra: Australian National University PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
2005aEwe serial verb constructions in their grammatical context. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 124–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005bMultiverb constructions on the West African littoral: Micro-variation and areal typology. In Mila Vulchanova & Tor A. Åfarli (eds.), Grammar and beyond: Essays in honor of Lars Hellan, 15–42. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix & James Essegbey
2001Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. 32nd Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Berkeley, March 2001.
In press. Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb- framed or neither? In Larry Hyman and Ian Maddieson (eds.) African comparative and historical linguistics. Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference on African Linguistics Lawrenceville, NJ Africa World Press
Ansre, Gilbert
1966The grammatical units of Ewe: A study of their structure, classes and systems. London: University of London PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1989Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 201. 513–543.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2010Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (eds.). 51–101.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen
2003The unique vector constraint. In Emile van der Zee & Jon Slack (eds.), Representing direction in language and space, 86–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Linking without grammatical relations in Yucatec: Alignment, extraction, and control. In Yoko Nishina, Yong-Min Shin, Stavros Skopeteas, Elisabeth Verhoeven, & Johannes Helmbrecht (eds.), Issues in functional-typological linguistics and language theory: A Festschrift for Christian Lehmann on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 185–214. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, et al.
2007Principles of event encoding: The case of motion events. Language 83(3). 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nick J. Enfield, James Essegbey, & Sotaro Kita
2010 The Macro-Event Property: The segmentation of causal chains. In Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds.), Event representation in language: Encoding events at the language-cognition interface, 43–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
1980Polyadicity. In Teun Hoekstra, Harry van der Hulst & Michael Moortgat (eds.), Lexical grammar, 97–121. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1982Polyadicity. In Joan Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations, 149–172. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Casati, Roberto and Achille C. Varzi
1999Parts and places: The structures of spatial representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cutrer, Michelle
1993Semantic and syntactic factors in control. In Robert D. Van ValinJr. (eds.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 167–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2006Serial verb constructions: Conspectus and coda. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 338–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1979Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J
1968The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals of linguistic theory, 1–90. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1972Subjects, speakers and roles. In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, 1–24. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry
1970Three reasons not to derive “kill” from “cause to die”. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 429–438.Google Scholar
Foley, William
2010Clause linkage and nexus in Papuan languages. In Isabelle Bril ed.. 27–50.Google Scholar
Foley William A. & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
1984Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1980The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 41. 333–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansell, Mark
1993Serial verbs and complement constructions in Mandarin: A clause linkage analysis. In Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 197–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko
1996A study of Japanese clause linkage: The connective TE in Japanese (Studies in Japanese Linguistics 5). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König
(eds.) 1995Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1994Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1998The origins of telicity. In S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1987Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 231. 379–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicatures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Igor V. Nedjalkov
1987On the typological characteristics of converbs. In Toomas Help (ed.), Symposium on language universals, 75–79. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1985Complementation. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. II: Complex constructions, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nunes, Mary L.
1993Argument linking in English derived nominals. In Robert Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 375–432. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, Michael L.
1981Barai clause junctures: Toward a functional theory of interclausal relations. Canberra: Australian National University PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terrence
1990Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sebba, Mark
1987The syntax of serial verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara
2010Inhärente Kontrollprädikate im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 2241. 391–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000Towards a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
2001An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Linguistics past and present: A view from the Rhine. In Zarina Estrada Fernández, Albert Álvarez González & María Belén Carpio (eds.), Ser lingüista: un oficio diverso y polifacético. Diez años de una Maestría en Lingüística [Being a linguist: A diverse and multifaceted profession. Ten years of a Masters program in Linguistics], 155–162. Hermosillo: Editorial Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
2015Cosubordination. Paper presented at 2015 Role and Reference Grammar Conference to appear in the Proceedings.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review LXVI1. 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watters, James K.
1993An investigation of Turkish clause linkage. In Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 535–560. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1980Lingua Mentalis. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan & Peerapat Yangklang
2004A third way of travel: The place of Thai in motion-event typology. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.) Relating events in narrative: Topological and contextual perspectives, 159–190. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Deng, Yu & Fuyin Thomas Li
2023. Event Segmentation and Causation: The Case of Mandarin Causal‐Chain Motion*. Studia Linguistica 77:2  pp. 368 ff. DOI logo
Fan, Ying
2021. Argument structure representation: Formation of serial verb constructions in Standard Mandarin Chinese. Lingua 249  pp. 102962 ff. DOI logo
Fan, Ying & Man Li
2019. The obligatory fronting of the undergoer argument in the Mandarin Excessive serial verb construction. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 45:2  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Matsumoto, Yo & Kazuhiro Kawachi
2020. Introduction. Motion event descriptions in broader perspective. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Osswald, Rainer & Robert D. Van Valin Jr.
2022. Chapter 10. The description of transitive directed motion in Lakhota (Siouan). In Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72],  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Rahman, Ghani, Abdul Hamid, Laraib Rahat, Arshad Ali Khan & Abid Karam
2021. VERBAL CLITICS IN ROLE AND REFERENCE GRAMMAR. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 9:2  pp. 581 ff. DOI logo
Takahashi, Kiyoko
2020. Chapter 4. Syntactic and semantic structures of Thai motion expressions. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69],  pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.