In constrast with Nêlêmwa (Oceanic, New Caledonia) whose lexemes are most generally subcategorised as nouns or verbs and undergo category-changing derivations, in Amis (Formosan), roots are pervasively categorially neutral, yet they contain semantic features and instructions that allow or disallow combination with primary derivational affixes which specify their class and category. Lexical categories are expressed after roots are derived into morphosyntactic words projected in a syntactic frame; they are then quite rigidly subcategorised as verbal, nominal or adjectival-modifying heads. Still, word forms display some functional flexibility; for instance, nouns and derived nouns, pronouns, numerals may be predicative in equative, ascriptive and focus constructions, simply by being in the syntactic position of the verb. Such functional flexibility is asymmetrical and does not apply to derived verb stems which must be nominalised to achieve argument function.
2000Tuvaluan. A Polynesian language of the Central Pacific. London, New York: Routledge.
Blust, Robert
1999Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In E. Zeitoun & P. J. K. Li (eds.), Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 31–94. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
In press. Lexical and functional categories in Nêlêmwa (New Caledonia) and some other Austronesian languages: fluid vs. rigid categoriality. In V. Vapnarsky and E. Veneziano eds. Lexical polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches 207 242 Amsterdam Benjamins
Broschart, Jürgen
1997Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology 11. 123–165.
Chen, Teresa
1987Verbal constructions and verbal classifications in Nataoran-Amis. Canberra: Pacific linguistics.
Croft, William
2000Parts of speech as typological universals and language particular categories. In Petra Vogel and Bernard Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, [EALT 23], 65–102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
2000Introduction. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: CUP.
Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada
2005Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9(3). 351–390.
Foley, William A.
1998Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages. Paper presented at the 3rd LFG conference, Brisbane.
Foley, William A.
2008The place of Philippine languages in a typology of voice systems. In P. Austin & S. Musgrave (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 22–44. Stanford: CSLI publications.
Hengeveld, Kees & Eva van Lier
2010An implicational map of parts of speech. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). 129–156.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus
2005Tagalog. In Alexander Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 350–376. London: Routledge.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus
2007Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. In Simon Musgrave & Peter Austin (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 247–293. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Huang, Lillian M.
1995The case markers and pronominal system in Amis. Journal of National Chengchi University 701. 217–257.
Keenan, Edward L. & Cécile Manorohanta
2001Quantitative study of voice in Malagasy. Oceanic Linguistics 40(1). 67–84.
Kroeger, Paul
1998Nouns and verbs in Tagalog: a reply to Foley. Asia SIL School. Paper presented at the 3rd LFG Conference, Brisbane. 30 June – 3 July, 1998.
Kuo, Jonathan Cheng-Chuen
2015Argument alternation and argument structure in symmetrical voice languages: A case study of transfer verbs in Amis, Puyuma, and Seediq. Hawaii: Hawaii University PhD dissertation.
Lazard, Gilbert
1999La question de la distinction entre nom et verbe en perspective typologique. Folia linguistica 33(3–4). 389–418.
Lehmann, Christian
2008Roots, stems and word classes. In: Umberto Ansaldo, Jan Don and Roland Pfau (eds.): Parts of Speech: descriptive tools, theoretical constructs. Special Issue of Studies in Language 32(3), 43–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lieber, Rochelle
2006The category of roots and the roots of categories: what we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology 161. 247–272.
1992Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Reid, Lawrence
1992On the development of the aspect system in some Philippine languages. Oceanic Linguistics 31(1). 65–92.
Ross, Malcolm
1995Reconstructing proto Austronesian verbal morphology; evidence from Taiwan. In Paul Jen-kuei Li, Dah-an Ho, Ying-kuei Huang & Cheng-hwa Tsang (eds.), Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan, 727–791. Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology (Academia Sinica 4). Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1993Syntactic categories & subcategories. In Joachim Jabobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax, An International Handbook of Contemporary research, 646–686. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
2001Scales between nouniness and verbiness. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 11, 495–509. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Shibatani, Masayoshi
2009Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t. In T. Givón & M. Shibatani (eds.), Syntactic complexity. Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution (TSL 85), 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Prashant Pardeshi
2002The causative continuum. In M. Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation (TSL 48), 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Starosta, Stanley, Andrew Pawley & Lawrence Reid
1982 [2009]The evolution of focus in Austronesian. In Amran Halim, Lois Carrington & Stephen Wurm (eds.), Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Vol. 2: Tracking the Travellers (Pacific Linguistics C-75), 145–170. Canberra: The Australian National University. [Subsequently published in Zeitoun, Elizabeth (ed.) 2009 Formosan linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s contributions (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series), Vol. 21, 297–328. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Starosta, Stanley
2002 [2009]Austronesian Focus as derivation: Evidence from nominalization. Language and Linguistics 3.2: 427–479. [Subsequently published in Zeitoun, Elizabeth (ed.) 2009 Formosan linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s contributions (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series), Vol. 21, 297–328. Taipei: Academia Sinica
Teng, Stacy
2014Grammaticalization of predicative possession in Nanwang Puyuma and as a basis for reconstruction in PAN. Oceanic Linguistics 53(1). 136–154.
Tsuchida, Shigeru
1988Amis. In Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono & Eiichi Chino (eds.), The Sanseido Encyclopedia or Linguistics, Vol 1: Languages of the World, Part one, 447–449. Tokyo: Sanseido.
Tsukida, Naomi
2008Verb classification in Amis. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 277–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wolff, John U.
1973Verbal inflection in Proto-Austronesian. In Andrew B. Gonzalez (ed.), Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez: Essays in honor of Cecilio Lopez on his seventy-fifth birthday (LSP Special monograph Issue n°4), 71–91. Quezon City: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
Wu, Joy
2006Verb classification, case marking, and grammatical relations in Amis. Buffalo: State University of New York Ph.D Dissertation.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Lillian M. Huang
2000Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 391. 415–427.
2016. Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages. Linguistic Typology 20:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.