Article published in:
Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages
Edited by Eva van Lier
[Studies in Language 41:2] 2017
► pp. 358407
References

References

Besnier, Niko
2000Tuvaluan. A Polynesian language of the Central Pacific. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert
1999Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In E. Zeitoun & P. J. K. Li (eds.), Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 31–94. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
2009The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics 602.Google Scholar
2013 revised edition online at: http://​pacling​.anu​.edu​.au​/materials​/Blust2013Austronesian​.pdf. Open Access Monographs.
Bril, Isabelle
2000Dictionnaire nêlêmwa-nixumwak-français-anglais. LCP 14, Paris, Peeters.Google Scholar
2002Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Analyse syntaxique et sémantique, LCP 16, Paris, Peeters.Google Scholar
. In press. Lexical and functional categories in Nêlêmwa (New Caledonia) and some other Austronesian languages: fluid vs. rigid categoriality. In V. Vapnarsky and E. Veneziano eds. Lexical polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches, 207–242. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Broschart, Jürgen
1997Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology 1. 123–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Teresa
1987Verbal constructions and verbal classifications in Nataoran-Amis. Canberra: Pacific linguistics.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000Parts of speech as typological universals and language particular categories. In Petra Vogel and Bernard Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, [EALT 23], 65–102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
2000Introduction. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada
2005Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9(3). 351–390.Google Scholar
Foley, William A.
1998Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages. Paper presented at the 3rd LFG conference, Brisbane.
2008The place of Philippine languages in a typology of voice systems. In P. Austin & S. Musgrave (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 22–44. Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Eva van Lier
2010An implicational map of parts of speech. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). 129–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus
2005Tagalog. In Alexander Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 350–376. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. In Simon Musgrave & Peter Austin (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 247–293. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Huang, Lillian M.
1995The case markers and pronominal system in Amis. Journal of National Chengchi University 70. 217–257.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Cécile Manorohanta
2001Quantitative study of voice in Malagasy. Oceanic Linguistics 40(1). 67–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroeger, Paul
1998Nouns and verbs in Tagalog: a reply to Foley. Asia SIL School. Paper presented at the 3rd LFG Conference, Brisbane. 30 June – 3 July, 1998.
Kuo, Jonathan Cheng-Chuen
2015Argument alternation and argument structure in symmetrical voice languages: A case study of transfer verbs in Amis, Puyuma, and Seediq. Hawaii: Hawaii University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1999La question de la distinction entre nom et verbe en perspective typologique. Folia linguistica 33(3–4). 389–418.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2008Roots, stems and word classes. In: Umberto Ansaldo, Jan Don and Roland Pfau (eds.): Parts of Speech: descriptive tools, theoretical constructs. Special Issue of Studies in Language 32(3), 43–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
2006The category of roots and the roots of categories: what we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology 16. 247–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1994The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. In Barbara Fox & Paul Hopper (eds.), Voice, form and function, 247–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen
1992Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence
1992On the development of the aspect system in some Philippine languages. Oceanic Linguistics 31(1). 65–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm
1995Reconstructing proto Austronesian verbal morphology; evidence from Taiwan. In Paul Jen-kuei Li, Dah-an Ho, Ying-kuei Huang & Cheng-hwa Tsang (eds.), Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan, 727–791. Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology (Academia Sinica 4). Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1993Syntactic categories & subcategories. In Joachim Jabobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax, An International Handbook of Contemporary research, 646–686. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001Scales between nouniness and verbiness. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 1, 495–509. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
2009Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t. In T. Givón & M. Shibatani (eds.), Syntactic complexity. Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution (TSL 85), 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Prashant Pardeshi
2002The causative continuum. In M. Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation (TSL 48), 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starosta, Stanley, Andrew Pawley & Lawrence Reid
1982 [2009]The evolution of focus in Austronesian. In Amran Halim, Lois Carrington & Stephen Wurm (eds.), Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Vol. 2: Tracking the Travellers (Pacific Linguistics C-75), 145–170. Canberra: The Australian National University. [Subsequently published in Zeitoun, Elizabeth (ed.) 2009 Formosan linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s contributions (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series), Vol. 2, 297–328. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley
2002 [2009]Austronesian Focus as derivation: Evidence from nominalization. Language and Linguistics 3.2: 427–479. [Subsequently published in Zeitoun, Elizabeth (ed.) 2009 Formosan linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s contributions (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series), Vol. 2, 297–328. Taipei: Academia SinicaGoogle Scholar
Teng, Stacy
2014Grammaticalization of predicative possession in Nanwang Puyuma and as a basis for reconstruction in PAN. Oceanic Linguistics 53(1). 136–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsuchida, Shigeru
1988Amis. In Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono & Eiichi Chino (eds.), The Sanseido Encyclopedia or Linguistics, Vol 1: Languages of the World, Part one, 447–449. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Tsukida, Naomi
2008Verb classification in Amis. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 277–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, John U.
1973Verbal inflection in Proto-Austronesian. In Andrew B. Gonzalez (ed.), Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez: Essays in honor of Cecilio Lopez on his seventy-fifth birthday (LSP Special monograph Issue n°4), 71–91. Quezon City: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Wu, Joy
2006Verb classification, case marking, and grammatical relations in Amis. Buffalo: State University of New York Ph.D Dissertation.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Lillian M. Huang
2000Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 39. 415–427.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Bril, Isabelle
2020. Indefinite expressions and accessibility hierarchy to core argument functionsin a sample of Austronesian languages(and beyond). Studies in Language 44:2  pp. 407 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.