1996. Semantic Fields and Metaphor: Going beyond Theory. Empirical Studies of the Arts 14:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Katz, Albert N
1989. On choosing the vehicles of metaphors: Referential concreteness, semantic distances, and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language 28:4 ► pp. 486 ff.
Katz, Albert N. & Hamad Al-Azary
2017. Principles That Promote Bidirectionality in Verbal Metaphor. Poetics Today 38:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Keil, Frank C.
1986. Conceptual domains and the acquisition of metaphor. Cognitive Development 1:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Kelly, Michael H. & Frank C. Keil
1987. Metaphor Comprehension and Knowledge of Semantic Domains. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 2:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
1982. The Creation of Similarity: A Discussion of Metaphor in Light of Tversky's Theory of Similarity. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:1 ► pp. 394 ff.
Kittay, Eva Feder
1984. The identification of metaphor. Synthese 58:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Kittay, Eva Feder
1988. Woman as Metaphor1. Hypatia 3:2 ► pp. 63 ff.
Koch, Ulrich
2015. Was tun mit Metaphern? Überlegungen zur Bedeutung von Metaphern und Metapherntheorie für die Wissenschaftsgeschichte am Beispiel medizinischer Schockmetaphorik. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 38:4 ► pp. 321 ff.
Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke
2000. Semantic fields and frames: Historical explorations of the interface between language, action, and cognition. Journal of Pragmatics 32:2 ► pp. 125 ff.
Rothbart, Daniel
1984. The Semantics of Metaphor and the Structure of Science. Philosophy of Science 51:4 ► pp. 595 ff.
Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida
1993. Introduction. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, ► pp. 1 ff.
Rybarkiewicz, Dorota
2020. Dialetheism and Metaphor. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 62:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Shen, Yeshayahu
1997. Metaphors and conceptual structure. Poetics 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
STITES, LAUREN J. & ŞEYDA ÖZÇALIŞKAN
2013. Developmental changes in children's comprehension and explanation of spatial metaphors for time. Journal of Child Language 40:5 ► pp. 1123 ff.
Strauß, Jürgen
1986. Concepts, fields, and 'non-basic' lexical items. In Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries, ► pp. 135 ff.
Thibodeau, Paul H. & Frank H. Durgin
2011. Metaphor Aptness and Conventionality: A Processing Fluency Account. Metaphor and Symbol 26:3 ► pp. 206 ff.
Turner, Mark
1993. An image-schematic constraint on metaphor. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, ► pp. 291 ff.
Vandaele, Sylvie & Leslie Lubin
2005. Approche cognitive de la traduction dans les langues de spécialité : vers une systématisation de la description de la conceptualisation métaphorique. Meta 50:2 ► pp. 415 ff.
2024. The Ups and Downs of Black and White: Do Sensorimotor Metaphors Reflect an Evolved Perceptual Interface?. Metaphor and Symbol 39:3 ► pp. 169 ff.
[no author supplied]
1996. References. In Total Speech, ► pp. 323 ff.
[no author supplied]
1996. Repetition. In Total Speech, ► pp. 226 ff.
[no author supplied]
1996. Further Principles of Integrational Linguistics, or, On Not Losing Sight of the Language User. In Total Speech, ► pp. 140 ff.
[no author supplied]
1996. Metaphor. In Total Speech, ► pp. 56 ff.
[no author supplied]
1996. On Inscribed or Literal Meaning. In Total Speech, ► pp. 24 ff.
[no author supplied]
1996. Rules. In Total Speech, ► pp. 271 ff.
[no author supplied]
1996. Intentionality and Coming into Language. In Total Speech, ► pp. 98 ff.
[no author supplied]
1996. Introduction. In Total Speech, ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
1996. Relevance in Theory and Practice. In Total Speech, ► pp. 181 ff.
[no author supplied]
2007. Literatur. In Handbuch deutscher Kommunikationsverben, Teil 2, Lexikalische Strukturen, ► pp. 411 ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Metaphorization in english-language terminological field "animal diseases" in linguocognitive aspect. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Philology" :84
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.