Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 6:2 (1982) ► pp.275–285
Book review

Jürgen M. Meisel & Martin D. Pam (eds.). Linear Order and Generative Theory
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1979. ix + 512 pp. [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, series IV – Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 7].

Reviewed by
| University of Münster
Published online: 1 January 1982
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.6.2.10len
References
Bach, Emmon
, “Is Amharic an SVO Language?” Journal of Ethiopian Studies 81 1970, 9–20.Google Scholar
, “Order in Base Structure”, in: Charles N. Li (ed.) Word Order and Word Order Change, Austin 1975, 307–343.Google Scholar
Bech, Gunnar
, Studien über das deutsche verbum infinitum. Kopenhagen 1955.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans
, “On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules”, GAGL 201 1981, i–iii, 1–78.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans / Edmonson, Jerold A.
, “The Verbal Complex in Continental West Germanic”, GAGL 191 1981, 2–61.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
, Grammatik des deutschen Verbs, Berlin 1963.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans U.
, Syntactic Generalizations and Linear Order in Generative Transformational Grammar. Tübingen 1975.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, Mass 1965.Google Scholar
Clément, Danièle
, “Le problème de l’ordre linéaire dans les structures sousjacentes en grammaire générative. Arbres Chomskyens ou ‘Mobiles’?”, DRLAV 22/231 1980, 39–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, M. J.
, Logics and Languages, London 1973.Google Scholar
Dean, O. C. jr.
, The Significance of Word Order Typology for the Basic Position of the Verb in a Grammar of German. Diss. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 1974.Google Scholar
DRLAV = Documentation et Recherche en linguistique Allemande Contemporaine-Vincennes no.22/23
, Paris, Université de Paris, Vincennes 1980.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A.
, “Gradienz und doppelte Infinitivkonstruktion im Deutschen.” Papiere zur Linguistik 221 1980, 59–82.Google Scholar
Esau, H.
, “Order of the Elements in the German Verb Constellation”, Linguistics 981 1973, 20–40.Google Scholar
Evers, Arn
, The Transformational Cycle in Dutch and German, Diss. Utrecht: Indiana University Linguistics Club 1975.Google Scholar
GAGL = Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Germanistisch Instituut.
Greenberg, Joseph H.
, “Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements”, in: J. H. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Language, Cambridge, Mass 1963, 73–113.Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
, “’Normalbetonung’ und ‘Normale Wortstellung’: eine pragmatische Explikation”, Leuvense Bijdragen 681 1979, 185–437. (An extended version in: W. Abraham (ed.) Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen 1982, 75–153.)Google Scholar
Kohrt, Manfred
, Koordinationsreduktion und Verbstellung in einer generativen Grammatik des Deutschen. Tübingen 1976 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. “Verbstellung und ‘doppelter Infinitiv’ im Deutschen”, Leuvense Bijdragen 681 1979, 1–31.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
, “Dutch as an SOV Language”, Linguistic Analysis 11 1975, 111–136.Google Scholar
Lange, Klaus-Peter
, Syntax und naturliche Semantik im Deutschen. Tübingen 1978.Google Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen
, Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen, Tübingen 1977.Google Scholar
. “Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Wortstellungsforschung”, PBB 1031 1981, 6–30.Google Scholar
Lötscher, Andreas
, “Zur Verbstellung im Zürichdeutschen und in anderen Varianten des Deutschen”, ZDL 451 1978, 1–29.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
, “English as a VSO Language”, Lg. 461 1970, 286–299.Google Scholar
Olsen, Susan
, Problems of seem/scheinen Constructions and their Implications for the Theory of Predicate Sentential Complementation. Tübingen 1981 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.
, Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York etc 1971.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey / Wilson, Deirdre
, “Autonomous Syntax and the Analysis of Auxiliaries”, Lg. 531 1977, 741–788.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
, “Syntaktische Hauptsatz-Privilegien und das Problem der deutschen Wortstellung”, ZGL 21 1974, 299–327.Google Scholar
. “On Justifying Topological Frames: ‘Positional Field’ and the Order of Nonverbal Constituents in German”, DRLAV 22/231; 1980, 59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
, “Auxiliaries as Main Verbs”, Journal of Philosophical Linguistics 11 1969, 71–162.Google Scholar
Staal, J. F.
, Word Order in Sanskrit and Universal Grammar, Dordrecht 1967 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thiersch, Craig
, Topics in German Syntax, PhD Diss. MIT Cambridge, Mass 1978.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
, “Topics, Subjects and Word Order: from SXV to SVX via TVX” in: J. Anderson / C. Jones (eds.) Historical Lingulistics, 21 vols., Amsterdam 1974, 339–376.Google Scholar