Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 7:2 (1983) ► pp.305313
References (32)
References
Alver, Brynjulf. 1970. Dag og merke. Folkelig tidsrekning of merkedagstradisjon. U-Bøkene, Nr. 119. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Arnau, Frank. 1969. Kunst der Fälscher. Fälscher der Kunst. Düsseldorf: Econ Verlag.Google Scholar
Arntz, Helmut. 1937. Bibliographie der Runenkunde. Leipzig: Harrasowitz. See “Register”, V(p), “Zweifelhafte oder vermeintliche Denkmaler, Fälschungen u. dgl.”Google Scholar
Ashley, Leonard R. N. 1968. Authorship and Evidence. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Blegen, Theodore C. 1968. The Kensington Rune Stone: New Light on an Old Riddle. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society.Google Scholar
Conway, James V. P. 1959. Evidential Documents. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Dévréesse, Robert. 1954. Introduction à l’étude des manuscrits grecs. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Düwel, Klaus. 1968. Runenkunde. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Erdman, David V., and Ephim G. Fogel. 1966. Evidence f or Authorship. Essays on Problems of Attribution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Farrer, J. A. 1907. Literary Forgeries. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Fell, Barry. 1980. Saga America. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Fridley, Russell W. 1976/77. Minnesota History 451.149–156, 195–99.Google Scholar
Friesen, Otto von. 1913. Upplands Runstenar. Uppsala: Akademiska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Gardner, Martin. 1957. Fads and Fallacies. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Hagen, Sivert N. 1950. “The Kensington Runic Inscription,” Speculum 251.321–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermannsson, Halldór. 1917. Annalium in Islandia farrago and De mirabilibus Islandiae by Gisli Oddsson. Islandica 10. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Holand, Hjalmar R. 1940. Westward from Vinland. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.Google Scholar
Jansson, Sven B. F. 1949. “’Runstenen’ från Kensington i Minnesota,” Nordisk Tidskrift för Vetenskap, Konst og Industri, n.s. 251.377–405.Google Scholar
Kraft, Wayne B. 1978. Attribution and Athetization. Dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Landsverk, Ole G. 1974. Runic Records of the Norsemen in America. New York: E. J. Friis.Google Scholar
MacDougall, Curtis D. 1958. Hoaxes. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Magnússon, Finnur, and Carl C. Rafn, eds. 1845. Grönlands historiske mendesmoerker. Vol. 31. Copenhagen: Brünnichske bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Marquardt, Hertha. 1961. Bibliographie der Runeninschriften nach Fundorten. Erster Teil: Die Runeninschriften der Britischen Insein. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen. Phil.- Hist. Klass. Dritte Folge, Nr. 48. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck ø Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Maurer, Konrad. 1874. Grönland im Mittelalter. In: Die zweite deutsche Nordpolfahrt in den Jahren 1869 und 1870. Leipzig: Verein für die deutsche Nordpolarfahrt in Bremen.Google Scholar
Morrissette, Bruce. 1956. The Great Rimbaud Forgery: The Affair of “La Chasse spirituelle”. St Louis: Washington University Press.Google Scholar
Reisner, Robert G. 1950. Fakes and Forgeries in the Fine Arts: A Bibliography. New York: Special Libraries Association.Google Scholar
Rieth, Adolf. 1967. Archaeological Fakes. Transi. Diana Imber. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Schottmann, Hans. 1973. Die isländische Mariendichtung. Münchener Germanistische Beitrage, 91. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Thalbitzer, William. 1951. Two Runic Stones, from Greenland and Minnesota. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 116, No. 3. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Vayson de Pradenne, André. 1932. Les fraudes en archéologie préhistorique. Paris: Nourry.Google Scholar
Wahlgreen, Erik. 1958. The Kensington Stone, A Mystery Solved. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Wessén, Elias. 1970. Schwedische Sprachgeschichte. Vol. 11. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar