Notes on Agentivity and Causation

Cited by 93 other publications

No author info given

1993.  In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, ► pp. 487 ff.

Ahdout, Odelia

2020.  In Perspectives on Causation [Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science, ], ► pp. 319 ff.

Al-Kharabsheh, Aladdin

2011. Arabic death discourse in translation: Euphemism and metaphorical conceptualization in Jordanian obituaries. Across Languages and Cultures 12:1 ► pp. 19 ff.

Allen, Colin

1996. Comparative cognitive studies, not folk phylogeny, please. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 122 ff.

Baron-Cohen, Simon

1996. Can children with autism integrate first and third person representations?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 123 ff.

Barresi, John & Chris Moore

1996. Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 107 ff.

Barresi, John & Chris Moore

1996. Understanding self and other. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 142 ff.

Bartelik, Piotr

2019. Zum Status und zu Funktionen der -n-\-t-Partizipien in polnischenmieć-Formen. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 64:2 ► pp. 190 ff.

Budwig, Nancy

1989. The linguistic marking of agentivity and control in child language. Journal of Child Language 16:2 ► pp. 263 ff.

Budwig, Nancy & Michael Bamberg

1996. Language and its role in understanding intentional relations: Research tool or mechanism of development?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 125 ff.

Budwig, Nancy & Angela Wiley

1995. What language reveals about children's categories of personhood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1995:69 ► pp. 21 ff.

Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang & Richard K. Larson

2015. Psych verbs in English and Mandarin. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33:1 ► pp. 127 ff.

Church, Jennifer

1996. An ambiguity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 126 ff.

Clark, Eve V. & Kathie L. Carpenter

1989. On children's uses of from, by and with in oblique noun phrases. Journal of Child Language 16:2 ► pp. 349 ff.

Cornelis, Louise H.

1995. The Passive Voice in Computer Manuals: A New Perspective. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 25:3 ► pp. 285 ff.

Cornillie, Bert

2005.  In Reviewing Linguistic Thought,

Croft, William

1993.  In Semantics and the Lexicon [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 49], ► pp. 55 ff.

Csibra, Gergely & György Gergely

1996. On the dangers of oversimulation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 127 ff.

Davidse, Kristin & Liesbet Heyvaert

2007. On the middle voice: an interpersonal analysis of the English middle. Linguistics 45:1

Deal, Amy Rose

2009. The Origin and Content of Expletives: Evidence from “Selection”. Syntax 12:4 ► pp. 285 ff.

Delbecque, Nicole

2014.  In Non-Nuclear Cases, ► pp. 217 ff.

Dwyer, Susan

1996. Moral competence is cognitive but (perhaps) nonmodular. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 128 ff.

Facundes, Sidney da Silva

2012. Morfemas “flutuantes” em Apurinã e a Tipologia dos Clíticos. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 2:1 ► pp. 63 ff.

Fauconnier, Stefanie

2011. Differential Agent Marking and animacy. Lingua 121:3 ► pp. 533 ff.

Fauconnier, Stefanie & Jean-Christophe Verstraete

2010. Distinguishing Animacy Effects for Agents: A Case Study of Australian Languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 183 ff.

Gallup, Gordon G.

1996. Rhesus monkeys are radical behaviorists. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 129 ff.

Ge-Soon Moon

2014. Toward a Ditransitive Prototype: The Gradience of English Ditransitives. English Language and Linguistics 20:3 ► pp. 115 ff.

Gerhardt, Julie

1988. From discourse to semantics: the development of verb morphology and forms of self-reference in the speech of a two-year-old. Journal of Child Language 15:2 ► pp. 337 ff.

Girard-Gillet, Geneviève

2016.  In Atypical predicate-argument relations [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa, 33], ► pp. 181 ff.

Gomez, Juan Carlos

1996. Second person intentional relations and the evolution of social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 129 ff.

Gordon, Robert M.

1996. First person representations need a methodology based on simulation or theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 130 ff.

Grône, Maryse

2012. L’influence de la volition sur la distribution des verbes à alternance causative dans les résultatives de l’anglais. Anglophonia :16 (32) ► pp. 99 ff.

Guerrero Medina, Pilar

2014.  In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 247], ► pp. 133 ff.

HARTSHORNE, JOSHUA K., AMANDA POGUE & JESSE SNEDEKER

2015. Loveis hard to understand: the relationship between transitivity and caused events in the acquisition of emotion verbs. Journal of Child Language 42:3 ► pp. 467 ff.

Heyes, C. M.

1996. Imagination and imitation: Input, acid test, or alchemy?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 131 ff.

Hobson, R. Peter

1996. Understanding minds and selves. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 132 ff.

Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau

2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 1 ff.

Hovav, Malka Rappaport

2014. Lexical content and context: The causative alternation in English revisited. Lingua 141 ► pp. 8 ff.

Huyghe, Richard & Marine Wauquier

2020. What’s in an agent?. Morphology 30:3 ► pp. 185 ff.

Ihara, Hiroko & Ikuyo Fujita

2003. On the production of irrelevant arguments in agrammatism. Brain and Language 84:2 ► pp. 273 ff.

Ilie, Cornelia

1998. The Ideological Remapping of Semantic Roles in Totalitarian Discourse, or, How to Paint White Roses Red. Discourse & Society 9:1 ► pp. 57 ff.

Ji, Jie & Maocheng Liang

2018. An animacy hierarchy within inanimate nouns: English corpus evidence from a prototypical perspective. Lingua 205 ► pp. 71 ff.

Jungmi Lee

2009. Transitivity of ‘give’ in English. The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 51:1 ► pp. 303 ff.

Kallulli, Dalina

2007. Rethinking the Passive/Anticausative Distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 38:4 ► pp. 770 ff.

KANERO, JUNKO, KATHY HIRSH-PASEK & ROBERTA MICHNICK GOLINKOFF

2016. Can a microwave heat up coffee? How English- and Japanese-speaking children choose subjects in lexical causative sentences. Journal of Child Language 43:5 ► pp. 993 ff.

Karasawa, Minoru & Anne Maass

2008.  In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition Across Cultures, ► pp. 315 ff.

Kittilä, Seppo

2005. Remarks on involuntary agent constructions. <i>WORD</i> 56:3 ► pp. 381 ff.

Kittilä, Seppo

2006. The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity. Linguistics 44:3

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew

2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27:1 ► pp. 77 ff.

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew

2010. The lexical semantics of derived statives. Linguistics and Philosophy 33:4 ► pp. 285 ff.

Labelle, Marie

1992. Change of state and valency. Journal of Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 375 ff.

Laks, Lior

2015. Variation and change in instrument noun formation in Hebrew and its relation to the verbal system. Word Structure 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Lavid, Julia

2000. Review of Lemmens (1998): Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity. Causative constructions in English. Functions of Language 7:1 ► pp. 155 ff.

Levin, Beth

2015. Semantics and Pragmatics of Argument Alternations. Annual Review of Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 63 ff.

Levin, Beth

2020.  In Perspectives on Causation [Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science, ], ► pp. 185 ff.

Levin, Beth

2022.  In A Reader's Guide to Classic Papers in Formal Semantics [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 100], ► pp. 103 ff.

Li, Chao

2018. Argument realization of psychological verbs. Studies in Language 42:4 ► pp. 755 ff.

Lieber, Rochelle

2001.  In Morphology and Lexical Semantics,

Maienborn, Claudia & Johanna Herdtfelder

2017. Eventive versus stative causation: the case of German causal von-modifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 40:3 ► pp. 279 ff.

Marie Laurence, Knittel, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost

2018. Retour vers le Médiopassif. SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 12009 ff.

Mitchell, Robert W.

1996. Self-knowledge, knowledge of other minds, and kinesthetic-visual matching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 133 ff.

Mora-Bustos, Armando , Alejandra I. Ortiz Villegas & H. Antonio García Zúñiga

2022. El gerundio predicativo en español. Folios :56

Morton, Adam

1996. But what is the intentional schema?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 133 ff.

Mulder, Monique N.

1996. Perception of Anthropomorphistic Expressions in Software Manuals. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 26:4 ► pp. 489 ff.

Nelson, Katherine

1996. Four-year-old humans are different: Why?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 134 ff.

Nuger, Justin

2016.  In Building Predicates [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 92], ► pp. 225 ff.

Olson, David R. & Bruce Homer

1996. Understanding that looking causes knowing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 135 ff.

Oosterwegel, Annerieke

1996. Social relations and understanding the intentional self. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 136 ff.

PAYNE, DORIS L., LEONARD OLE-KOTIKASH & A. KESWE MAPENA OLE-LEKUTIT

2001. A Frame Semantics approach to lexemic structure: Uncovering the truth about Maa a-síp. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 22:2

PISHWA, HANNA

1999. THE CASE OF THE “IMPERSONAL” CONSTRUCTION IN OLD ENGLISH. Folia Linguistica Historica 33:Historica vol. 20,1-2

Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea & Barbara De Cock

2022. Taboo effects at the syntactic level. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 113 ff.

Povinelli, Daniel J., Mia C. Zebouni & Christopher G. Prince

1996. Ontogeny, evolution, and folk psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 137 ff.

Premack, David & Ann James Premack

1996. Intentional schema will not do the work of a theory of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 138 ff.

Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin

2015.  In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, ► pp. 593 ff.

Rawoens, Gudrun

2011. Causality and causation: A functional approach to causative constructions in Modern Swedish. Folia Linguistica 45:1

Reddy, Vasudevi

1996. Omitting the second person in social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 140 ff.

Romain, Laurence

2022. Putting the argument back into argument structure constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 35 ff.

Schlesinger, I. M.

1989. Instruments as agents: on the nature of semantic relations. Journal of Linguistics 25:1 ► pp. 189 ff.

Schlesinger, I.M

1992. The experiencer as an agent. Journal of Memory and Language 31:3 ► pp. 315 ff.

Schäfer, Florian

2012. Two Types of External Argument Licensing - The Case of Causers*. Studia Linguistica 66:2 ► pp. 128 ff.

Slater, Carol

1996. Are blind babies delayed in achieving social understanding?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 141 ff.

Stukker, Ninke & Ted Sanders

2009. Another(’s) perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives: a usage-based analysis of volitional causal relations. Discours :4

Tham, Shiao Wei

2018.  In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11173], ► pp. 61 ff.

Turley, Jeffrey S.

1998. A prototype analysis of Spanish indeterminate reflexive constructions. Language Sciences 20:2 ► pp. 137 ff.

van Voorst, Jan

1996. Some systematic differences between the dutch, French and English transitive construction. Language Sciences 18:1-2 ► pp. 227 ff.

Västi, Katja & Seppo Kittilä

2014. Semantic roles and verbless constructions. Studies in Language 38:3 ► pp. 512 ff.

Västi, Katja & Seppo Kittilä

2016.  In Advances in Research on Semantic Roles [Benjamins Current Topics, 88], ► pp. 79 ff.

Wolff, Phillip

2003. Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events. Cognition 88:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Wolff, Phillip, Ga-Hyun Jeon & Yu Li

2009. Causers in English, Korean, and Chinese and the individuation of events. Language and Cognition 1:2 ► pp. 167 ff.

YOSHIMURA, KIMIHIRO

2001. The Interplay between Transitivity and Ergativity: A Critical Insight from the ^|^ldquo;Middle^|^rdquo; (M. Lemmens, Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity: Causative Constructions in English). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 18:1 ► pp. 167 ff.

Ze'ev, Aaron Ben & Keith Oatley

1996. Development of social emotions and constructive agents. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 124 ff.

고태진

2015. ‘Volitionality’ and Ergative Case Marking in Hindi: Focusing on the Implicational Universals of Greenberg. Journal of Indian Studies 20:2 ► pp. 59 ff.

김경열

2017. A Study on Subject Selection and Transitivity in English. Studies in Linguistics null:45 ► pp. 177 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.