1994. THE EXPANDING DISCOURSE OF PROMISES IN PRESENT-DAY ENGLISH: A CASE STUDY IN HISTORICAL PRAGMATICS. Folia Linguistica Historica 28:Historica vol. 15,1-2
Belyaeva-Standen, Yelena
2003. The functional–pragmatic field of possibility in Russian: meaning and structure. Language Sciences 25:3 ► pp. 239 ff.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Graeme Trousdale
2012. Cycles and continua: On unidirectionality and gradualness in language change. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ► pp. 691 ff.
Budts, Sara
2022. A connectionist approach to analogy. On the modal meaning of periphrastic do in Early Modern English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2 ► pp. 337 ff.
Castillo, Concha
2022. The Status of English Modals Prior to Their Recategorization as T and the Trigger for Their Recategorization. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :31/2 ► pp. 49 ff.
de Haan, Ferdinand
2012. The Relevance of Constructions for the Interpretation of Modal Meaning: The Case ofMust. English Studies 93:6 ► pp. 700 ff.
De Smet, Hendrik
2009. Analysing reanalysis. Lingua 119:11 ► pp. 1728 ff.
Dell’Oro, Francesca
2023. The Digital Tool Pygmalion and its Interactive Maps: Visualising Modal Verbs in the Classroom. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité - Cahiers de l APLIUT :Vol. 42 N°1
Denison, David
1999. SYNTAX. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 92 ff.
Dollinger, Stefan
2006. The Modal Auxiliarieshave toandmustin theCorpus of Early Ontario English: Gradient Change and Colonial Lag. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 51:2-3 ► pp. 287 ff.
E. Schulz, Monika
2015. Causer, recipient and possessor: the grammatical subject of get and the context-sensitivity of PHAVE. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes :43 ► pp. 77 ff.
Eide, Kristin Melum
2020. Modality in Germanic. In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics, ► pp. 567 ff.
2021. Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification in an Iranian modal verb: A paradox resolved by Dutch. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:4 ► pp. 389 ff.
Roger Lass
2000. The Cambridge History of the English Language,
Minkova, Donka & Robert P. Stockwell
1994. Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language: Vol. II, 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Pp. xxi + 703.. Journal of Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 528 ff.
NAGLE, STEPHEN J.
1989. QUASI-MODALS, MARGINAL MODALS, AND THE DIACHRONY OF THE ENGLISH MODAL AUXILIARIES. Folia Linguistica Historica 22:Historica vol. 9,2
Narrog, Heiko
2010. Voice and non-canonical case marking in the expression of event-oriented modality. Linguistic Typology 14:1
2013. De-auxiliarization without de-modalization in the Dutch core modals: a case of collective degrammaticalization?. Language Sciences 36 ► pp. 124 ff.
Petré, Peter & Hubert Cuyckens
2009. Constructional change in Old and Middle English Copular Constructions and its impact on the lexicon. Folia Linguistica Historica 43:Historica vol. 30
2000. SYNTAX. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 187 ff.
ROBERTS, IAN
1992. A FORMAL ACCOUNT OF GRAMMATICALISATION IN THE HISTORY OF ROMANCE FUTURES. Folia Linguistica Historica 26:Historica vol. 13,1-2
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003. Syntactic Change,
Salkie, Raphael
1988. F. R. Palmer, Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. Pp. xii + 243.. Journal of Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 240 ff.
Seuren, Pieter A. M.
1996. What a universal semantic interlingua can and cannot do. In Perspectives of System Informatics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1181], ► pp. 101 ff.
Stenbrenden, Gjertrud Flermoen
2016. Why English is not dead: A rejoinder to Emonds and Faarlund. Folia Linguistica 37:1 ► pp. 239 ff.
TANAKA, TOMOYUKI
1996. SYNCHRONIC AND DIACHRONIC ASPECTS OF ENGLISH AUXILIARIES. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 13:0 ► pp. 338 ff.
Toyota, Junichi
2009. Fossilisation of Passive in English: Analysis of Passive Verbs. English Studies 90:4 ► pp. 476 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1997. Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: The case of promise and threaten. In Modality in Germanic Languages, ► pp. 185 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001. Regularity in Semantic Change,
Van de Velde, Freek
2018. Iterated Exaptation. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 519 ff.
VAN KEMENADE, ANS
1992. THE HISTORY OF ENGLISH MODALS; A REANALYSIS. Folia Linguistica Historica 26:Historica vol. 13,1-2
Van Linden, An
2010. From premodal to modal meaning: Adjectival pathways in English. Cognitive Linguistics 21:3
VAN LINDEN, AN
2010. The rise of theto-infinitive: evidence from adjectival complementation. English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
2013. Invariantist ‘might’ and modal meaning change. Linguistics and Philosophy 36:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Ziegeler, D.P.
2006. Mood and Modality in Grammar. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 259 ff.
Ziegeler, Debra
2006. Omnitemporal will. Language Sciences 28:1 ► pp. 76 ff.
Ziegeler, Debra
2022. Werner Abraham: Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics. Glottotheory 13:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
[no author supplied]
1992. References. In Linguistic Representation, ► pp. 227 ff.
[no author supplied]
2000. References. In Emerging English Modals, ► pp. 299 ff.
[no author supplied]
2001. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, ► pp. 768 ff.
[no author supplied]
2013. Modal verbs. In Varieties of English, ► pp. 155 ff.
[no author supplied]
2017. Laudationes. Linguistic Typology 21:2017
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.