Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology

• Preface
• A. Introduction
• I. Introduction | p. 3
• 1. What is naturalness?
• 2. Inflection and word formation
• 3. Towards a theory of morphological naturalness
• 4. The structure of a theory of naturalness
• 5. Evidence for naturalness
• 6. The semiotic framework of natural morphology
• 7. Divergences and convergences among proponents of natural approaches to morphology
• Notes
• B. Naturalness in Inflection
• I. System-independent morphological naturalness
  Willi Mayerthaler | p. 25
• 0. Introduction
• 1. Universal grammar and markedness
• 2. Preference theories
• 3. Some other prerequisites of theoretical morphology
• 4. Principles of morphological markedness theory
• 5. What is a ‘theory’?
• 6. Appendix on attractors in catastrophe theory
• Notes
• II. System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection
  Wolfgang Ullrich Wurzel | p. 59
• 0. Naturalness, morphology and language system
• 1. System-dependent naturalness I: System-congruity
• 2. System-dependent naturalness II: Stability of inflectional classes
• 3. System-congruity and class-stability: Productivity in inflectional morphology
• 4. Naturalness principles of inflectional morphology
• Notes
• C. Naturalness in Word Formation
• I. Word formation as part of natural morphology
  Wolfgang U. Dressler | p. 99
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Iconicity in word formation
• 3. Indexicality in word formation
• 4. The scale of (bi)uniqueness in word formation
• 5. Signans shapes adequate for motivation in word formation
• 6. Typological adequacy of word formation rules
• 7. System adequacy (congruity) of word formation rules
• 8. Inflection vs. derivation again
• Notes
• II. Productivity and diachronic change in morphology
  Oswald Panagl | p. 127
• 0. Introduction
• 1. Interpretations of productivity
• 2. Vedic root-nouns and Ancient Greek diminutives
• 3. Semantic predictability (transparency)
• 4. Transition from word formation into inflection
• 5. Hierarchy of productivity in types of word formation
• 6. Conclusion on productivity in corpus languages: The Latine Supine in -(t)um — a Case Study of Categorial Change
• 7. From derivational to inflectional morphology
• 8. Reasons for loss of productivity
• 9. Indo-European cognates
• Notes
• Abbreviations | p. 153
• Subject index | p. 165

Cited by 81 other publications

No author info given

2017.  In The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics: A Handbook for Language Teaching, ► pp. 744 ff.

No author info given

2017.  In The Handbook of Morphology, ► pp. 737 ff.

No author info given

2019.  In Agreement in Language Contact [Studies in Language Companion Series, 208],

Abraham, Werner

2017. Paradigmatics precedes syntagmatics in language evolution?Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy,The evolution of morphology. Word Structure 10:1 ► pp. 100 ff.

Alfieri, Luca

2021.  In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 313 ff.

ANDERWALD, LIESELOTTE

2011. Are non-standard dialects more ‘natural’ than the standard? A test case from English verb morphology. Journal of Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 251 ff.

Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins

2018. Beware Occam’s Syntactic Razor: Morphotactic Analysis and Spanish Mesoclisis. Linguistic Inquiry 49:4 ► pp. 625 ff.

Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett

2005.  In The Syntax-Morphology Interface,

Beard, Robert

1990. The nature and origins of derivational polysemy. Lingua 81:2-3 ► pp. 101 ff.

Berg, Thomas

1998. The (in)compatibility of morpheme orders and lexical categories and its historical implications. English Language and Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 245 ff.

BERG, THOMAS

2011. A diachronic frequency account of the allomorphy of some grammatical markers. Journal of Linguistics 47:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

Boyé, Gilles & Gauvain Schalchli

2016.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, ► pp. 206 ff.

Bubenik, Vit

1992. Review of Shapiro (1991): The Sense of Change: Language as history. Diachronica 9:2 ► pp. 317 ff.

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew

2005.  In Yearbook of Morphology 2005 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 253 ff.

Cetnarowska, Bożena

2017. Where is conversion in Slavonic languages?Stela Manova,Understanding morphological rules. With special emphasis on conversion and subtraction in Bulgarian, Russian and Serbo-Croatian. Word Structure 10:1 ► pp. 121 ff.

Da Tos, Martina

2019.  In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 41 ff.

Dabašinskienė, Ineta & Violeta Kalėdaitė

2012. Child Language Acquisition Research in the Baltic Area. Journal of Baltic Studies 43:2 ► pp. 151 ff.

Dammel, Antje & Sebastian Kürschner

2018.  In The Diachrony of Classification Systems [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 342], ► pp. 283 ff.

Dammel, Antje & Damaris Nübling

2006. The Superstable Marker as an Indicator of Categorial Weakness?. Folia Linguistica 40:1part2 ► pp. 97 ff.

De Smet, Isabeau & Freek Van de Velde

2020. Semantic differences between strong and weak verb forms in Dutch. Cognitive Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 393 ff.

Dressler, Wolfgang

2009. Natural Phonology as Part of Natural Linguistics. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45:1

Dressler, Wolfgang U

2006. Introduction: Natural Morphology. Folia Linguistica 40:1part2 ► pp. 1 ff.

Dressler, Wolfgang U.

1984. Explaining Natural Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1 ► pp. 29 ff.

Dressler, Wolfgang U.

2005.  In Handbook of Word-Formation [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 64], ► pp. 267 ff.

Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Annemarie Karpf

1995.  In Yearbook of Morphology 1994 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 99 ff.

Dressler, Wolfgang U., F. Nihan Ketrez, Marianne Kilani-Schoch & Ursula Stephany

2017.  In Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 61], ► pp. 1 ff.

Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Marianne Kilani-Schoch

2016.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, ► pp. 356 ff.

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Veronika Mattes & Laila Kjærbæk

2021.  In The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 66], ► pp. 2 ff.

Elsen, Hilke

2001. Formen, Konzepte und Faktoren der Sprachveränderung [Language Change: Forms, Concepts, and Determinants]. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Fehringer, Carol

2003.  In Yearbook of Morphology 2003 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 249 ff.

Fonteyn, Lauren & Charlotte Maekelberghe

2018. Competing motivations in the diachronic nominalization of English gerunds. Diachronica 35:4 ► pp. 487 ff.

Gaeta, Livio

2006. How to Live Naturally and not be Bothered by Economy. Folia Linguistica 40:1part2 ► pp. 7 ff.

Giraudo, Hélène & Serena Dal Maso

2016. The Salience of Complex Words and Their Parts: Which Comes First?. Frontiers in Psychology 7

Haspelmath, Martin

1995.  In Yearbook of Morphology 1994 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 1 ff.

Hentschel, Gerd

1991. РОЛЬ СХЕМ ФОРМАЛЬНОЙ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЦИИ В ИСТОРИЧЕСКОМ РАЗВИТИИ ФЛЕКТИВНОЙ СИСТЕМЫ РУССКОГО СУЩЕСТВИТЕЛЬНОГО. Russian Linguistics 15:1

Herce, Borja

2019. Deconstructing (ir)regularity. Studies in Language 43:1 ► pp. 44 ff.

Hippisley, Andrew & Gregory Stump

2016.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff.

Joseph, Brian D.

2020.  In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ► pp. 63 ff.

Juul Nielsen, Peter

2017. Elisa Mattiello, Extra-grammatical morphology in English (= Topics in English Linguistics 82). Word Structure 10:2 ► pp. 256 ff.

Karlsson, Fred

2014. Complexity in linguistic theorizing. The Mental Lexicon 9:2 ► pp. 144 ff.

Kemps, Rachèl J. J. K., Mirjam Ernestus, Robert Schreuder & R. Harald Baayen

2005. Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition 33:3 ► pp. 430 ff.

Konieczna, Ewa

2011. Inflectional diagrammaticity in Polish: A case study of Polish children. Word Structure 4:1 ► pp. 20 ff.

Kopecky, Carmen Teržan

2007. Natürlicher syntaktischer Wandel. Epistemizität als Drehscheibe der kategorialen Innovation. Oder:in S. wird es (wohl) gerade schneien. Folia Linguistica 27:1-2 ► pp. 117 ff.

Koutsoukos, Nikos, Kristel Van Goethem & Hendrik De Smet

2018. Asymmetries, mismatches and construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 10:2 ► pp. 123 ff.

Krivickaitė-Leišienė, Eglė

2020. Impact of Dialect on the Acquisition of Sounds and their Clusters: the Results of a Non-word Repetition Test. Taikomoji kalbotyra :14 ► pp. 133 ff.

Laks, Lior

2013. Why and how do Hebrew verbs change their form? A morpho-thematic account. Morphology 23:3 ► pp. 351 ff.

Ralph Ludwig, Steve Pagel & Peter Mühlhäusler

2018.  In Linguistic Ecology and Language Contact,

Lustigman, Lyle

2013. Developing structural specification: Productivity in early Hebrew verb usage. First Language 33:1 ► pp. 47 ff.

Lustigman, Lyle

2016.  In Acquisition and Development of Hebrew [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 19], ► pp. 225 ff.

Manova, Stela

2010. Suffix combinations in Bulgarian: parsability and hierarchy-based ordering. Morphology 20:1 ► pp. 267 ff.

Manova, Stela, Harald Hammarström, Itamar Kastner & Yining Nie

2020. What is in a morpheme? Theoretical, experimental and computational approaches to the relation of meaning and form in morphology. Word Structure 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Martohardjono, Gita

1988. MORPHOPHONOLOGY: THE DYNAMICS OF DERIVATION. Wolfgang U. Dressler. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma, 1985. Pp. ix + 439. $35.00.. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10:1 ► pp. 110 ff.

Mattiello, Elisa & Wolfgang U. Dressler

2018. The Morphosemantic Transparency/Opacity of Novel English Analogical Compounds and Compound Families. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 53:1 ► pp. 67 ff.

Meiser, Gerhard

1992. SYNCRETISM IN INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES-MOTIVES, PROCESS AND RESULTS. Transactions of the Philological Society 90:2 ► pp. 187 ff.

Meletis, Dimitrios

2018. What is natural in writing?. Written Language & Literacy 21:1 ► pp. 52 ff.

Miret, Fernando Sánchez

2006. Productivity of the Weak Verbs in Romanian. Folia Linguistica 40:1part2 ► pp. 29 ff.

Mithun, Marianne

2016.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, ► pp. 149 ff.

Nevins, Andrew

2015.  In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 8], ► pp. 175 ff.

Nevins, Andrew, Cilene Rodrigues & Kevin Tang

2015. The rise and fall of the L-shaped morphome: diachronic and experimental studies. Probus 27:1

Orzechowska, Paula

2019.  In Complexity in Polish Phonotactics [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ], ► pp. 1 ff.

Orzechowska, Paula

2019.  In Complexity in Polish Phonotactics [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ], ► pp. 59 ff.

Peperkamp, Sharon

1995.  In Yearbook of Morphology 1994 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 207 ff.

PERKO, Gregor

2010. Le métalinguistique et le périphérique en morphologie constructionnelle. Écho des études romanes 6:1-2 ► pp. 171 ff.

Pozza, Marianna

2021. Vista conoscenza, parola: lo “Schema del contenitore” applicato a un caso di polisemia indoeuropea. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia 66:3 ► pp. 235 ff.

Połczyńska, Monika

2009. Dysarthric Processes in First and Second Language Used by Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 12:2 ► pp. 137 ff.

Rainer, Franz, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky

2014.  In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327], ► pp. 3 ff.

Ramat, Anna Giacalone

1992. Grammaticalization Processes in the Area of Temporal and Modal Relations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14:3 ► pp. 297 ff.

Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke

2001.  In Yearbook of Morphology 1999 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 97 ff.

Saturno, Jacopo

2016.  In Le lingue slave tra struttura e uso [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 31], ► pp. 279 ff.

Saturno, Jacopo

2020. Word formation in the earliest stages of L2 Polish. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11:2 ► pp. 232 ff.

Soares Rodrigues, Alexandra

2022. Phonotactic conditions and morphotactic transparency in Mirandese word formation. Folia Linguistica 56:1 ► pp. 87 ff.

Soares Rodrigues, Alexandra

2022. Phonotactic conditions and morphotactic transparency in Mirandese word formation. Folia Linguistica 56:1 ► pp. 87 ff.

Stark, Heinz Karl & Jacqueline A. Stark

1990.  In Morphology, Phonology, and Aphasia [Springer Series in Neuropsychology, ], ► pp. 213 ff.

Stolz, Thomas

2007. Word-internal agreement. Language Typology and Universals 60:3 ► pp. 219 ff.

Stolz, Thomas & Nataliya Levkovych

2019. Absence of material exponence . STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:3 ► pp. 373 ff.

Tobin, Yishai

1997. Developmental and clinical phonology: Roman Jakobson and beyond. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 29:1 ► pp. 179 ff.

Tobin, Yishai

2009. Comparing and Contrasting Natural Phonology, Optimality Theory and the Theory of Phonology as Human Behavior. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45:1

Walker, Douglas C.

1995. Patterns of analogy in the Canadian French verb system. Journal of French Language Studies 5:1 ► pp. 85 ff.

Wheeler, Max W.

1993. On the hierarchy of naturalness principles in inflectional morphology. Journal of Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 95 ff.

ZARETSKY, EUGEN, BENJAMIN P. LANGE, HARALD A. EULER & KATRIN NEUMANN

2016. Factors considered and ignored in plural acquisition: Frequency rules?. Language and Cognition 8:2 ► pp. 283 ff.

Zimmer, Christian

2018.  In Germanic Genitives [Studies in Language Companion Series, 193], ► pp. 65 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.