Article published in:
Discourse and Grammar in Australian LanguagesEdited by Ilana Mushin and Brett Baker
[Studies in Language Companion Series 104] 2008
► pp. 111–134
Pragmatically case-marked: Non-syntactic functions of the Kuuk Thaayorre ergative suffix
Alice Gaby | University of California, Berkeley
In Kuuk Thaayorre, ergative marking is of both syntactic and pragmatic import. Syntactically, ergative inflection marks a noun phrase as the subject of a transitive clause. Though this may be considered definitional of an ergative morpheme, Kuuk Thaayorre joins a growing number of languages in which ergative marking is documented to be “optional”; not obligatorily present in all transitive clauses. Conversely – and more unusually – the subject of a Kuuk Thaayorre intransitive clause may in some cases be ergative-marked. This chapter proposes that as well as signifying the ergative case relation, the ergative morpheme’s presence in an intransitive clause signals that the subject referent is “unexpected”, and its absence from a transitive clause signals that the subject referent is “expected”.
Published online: 16 October 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.104.08gab
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.104.08gab
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Berio, Leda, Anja Latrouite, Robert Van Valin & Gottfried Vosgerau
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
Fauconnier, Stefanie & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.