In Kuuk Thaayorre, ergative marking is of both syntactic and pragmatic import. Syntactically, ergative inflection marks a noun phrase as the subject of a transitive clause. Though this may be considered definitional of an ergative morpheme, Kuuk Thaayorre joins a growing number of languages in which ergative marking is documented to be “optional”; not obligatorily present in all transitive clauses. Conversely – and more unusually – the subject of a Kuuk Thaayorre intransitive clause may in some cases be ergative-marked. This chapter proposes that as well as signifying the ergative case relation, the ergative morpheme’s presence in an intransitive clause signals that the subject referent is “unexpected”, and its absence from a transitive clause signals that the subject referent is “expected”.
2019. Optional and alternating case marking: Typology and diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:3
Berio, Leda, Anja Latrouite, Robert Van Valin & Gottfried Vosgerau
2017. Immediate and General Common Ground. In Modeling and Using Context [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10257], ► pp. 633 ff.
Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis
2017. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity,
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
2010. What to Expect in Morphosyntactic Typology and Terminology. In Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork, ► pp. 279 ff.
Fauconnier, Stefanie & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2010. Distinguishing Animacy Effects for Agents: A Case Study of Australian Languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Gaby, Alice
2005. Some Participants are More Equal than Others. In Competition and Variation in Natural Languages, ► pp. 9 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.