Part of
Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics InterfaceEdited by Robert D. Van Valin Jr.
[Studies in Language Companion Series 105] 2008
► pp. 413–434
Edited by Robert D. Van Valin Jr.
[Studies in Language Companion Series 105] 2008
► pp. 413–434
Unmarked transitivity
A processing constraint on linking
Recent experimental evidence suggests that a prototypical concept of transitive events (“unmarked transitivity”), which has proven a useful descriptive notion in language typological research, also plays a crucial role during real time language comprehension. In this chapter, we review neurocognitive evidence for unmarked transitivity from both a neuroanatomical (spatial) and neurophysiological (temporal) perspective. We further show how unmarked transitivity, which we characterise as the default realisation of a more general requirement for argument distinctness, can be integrated into a comprehensive model of cross-linguistic language comprehension. Finally, we discuss possible consequences of the comprehension findings for theoretical characterisations of language architecture, with a particular focus on Role and Reference Grammar.
Cited by
Cited by 36 other publications
Ariel, Mira
2014. Orconstructions: Monosemy vs. polysemy. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 333 ff. 
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2009. Minimality as vacuous distinctness: Evidence from cross-linguistic sentence comprehension. Lingua 119:10 ► pp. 1541 ff.
Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2009. The Role of Prominence Information in the Real‐Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross‐Linguistic Approach. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2014. Competition in argument interpretation: Evidence from the neurobiology of language. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 107 ff.
Cristofaro, Sonia
2014. Competing motivation models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 282 ff.
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gary Libben & Katharina Korecky‐Kröll
2014. Conflicting vs. convergent vs. interdependent motivations in morphology. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 180 ff.
Dröge, Alexander, Laura Maffongelli & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2014. Luigi piace a Laura?. In Structuring the Argument [Language Faculty and Beyond, 10], ► pp. 83 ff.
Du Bois, John W.
2014. Motivating competitions. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 262 ff.
Francis, Elaine J. & Laura A. Michaelis
2014. Why move? How weight and discourse factors combine to predict relative clause extraposition in English. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 70 ff.
Haiman, John
2014. Six competing motives for repetition. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 246 ff.
Hamelin, Lise & Dominique Legallois
2022. Accounting for the Semantics of the NP V NP Construction in English. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :31/2 ► pp. 5 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2014. On system pressure competing with economic motivation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 197 ff.
Hawkins, John A.
2014. Patterns in competing motivations and the interaction of principles. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 54 ff.
Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog
2009. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis,
Helmbrecht, Johannes
2014. Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns: A case study on competing motivations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 315 ff.
Hughes, Mary E. & Shanley E. M. Allen
2014. Competing motivations in children's omission of subjects? The interaction between verb finiteness and referent accessibility. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 144 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Bernd Heine
2014. Sentence grammar vs. thetical grammar: Two competing domains?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 348 ff.
Krajewski, Grzegorz & Elena Lieven
2014. Competing cues in early syntactic development. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 163 ff.
Lamers, Monique J. A. & Helen de Hoop
2014. Animate object fronting in Dutch: A production study. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 42 ff.
MacWhinney, Brian
2014. Conclusions: Competition across time. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 364 ff.
Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik
2014. Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
Malchukov, Andrej
2014. Resolving alignment conflicts: A competing motivations approach. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 16 ff.
Mondorf, Britta
2014. Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 209 ff.
Moravcsik, Edith
2014. Introduction. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 1 ff.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014. Where do motivations compete?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 299 ff.
Pfeiffer, Martin
2014. Formal vs. functional motivations for the structure of self‐repair in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 229 ff.
Roehm, Dietmar, Antonella Sorace & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2013. Processing flexible form-to-meaning mappings: Evidence for enriched composition as opposed to indeterminacy. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:8 ► pp. 1244 ff.
Rowland, Caroline F., Claire Noble & Angel Chan
2014. Competition all the way down: How children learn word order cues to sentence meaning. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 127 ff.
Strunk, Jan
2014. A statistical model of competing motivations affecting relative clause extraposition in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 88 ff.
Wang, Luming, Matthias Schlesewsky, Markus Philipp & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2012. The Role of Animacy in Online Argument Interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. In Case, Word Order and Prominence [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 40], ► pp. 91 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. List of abbreviations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. xviii ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Preface. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. vii ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. List of figures and tables. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. xiv ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Notes on contributors. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. viii ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Copyright Page. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. iv ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.