Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose

Olga Spevak

| University of Toulouse

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027205841 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027288516 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00

Latin is a language with variable (so-called 'free') word order. Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose (Caesar, Cicero, and Sallust) presents the first systematic description of its constituent order from a pragmatic point of view. Apart from general characteristics of Latin constituent order, it discusses the ordering of the verb and its arguments in declarative, interrogative, and imperative sentences, as well as the ordering within noun phrases. It shows that the relationship of a constituent with its surrounding context and the communicative intention of the writer are the most reliable predictors of the order of constituents in a sentence or noun phrase. It differs from recent studies of Latin word order in its scope, its theoretical approach, and its attention to contextual information. The book is intended both for Latinists and for linguists working in the fields of the Romance languages and language typology.

[Studies in Language Companion Series, 117] 2010. xv, 318 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.117

Table of Contents

Preface | pp. xiii–xiv

Abbreviations | pp. xv–xvi

Introduction | pp. 1–12

Placement constraints and liberties in Latin constituent order | pp. 13–26

Pragmatic functions | pp. 27–114

Declarative sentences | pp. 115–194

Interrogative sentences | pp. 195–204

Imperative sentences | pp. 205–222

Noun phrases | pp. 223–282

Conclusion | pp. 283–286

Index locorum | pp. 299–302

Index rerum | pp. 303–304

Three commented texts | pp. 305–318

“Dr. Spevak has written a readable and well-structured book on a challenging subject. ”

Joseph Reisdoerfer, University of Luxemburg, on Linguist List 22.2867, 2011

“This book is a substantial and valuable contribution to the growing body of research on Latin word order, and all who work on the topic will need to take account of its findings. It has a firm empirical basis, using the works of Cicero, Caesar and Sallust as its primary corpus of material, but resorting to a subset of this for the investigation of certain grammatical features where analysis of a larger corpus might have been intractable. [...] Spevak has demonstrated the very considerable advances in understanding that can come from a functionalist analysis of Latin word order, and her work deserves serious attention. This reviewer, at least, will have cause to return to it frequently.”

J. G. F. Powell, Royal Holloway, University of London, in Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2011.06.30

“This book is an enjoyable read. It contains important information and insights, and there is a useful appendix containing pragmatic commentaries on three passages. Series students of Latin syntax must not neglect to consult this rich contribution to the field.”

James W. R. Brooks, University of Manchester, in Journal of Roman Studies 102: 400-401. (2012)

Cited by

Cited by 38 other publications

Adema, Suzanne

2019. Latin learning and instruction as a research field . Journal of Latin Linguistics 18:1-2 ► pp. 35 ff.

Agbayani, Brian & Chris Golston

2016. Phonological constituents and their movement in Latin. Phonology 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Bonilla Carvajal, Camilo Andrés

2020. The syntax of the Latin presentative adverb ecce: Relation to focus phrase. Journal of Latin Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 27 ff.

Cabrillana, Concepción

2017. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190], ► pp. 113 ff.

Chaudhuri, Pramit, Tathagata Dasgupta, Joseph P Dexter & Krithika Iyer

2019. A small set of stylometric features differentiates Latin prose and verse. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34:4 ► pp. 716 ff.

Ctibor, Michal

2017. Paragraphs in classical Latin texts : problems with editing and the internal evidence from texts. Graeco-Latina Brunensia :1 ► pp. 17 ff.

Danckaert, Lieven

2014. Quidemas a Marker of Emphatic Polarity. Transactions of the Philological Society 112:1 ► pp. 97 ff.

Danckaert, Lieven

2015. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169], ► pp. 233 ff.

Danckaert, Lieven

2015. Spelling out the obvious. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 109 ff.

de la Villa, Jesús

2017. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190], ► pp. 181 ff.

Dufter, Andreas & Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo

2014. In Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 214], ► pp. 1 ff.

Giusti, Giuliana & Rossella Iovino

2016. Latin as a split-DP language. Studia Linguistica 70:3 ► pp. 221 ff.

Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew, Marius Jøhndal & Per Erik Solberg

2019. An Unexpected Root Clause. Linguistic Inquiry 50:3 ► pp. 649 ff.

Hulstaert, Kristien

2019. Reading, seeing and understanding Latin . Journal of Latin Linguistics 18:1-2 ► pp. 61 ff.

Klævik-Pettersen, Espen

2019. What is Germanic and what is not about Old French V2. Linguistic Variation 19:1 ► pp. 141 ff.

Korkiakangas, Timo

2018. Spoken Latin behind written texts. Diachronica 35:3 ► pp. 429 ff.

Korkiakangas, Timo

2020. In Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 113], ► pp. 130 ff.

Kruijer, Mike & Ezra la Roi

2018. Paradigmatic Possibilities as Perspective for Absolute Constructions. Mnemosyne 71:5 ► pp. 799 ff.

Lafond, Muriel

2013. Une figure autoriale dans le commentaire grammatical ?. Études littéraires 43:2 ► pp. 13 ff.

Lapidge, Michael

2020. THE LATIN OF THE PASSIONES MARTYRVM OF LATE ANTIQUE ROME. The Cambridge Classical Journal 66 ► pp. 96 ff.

Ledgeway, Adam

2012. From Latin to Romance: Configurationality, Functional Categories and Head-Marking. Transactions of the Philological Society 110:3 ► pp. 422 ff.

Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway

2013. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages,

Mikulová, Jana

2021. Pragmatic uses of ‘I say’ in Latin. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:1 ► pp. 34 ff.

Modicom, Pierre-Yves & Olivier Duplâtre

2020. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 2 ff.

Pultrová, Lucie

2017. Remarks on Varro’s Word-Order. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2017:2 ► pp. 81 ff.

Ranta, Aarne, Krasimir Angelov, Normunds Gruzitis & Prasanth Kolachina

2020. Abstract Syntax as Interlingua: Scaling Up the Grammatical Framework from Controlled Languages to Robust Pipelines. Computational Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 425 ff.

Rosén, Hannah

2020. Composite predicates in the layers of Latin. Journal of Latin Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 231 ff.

Schrickx, Josine

2017. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190], ► pp. 235 ff.

Spevak, Olga

2013. La dislocation à droite en latin. Glotta 89:1-4 ► pp. 195 ff.

Spevak, Olga

2014. In Noun Valency [Studies in Language Companion Series, 158], ► pp. 183 ff.

Spevak, Olga & Camille Denizot

2017. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190], ► pp. 1 ff.

Torrego, María Esperanza

2017. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190], ► pp. 159 ff.

Tronci, Liana

2017. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190], ► pp. 213 ff.

Tărnăuceanu, Claudia

2021. Hyperbaton in Obsequens’s Prodigiorum liber. Diacronia :13

Tărnăuceanu, Claudia

2021. Hyperbaton în Prodigiorum liber al lui Obsequens. Diacronia :13

Wolfe, Sam

2015. The Old SardinianCondaghes: a syntactic study. Transactions of the Philological Society 113:2 ► pp. 177 ff.

Wolfe, Sam

2016. A comparative perspective on the evolution of Romance clausal structure. Diachronica 33:4 ► pp. 461 ff.

Zyman, Erik & Nick Kalivoda

2020. XP- and X<sup>0</sup>-movement in the Latin verb: Evidence from mirroring and anti-mirroring. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata