Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose

Olga Spevak | University of Toulouse
ISBN 9789027205841 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
ISBN 9789027288516 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
Google Play logo
Latin is a language with variable (so-called 'free') word order. Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose (Caesar, Cicero, and Sallust) presents the first systematic description of its constituent order from a pragmatic point of view. Apart from general characteristics of Latin constituent order, it discusses the ordering of the verb and its arguments in declarative, interrogative, and imperative sentences, as well as the ordering within noun phrases. It shows that the relationship of a constituent with its surrounding context and the communicative intention of the writer are the most reliable predictors of the order of constituents in a sentence or noun phrase. It differs from recent studies of Latin word order in its scope, its theoretical approach, and its attention to contextual information. The book is intended both for Latinists and for linguists working in the fields of the Romance languages and language typology.
[Studies in Language Companion Series, 117] 2010.  xv, 318 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“Dr. Spevak has written a readable and well-structured book on a challenging subject. ”
“This book is a substantial and valuable contribution to the growing body of research on Latin word order, and all who work on the topic will need to take account of its findings. It has a firm empirical basis, using the works of Cicero, Caesar and Sallust as its primary corpus of material, but resorting to a subset of this for the investigation of certain grammatical features where analysis of a larger corpus might have been intractable. [...] Spevak has demonstrated the very considerable advances in understanding that can come from a functionalist analysis of Latin word order, and her work deserves serious attention. This reviewer, at least, will have cause to return to it frequently.”
“This book is an enjoyable read. It contains important information and insights, and there is a useful appendix containing pragmatic commentaries on three passages. Series students of Latin syntax must not neglect to consult this rich contribution to the field.”
Cited by

Cited by 49 other publications

Adema, Suzanne
2019. Latin learning and instruction as a research field. Journal of Latin Linguistics 18:1-2  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Agbayani, Brian & Chris Golston
2016. Phonological constituents and their movement in Latin. Phonology 33:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bonilla Carvajal, Camilo Andrés
2020. The syntax of the Latin presentative adverb ecce: Relation to focus phrase. Journal of Latin Linguistics 19:1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Cabrillana, Concepción
2017. Chapter 6. Constituent order in directives with stative verbs in Latin. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190],  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Carlier, Anne & Bernard Combettes
2015. Typologie et catégorisation morphosyntaxique : du latin au français moderne. Langue française N° 187:3  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Chaudhuri, Pramit, Tathagata Dasgupta, Joseph P Dexter & Krithika Iyer
2019. A small set of stylometric features differentiates Latin prose and verse. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34:4  pp. 716 ff. DOI logo
Ciccarelli, Rossana
2022. L’ordine delle parole nel Chronicon Vulturnense. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia 67:4  pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Clackson, James
2024. Latin Literature and Linguistics. In The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature,  pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Combettes, Bernard
2012. De quelques problèmes spécifiques à l'élaboration d'une grammaire historique. Langue française n°176:4  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Ctibor, Michal
2017. Paragraphs in classical Latin texts : problems with editing and the internal evidence from texts. Graeco-Latina Brunensia :1  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Danckaert, Lieven
2014. Quidem as a Marker of Emphatic Polarity. Transactions of the Philological Society 112:1  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Danckaert, Lieven
2015. Studying word order changes in Latin. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169],  pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Danckaert, Lieven
2015. Spelling out the obvious. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
de la Villa, Jesús
2017. Chapter 9. Res Gestae Divi Augusti. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190],  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Dufter, Andreas & Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo
2014. Introduction. In Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 214],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Giusti, Giuliana & Rossella Iovino
2016. Latin as a split‐DP language. Studia Linguistica 70:3  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Haider, Hubert & Luka Szucsich
2022. Slavic languages – “SVO” languages without SVO qualities?. Theoretical Linguistics 48:1-2  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew, Marius Jøhndal & Per Erik Solberg
2019. An Unexpected Root Clause. Linguistic Inquiry 50:3  pp. 649 ff. DOI logo
Hublet, François
2022. IDL-PMCFG, a Grammar Formalism for Describing Free Word Order Languages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 31:3  pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Hulstaert, Kristien
2019. Reading, seeing and understanding Latin. Journal of Latin Linguistics 18:1-2  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Ježová, Martina
2023. Funkce a slovosled partikulí »zajisté« a »pak« ve staré a střední češtině. Bohemistyka 23:4  pp. 509 ff. DOI logo
Klævik-Pettersen, Espen
2019. What is Germanic and what is not about Old French V2. Linguistic Variation 19:1  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Korkiakangas, Timo
2018. Spoken Latin behind written texts. Diachronica 35:3  pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Korkiakangas, Timo
2020. Spoken Latin behind written texts. In Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 113],  pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Kruijer, Mike & Ezra la Roi
2018. Paradigmatic Possibilities as Perspective for Absolute Constructions. Mnemosyne 71:5  pp. 799 ff. DOI logo
Lafond, Muriel
2013. Une figure autoriale dans le commentaire grammatical ?. Études littéraires 43:2  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Lapidge, Michael
2020. THE LATIN OF THE PASSIONES MARTYRVM OF LATE ANTIQUE ROME. The Cambridge Classical Journal 66  pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Ledgeway, Adam
2012. From Latin to Romance: Configurationality, Functional Categories and Head‐Marking. Transactions of the Philological Society 110:3  pp. 422 ff. DOI logo
Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway
2013. The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, DOI logo
Mikulová, Jana
2021. Pragmatic uses of ‘I say’ in Latin. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Modicom, Pierre-Yves & Olivier Duplâtre
2020. Introduction. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213],  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Navrátilová, Olga
2024. Slovosled zájmen v nominální frázi v Husově české a latinské korespondenci. Bohemistyka 24:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Ongenae, Tim A.F.
2024.  Permittito aperiat oculum: typological considerations on P-lability and its interaction with morphosyntactic alignment in Latin medical texts. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Pultrová, Lucie
2017. Remarks on Varro’s Word-Order. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2017:2  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Ranta, Aarne, Krasimir Angelov, Normunds Gruzitis & Prasanth Kolachina
2020. Abstract Syntax as Interlingua: Scaling Up the Grammatical Framework from Controlled Languages to Robust Pipelines. Computational Linguistics 46:2  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez Guerra, Alexandre
2022. Os suxeitos explícitos no galego medieval. Revista Galega de Filoloxía 23  pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Rosén, Hannah
2020. Composite predicates in the layers of Latin. Journal of Latin Linguistics 19:2  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Schrickx, Josine
2017. Chapter 11. Polar questions in Latin with and without the enclitic particle -ne. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190],  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Spevak, Olga
2013. La dislocation à droite en latin. Glotta 89:1-4  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Spevak, Olga
2014. Chapter 8. Noun valency in Latin. In Noun Valency [Studies in Language Companion Series, 158],  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Spevak, Olga & Camille Denizot
2017. Chapter 1. Pragmatics in Latin and Ancient Greek. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Torrego, María Esperanza
2017. Chapter 8. Res Gestae Divi Augusti. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190],  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Tronci, Liana
Tărnăuceanu, Claudia
2021. Hyperbaton în Prodigiorum liber al lui Obsequens. Diacronia :13 DOI logo
Tărnăuceanu, Claudia
2021. Hyperbaton in Obsequens’s Prodigiorum liber. Diacronia :13 DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2015. The Old Sardinian Condaghes: a syntactic study. Transactions of the Philological Society 113:2  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
Wolfe, Sam
2022. Microvariation and Change in the Romance Left Periphery. Probus 34:1  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Zyman, Erik & Nick Kalivoda
2020. XP- and X<sup>0</sup>-movement in the Latin verb: Evidence from mirroring and anti-mirroring. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.


Main BIC Subject

CFK: Grammar, syntax

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2009048325 | Marc record