Article published in:Language Description Informed by Theory
Edited by Rob Pensalfini, Myfany Turpin and Diana Guillemin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 147] 2014
► pp. 99–122
Liminal pronoun systems
Evidence from Garrwa
Pronoun systems are often described as a single linguistic category consisting of a paradigm of forms that serve as referential indices, or as “dual” systems consisting of more than one paradigm. In dual systems, a paradigm of “bound” pronouns serves the basic referential functions usually for core grammatical functions, with a paradigm of free pronouns used in contexts of emphasis or contrast, and in oblique grammatical roles (Bresnan 2001; Mushin & Simpson 2008). The same kinds of pragmatic splits can be systematically signalled in single pronoun system for example by means of prosody. Bresnan (2001: 4) claims that a system is only dual when there is a divergence in both form and syntactic distribution. In this chapter I examine the usefulness of this claim in defining pronoun systems as dual (or not dual) using evidence from Garrwa (Northern Australia). Here I argue that Garrwa pronouns function as a liminal system, neither single nor dual. This analysis raises questions about the degree to which categorical distinctions can be made in language description. I also consider implications this has for understanding the typology of pronouns more generally.
Published online: 28 January 2014
Austin, Peter & Bresnan, Joan.
2003. Wanyi and Garrwa comparative data. In The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia , Nicholas Evans (ed.), 425–462. Canberra:Pacific Linguistics.
Furby, Edward, S. & Furby, Christine E.
Mushin, Ilana & Simpson, Jane.
Simpson, Jane & Mushin, Ilana.
Cited by 1 other publications
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.