Marking Definiteness or Specificity, not necessarily both
Evidence of a principle of economy from Mauritian Creole
Definiteness and Specificity are assumed to be universal semantic categories, but they are not marked in all languages. Languages with only two articles mark either Definiteness or Specificity, not both (Ionin 2003). I apply Chomsky’s theory of Derivation by Phase (2001a, 2001b) to the analysis of the specificity marker la in Mauritian Creole to argue that this morpheme must surface as a “last resort” to license the null definite article in some syntactic environments. Building on Chierchia’s (1998) Nominal Mapping Parameter – according to which nouns vary with respect to the features “argumental” or “predicative” – I propose that languages whose nouns are argumental lack a definite article and mark the specific vs. non-specific contrast. Languages whose nouns are predicative require an overt definite article and mark the definite vs. indefinite contrast.
References
Abney, Steven Paul.
1987.
The English Noun Phrase and its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aboh, Enoch O.
2004a.
The Morpho-syntax of Complement-head Sequences: Clause Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa
. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Philip.
2003.
Quelques cas de réanalyse et de grammaticalisation dans l'évolution du créole mauricien. In
Grammaticalisation et réanalyse: Approches de la variation créole et française
,
Sibylle Kriegel (ed.), 111–141. Paris: CNRS Editions.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Philip & Hookoomsing, Vinesh Y.
1987.
Diksyoner Kreol Morisyen; Dictionary of Mauritian Creole; Dictionnaire du Créole Mauricien
. Paris: L'Harmattan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baptista, Marlyse & Guéron, Jacqeline
Bickerton, Derek.
1981.
Roots of Language
. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlson, Greg. N.
1978.
Reference to Kinds in English
. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlson, Greg. N.
1999.
No lack of determination: On determinerless noun phrases.
Glot International
4(3): 3–8.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, Gennaro.
1998.
Reference to kinds across languages.
Natural Language Semantics
6: 339–405.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam.
1986.
Barriers
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam.
1995.
The Minimalist Program
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam.
2001a.
Beyond Explanatory Adequacy
[MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
2001b.
Derivation by phase. In
Ken Hale: A Life in Language
,
Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christophersen, Paul.
1939.
The Articles: A Study of their Theory and Use in English
. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Déprez, Viviane
2003.
Determiner architecture and phrasal movement in French lexifier creoles. In
Romance language and linguistic theory: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 6–8 December 2001
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 245],
Joseph Quer,
Jan Schroten,
Maura Scorretti,
Petra Sleeman &
Els Verheugd (eds), 49–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donnellan, Keith S.
1966.
Reference and definite descriptions.
The Philosophical Review
75: 281–304.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Epstein, David, Thrainsson, Hoskuldur & Zwart, Jan-Wouter.
1996.
Introduction. In
Minimal Ideas
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 12],
Werner Abraham,
David Epstein,
Hoskuldur Thrainsson &
C. Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds), 1–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farkas, Donka F.
1994.
Specificity and scope. In
Langues et grammaires
1,
Léa Nash &
Georges Tsoulas (eds), 119–137. Paris: Université Paris 8.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, Jerry D. & Sag, Ivan A.
1982.
Referential and quantificational indefinites.
Linguistics and Philosophy
5: 355–398.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A.
1978.
Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction
. London: Croom Helm.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heim, Irene.
1983.
File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness. In
Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language
,
Rainer Bauerle,
Christoph, Schwarze &
Armin von Stechow (eds), 165–189. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heim, Irene.
1988.
The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases
. New York NY: Garland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2001.
Articles. In
Language Typology and Language Universals
,
Martin Haspelmath,
Ekkehard König,
Wulf Oesterreicher &
Wolfgang Raible (eds.), 831–841. Berlin: de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ionin, Tania.
2003.
The interpretation of the: a new look at articles in L2 English. In,
Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development
,
Barbara Beachley,
Amanda Brown &
Frances Conlin (eds), 346–357. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ionin, Tania.
2006.
This is definitely specific: Specificity and Definiteness in article systems.
Natural Language Semantics
14: 175–234.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ishane, Tabea & Puskás, Genoveva.
2001.
Specific is not definite.
Generative Grammar in Geneva
2: 39–54.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto.
1933.
Essentials of English grammar
. London: Allen and Unwin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karttunen, Lauri J.
1971.
Discourse referents
. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sarah A.
1976.
Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In
Subject and Topic
,
Charles N. Li (ed.), 457–461. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longobardi, Giuseppe.
1994.
Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form [Fall].
Linguistic Inquiry
25: 609–665.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longobardi, Giuseppe.
2001.
The structure of DPs. In
The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory
,
Mark Baltin &
Chris Collins (eds), 562–603. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthewson, Lisa & Schaeffer, Jeannette.
2000.
Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. In
UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics: Language Development and Breakdown
,
Jill Gilkerson,
Misha Becker &
Nina Hyams (eds), 1–39. Los Angeles CA: UCLA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
May, Robert.
1985.
Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milsark, Gary L.
1979.
Existential Sentences in English
. New York NY: Garland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perlman, Abraham.
1969.
‘This’ as a third article in American English.
American Speech
44: 76–80.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pesetsky, David.
1987.
Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In
The Representation of (In)definiteness
,
Eric J. Reuland &
Alice G. B. ter Meulen (eds), 98–129. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollock, Jean-Yves.
1989.
Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP.
Linguistic Inquiry
20: 365–424.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Ellen F.
1981.
On the inferencing of indefinite-this NPs. In
Elements of Discourse Understanding
,
Aravind K. Joshi,
Bonnie L. Webber &
Ivan A. Sag (eds), 231–250. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ritter, Elizabeth.
1988.
A head movement approach to construct state noun phrases.
Linguistics
26: 909–929.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi.
1990.
Relativized Minimality
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi.
1997.
The fine structure of the left periphery. In
Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax
,
Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rochecouste, Judith.
1997.
A Grammar of Mauricien. PhD dissertation, University of Western Australia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Russell, Bertrand.
1905.
On denoting.
Mind
14: 479–493.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stowell, Tim.
1989.
Subjects, specifiers, and X-Bar theory. In
Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure
,
Mark Baltin &
Anthony S. Kroch (eds), 232–262. Chicago Il: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strawson, Peter Frederick.
1950.
On referring.
Mind
59: 320–344.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szabolcsi, Anna.
1989.
Noun phrases and clauses: Is DP analogous to CP?In
The Structure of Noun Phrases
,
John Payne (ed.), 151–180. Berlin: de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szabolcsi, Anna.
1994.
The noun phrase. In
The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian
,
Ferenc Kiefer &
Katalin E. Kiss (eds). San Diego CA: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Syea, Anand.
1996.
The development of a marker of definiteness in Mauritian Creole. In
Changing Meanings, Changing Functions: Papers Relating to Grammaticalization in Contact Languages
,
Philip Baker &
Anand Syea (eds), 171–186. London: University of Westminster Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szabolcsi, Anna.
1987.
Functional categories in the noun phrase. In
Approaches to Hungarian
,
Istvan Kenesei (ed.), 167–189. Szaged: JATE.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valois, Daniel.
1991.
The Internal Syntax of DP. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Virahsawmy, Dev.
2004.
Aprann lir ek ekrir Morisien
. <
[URL]> (January 2009).
von Heusinger, Klaus.
2002.
Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure.
Journal of Semantics
19: 245–274.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zamparelli, R.
2000.
Layers in the Determiner System
. New York NY: Garland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Guillemin, Diana
2015.
Of nouns, and kinds, and properties, and why one D is null or not.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 60:3
► pp. 259 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.