Article published in:
Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 116
References

References

Abraham, Werner
1988Vorbemerkungen zur Modalpartikelsyntax im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 118: 443–466.Google Scholar
1989Syntaktische Korrelate zum Lesartwechsel zwischen epistemischen und deontisch/volitiven Modalverben. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL) 30: 145–166.Google Scholar
1991aModalverben in der Germania. In Begegnung mit dem Fremden. Akten des VIII. Germanistenkongresses, Tokyo 1990. Vol. 4: Kontrastive Syntax, kontrastive Semantik, Lexikologie, Lexikographie, kontrastive Pragmatik, Eijiró Iwasaki (ed.) 109–118. München: Iudicium.Google Scholar
1991bDiscourse particles in German: How does their illocutionary force come about? Between a maximalist and a minimalistic position. In Discourse Particles. Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German and English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 220–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Modals: Toward explaining the ‘epistemic non-finiteness gap’. In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 9], Reimar Müller & Marga Reis (eds),7–36. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
2002Modal verbs: Epistemics in German and English. In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 47], Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van de Wurff (eds), 19–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Event arguments and modal verbs. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications [Linguistische Arbeiten 501], Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein (eds), 243–276. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Datives: Structural vs. inherent – abstract vs. morphological – autonomous vs. combinatory – universally vs. language-specifically configured? In Daniel Hole, André Meinunger & Werner Abraham (eds), Datives and Other Cases: Between Argument Structure and Event Structure [Studies in Language Companion Series 75], 3–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung. Modalität anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikel und Modus. Was ist das Gemeinsame, was das Trennende, und was steckt dahinter? In Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 77], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 251–302. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2010aModalitäts-Aspekt-Generalisierungen: Interaktion und deren Brüche. Woi kommen die epistemischen Lesarten tiher? In Modalität. Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht, Andrzej Ktny & Anna Socka (eds), 13–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010bDiskurspartikel zwischen Modalität, Modus und Fremdbewusstseinsabgleich (Theory of Mind). In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Theo Harden & Elke Hentschel (eds), 33–77. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012a(Inter)Subjectification or foreign consciousness alignment/Other’s mind alignment as synchronic and diachronic concepts of change? Conceptualization and data fidelity. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 24–78. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012bCovert modality in typology. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 386–439. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012cSprecherdeixis und Merkmaldistributionsdifferential deutscher Modalitätselemente. Deutsche Sprache 40: 200–231.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
2012d. Introduction. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elizabeth Leiss (eds), 1–21. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012eModality and Theory of Mind across Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Antomo, Mailin & Steinbach, Markus
2010Desintegration und Interpretation: weil-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29: 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent
2011Perspectives on possibilities: Contextualism, relativism or what? In Epistemic Modality, Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (eds), 19–59. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bavin, Edith L.
1995The obligation modality in Western Nilotic languages. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 107–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2012From modal particle to interrogative marker: A study of German denn. In Functional Heads [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7], Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecelia Poletto (eds) 13–28. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh
2006Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek
1990Language and Species. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2012Epistemic Meaning. A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Jonney
2003A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua 113: 997–1029. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000Minimalist inquiries. In Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicsz (ed.),1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.),104–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–66. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2011Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln. Ihre Distribution und Lizensierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen [Studia Grammatica 73]. Berlin: Akademieverlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delin, Judy, Hartley, Anthony G., Paris, Cecile, Scott, Donia & Van der Linden, Keith
1994Expressing procedural relationships in multilingual instructions. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Generation Workshop (June 1994, Kennebunkport, ME), 61–70. www​.mt​-archive​.info​/NLG​-1994​-Delin​.pdf (December 2011).Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse & Verhulst, An
2008Source of modality: A reassessment. English Language and Linguistics 12(1): 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egg, Markus
2012Discourse particles at the semantics-pragmatics interface. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elizabeth Leiss (eds), 297–333. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emenanjọ, E. Nolue
1978Elements of Modern Igbo Grammar. Ibadan: OUP.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2001Modal particles in Germanic. Folia Linguistica Historica 22(1–2): 310–333.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1993English Grammar. A Function-based Introduction, II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I.
1970A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2009Modal particles redux: Ruhig, bloß and JA: A case study in modal matching. Generals paper, MIT.Google Scholar
Hansen, Björn & de Haan, Ferdinand
(eds) 2009Modals in the Languages of Europe. A Reference Work [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 44]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2007Mood and Modality in Latvian. Kraków: Wydawnictwo universitetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2012Modals and Conditionals: New and Revised Perspectives [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1993Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
[2009]2012. Sprachphilosophie, 2nd edn. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Epistemicity, evidentiality, and Theory of Mind (ToM). In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 37–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melis, Chantal
2011El cambio semántico, sus contextos y los verbos de suficiencia del español. Paper presented at the XIII Coloquio Internacional de Lingüística Iberrománica, 3–5 February, 2011, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Meisnitzer, Benjamin
2012Modality in the Romance languages: Modal verbs and modal particles. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 335–360. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Sonja
2012The distribution of knowledge in (un)acceptable questions. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 147–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela
1999Chickasaw subjecthood. In External Possession, Doris L. Payne & Immanuel Barshi (eds), 251–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nwachukwu, Akụjửọobi P.
1987The Argument Structure of Igbo Verbs [Lexicon Project Working Papers 18]. Cambridge MA: The Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
2001Mood and Modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
2000Modality: Issues in the Semantics-pragmatics Interface [Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 6]. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul
2012Permission and choice. In Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), 43–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwager, Magdalena
2010Modality and speech acts: Troubled by German ruhig. In Proceedings of the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Maria Aloni & Katrin Schulz (eds), 416–425. Amsterdam: ILLC.Google Scholar
Speas, Margret Jean
2004Evidentiality, logophoricity, and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114: 255–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Evidentials as generalized functional heads. In Edges, Heads, and Projections: Interface Properties [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 156], Anna-Maria Di Sciullo & Virginia Hill (eds), 127–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2003On the edge. In Peripheries, David Adger, Cecile De Cat & George Tsoulas (eds), 259–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Traugott Elisabeth
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Linden, An & Verstraete, Jean-Christoph
2011Revisiting deontic modality and related categories: A conceptual map based on the study of English modal adjectives. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 150–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra
2010Semantic determinism and the grammaticalization of have to in English. A reassessment. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 11(1): 32–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar