The syntax of modal polyfunctionality revisited
Evidence from the languages of Europe
This paper deals with the semantics and the syntax of modal constructions from a cross-linguistic perspective. It focuses on the syntactic representation of modal polyfunctionality, usually understood as the semantic alternation between root and epistemic readings. This ambiguity is not an idiosyncratic feature of the Germanic languages, as it is also found in other non-related language families. In this contribution, the empirical base is broadened by discussing the data taken from Hansen and de Haan (2009), which covers all major languages spoken in Europe. I discuss the notion of modal polyfunctionality and give a first account of cross-linguistic morpho-syntactic variation among modal constructions in the languages of Europe. The hypothesis is forwarded that there is cross-linguistic evidence for the syntactic relevance of the distinction between epistemic-root polyfunctionality (EPI-ROOT) and alternations within root modality (ROOT). The relative semantic uniformity of modals contrasts with their structural diversity. It will be shown that modals in the languages of Europe vary with respect to two features: (i) the encoding of the subject and (ii) inflectional categories. It is shown that modal constructions are not restricted to canonical subjects, encoded in the default (nominative) case, but also allow for cases other than nominative, or null subjects. Thus, canonical subject constructions appear to be best suited to fully-fledged EPI-ROOT polyfunctionality, whereas quirky or null subjects tend to be restricted to alternations within the semantic domain ROOT. Categories such as the latter need not be marked on the modal itself, but can be assigned to a lexical verb or the copula – a fact which provides evidence for the claim that polyfunctionality is not restricted to ‘modal verbal status’. In the second part of the paper, the following question will be addressed: Which syntactic features are cross-linguistically connected to polyfunctionality? These chapters focus on (a) the distinction between verbs and auxiliaries in modal constructions, (b) raising vs. control status on the modal, and, (c) the coherence of modal verbal complexes. The subsequent analysis presents clear evidence for the tendency towards a loss of inflectional categories, but, on the other hand, does not lend itself to corroboration of the claim that modals form a syntactic category sui generis (cf. Reis 2001). The conclusion is drawn that the distinction raising vs. control is best suited to explain the syntactic prerequisites of polyfunctionality. It will be argued that modals with canonical subjects displaying full EPI-ROOT involve a raising structure, whereas modals with non-canonically case marked subjects displaying only ROOT alternations form control constructions (cf. Abraham 1989, 2001, 2002 on modals in Germanic).
References (48)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1989. Syntaktische Korrelate zum Lesartwechsel zwischen epistemischen und deontisch/volitiven Modalverben. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL) 30: 145–166.
Abraham, Werner. 1998. The aspectual source of the epistemic-root distinction of modal verbs in German. In Sprache in Raum und Zeit. In Memoriam Johannes Bechert. Band 2: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenschaft, Winfried Boeder, Christoph Schroeder, Karl Heinz Wagner & Wolfgang Wildgen (eds), 231–249. Tübingen: Narr.
Abraham, Werner. 2001. Modals: Toward explaining the ‘epistemic non-finiteness gap’. In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 9], Reimar Müller & Marga Reis (eds), 7–36. Hamburg: Buske.
Abraham, Werner. 2002. Modal verbs: Epistemics in German and English. In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 47], Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds),19–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Abraham, Werner. 2004. Modalität und Modalverben. Wohin führt uns die Syntax – inwieweit brauchen wir die Pragmatik? In Diathese, Modalität, Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Festschrift für Odleif Leirbukt zum 65. Geburtstag, Beate Lindemanne & Ole Letnes (eds), 3–14. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Abraham, Werner. 2009. Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung. Modalität anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikel und Modus. Was ist das Gemeinsame, was das Trennende, und was steckt dahinter? In Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 77], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds),251–302. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Abraham, Werner. 2010. Modalitäts-Aspekt-Generalisierungen Interaktionen und deren Brüche: Wo kommen die epistemischen Lesarten her? In Modalität/Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht [Danziger Beiträge zur Germanistik 30]e, Andrzej Kątny & Anna Socka (eds), 13–28. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Abraham, Werner. 2012. Covert modality in typology. In Covert Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 386–439. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Anderson, Gregory David Shelton. 2006. Auxiliary Verb Constructions. Oxford: OUP.
Barbiers Sjef. 2005. The syntax of modal auxiliaries. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol V., Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 1–23. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Bech, Gunnar. 1955/1957. Studien über das deutsche verbum infinitum, 2 Vols. København: Munksgaard in Komm.
Besters-Dilger, Juliane, Drobnjaković, Ana & Hansen, Björn. 2009. Modals in the Slavonic languages. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 167–199.
Breu, Walter. 2009. Modals in Albanian. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 229–266.
Cornillie, Bert, De Mulder, Walter, Van Hecke, Tine & Vermandere, Dieter. 2009. Modals in the Romance languages. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 107–137.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1997. The Interaction of Negation and Modality. A Typological Study. New York NY: Garland.
de Haan, Ferdinand & Hansen, Björn. 2009. Introduction. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 1–8.
Elšík, Viktor & Matras,Yaron. 2009. Modality in Romani. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 267–322.
Francis, Elaine J. & Michaelis, Laura A. (eds). 2003. Mismatch: Form-function Incongruity and Architecture of Grammar. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Hansen, Björn. 2013. Yiddish modals. With special reference to their polyfunctionality and constructional properties. In Yiddish Language Structures, Björn Hansen & Marion Aptroot (eds),146–192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hansen, Björn & de Haan, Ferdinand. 2009. Concluding chapter: Modal constructions in the languages of Europe. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 511–559.
Hansen, Björn & de Haan, Ferdinand (eds). 2009. Modals in the Languages of Europe. A Reference Work [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 44]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.
Holvoet, Axel. 2009. Modals in Baltic. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 199–228.
Johanson, Lars. 2009. Modals in Turkic. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 487–510.
Kehayov, Petar & Torn-Leesik, Reeli. 2009. Modals in Balto-Finnic. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 363–401.
King, Alan R. 2009. Modality in Basque. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 457–486.
Körtvély, Erika. 2009. Modals in Hungarian. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 403–430.
Kyncl, Jaroslav. 2008. Semi Lexical Heads in Czech Modal Structures. PhD dissertation, University of Wolverhampton.
Laitinen, Lea. 1992. Välttämättömyys ja persoona. Suomen murteiden nesessiivisten rakenteiden semantiikkaa ja kielioppia (Inevitability and Person. Semantic and Grammatical Properties of Finnish Necessive Constructions). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
McQuillan, Peter. 2009. Modals in Irish. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 71–105.
Mettouchi, Amina. 2009. Mood and modality in Berber. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 431–456.
Mortelmans, Tanja, Boye, Kasper & Van der Auwera, Johan. 2009. Modals in the Germanic languages. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 11–69.
Öhlschläger, Günter.1998. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Modalverben des Deutschen [Linguistische Arbeiten 11]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan (eds). 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20(3)], Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–277. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Reis, Marga 2001. Bilden Modalverben im Deutschen eine syntaktische Klasse? In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 9], Reimar Müller & Marga Reis (eds), 287–331. Hamburg: Buske.
Reis, Marga. 2007. Modals, so-called semi-modals, and grammaticalization in German. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 12(1): 1–57.
Rezac, Milan. 2005. The syntax of clitic climbing in Czech. In Clitics and Affix Combinations. Theoretical Perspectives, Lorie Heggie & Francisco Ordóñez (eds), 103–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roeder, Carolin F. & Hansen, Björn. 2006. Modals in contemporary Slovene. Wiener slawistisches Jahrbuch 52: 153–170.
Słodowicz, Szymon. 2008. Control in Polish Complement Clauses. München: Sagner.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur & Vikner, Sten. 1995. Modals and double modals in the Scandinavian languages. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 55: 51–88.
Tsangalidis, Anastasios. 2009. Modals in Greek. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 139–163.
Van der Auwera, Johan, Kehayov, Petar & Vittrand, Alice. 2009: Acquisitive modals. In Crosslinguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect and Modality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 148], Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1): 79–124.
Vanhove, Martine, Miller, Catherine & Caubet, Dominique. 2009. The grammaticalisation of modal auxiliaries in Maltese and Arabic vernaculars of the Mediterranian area. In Hansen & de Haan (eds), 325–361.
Wiemer, Björn. 2010. Hearsay in European languages: Toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical marking. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds) 59–129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, 3 Vols. [Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 7]. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Abraham, Werner
2020.
Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics,
LINDSTRÖM, LIINA & VIRVE-ANNELI VIHMAN
2017.
Who needs it? Variation in experiencer marking in Estonian ‘need’-constructions.
Journal of Linguistics 53:04
► pp. 789 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.