Part of
Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 127166
References (45)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2008. On the logic of generalizations about cross-linguistic aspect-modality links. In Modality-aspect Interfaces. Implications and Typological Solutions [Typological Studies in Language 79], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 3–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aronson, Howard I. 1977. Interrelationships between aspect and mood in Bulgarian. Folia Slavica 1(1): 9–32.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breu, Walter. 1996. Komponentenmodell der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt. In Slavistische Linguistik 1995 [Slavistische Beiträge 342], Wolfgang Girke (ed.), 37–74. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
. 2000. Zur Position des Slavischen in einer Typologie des Verbalaspekts: Form, Funktion, Ebenenhierarchie und lexikalische Interaktion. In Walter Breu (ed.), Probleme der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt (ILA), 21–54. [Linguistische Arbeiten 412].Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Der Verbalaspekt im Spannungsfeld zwischen Grammatik und Lexik. Sprachwissenschaft 32(2): 123–166.Google Scholar
Čašule, Ilija. 1989. Modalnite glagoli vo makedonskiot jazik. Prilozi MANU/OLLN XIV-2: 89–117.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar. 2011. Predicting aspectual choice in modal constructions: A quest for the Holy Grail? In Slavic Linguistics in a Cognitive Framework, Marcin Grygiel & Laura A. Janda (eds), 67–85. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Feleško, Kazimjež [=Feleszko, Kazimierz]. 1974. Od problematikata na takanarečenata konstrukcija so da (Nekolku prašanja za diskusija). Makedonski jazik XXV: 137–144.Google Scholar
Feleszko, Kazimierz. 1979. Wokół południowosłowiańskiego coniunctivu. Studia z filologii polskiej i słowiańskiej 18: 185–192.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor. 1999. Proverbal evidentiality: On the gnomic uses of the category of status in languages of the Balkans and the Caucasus. Mediterranean Language Review 11: 135–155.Google Scholar
. 2000. Confirmative/Nonconfirmative in Balkan Slavic, Balkan Romance, and Albanian, with additional observations on Turkish, Romani, Georgian, and Lak. In Evidentials in Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 24], Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds), 329–366. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Evidentiality in the Balkans with special attention to Macedonian and Albanian. In Studies in Evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds.), 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The typology of Balkan evidentiality and areal linguistics. In Balkan Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 67], Olga Mišeska Tomić (ed.), 101–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgievski, Georgi. 2009. Da-rečenicata vo makedonskiot jazik. Skopje: Institut za makedonski jazik 'Krste Misirkov'.Google Scholar
Hansen, Björn. 2001. Das slavische Modalauxiliar. Semantik und Grammatikalisierung im Russischen, Polnischen, Serbischen/Kroatischen und Altkirchenslavischen [Slavolinguistica 2]. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
. 2010. Constructional aspects of the rise of epistemic sentence adverbs in Russian. In Diachronic slavonic syntax. Gradual Changes in Focus [Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 74], Björn Hansen & Jasmina Grković-Major (eds), 75–86. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Hansen, Björn & de Haan, Ferdinand. 2009. Concluding chapter: Modal constructions in the languages of Europe. In Modals in the Languages of Europe. A Reference Work [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 44], Björn Hansen & Ferdinand de Haan (eds), 511–559. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971[1967]. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings II, Roman Jakobson, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, EUROTYP 20–6], Östen Dahl (ed.), 27–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994.Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klimonow, Vladimir D. & Gerda Klimonow. 2008. The connections between modality, aspectuality, and temporality in Modern Russian. In Modality-aspect Interfaces. Implications and Typological Solutions [Typological Studies in Language 79], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 147–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koneski, Blaže. 1976. Gramatika na makedonskiot literaturen jazik. Skopje: Kultura.Google Scholar
Kramer, Christina Elizabeth. 1986. Analytic modality in Macedonian [Slavistische Beiträge 198]. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred. 2011. Auxiliaries and grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds) 547–558. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation: An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Volkmar. 1999. Aspekt. In: Handbuch der sprachwissenschaftlichen Russistik und ihrer Grenzdisziplinen [Slavistische Studienbücher, Neue Folge 8], Helmut Jachnow (ed.) 214–242. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 2009. Aspekt und tempus. In Die slavischen Sprachen: Ein internationales Handbuch zu ihrer Struktur, ihrer Geschichte und ihrer Erforschung, 1. Halbband [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 32(1)], Sebastian Kempgen, Tilman Berger, Karl Gutschmidt & Peter Kosta (eds), 526–556. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mišeska Tomić, Olga. 2006. Balkan Sprachbund Morpho-syntactic Features [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 67]. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. A Grammar of Macedonian. Bloomington IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview. In Linguistic realization of Evidentiality in European Languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 49], Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds), 15–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, EUROTYP 20–3], Johan van der Auwera & Dónal Pádraig Ó. Baoill (eds), 187–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlotta. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect, 2nd edn [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 43]. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergej G. 2002. The parameter of actionality. Linguistic Typology 6: 317–401.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf. 2000. On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, EUROTYP 20–6], Östen Dahl (ed.), 265–305.. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Topolinjska [=Topolińska], Zuzana. 2000. Polski—makedonski. Gramatička konfrontacija 3: Studii od morfosintaksata. Skopje: MANU.Google Scholar
. 2001. Polski—makedonski. Gramatička konfrontacija 5: Zdanie w zdaniu. Skopje: MANU.Google Scholar
. 2008a. Polski—makedonski. Gramatička konfrontacija 8: Razvitokot na gramatičkite kategorii. Skopje: MANU.Google Scholar
Topolińska, Zuzanna. 2008b. Factivity as a grammatical category in Balkan Slavic and Balkan Romance. In Z Polski do Macedonii: Studia językoznawcze, problemy predikacii 1, Zuzanna Topolińska, 173–184. Kraków: Lexis. Reprint from: Slavia Meridionalis 1 (1994), 105–121.Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn 2011. Grammaticalization in Slavic languages. In The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 740–753. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, 3 Vols. [Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 7]. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wiemer, Björn
2024. Clause-Initial Connectives, Bound and Unbound: Indicators of Mood, of Subordination, or of Something More Fundamental?. Slavia Meridionalis 23 DOI logo
Abraham, Werner
2020. Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.