Mora da as a marker of modal meanings in Macedonian
On correlations between categorial restrictions and morphosyntactic behaviour
The article presents a semasiological case study of the Macedonian modal mora, which derives from the common South Slavic modal verb morati ‘must’, and its collocation with the morpheme da, which is the probably most prominent non-factivity marker of Macedonian used in a broad variety of syntactic functions: as a complementiser, as a main clause marker in “insubordination” phenomena (with hortative and optative functions) as well as a morpheme connecting auxiliary and lexical verb in complex predicates. The latter function forms the starting point for the investigation: the author raises the question whether mora and da should not (in many cases) be analysed as one single unit (in functional and lexicographic terms). Mora can be regarded as a full-fledged modal auxiliary, but it tends to lose its inflectional properties (first, person and number, then tense), so that mora becomes petrified as a form isolated from its paradigm and homonymous with the prs.3sg-form of the inflected verb. Furthermore, it needs to be somehow connected to a finite verb and can cooccur only with da. This distribution, in connection with the successive loss of inflectional categories, conditions a transient stage whereby mora+da appear to become a sentence adverb (or particle) with propositional scope (univerbation toward a function word). Together with this, the split between inflected and uninflected mora correlates with a strong tendency to distinguish deontic (with inflected mora) vs. epistemic (with uninflected mora) readings (dynamic readings have largely been ignored). As concerns this distinction, the feature [± inflected] proves more decisive than the choice of pfv. vs. ipfv. aspect for the lexical verb (being under scope of mora da). Moreover, the only grammatical context for which mora da + Vfin shows a systematic preference for deontic readings, is the pfv. present. All other contexts (and given mora is uninflected) rather favour epistemic readings, and for pfv. present tense (under scope of mora) the deontic reading can be overridden by some other factors. The article divides into two main parts: in the first, the author provides a systematic analysis of mora (da) in virtually all grammatical contexts imaginable for the occurrence of mora (da) in monoclausal structures (Section 2). In the second part (Section 3), the author takes issue with the question whether mora+da should not be treated as one linguistic unit, namely a propositional operator marking epistemic necessity (= ‘strong epistemic support’, in terms of Boye 2012).
References (45)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronson, Howard I. 1977. Interrelationships between aspect and mood in Bulgarian. Folia Slavica 1(1): 9–32.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breu, Walter. 1996. Komponentenmodell der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt. In Slavistische Linguistik 1995 [Slavistische Beiträge 342], Wolfgang Girke (ed.), 37–74. München: Sagner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breu, Walter. 2000. Zur Position des Slavischen in einer Typologie des Verbalaspekts: Form, Funktion, Ebenenhierarchie und lexikalische Interaktion. In Walter Breu (ed.), Probleme der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt (ILA), 21–54. [Linguistische Arbeiten 412].Tübingen: Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breu, Walter. 2007. Der Verbalaspekt im Spannungsfeld zwischen Grammatik und Lexik. Sprachwissenschaft 32(2): 123–166.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Čašule, Ilija. 1989. Modalnite glagoli vo makedonskiot jazik. Prilozi MANU/OLLN XIV-2: 89–117.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Divjak, Dagmar. 2011. Predicting aspectual choice in modal constructions: A quest for the Holy Grail? In Slavic Linguistics in a Cognitive Framework, Marcin Grygiel & Laura A. Janda (eds), 67–85. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feleško, Kazimjež [=Feleszko, Kazimierz]. 1974. Od problematikata na takanarečenata konstrukcija so da (Nekolku prašanja za diskusija). Makedonski jazik XXV: 137–144.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feleszko, Kazimierz. 1979. Wokół południowosłowiańskiego coniunctivu. Studia z filologii polskiej i słowiańskiej 18: 185–192.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedman, Victor. 1999. Proverbal evidentiality: On the gnomic uses of the category of status in languages of the Balkans and the Caucasus. Mediterranean Language Review 11: 135–155.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedman, Victor. 2000. Confirmative/Nonconfirmative in Balkan Slavic, Balkan Romance, and Albanian, with additional observations on Turkish, Romani, Georgian, and Lak. In Evidentials in Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 24], Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds), 329–366. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Georgievski, Georgi. 2009. Da-rečenicata vo makedonskiot jazik. Skopje: Institut za makedonski jazik 'Krste Misirkov'.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansen, Björn. 2001. Das slavische Modalauxiliar. Semantik und Grammatikalisierung im Russischen, Polnischen, Serbischen/Kroatischen und Altkirchenslavischen [Slavolinguistica 2]. München: Sagner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansen, Björn. 2010. Constructional aspects of the rise of epistemic sentence adverbs in Russian. In Diachronic slavonic syntax. Gradual Changes in Focus [Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 74], Björn Hansen & Jasmina Grković-Major (eds), 75–86. München: Sagner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansen, Björn & de Haan, Ferdinand. 2009. Concluding chapter: Modal constructions in the languages of Europe. In Modals in the Languages of Europe. A Reference Work [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 44], Björn Hansen & Ferdinand de Haan (eds), 511–559. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, Roman. 1971[1967]. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings II, Roman Jakobson, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, EUROTYP 20–6], Östen Dahl (ed.), 27–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994.Time in Language. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koneski, Blaže. 1976. Gramatika na makedonskiot literaturen jazik. Skopje: Kultura.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kramer, Christina Elizabeth. 1986. Analytic modality in Macedonian [Slavistische Beiträge 198]. München: Sagner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krug, Manfred. 2011. Auxiliaries and grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds) 547–558. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation: An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, Volkmar. 1999. Aspekt. In: Handbuch der sprachwissenschaftlichen Russistik und ihrer Grenzdisziplinen [Slavistische Studienbücher, Neue Folge 8], Helmut Jachnow (ed.) 214–242. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, Volkmar. 2009. Aspekt und tempus. In Die slavischen Sprachen: Ein internationales Handbuch zu ihrer Struktur, ihrer Geschichte und ihrer Erforschung, 1. Halbband [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 32(1)], Sebastian Kempgen, Tilman Berger, Karl Gutschmidt & Peter Kosta (eds), 526–556. Berlin: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mišeska Tomić, Olga. 2006. Balkan Sprachbund Morpho-syntactic Features [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 67]. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mišeska Tomić, Olga. 2012. A Grammar of Macedonian. Bloomington IN: Slavica.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–357. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview. In Linguistic realization of Evidentiality in European Languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 49], Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds), 15–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, EUROTYP 20–3], Johan van der Auwera & Dónal Pádraig Ó. Baoill (eds), 187–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Carlotta. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect, 2nd edn [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 43]. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tatevosov, Sergej G. 2002. The parameter of actionality. Linguistic Typology 6: 317–401.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thieroff, Rolf. 2000. On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, EUROTYP 20–6], Östen Dahl (ed.), 265–305.. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Topolinjska [=Topolińska], Zuzana. 2000. Polski—makedonski. Gramatička konfrontacija 3: Studii od morfosintaksata. Skopje: MANU.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Topolinjska [=Topolińska], Zuzana. 2001. Polski—makedonski. Gramatička konfrontacija 5: Zdanie w zdaniu. Skopje: MANU.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Topolinjska [=Topolińska], Zuzana. 2008a. Polski—makedonski. Gramatička konfrontacija 8: Razvitokot na gramatičkite kategorii. Skopje: MANU.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Topolińska, Zuzanna. 2008b. Factivity as a grammatical category in Balkan Slavic and Balkan Romance. In Z Polski do Macedonii: Studia językoznawcze, problemy predikacii 1, Zuzanna Topolińska, 173–184. Kraków: Lexis. Reprint from: Slavia Meridionalis 1 (1994), 105–121.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiemer, Björn 2011. Grammaticalization in Slavic languages. In The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 740–753. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, 3 Vols. [Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 7]. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Wiemer, Björn
2024.
Clause-Initial Connectives, Bound and Unbound: Indicators of Mood, of Subordination, or of Something More Fundamental?.
Slavia Meridionalis 23
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Abraham, Werner
2020.
Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.