Cover not available
Part of
Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 379–406

From agent-oriented modality to sequential

The polysemy of the marker ni in Kakabe (Mande)

ORCID logo | LLACAN (INALCO, CNRS, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité)
The paper provides an analysis of an unusual type of polysemy of a modal marker which so far has not been in the focus of the studies dealing with semantics and grammaticalization paths of modal meaning, namely the polysemy between the modal meaning of obligation and the sequential meaning. Modal meaning and the dependent status of a clause may be related because they are both characterized by the lack of assertiveness. This hypothesis is explored in the diachronic perspective on the example of Kakabe data.
Published online: 24 January 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.149.13vyd
References (30)
References
Abraham, Werner 2002. Modal verbs: Epistemics in German and English. In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 47], Sjef Barbiers Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 19–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In: Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 67–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bril, Isabelle (eds). 2010. Clause-hierarchy and Clause-linking: The Syntax and Pragmatics Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 121]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Pagliuca, William. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Historical Semantics, Historical Word Formation, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 59–83. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joan L. Bybee & Fleischman, Suzanne (eds). 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse: An introductory essay. In Bybee & Fleischman (eds), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis, Dimmendaal, Gerrit, Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & König, Christa. 2008. Africa as a morphosyntactic area. In A linguistic geography of Africa, Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds), 86–150. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1995. Imperfective and irrealis. In Bybee & Fleischman (eds), 519–552.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 2010. Clause linkage and Nexus in Papuan languages. In Bril (ed.), 27–50.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1995. A functional theory of complementizers. In Bybee & Fleischman (eds), 473–502.Google Scholar
. 1996. Grammaticalizatoin of the Complex Sentence. A Case Study in Chadic [Studies in Language 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón. T. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2001. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Janse, Jacquelin. 1999. Grammaire mɔgɔfin. Boké: Mission Évangélique Réformée Néerlandaise.Google Scholar
Kastenholz, Raimund. 1987. Das Koranko. Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Nord-Mande-Sprachen. PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 1985. Sentences as combinations of clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 235–86. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nordström, Jackie. 2010. Modality and Subordinators [Studies in Language and Companion Series 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality, 2nd ed. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robert, Stéphane. 1991. Approche énonciative du système verbal. Le cas du Wolof. Paris: Editions du CNRS, collection Science du langage.Google Scholar
. 2010. Clause chaining and conjugations in Wolof: A typology of parataxis and its semantics. In Bril (ed.), 469–498.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization [Topics in English Linguistics 66], Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir. 1989. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.Google Scholar
Vydrine, Valentin. 2009. Esquisse de la langue lélé (groupe mokolé). Mandenkan 45: 29–104.Google Scholar