Article published in:
Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 457484
References

References

Abraham, Werner
1989Syntaktische Korrelate zum Lesartwechsel zwischen epistemischen und deontisch/volitiven Modalverben. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik/GAGL 30: 145–166.Google Scholar
2002Modal verbs: epistemics in German and English. In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 47], Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 19–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Tempus- und Aspektkodierung als Textverketter: Vorder- und Hintergrundierung. Deutsche Sprache 4: 287–304.Google Scholar
2009Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung. Modalität anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikel und Modus. Was ist das Gemeinsame, was das Trennende, und was steckt dahinter? In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 251–302.Google Scholar
2010Modalitäts-Aspekt-Generalisierungen: Interaktion und deren Brüche. Woi kommen die epistemischen Lesarten ti-her? In Modalität. Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht, Andrzej Kątny & Anna Socka (eds), 13–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012a(Inter)subjectification or foreign consciousness/other’s mind alignment as synchronic and diachronic concepts of change? Conceptualization and data fidelity. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 24–78.Google Scholar
2012bCovert modality in typology. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 386–439.Google Scholar
2012cIllocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 67–108.Google Scholar
2012dSprecherdeixis und Merkmaldistributionsdifferential deutscher Modalitätselemente. Deutsche Sprache 40: 200–231.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
(eds) 2008Modality-aspect Interfaces. Implications and Typological Solutions [Typological Studies in Language 79]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2009Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 77]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2012Introduction. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 1202a, 1–21.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012aCovert Patterns of Modality. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012bModality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abusch, Dorit
1997Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(1): 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex
2003Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke
2008Phantom sentences. In Phantom Sentences. Essays in Linguistics and Literature Presented to Ann Banfield, Robert S. Kawashima, Gilles Philippe & Thelma Sowley (eds), 17–41. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bally, Charles
1950Linguistique generale et linguistique francaise. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Banfield, Anne
1982Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh
2000Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. http://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/ircs​_reports​/32> (18 October 2012).Google Scholar
2006Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Binnick, Robert I.
1991Time and the Verb. A Guide to Tense & Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boogart, Ronny & Trnavac, Radoslava
2011Imperfective aspect and epistemic modality. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 217–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2012Epistemic Meaning. A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
[1934]1999Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Reprint, Jena: Fischer 1934. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
Brisard, Frank
2002The English present. In Brisard (ed.), 251–297.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2002Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference [Cognitive Linguistics Research 21]. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brisard, Frank & Adeline Patard
(eds.) 2011. Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect, and Epistemic Modality [Human Cognitive Processing 29]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Pagliuca, William & Perkins, Revere D.
1994The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caenepeel, Mimo & Moens, Marc
1994Temporal structure and discourse structure. In Tense and Aspect in Discourse [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 75], Co Vet & Carl Vetters (eds), 5–20. Berlin: de Gruyter CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chatman, Seymour B.
1980Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve
2005Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse
2012Time in sentences with modal verbs. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 989–1019. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2009Die Interdependenzen von Kontexttypen bei Grammatikalisierungsprozessen illustriert am Beispiel der deutschen Modalverben. In Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 101–122.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Smirnova, Elena
2010Abgrenzung von Modalität und Evidentialität im heutigen Deutsch. In Modalität. Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht, Andrzej Kątny & Anna Socka (eds), 113–131. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(eds) 2011Modalität und Evidentialität. Modality and Evidentiality. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, edited by Kees Hengeveld, 2nd edn. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Duden
2009Die Grammatik, 8th edn. Mannheim: Duden Verlag.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
Ehrlich, Susan
1990Point of View. A Linguistic Analysis of Literary Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1991Toward a theory of tense-aspect in narrative discourse. In The Function of Tense in Texts, Jadranka Gvozdanović & Theo A.J.M. Janssen (eds), 75–97. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika
1993The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gerd
1997Historische Semantik der Modalverben. Problemskizze – exemplarische Analysen – Forschungsübersicht. In Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen [Reihe germanistische Linguistik 187], Gerd Fritz & Thomas Gloning (eds), 1–157. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, Thoma
2000Wahr-Sagen. Futur, Modalität und Sprecherbezug im Deutschen [Beiträge zur Germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 16]. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Glas, Reinhold
1984‘Sollen’ im heutigen Deutsch. Bedeutung und Gebrauch in der Schriftsprache. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gloning, Thomas
1991Bedeutung und zusammenhängendes sprachliches Handeln: sollen und das Vorausdeutungsspiel. In Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990. Teil 1, Sorin Stati, Edda Weigand & Franz Hundsnurscher (eds), 123–134. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2001Gebrauchsweisen von Modalverben und Texttraditionen. In Reimar Müller & Marga Reis (eds), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte, special issue 9], 177–200. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Graumann, Carl Friedrich & Kallmeyer, Werner
2002Introduction. In Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 9], Carl Frierich Graumann & Werner Kallmeyer (eds) 1–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
2001The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte 9: 201–216.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine
2010On the event relativity of modal auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics 18: 79–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine & Wellwood, Alexis
2012Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based study. Semantics and Pragmatics 5: 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haßler, Gerda
2012Indicative verb forms as means of expressing modality in Romance languages. In Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds) 2012a, 133–152.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael
1970Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6: 322–361.Google Scholar
Hegarty, Michael
2006Information update and covert modality in the semantics of propositional attitude verbs. In of KONVENS 2006 Proceedings, Miriam Butt (ed.), 174–180. http://​nbn​-resolving​.de​/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352​-opus​-20131> (8 December 2012).Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1995Agent-oriented vs. epistemic modality: Some observations on German modals. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, Joan Bybee & Susanne Fleischman (eds), 17–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko
1962Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1979Some observations on the typology of focus and aspect in narrative language. Studies in Language 3(1): 37–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna
2009Representing Time. An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jäntti, Ahti
1989Zum Begriff der Modalität in der Sprachforschung. In Probleme der Modalität in der Sprachforschung, Ahti Jäntti (ed.), 11–36. Jyväskylä: Universität Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Katz, Graham
2003. A Modal Account of the English Present Perfect Puzzle. Proceedings of SALT 13: 145–161.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1991Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. / Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639–650. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc
1987On defining modality. Folia Linguistica 21(1): 67–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2002Remarks on the English grounding systems. In Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference, Frank Brisard (ed.), 29–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The English present. Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 45–86.Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2000Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit [Studia Linguistica Germanica 31]. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009a. Sprachphilosophie. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bDrei Spielarten der Epistemizität, drei Spielarten der Evidentialität und drei Spielarten des Wissens. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 3–24.Google Scholar
2011Lexikalische versus grammatische Epistemizität und Evidentialität: Plädoyer für eine klare Trennung von Lexikon und Grammatik. In Diewald & Smirnova (eds), 149–169.Google Scholar
2012aEpistemicity, evidentiality, and theory of mind. In Abraham & Leiss (eds)2012b, 39–65.Google Scholar
2012bAspectual patterns of covert coding of modality in Gothic and Old High German. In Abraham & Leiss (eds) 2012a, 175–200.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Maché, Jakob
2008The autopsy of a modal – insights from the historical development of German. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 385–415.Google Scholar
2009Das Wesen epistemischer Modalität. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 25–55.Google Scholar
2012Exploring the theory of mind interface. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 109–146.Google Scholar
Maier, Emar
2012Quotation and unquotation in free indirect discourse. Ms, Groningen. https://​sites​.google​.com​/site​/emarmaier​/publications> (16 November 2012).Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2005Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings: A new perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4): 677–731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2012The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends. The Past + now in language and literature. In Viewpoint in Language. A Multimodal Perspective, Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds), 177–197. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nerbonne, John
1986Reference time and time in narration. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(2): 83–95.Google Scholar
Öhlschläger, Günther
1989Zur Syntax und Semantik der Modalverben des Deutschen [Linguistische Arbeiten 144]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank
2001Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive, and typological issues. In Modality in Contemporary English [Topics in English Linguistics 44], Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 1–17 . Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
2006Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 116: 1688–1702. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patard, Adeline
2011The epistemic uses of the English simple past and the French Imparfait: When temporality conveys modality. In Patard & Brisard (eds), 279–310.Google Scholar
Patron, Sylvie
2009Le Narrateur: Introduction à la théorie narrative. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
2010The death of the narrator and the interpretation of the novel. The example of Pedro Páramo by Juan Rulfo. Journal of Literary Theory 4(2): 253–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pietrandrea, Paola
2005Epistemic Modality: Functional Properties and the Italian System [Studies in Language Companion Series 74]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul
2003The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(4): 459–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15(4): 351–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir
[1928]1968Morphology of the Folktale, 2nd edn. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rauh, Gisa
1978Linguistische Beschreibung deiktischer Komplexität in narrativen Texten [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 106]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2003Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, José & Redeker, Gisela
1996Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse. In Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, Gilles Fauconnier & Eve Sweetser (eds), 290–317. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
2004Context of thought and context of utterance. (A note on free indirect discourse and the historical present). Mind and Language 19(3): 279–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharvit, Yael
2008The puzzle of Free Indirect Discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(3): 353–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simone, Raffaele & Amacker, René
1977Verb ‘modali’ in italiano. Italian Linguistics 3: 7–102.Google Scholar
Šklovskij, Viktor B.
[1929 2 ]1991 Theory of Prose, Benjamin Sher (ed.). Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota
2003Modes of Discourse. The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Elena
2011The organization of the German clausal grounding system. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 87–107.Google Scholar
Smirnova, Elena & Mortelman, Tanja
2011Some remarks on the role of the reference point in the construal configuration of “more” and “less” grounding predications. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 137–158.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim
2004Tense and modals. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 621–636. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Shin
2008The aspect-modality link in Japanese. The case of the evaluating sentence. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 309–327.Google Scholar
Temürcü, Ceyhan
2011Grounding in terms of anchoring relations. Epistemic associations of ‘present continuous’ marking in Turkish. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 109–133.Google Scholar
Tomaševsky, Boris
[1925]1965Thematics. In Russian Formalist Criticism. Four Essays, Lee T. Lemon & Marion J. Reis (eds), 61–89. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989On the rise of epistemic meaning in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A.
1998Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1): 79–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik
1951An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Zeman, Sonja
To appear. Zur Diachronie der Modalverben: sollen zwischen Temporalität, Modalität und Evidentialität. In Funktion(en) von Modalität, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds) Berlin de Gruyter
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Zeman, Sonja
2018.  In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247],  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Zeman, Sonja
2019. The emergence of viewpoints in multiple perspective constructions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:2  pp. 226 ff. Crossref logo
Zeman, Sonja, Wiebke Blanck, Christine Ott, Michael Rödel & Sven Staffeldt
2017. Was bedeutet eigentlich erzählen? Linguistische und didaktische Annäherungen an einen schwierigen Begriff. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes 64:3  pp. 307 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.