Cover not available
Part of
Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 457–484

(C)Overt epistemic modality and its perspectival effects on the textual surface

| LMU Munich

With an eye on the universal status of modality, the paper focuses on covert and overt grammatical coding of epistemic modality and its perspectival effects on the textual surface. Based on a theoretical discussion concerning the core principle of root vs. epistemic modality, it is argued that the grammatical structure of epistemic modality is reflected on the sentence level, on the textual surface, and within narrative discourse, and thus is manifested in a recursive manner on different levels of linguistic structure. In consequence, it is claimed that the universal status of modality can be pinned down not only cross-linguistically, but also within the language itself. En passant, the alignment of linguistic micro- and macro-structure sheds light on the basic question what modality is about in its core meaning.

Published online: 24 January 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.149.15zem
References
Abraham, Werner
1989 Syntaktische Korrelate zum Lesartwechsel zwischen epistemischen und deontisch/volitiven Modalverben. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik/GAGL 30: 145–166.Google Scholar
2002 Modal verbs: epistemics in German and English. In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 47], Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 19–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Tempus- und Aspektkodierung als Textverketter: Vorder- und Hintergrundierung. Deutsche Sprache 4: 287–304.Google Scholar
2009 Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung. Modalität anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikel und Modus. Was ist das Gemeinsame, was das Trennende, und was steckt dahinter? In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 251–302.Google Scholar
2010 Modalitäts-Aspekt-Generalisierungen: Interaktion und deren Brüche. Woi kommen die epistemischen Lesarten ti-her? In Modalität. Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht, Andrzej Kątny & Anna Socka (eds), 13–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012a (Inter)subjectification or foreign consciousness/other’s mind alignment as synchronic and diachronic concepts of change? Conceptualization and data fidelity. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 24–78.Google Scholar
2012b Covert modality in typology. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 386–439.Google Scholar
2012c Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 67–108.Google Scholar
2012d Sprecherdeixis und Merkmaldistributionsdifferential deutscher Modalitätselemente. Deutsche Sprache 40: 200–231.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
(eds) 2008 Modality-aspect Interfaces. Implications and Typological Solutions [Typological Studies in Language 79]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2009 Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 77]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2012 Introduction. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 1202a, 1–21.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012a Covert Patterns of Modality. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012b Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abusch, Dorit
1997 Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(1): 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex
2003 Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke
2008 Phantom sentences. In Phantom Sentences. Essays in Linguistics and Literature Presented to Ann Banfield, Robert S. Kawashima, Gilles Philippe & Thelma Sowley (eds), 17–41. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bally, Charles
1950 Linguistique generale et linguistique francaise. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Banfield, Anne
1982 Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh
2000 Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. [URL]> (18 October 2012).Google Scholar
2006 Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binnick, Robert I
1991 Time and the Verb. A Guide to Tense & Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boogart, Ronny & Trnavac, Radoslava
2011 Imperfective aspect and epistemic modality. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 217–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2012 Epistemic Meaning. A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
[1934]1999 Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Reprint, Jena: Fischer 1934. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
Brisard, Frank
2002 The English present. In Brisard (ed.), 251–297.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2002 Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference [Cognitive Linguistics Research 21]. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brisard, Frank & Adeline Patard
(eds.) 2011. Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect, and Epistemic Modality [Human Cognitive Processing 29]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Pagliuca, William & Perkins, Revere D
1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caenepeel, Mimo & Moens, Marc
1994 Temporal structure and discourse structure. In Tense and Aspect in Discourse [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 75], Co Vet & Carl Vetters (eds), 5–20. Berlin: de Gruyter DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chatman, Seymour B
1980 Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985 Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve
2005 Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse
2012 Time in sentences with modal verbs. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 989–1019. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2009 Die Interdependenzen von Kontexttypen bei Grammatikalisierungsprozessen illustriert am Beispiel der deutschen Modalverben. In Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 101–122.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Smirnova, Elena
2010 Abgrenzung von Modalität und Evidentialität im heutigen Deutsch. In Modalität. Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht, Andrzej Kątny & Anna Socka (eds), 113–131. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(eds) 2011 Modalität und Evidentialität. Modality and Evidentiality. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon
1997 The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, edited by Kees Hengeveld, 2nd edn. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Duden
2009 Die Grammatik, 8th edn. Mannheim: Duden Verlag.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2012 Particles as speaker indexicals in free indirect discourse. [URL]> (19 November 2012).Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan
1990 Point of View. A Linguistic Analysis of Literary Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1991 Toward a theory of tense-aspect in narrative discourse. In The Function of Tense in Texts, Jadranka Gvozdanović & Theo A.J.M. Janssen (eds), 75–97. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika
1993 The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gerd
1997 Historische Semantik der Modalverben. Problemskizze – exemplarische Analysen – Forschungsübersicht. In Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen [Reihe germanistische Linguistik 187], Gerd Fritz & Thomas Gloning (eds), 1–157. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fritz, Thoma
2000 Wahr-Sagen. Futur, Modalität und Sprecherbezug im Deutschen [Beiträge zur Germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 16]. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Glas, Reinhold
1984 ‘Sollen’ im heutigen Deutsch. Bedeutung und Gebrauch in der Schriftsprache. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gloning, Thomas
1991 Bedeutung und zusammenhängendes sprachliches Handeln: sollen und das Vorausdeutungsspiel. In Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990. Teil 1, Sorin Stati, Edda Weigand & Franz Hundsnurscher (eds), 123–134. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2001 Gebrauchsweisen von Modalverben und Texttraditionen. In Reimar Müller & Marga Reis (eds), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte, special issue 9], 177–200. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Graumann, Carl Friedrich & Kallmeyer, Werner
2002 Introduction. In Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 9], Carl Frierich Graumann & Werner Kallmeyer (eds) 1–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
2001 The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte 9: 201–216.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine
2010 On the event relativity of modal auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics 18: 79–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine & Wellwood, Alexis
2012 Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based study. Semantics and Pragmatics 5: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haßler, Gerda
2012 Indicative verb forms as means of expressing modality in Romance languages. In Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds) 2012a, 133–152.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael
1970 Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6: 322–361.Google Scholar
Hegarty, Michael
2006 Information update and covert modality in the semantics of propositional attitude verbs. In of KONVENS 2006 Proceedings, Miriam Butt (ed.), 174–180. [URL]> (8 December 2012).Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1995 Agent-oriented vs. epistemic modality: Some observations on German modals. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, Joan Bybee & Susanne Fleischman (eds), 17–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko
1962 Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1979 Some observations on the typology of focus and aspect in narrative language. Studies in Language 3(1): 37–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna
2009 Representing Time. An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jäntti, Ahti
1989 Zum Begriff der Modalität in der Sprachforschung. In Probleme der Modalität in der Sprachforschung, Ahti Jäntti (ed.), 11–36. Jyväskylä: Universität Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Katz, Graham
2003. A Modal Account of the English Present Perfect Puzzle. Proceedings of SALT 13: 145–161.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1991 Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. / Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639–650. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc
1987 On defining modality. Folia Linguistica 21(1): 67–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
2002 Remarks on the English grounding systems. In Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference, Frank Brisard (ed.), 29–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 The English present. Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 45–86.Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2000 Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit [Studia Linguistica Germanica 31]. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009a. Sprachphilosophie. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b Drei Spielarten der Epistemizität, drei Spielarten der Evidentialität und drei Spielarten des Wissens. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 3–24.Google Scholar
2011 Lexikalische versus grammatische Epistemizität und Evidentialität: Plädoyer für eine klare Trennung von Lexikon und Grammatik. In Diewald & Smirnova (eds), 149–169.Google Scholar
2012a Epistemicity, evidentiality, and theory of mind. In Abraham & Leiss (eds)2012b, 39–65.Google Scholar
2012b Aspectual patterns of covert coding of modality in Gothic and Old High German. In Abraham & Leiss (eds) 2012a, 175–200.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Maché, Jakob
2008 The autopsy of a modal – insights from the historical development of German. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 385–415.Google Scholar
2009 Das Wesen epistemischer Modalität. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 25–55.Google Scholar
2012 Exploring the theory of mind interface. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 109–146.Google Scholar
Maier, Emar
2012 Quotation and unquotation in free indirect discourse. Ms, Groningen. [URL]> (16 November 2012).Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2005 Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings: A new perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4): 677–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2012 The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends. The Past + now in language and literature. In Viewpoint in Language. A Multimodal Perspective, Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds), 177–197. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerbonne, John
1986 Reference time and time in narration. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(2): 83–95.Google Scholar
Öhlschläger, Günther
1989 Zur Syntax und Semantik der Modalverben des Deutschen [Linguistische Arbeiten 144]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank
2001 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive, and typological issues. In Modality in Contemporary English [Topics in English Linguistics 44], Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 1–17 . Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
2006 Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 116: 1688–1702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patard, Adeline
2011 The epistemic uses of the English simple past and the French Imparfait: When temporality conveys modality. In Patard & Brisard (eds), 279–310.Google Scholar
Patron, Sylvie
2009 Le Narrateur: Introduction à la théorie narrative. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
2010 The death of the narrator and the interpretation of the novel. The example of Pedro Páramo by Juan Rulfo. Journal of Literary Theory 4(2): 253–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietrandrea, Paola
2005 Epistemic Modality: Functional Properties and the Italian System [Studies in Language Companion Series 74]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul
2003 The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(4): 459–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15(4): 351–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir
[1928]1968 Morphology of the Folktale, 2nd edn. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rauh, Gisa
1978 Linguistische Beschreibung deiktischer Komplexität in narrativen Texten [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 106]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947 Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2003 Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, José & Redeker, Gisela
1996 Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse. In Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, Gilles Fauconnier & Eve Sweetser (eds), 290–317. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
2004 Context of thought and context of utterance. (A note on free indirect discourse and the historical present). Mind and Language 19(3): 279–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharvit, Yael
2008 The puzzle of Free Indirect Discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(3): 353–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simone, Raffaele & Amacker, René
1977 Verb ‘modali’ in italiano. Italian Linguistics 3: 7–102.Google Scholar
Šklovskij, Viktor B
[1929 2 ]1991 Theory of Prose, Benjamin Sher (ed.). Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota
2003 Modes of Discourse. The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Elena
2011 The organization of the German clausal grounding system. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 87–107.Google Scholar
Smirnova, Elena & Mortelman, Tanja
2011 Some remarks on the role of the reference point in the construal configuration of “more” and “less” grounding predications. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 137–158.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim
2004 Tense and modals. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 621–636. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Shin
2008 The aspect-modality link in Japanese. The case of the evaluating sentence. In Abraham & Leiss (eds), 309–327.Google Scholar
Temürcü, Ceyhan
2011 Grounding in terms of anchoring relations. Epistemic associations of ‘present continuous’ marking in Turkish. In Brisard & Patard (eds), 109–133.Google Scholar
Tomaševsky, Boris
[1925]1965 Thematics. In Russian Formalist Criticism. Four Essays, Lee T. Lemon & Marion J. Reis (eds), 61–89. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989 On the rise of epistemic meaning in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir A
1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1): 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik
1951 An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Zeman, Sonja
To appear. Zur Diachronie der Modalverben: sollen zwischen Temporalität, Modalität und Evidentialität. In Funktion(en) von Modalität, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds) Berlin de Gruyter
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Zeman, Sonja
2018. What is a Narration – and why does it matter?. In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247], ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Zeman, Sonja
2019. The emergence of viewpoints in multiple perspective constructions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Zeman, Sonja, Wiebke Blanck, Christine Ott, Michael Rödel & Sven Staffeldt
2017. Was bedeutet eigentlich erzählen? Linguistische und didaktische Annäherungen an einen schwierigen Begriff. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes 64:3 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.