Cover not available
Part of
Language Processing and Grammars: The role of functionally oriented computational models
Edited by Brian Nolan and Carlos Periñán-Pascual
[Studies in Language Companion Series 150] 2014
► pp. 339–366

The interaction of non-linguistic 
and linguistic knowledge in FunGramKB

| Universidad de La Laguna
This chapter investigates how the non-linguistic knowledge stored in the conceptual level of FunGramKB interacts with the idiosyncratic linguistic knowledge stored in the other two levels, i.e. the lexical and the grammatical levels. It will be argued that the pivotal module of this knowledge base, the Ontology, and the conceptual information stored for the concepts building its taxonomy may be a good source to predict certain aspects of the different lexicalization patterns of the lexical units that lexicalize those concepts and the constructions in which they are subsumed. Consequently, the nature of this work is that of a cross-level analysis. At the same time, this work also analyzes how a verb-framed language like Spanish and a satellite-framed language like English draw different information from the same conceptual base.
Published online: 1 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.150.14gar
References (37)
References
Allen, James F. 1983. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM 26(11): 832–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BYU-BNC: British National Corpus. <[URL]> (15 July 2012).
Cifuentes-Férez, Paula. 2009. A Crosslinguistic Study on the Semantics of Motion Verbs in English and Spanish . Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Corpus of Contemporary American English. <[URL]> (15 July 2012).
Corpus del Español de Mark Davies. <[URL]> (15 July 2012).
Cortés Rodríguez, Francisco J. 2007. Building a onstructicon: Templates, constraints and unification. Ms, Universidad de La Laguna.Google Scholar
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco & Butler, Christopher S. 2006. Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4: 39–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80: 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Briones, Rocío & Pérez-Cabello de Alba, Beatriz. 2011. An account of selection restrictions in Role and Reference Grammar. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 62: 99–122.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Briones, Rocío & Luzondo Oyón, Alba. 2011. Building ontological meaning in a lexico-conceptual knowledge base. Onomazein 23: 11–40.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1999. Two structures for compositionally derived events. In Proceedings of SALT 9 [Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications], 199–223. Ithaca NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Mairal-Usón, Ricardo & Periñán Pascual, Carlos. 2009. The anatomy of the lexicon component within the framework of a conceptual knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 22: 217–244.Google Scholar
Mairal-Usón, Ricardo & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. 2008. Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In Deconstructing Constructions [Studies in Language Companion Series 107], Chrisopher S. Butler & Juan Martín Arista (eds), 153–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mora Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo. 2001. Directed motion in English and Spanish. In Estudios de Lingüística del Español 11. <[URL]
Pérez Hernández, Lorena & Peña Cervel, María Sandra. 2009. Pragmatic and cognitive constraints on lexical-constructional subsumption. Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 31(2): 57–73.Google Scholar
Periñán Pascual, Carlos & Arcas Túnez, Francisco. 2007a. Cognitive modules of an NLP knowledge base for language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 39: 197–204.Google Scholar
. 2007b. Deep semantics in an NLP knowledge base. In 12th Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence , 279–288. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
. 2010. The architecture of FunGramKB. In 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, European Language Resources Association (ELRA) , 2667–2674. Valeta, Malta.Google Scholar
Periñán Pascual, Carlos & Mairal-Usón, Ricardo. 2009. Bringing Role and Reference Grammar to natural language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 43: 265–273.Google Scholar
. 2010a. La gramática de COREL: Un lenguaje de representación conceptual. Onomázein 21 (1): 11–45.Google Scholar
. 2010b. Enhancing UniArab with FunGramKB. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 44: 19–26.Google Scholar
. 2011. The coherent methodology in FunGramKB. Onomázein 24: 13–33.Google Scholar
Procter, Paul (ed.). 1978. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English . Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA). Corpus de referencia del español actual . <[URL]> (10 August 2012).
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meaning. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors , Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Mairal-Usón, Ricardo. 2007. High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. In Aspects of Meaning Construction in Lexicon and Grammar , Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds), 33–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica 42(2): 355–400.Google Scholar
Sacramento Lechado, Elena & Guerra García, Fátima. 2011. Ontología de la base de conocimiento FunGramKB: Desarrollo y creación de conceptos, III Coloquio de Lingüística Andrés Bello, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife.
. 2012. Ontología de la base de conocimiento FunGramKB: Desarrollo y creación de conceptos. En Estudios sobre lengua, cultura y cognición , Gerd Wotjak, Dolores García Padrón & María del Carmen Fumero Pérez (eds), 215–226. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon , Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy. 1997. Syntax, Structure, Meaning and Function . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy . Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
WebCorp Live. Concordance the Web in Real-time . <[URL]> (15 July 2012).