Article published in:Language Processing and Grammars: The role of functionally oriented computational models
Edited by Brian Nolan and Carlos Periñán-Pascual
[Studies in Language Companion Series 150] 2014
► pp. 367–390
Low-level situational cognitive models within the Lexical Constructional Model and their computational implementation in FunGramKB
This paper investigates the notion of low-level situational cognitive model, its role in linguistic description and its possible computational treatment in the knowledge base FunGramKB. Low-level situational models are exploited metonymically to produce situation-based implicatures. When such inferences become stably associated with a formal pattern, they give rise to implicational constructions. Other kinds of construction make use of different kinds of cognitive model. For example, argument-structure constructions are based on high-level non-situational cognitive models. The paper then provides a typology of low-level situational cognitive models, which can be roughly equated with Schank and Abelson’s now classical notion of script. Schank and Abelson’s classification into situational, personal and instrumental scripts is revised and refined to make it include a further division into simple, complex and composite scripts. Simple scripts capture sequences of actions, while complex scripts consist of chained sequences of subscripts and composite scripts are combinations of independent subscripts. Since scripts are cases of procedural knowledge, which is included in the so-called cognicon of FunGramKB, the paper explores the incorporation of this typology into the architecture of this part of the knowledge base. This incorporation is argued to endow the cognicon with greater descriptive parsimony, which results in a more efficient computational implementation. Finally, the paper uses the FunGramKB representation metalanguage COREL as an adequate way of supplying precise descriptions in terms of event structure variables and their sequencing, which turns out to be useful to enhance descriptive adequacy in the linguistic model itself.
Published online: 01 April 2014
Allen, James F.
Atkins, Sue, Fillmore, Charles J. & Johnson, Christopher R.
Baker, Colin F. & Ruppenhoffer, Josef
2002 FrameNet’s frames vs. Levin’s verb classes. In J. Larson and M. Paster (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , pp. 27–38.
de Beaugrande, Robert & Dressler, Wolfgang U.
Boas, Hans C.
Butler, Christpher S.
Butler, Christopher S.
Del Campo Martínez, Nuria
Fillmore, Charles J.
Fillmore, Charles J. & Atkins, B.T.
Fillmore, Charles J., Johnson, Christopher R. & Petruck, Miriam R.L.
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
Langacker, Ronald W.
Mairal Usón, Ricardo & Periñán-Pascual, Carlos
Mairal Usón, Ricardo & Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José
Manning, Chris D. & Schütze, Hinrich
1975 A Framework for Representing Knowledge. MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306.
Peña Cervel, Sandra
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos & Arcas Túnez, Francisco
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos & Mairal Usón, Ricardo
2012 La dimensión computacional de la Gramática del Papel y la Referencia: La estructura lógica conceptual y su aplicación en el procesamiento del lenguaje natural”. In El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia. Introducción, avances y aplicaciones , Ricardo Mairal Usón, Lilián Guerrero & Carlos González (eds), 333–348. Madrid: Akal.
In preparation. Cultural distinctiveness in a knowledge engineering project. Ms.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José
2013 Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The Role of Constructions in a Functional Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], Brian Nolan & Elke Diedrichsen (eds), 231–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Baicchi, Annalisa
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Luzondo Oyón, Alba
In preparation. Figurative and non-figurative motion in English resultative constructions. In Conceptualizing Movement. A Cognitive and Cross-Linguistic Perspective , Diana Ponterotto (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Mairal Usón, Ricardo
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Peérez Hernaández, Lorena
Rumelhart, David E.
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Ellsworth, Michael, Petruck, Miriam R.L., Johnson, Christopher R. & Scheffczyk, Jan
2010 FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Technical Report, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley. http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/>
Sanford, Anthony J. & Simon C. Garrod
Schank, Roger C. & Robert P. Abelson
Van Dijk, Teun A. & Kintsch, Walter
Cited by 13 other publications
No author info given
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.