References
Allen, James F.
1989Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. In Readings in Qualitative Reasoning About Physical Systems , Daniel S. Weld & Johan de Kleer (eds), 361–372. San Francisco CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Atkins, Sue, Fillmore, Charles J. & Johnson, Christopher R.
2003Lexicographic relevance: Selecting information from corpus evidence. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3):251–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Colin F. & Ruppenhoffer, Josef
2002FrameNet’s frames vs. Levin’s verb classes. In J. Larson and M. Paster (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , pp. 27–38.
de Beaugrande, Robert & Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1981 Introduction to Text Linguistics . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
2005From theory to practice: Frame semantics and the design of FrameNet. In Semantik im Lexikon , Stefan Langer & Daniel Schnorbusch (eds), 129–160. TÜbingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Butler, Christpher S.
2009The Lexical Constructional Model: Genesis, strengths and challenges. In Deconstructing Constructions [Studies in Language Companion Series 107], Christopher S. Butler & Javier Martín Arista (eds), 117–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Christopher S.
2013Constructions in the Lexical Constructional Model. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The Role of Constructions in a Functional Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], Brian Nolan & Elke Diedrichsen (eds), 271–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Campo Martínez, Nuria
2012A constructional account of advising: Construal operations and social conventions. Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos 33: 115–132.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1975An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 123–131. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1977Scenes-and-frames semantics. In Linguistic Structures Processing , Antonio Zampolli (ed.), 55–82. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1982Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm , Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), 111–138. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
1985Frames and the semantic understanding. Quaderni di Semantica VI(2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Atkins, B.T.
Sue 1992Towards a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In Frames, Fields, and Contrast: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization , Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Kittay (eds), 75–102. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Johnson, Christopher R. & Petruck, Miriam R.L.
2003Background to Framenet. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3): 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine
1998Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A.C.
1981 Prose comprehension beyond the word . New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987 The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, Walter
1988The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review 95: 163–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Wome, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind . Chicago IL: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought , 2nd. edn, Andrew Ortony (ed.), 202–251. Cambridge MA: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought . New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar , Vol 1: Theoretical Prerequisites . Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999 Grammar and Conceptualization . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mairal Usón, Ricardo & Periñán-Pascual, Carlos
2009a Teoría lingüística y representación del conocimiento: Una discusión preliminar. In Tendencias en lingüística general y aplicada , Dolores García Padrón & Maria del Carmen Fumero Pérez (eds), 155–168. Berlín: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009b The anatomy of the lexicon within the framework of an NLP knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 22: 217–244.Google Scholar
2010Teoría lingüística y representación del conocimiento: Una discusión preliminar. In Tendencias en lingüística general y aplicada , Dolores García Padrón & Maria del Carmen Fumero Pérez (eds), 155–168. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mairal Usón, Ricardo & Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José
2009Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In Deconstructing Constructions [Studies in Language Companion Series 107], Christopher S. Butler & Javier Martín Arista (eds),153–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Chris D. & Schütze, Hinrich
1999 Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1975A Framework for Representing Knowledge. MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306.
Peña Cervel, Sandra
2008Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics 40(6): 1041–1066. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos
2012The situated common-sense knowledge in FunGramKB. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10(1): 184–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos & Arcas Túnez, Francisco
2004Meaning postulates in a lexico-conceptual knowledge base. In 15th International Workshop on Databases and Expert Systems Applications , 38–42. Los Alamitos CA: IEEE.Google Scholar
2005Microconceptual-knowledge spreading in FunGramKB. In Proceedings on the 9th IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing , 239–244. Anaheim CA: ACTA Press.Google Scholar
2006Reusing computer-oriented lexica as foreign-language electronic dictionaries. Anglogermánica Online 4: 69–93.Google Scholar
2007Cognitive modules of an NLP knowledge base for language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 39: 197–204.Google Scholar
2010a Ontological commitments in FunGramKB. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 44: 27–34.Google Scholar
. 2010b. The Architecture of FunGramKB. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation , 2667–2674. Malta, ELRA.Google Scholar
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos & Mairal Usón, Ricardo
2009Bringing Role and Reference Grammar to natural language understanding Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 43: 265–273.Google Scholar
2010La gramática de COREL: Un lenguaje de representación conceptual. Onomázein 21: 11–45.Google Scholar
2012La dimensión computacional de la Gramática del Papel y la Referencia: La estructura lógica conceptual y su aplicación en el procesamiento del lenguaje natural”. In El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia. Introducción, avances y aplicaciones , Ricardo Mairal Usón, Lilián Guerrero & Carlos González (eds), 333–348. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
In preparation. Cultural distinctiveness in a knowledge engineering project. Ms.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José
1996Semantic networks in conceptual structure. Epos. Revista de Filología XII: 339–356.Google Scholar
1997Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual interaction. ATLANTIS. Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglonorteamericanos 19: 281–295.Google Scholar
2007High-level cognitive models: In search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior. In Perspectives on Metonymy , Krzysztof Kosecki (ed.), 11–30. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011Metonymy and cognitive operations. In Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a Consensus View [Human Cognitive Processing 28], Reka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza (eds), 103–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The Role of Constructions in a Functional Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], Brian Nolan & Elke Diedrichsen (eds), 231–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Baicchi, Annalisa
2007Illocutionary constructions: Cognitive motivation and linguistic realization. In Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects , Istvan Kecskes & Laurence Horn (eds), 95–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Luzondo Oyón, Alba
In preparation. Figurative and non-figurative motion in English resultative constructions. In Conceptualizing Movement. A Cognitive and Cross-Linguistic Perspective , Diana Ponterotto (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Mairal Usón, Ricardo
2008Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica 42(2): 355–400.Google Scholar
2011Constraints on syntactic alternation: Lexical-constructional subsumption in the Lexical-Constructional Model. In Morphosyntactic Alternations in English , Pilar Guerrero Medino (ed.), 62–82. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Peérez Hernaández, Lorena
2003Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing , Klaus-Uwe Panther & Linda Thornburg (eds), 23–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David E.
1975Notes on a schema for stories. In Representation and Understanding: Studies on Cognitive Science , Daniel Gureasko Bobrow & Allan M. Collins (eds). New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Ellsworth, Michael, Petruck, Miriam R.L., Johnson, Christopher R. & Scheffczyk, Jan
2010FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Technical Report, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley. [URL]>
Sanford, Anthony J. & Simon C. Garrod
1981 Understanding Written Language . Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. & Robert P. Abelson
1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding . Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. & Kintsch, Walter
1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension . New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Veale, Tony
2006Computability as a test on linguistic theories. In Cognitive Linguistics. Current Applications and Future Perspectives , Gitte Kristiansen, Michel, Achard, Reneé Dirven & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza (eds),461–484. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Mairal-Usón, Ricardo
2015. Constructional meaning representation within a knowledge engineering framework. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Morras, Javier
2022. Semantic Parameters, Cognitive Models, and Mental Units. Cognitive Semantics 8:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Name index. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 6. Conclusions. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Cognitive operations. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Cognitive models. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Subject index. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Content operations across levels of representation. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Theoretical pre-requisites. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Acknowledgements. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.