Article published in:
Language Processing and Grammars: The role of functionally oriented computational models
Edited by Brian Nolan and Carlos Periñán-Pascual
[Studies in Language Companion Series 150] 2014
► pp. 367390
References

References

Allen, James F.
1989Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. In Readings in Qualitative Reasoning About Physical Systems , Daniel S. Weld & Johan de Kleer (eds), 361–372. San Francisco CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Atkins, Sue, Fillmore, Charles J. & Johnson, Christopher R.
2003Lexicographic relevance: Selecting information from corpus evidence. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3):251–280. Crossref link
Baker, Colin F. & Ruppenhoffer, Josef
2002FrameNet’s frames vs. Levin’s verb classes. In J. Larson and M. Paster (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , pp. 27–38.
de Beaugrande, Robert & Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1981 Introduction to Text Linguistics . London: Longman.
Boas, Hans C.
2005From theory to practice: Frame semantics and the design of FrameNet. In Semantik im Lexikon , Stefan Langer & Daniel Schnorbusch (eds), 129–160. TÜbingen: Narr.
Butler, Christpher S.
2009The Lexical Constructional Model: Genesis, strengths and challenges. In Deconstructing Constructions [Studies in Language Companion Series 107], Christopher S. Butler & Javier Martín Arista (eds), 117–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Butler, Christopher S.
2013Constructions in the Lexical Constructional Model. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The Role of Constructions in a Functional Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], Brian Nolan & Elke Diedrichsen (eds), 271–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Del Campo Martínez, Nuria
2012A constructional account of advising: Construal operations and social conventions. Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos 33: 115–132.
Fillmore, Charles J.
1975An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 123–131. Amsterdam: North Holland.
1977Scenes-and-frames semantics. In Linguistic Structures Processing , Antonio Zampolli (ed.), 55–82. Amsterdam: North Holland.
1982Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm , Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), 111–138. Seoul: Hanshin.
1985Frames and the semantic understanding. Quaderni di Semantica VI(2): 222–254.
Fillmore, Charles J. & Atkins, B.T.
Sue 1992Towards a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In Frames, Fields, and Contrast: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization , Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Kittay (eds), 75–102. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fillmore, Charles J., Johnson, Christopher R. & Petruck, Miriam R.L.
2003Background to Framenet. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3): 235–250. Crossref link
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine
1998Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538. Crossref link
Graesser, A.C.
1981 Prose comprehension beyond the word . New York: Springer-Verlag. Crossref link
Johnson, Mark
1987 The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kintsch, Walter
1988The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review 95: 163–182. Crossref link
Lakoff, George
1987 Wome, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind . Chicago IL: University Press. Crossref link
1993The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought , 2nd. edn, Andrew Ortony (ed.), 202–251. Cambridge MA: CUP. Crossref link
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought . New York NY: Basic Books.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar , Vol 1: Theoretical Prerequisites . Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
1999 Grammar and Conceptualization . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Mairal Usón, Ricardo & Periñán-Pascual, Carlos
2009a Teoría lingüística y representación del conocimiento: Una discusión preliminar. In Tendencias en lingüística general y aplicada , Dolores García Padrón & Maria del Carmen Fumero Pérez (eds), 155–168. Berlín: Peter Lang.
2009b The anatomy of the lexicon within the framework of an NLP knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 22: 217–244.
2010Teoría lingüística y representación del conocimiento: Una discusión preliminar. In Tendencias en lingüística general y aplicada , Dolores García Padrón & Maria del Carmen Fumero Pérez (eds), 155–168. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Mairal Usón, Ricardo & Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José
2009Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In Deconstructing Constructions [Studies in Language Companion Series 107], Christopher S. Butler & Javier Martín Arista (eds),153–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Manning, Chris D. & Schütze, Hinrich
1999 Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Minsky, Marvin
1975A Framework for Representing Knowledge. MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306.
Peña Cervel, Sandra
2008Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics 40(6): 1041–1066. Crossref link
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos
2012The situated common-sense knowledge in FunGramKB. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10(1): 184–214. Crossref link
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos & Arcas Túnez, Francisco
2004Meaning postulates in a lexico-conceptual knowledge base. In 15th International Workshop on Databases and Expert Systems Applications , 38–42. Los Alamitos CA: IEEE.
2005Microconceptual-knowledge spreading in FunGramKB. In Proceedings on the 9th IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing , 239–244. Anaheim CA: ACTA Press.
2006Reusing computer-oriented lexica as foreign-language electronic dictionaries. Anglogermánica Online 4: 69–93.
2007Cognitive modules of an NLP knowledge base for language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 39: 197–204.
2010a Ontological commitments in FunGramKB. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 44: 27–34.
. 2010b. The Architecture of FunGramKB. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation , 2667–2674. Malta, ELRA.
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos & Mairal Usón, Ricardo
2009Bringing Role and Reference Grammar to natural language understanding Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 43: 265–273.
2010La gramática de COREL: Un lenguaje de representación conceptual. Onomázein 21: 11–45.
2012La dimensión computacional de la Gramática del Papel y la Referencia: La estructura lógica conceptual y su aplicación en el procesamiento del lenguaje natural”. In El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia. Introducción, avances y aplicaciones , Ricardo Mairal Usón, Lilián Guerrero & Carlos González (eds), 333–348. Madrid: Akal.
. In preparation. Cultural distinctiveness in a knowledge engineering project. Ms.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José
1996Semantic networks in conceptual structure. Epos. Revista de Filología XII: 339–356.
1997Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual interaction. ATLANTIS. Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglonorteamericanos 19: 281–295.
2007High-level cognitive models: In search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior. In Perspectives on Metonymy , Krzysztof Kosecki (ed.), 11–30. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
2011Metonymy and cognitive operations. In Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a Consensus View [Human Cognitive Processing 28], Reka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza (eds), 103–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2013Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The Role of Constructions in a Functional Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], Brian Nolan & Elke Diedrichsen (eds), 231–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Baicchi, Annalisa
2007Illocutionary constructions: Cognitive motivation and linguistic realization. In Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects , Istvan Kecskes & Laurence Horn (eds), 95–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Luzondo Oyón, Alba
. In preparation. Figurative and non-figurative motion in English resultative constructions. In Conceptualizing Movement. A Cognitive and Cross-Linguistic Perspective , Diana Ponterotto (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Mairal Usón, Ricardo
2008Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica 42(2): 355–400.
2011Constraints on syntactic alternation: Lexical-constructional subsumption in the Lexical-Constructional Model. In Morphosyntactic Alternations in English , Pilar Guerrero Medino (ed.), 62–82. London: Equinox.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Peérez Hernaández, Lorena
2003Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing , Klaus-Uwe Panther & Linda Thornburg (eds), 23–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Rumelhart, David E.
1975Notes on a schema for stories. In Representation and Understanding: Studies on Cognitive Science , Daniel Gureasko Bobrow & Allan M. Collins (eds). New York NY: Academic Press. Crossref link
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Ellsworth, Michael, Petruck, Miriam R.L., Johnson, Christopher R. & Scheffczyk, Jan
2010FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Technical Report, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley. http://​framenet​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu/>
Sanford, Anthony J. & Simon C. Garrod
1981 Understanding Written Language . Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Schank, Roger C. & Robert P. Abelson
1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding . Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Dijk, Teun A. & Kintsch, Walter
1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension . New York NY: Academic Press.
Veale, Tony
2006Computability as a test on linguistic theories. In Cognitive Linguistics. Current Applications and Future Perspectives , Gitte Kristiansen, Michel, Achard, Reneé Dirven & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza (eds),461–484. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. ix ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 59 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 147 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 227 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], Crossref logo
Mairal-Usón, Ricardo
2015. Constructional meaning representation within a knowledge engineering framework. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.