Chapter 4. Figuratively speaking – number in Kharia
The present study deals with number in Kharia, a South Munda language of eastern-central India. Kharia possesses three grammatical categories which may be loosely termed number – singular, dual and plural. While the singular is unmarked, the dual and plural are expressed by enclitic proforms. In addition to expressing two or more than two entities, however, these forms also fulfill a number of other, “figurative” functions such as deference, associativity and approximation, which are the main emphasis of the present discussion. Here we will make use of the concept of “n (+1) indexicality” (Silverstein 2003) as well as a version of the so-called “NP hierarchy” or “reference hierarchy” deriving from the original, binary feature-based version of this hierarchy in Silverstein (1976), as opposed to other versions of the hierarchy.
References (28)
References
Anderson, Gregory D.S. 2007.
The Munda Verb. Typological Perspectives
[Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 174.] Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Benveniste, Émile. 1946. Structure des relations de personne dans le verbe.
Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique
46:1. Reprinted in Émile Benveniste. 1966, 225–236.
Benveniste, Émile. 1956. La nature des pronoms. In
For Roman Jakobson
, Morris Halle et al. (eds). The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in: Émile Benveniste. 1966, 251–257.
Benveniste, Émile. 1966.
Problèmes de linguistique générale
[Bibliothèque des Sciences Humaines, NRF, Éditions Gallimard]. Paris: Gallimard.
Corbett, Greville G. 2000.
Number
. Cambridge: CUP.
Daniel, Michael & Moravcsik, Edith. 2011. The associative plural. In
The World Atlas of Language Structures Online
, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, feature 36A. <[URL]> (7 August 2012).
Hoffmann, Reverend J., S.J. 1903.
Mundari Grammar
. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.
Johnstone, Barbara, Andrus, Jennifer & Danielson, Andrew E. 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”.
Journal of English Linguistics
34(2): 77–104.
Lehmann, Christian. 2002.
Thoughts on Grammaticalization,
2nd
& revised edn. [Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt (ASSidUE), 9].
Lewis, M. Paul (ed.). 2009.
Ethnologue: Languages of the World
, 16th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. <[URL]>
Malhotra, Veena. 1982. The Structure of Kharia: A Study of Linguistic Typology and Language Change. PhD. dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
Peterson, John. 2005. There’s a grain of truth in every ‘myth’, or, Why the discussion of lexical classes in Mundari isn’t quite over yet.
Linguistic Typology
9: 391–405.
Peterson, John. 2007. Languages without nouns and verbs? An alternative to lexical classes in Kharia. In
Old and New Perspectives on South Asian Languages. Grammar and Semantics. Papers growing out of the Fifth International Conference on South Asian Linguistics (ICOSAL-5), held at Moscow, Russia in July 2003
, Colin Masica (ed.), 274–303. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Peterson, John. 2011a.
A Grammar of Kharia. A South Munda Language
[Brill’s Studies in South and Southwest Asian Languages 1]. Leiden / Boston: Brill.
Peterson, John. 2011b.
Kharia Texts. Glossed, Translated and Annotated
[Language Description Heritage - Open Access Library]. <[URL]>
Peterson, John. In press a. Parts of speech in Kharia A formal account. To appear in
Flexible Word Classes: A Typological Study of Underspecified Parts-of-speech
, Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Peterson, John. In press b. The “totality” morpheme
-may in Kharia
. To appear in Felicitation Volume for Noman Zide,
Ram Dayal Munda (ed.).
Pfeffer, Georg. 1993. Kharia totemism.
Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society
28: 221–227.
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1959.
Versuch einer historischen Lautlehre der Kharia-Sprache
. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1965.
Kharia-Texte (Prosa und Poesie)
. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1966. A comparative study of the verb in the Munda languages. In
Studies in Comparative Austroasiatic Linguistics
[Indo-Iranian Monographs V], Norman H. Zide (ed.). The Hague: Mouton.
Roy, Sarat Chandra & Roy, Ramesh Chandra. 1937.
The Khâṛiâs
. Ranchi.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976 [1986a]]. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In
Features and Projections
, Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 163–232. Dordrecht: Foris. [Reprint from R.M.W. Dixon,
Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages
, Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 112–171. Canberra ACT: Australian Institute of Aboriginal [and Torres Straits Islander] Studies.]
Silverstein, Michael. 1981. Case marking and the nature of language.
Australian Journal of Linguistics: Journal of the Australian Linguistic Society
227–247.
Silverstein, Michael. 1986b. Noun phrase categorial markedness and syntactic parametricization. Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, SUNY Buffalo, October, 1985, 337–361. Columbus OH: Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.
Silverstein, Michael. 1987. Cognitive implications of a referential hierarchy. In
Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought
, Maya Hickmann (ed.), 125–164. Orlando FL: Academic Press.
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.
Language and Communication
23: 193–229.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Krifka, Manfred
2022.
Number, Numbers and the Mass/Count Distinction in Daakie (Ambrym, Vanuatu). In
Measurements, Numerals and Scales,
► pp. 163 ff.
Kruspe, Nicole & Niclas Burenhult
Peterson, John
2015.
Introduction – advances in the study of Munda languages.
Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2:2
► pp. 149 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.