Article published in:
Events, Arguments, and Aspects: Topics in the Semantics of Verbs
Edited by Klaus Robering
[Studies in Language Companion Series 152] 2014
► pp. 89114
Bibliography

Bibliography

Askedal, John Ole
(1986): “On ergativity in modern Norwegian.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 9: 25–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bjerre, Anne & Bjerre, Tavs
(2007): “Perfect and periphrastic passive constructions in Danish.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 30: 5–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008a): “Danish there-constructions with intransitive verbs.” In: Philippe de Groote (ed.) Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Formal Grammar . Stanford CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 7–22.Google Scholar
(2008b): Danish there-constructions with transitive verbs.” In: Stefan Müller (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar . Stanford CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 46–66.Google Scholar
Bjerre, Tavs
(2003): “Syntactically and semantically complex predicates.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti & Vincent, Nigel
(2005): “Position vs. function in Scandinavian presentational constructions.” In: Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.) Proceedings of the LFG05 Conference . Stanford CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 54–72. URL http://​cslipublications​.stanford​.edu​/LFG​/10​/lfg05​.html.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
(1986): Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach . Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Anthony
(2001): Linking by Types in the Hierarchical Lexicon . Stanford CA: Centerfor the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, Paul
(1957): Elementær Dansk Grammatik . Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
(1979): Word Meaning and Montague Grammar . Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991): “Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.” Language 67: 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ekberg, Lena
(1990): “Theta role tiers and the locative PP in existential constructions.” Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 46: 37–45.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
(1994): An Introduction to Functional Grammar . London: Arnold,2nd edition.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun & Mulder, Rene
(1990): “Unergatives as copular verbs: locational and existential predication.” The Linguistic Review 7: 1–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
(1990): Semantic Structures . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kathol, Andreas
(2000): Linear Syntax . Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kathol, Andreas & Pollard, Carl
(1995): “Extraposition via Complex Domain Formation.” In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the ACL. Cambridge MA, 174–80.
Kirsner, Robert S.
(1973): “Natural focus and agentive interpretation: On semantics of dutch expletive er.” Stanford Occasional Paper in Linguistics : 101–114.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
(1965): “On the nature of syntactic irregularity.” Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University. Published as: Irregularity in Syntax . New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston 1970.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Hovav, Malka Rappaport
(1995): Unaccusativity. At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lødrup, Helge
(2000): “Linking and optimality in the norwegian presentational focus construction.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22: 205–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia
(1991): “Verbs of motion and positions: On the optionality of the local argument.” In: Claus-Rainer Rollinger & Otthein Herzog (eds.) Textunderstanding in LILOG: Integrating Computational Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence ,Berlin and New York: Springer, volume 546. 621–631.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan
(1987): “Existential sentences in swedish and icelandic: reference ti thematic roles.” University of Lund. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax . No. 28.Google Scholar
(1988): “Variation on a theme: Existential sentences in Swedish and Icelandic.” McGill Working Papers in Linguistics : 168–191. Special issue on comparative Germanic syntax.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
(1968): “Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure.” CLS (Papers from the Regional Meetings of the Chicago Linguistic Society) 4: 71–80.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan & Ørsnes
(2013): “Danish in head-driven phrase structure grammar.” URL http: /​/hpsg​.fu​-berlin​.de​/~stefan​/Pub​/danish​.pdf.
Oxenvad, Erik
(1934): “Om nogle upersonlige konstruktioner i dansk.” In: Poul Andersen, Aage Hansen & Peter Skautrup (eds.) Studier tilegnede Verner Dahlerup paa Femoghalvfjerdsaars- dagen den 31. Oktober 1934 , Copenhagen: Reitzel. 135–140.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.
(1978): “Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis.” BLS (Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society) 4: 157–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer
(1983): “Existential sentences in English, Swedish, German and Icelandic.” In: Fred Karlsson (ed.) Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian Conference on Linguistics . Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 80–100.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
(1991): “The syntax of event structure.” Cognition 41: 47–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995): The Generative Lexicon . Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reape, Mike
(1994): “Domain union and word order in German.” In: John Nerbonne, Klaus Netter & Carl J. Pollard (eds.) German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar , Stanford CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information. 151–197.Google Scholar
Sveen, Andreas
(1996): “Norwegian personal actives and the unaccusative hypotehsis.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
(1967): Linguistics in Philosophy , Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press,chapter Verbs and Times. 97–121.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
(1995): Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie
(1993): “Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics.” In: James Pustejovsky (ed.) Sematics and the Lexicon , Kluwer Academic Publishers, volume 49. 129–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar