Cover not available
Part of
Events, Arguments, and Aspects: Topics in the Semantics of Verbs
Edited by Klaus Robering
[Studies in Language Companion Series 152] 2014
► pp. 159–186

Object-orientation and the semantics of verbs

The paper introduces a decompositional approach to verbal semantics that is object-oriented in nature and based on the Unified Modeling Language (UML), the de-facto standard formalism for object-oriented software design and analysis. In addition to laying out the very rich semantic structure of verbal meaning and its object-oriented modeling, the paper focuses on the advantages a semantic representation along the lines of the UML provides, in particular looking at the multi-layered architecture of UML and its implications for verbal meaning. Other semantic phenomena and problems (such as metaphors, questions of classifications of verbal meaning, or selectional restrictions) will be touched on and discussed in the light of an object-oriented, UML-based approach to verbal meaning.

Published online: 28 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.152.04sch
References

Bibliography

Barsalou, Lawrence W
(1992): “Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields.” In: Eva Feder Kittay & Adrienne J. Lehrer (eds.) Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization , Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 21–74.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. & Hale, Christopher R
(1993): “Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames.” In: Iven Van Mechelen, James Hampton, Ryszard S. Michalski & Peter Theuns (eds.) Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis , San Diego CA: Academic Press. 221–242.Google Scholar
Benz, Anton
(2014): “Ergativity and the object-oriented representation of verb meaning.” This Volume, pp. <?>–87.
Dölling, Johannes
(2014): “Aspectual coercion and eventuality structure.” This Volume, pp. <?>–225.
Dowty, David R
(1979): Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ . Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991): “Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.” Language 67: 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane
(ed.) (1998): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry Alan
(1975): The Language of Thought . New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
(1983): The Modularity of Mind. An Essay on Faculty Psychology . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio & Metzinger, Thomas
(2003): “Motor ontology: The representational reality of goals, actions, and selves.” Philosophical Psychology 16: 365–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier
(ed.) (2003): Semantics. Critical Concepts in Linguistics . 6 Vols. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hommel, Bernhard, Müsseler, Jochen, Aschersleben, Gisa & Prinz, Wolfgang
(2001): “The theory of event coding (tec): A framework for perception and action planning.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 849–937. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
(1983): Semantics and Cognition . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1990): Semantic Structures . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1991): “Parts and boundaries.” Cognition 41: 9–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002): Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution . Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kobryn, Cris
(1999): “Uml 2001: A standardization odyssey.” Communications of the ACM 42: 29–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
(1993): English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Montague, Richard
(1973): “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English.” In: Jaakko Hintikka, Julius M. E. Moravcsik & Patrick Suppes (eds.) Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics , Dordrecht: Reidel. 221–242. Reprinted in: Montague (1974: 247–270), Portner & Partee (2002: 17–34), Gutiérrez-Rexach (2003: Vol. I, 225–244).DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1974): Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague . Edited and with an introduction by Richmond H. Thomason. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nickles, Matthias, Pease, Adam, Schalley, Andrea C. & Zaefferer, Dietmar
(2007): “Ontologies across disciplines.” In Schalley & Zaefferer (2007: 23–67).
Öhl, Peter
(2014): “Predicate classes: a study in compositional semantic.” This Volume, pp. <?>–362.
OMG (
1997–2010): “Unified Modeling Language. uml resource page.” Object Management Group. URL [URL]. Accessed 30 January 2014.
2001): “Omg Unified Modeling Language Specification. Version 1.4.” Object Management Group. URL [URL]. Accessed 30 January 2014.
2011): “Omg Unified Modeling Language Specification. Version 2.4.1.” Object Management Group. URL [URL]. Accessed 30 January 2014.
Portner, Paul & Partee, Barbara H
(eds.) (2002): Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings . Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
(1995): The Generative Lexicon . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schalley, Andrea C
(2004): Cognitive Modeling and Verbal Semantics. A Representational Framework Based on UML . Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To appear): “Types of part-whole relations in common-sense reasoning.” In: Hans Burkhardt, Johanna Seibt & Guido Imaguire (eds.) Handbook of Mereology München Philosophia
Schalley, Andrea C. & Zaefferer, Dietmar
(eds.) (2007): Ontolinguistics. How Ontological Status Shapes the Linguistic Coding of Concepts . Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schindler, Heidrun
(2001): Das Verb ›legen‹. Eine Untersuchung seiner räumlich-konkreten Bedeutungsvarianten . Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
(2007): “The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language: A neural model.” In Schalley & Zaefferer (2007: 231–277).
Van Valin, Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J
(1997): Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function . Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
(1967): Linguistics in Philosophy , Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press,chapter Verbs and times. 97–121.Google Scholar
Winston, Morton E., Chaffin, Roger & Herrmann, Douglas J
(1987): “A taxonomy of part–whole relations.” Cognitive Science 11: 417–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar
(2002): “Polysemy, polyvalence, and linking mismatches. The concept of rain and its codings in English, German, Italian, and Spanish.” DELTA – Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Téorica e Aplicada 18: 27–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zybatow, Tatjana
(2001): “Grammatische Determinatoren von Zeit- und Sachverhaltsverlauf im Deutschen.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Leipzig, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Morrissey, Lochlan & Andrea C. Schalley
2017. A Lexical Semantics forRefugee,Asylum SeekerandBoat Peoplein Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 37:4 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.