Article published in:
The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
Edited by András Kertész and Csilla Rákosi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 153] 2014
► pp. 112


Bibok, Károly
2010From syntactic alternations to lexical pragmatics. In The Role of Data at the Semantics–pragmatics Interface , Enikő Németh T. & Károly Bibok (eds), 261–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D.
(ed.) 2005 Data in Theoretical Linguistics . Special issue of Lingua .Google Scholar
Featherston, Sam & Winkler, Susanne
(eds) 2009 The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics , Vol. 1: Process . Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas & Ashley, Aaron
2001Comprehending illocutionary force. Memory & Cognition 29: 83–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hung, Edwin
2014 Philosophy of Science Complete. A Text on Traditional Problems and Schools of Thought . Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Juge, Matthew L.
2006Morphological factors in the grammaticalisation of the Catalan “go” past. Diachronica 23(2): 313–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kallmeyer, Werner & Zifonun, Gisela
(eds) 2007 New York: De Gruyter (Institut für Deutsche Sprache – Jahrbuch 2006).Google Scholar
Kaplan, David
1989Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan, Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds), 481–563. Oxford:OUP.Google Scholar
Kepser, Stephan & Reis, Marga
(eds) 2005 Linguistic Evidence. Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives . Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Evidence in linguistics. In Kepser & Reis (eds), 1–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla
2008aConservatism vs. innovation in the debate on data in generative grammar. In Kertész & Rákosi (eds), 85–108.Google Scholar
2008bConservatism vs. innovation in the (un)grammaticality debate. In Kertész & Rákosi (eds), 61–84.Google Scholar
(eds) 2008 New Approaches to Linguistic Evidence. Pilot Studies / Neue Ansätze zu linguistischer Evidenz. Pilotstudien . Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012 Data and Evidence in Linguistics. A Plausible Argumentation Model . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte, Achard, Michel, Dirven, René & de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. Ruiz
(eds) 2006 Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives . Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2004Data in linguistics. The Linguistic Review 21: 175–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penke, Martina & Rosenbach, Anette
(eds) 2004 What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics? Studies in Language 28(3): 481–747. Special Issue.Google Scholar
(eds) 2007 What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics? [Benjamins Current Topics 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T.
1996 The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A.M.
1998 Western Linguistics. An Historical Introduction . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T.
(eds) 2007 Grammar Without Grammaticality [Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3(1)].Google Scholar
Sternefeld, W.
(ed) 2007 Data in Generative Grammar [Theoretical Linguistics 33(3)].Google Scholar
Winkler, Susanne & Featherston, Sam
(eds) 2009 The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics, Vol. 2: Product . Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar