Cover not available
Part of
The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
Edited by András Kertész and Csilla Rákosi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 153] 2014
► pp. 103–132

Chapter 5. Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena with explicit and implicit subject arguments

Their use and occurrence in the light of data

The present chapter has two main aims. First, it attempts to provide a novel account for the occurrence of Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena with subject arguments. The problem which the present chapter wants to resolve is that there is an inconsistency between the previous explanations of the behaviour of verbs of natural phenomena with and without an explicit subject and the data. The previous approaches have considered the Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena subjectless, although data from various direct sources (such as written corpora, intuition, introspection, and spoken discourses) testify to occurrences of verbs of natural phenomena with explicit subjects. To eliminate this inconsistency, the chapter argues for a new, unified approach, according to which Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena have subject arguments in their lexical-semantic representations which can (or even should) be lexically unrealised in some contexts, while in others they can be explicitly expressed and contextual, grammatical as well as lexical-semantic factors together license the implicit or explicit occurrence of subject arguments. Second, applying Kertész & Rákosi’s (this volume, 2012) p-model, the chapter aims to reflect on a metalinguistic level on how the proposed explanation has been reached in the course of the research as well as how the new account can resolve the above mentioned problem.

Published online: 23 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.153.05nem
References
Bartos, Huba
2000 Az inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere (The syntactic background of inflectional phenomena). In Stukturális magyar nyelvtan , 3: Morfológia (Structural Hungarian Grammar, 3: Morphology), Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), 653–762. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó,Google Scholar
Bibok, Károly
2008 Az igék szemantikája és a szintaktikai alternáció (The semantics of verbs and syntactic alternation). In Strukturális magyar nyelvtan , 4: A szótár szerkezete (Structural Hungarian Grammar, 4: Structure of the Lexicon), Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), 23–70. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
2009 Az evidencia problémája az elméleti nyelvészetben (The problem of evidence in theoretical linguistics). Talk presented at the conference Kutatócsoportjaink (Our research groups), Szeged.
2010 From syntactic alternation to lexical pragmatics. In The Role of Data at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface , Enikő Németh T. & Károly Bibok (eds), 261–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bibok, Károly & Németh T., Enikő
2001 How the lexicon and context interact in the meaning construction of utterances. In Pragmatics and the Flexibility of Word Meaning , Enikő Németh T. & Károly Bibok (eds), 289–320. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1983 Semantische und konzeptuelle Repräsentation lexikalischer Einheiten. In Untersuchungen zur Semantik [Studia Grammatica 22], Rudolf Růžička & Wolfgang Motsch (eds), 61–99. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
1996 How much space gets into language? In Language and Space , Paul Bloom, Mary A Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds), 31–76. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cote, Sharon A
1996 Grammatical and Discourse Properties of Null Arguments in English. Ph.D. dissertation, [URL]> (20 December 2009).
Dik, Simon C
1985 Formal and semantic adjustment of derived constructions. In Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar , A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Casper de Groot & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 1–28. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
2002  The Syntax of Hungarian . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Portero Muñoz, Carmen
2002  Understood Objects in Functional Grammar [Working Papers in Functional Grammar 76], Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E
1995  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2005 Constructions, lexical semantics and the correspondence principle: Accounting for generalizations and subregularities in the realization of arguments. In The Syntax of Aspect , Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 215–236. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groefsema, Marjolein
1995 Understood arguments: A semantic/pragmatic approach. Lingua 96: 139–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Groot, Casper
1985 Predicates and features. In Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar , A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Casper de Groot & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 71–84. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1990  Semantic Structures . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla
2012. Data and Evidence in linguistics. A plausible argumentation model . Cambridge: CUP.DOI logo
this volume The p-model of data and evidence in linguistics. Google Scholar
Keszler, Borbála
(ed.) 2000  Magyar grammatika (Hungarian Grammar). Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Kocsány, Piroska
1997 Pro-drop und Textkohärenz: Interagierende Regeln im Gebrauch des Subjektspronomens im Ungarischen. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 44: 385–411.Google Scholar
Komlósy, András
1994 Complements and adjuncts. In Syntax and Semantics 27, Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds), 91–178. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2001  A lexikai-funkcionális grammatika mondattanának alapfogalmai [Basic notions in the syntax of lexical-functional grammar]. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Maleczki Márta
2001 Indefinite arguments in Hungarian. In Argument Structure in Hungarian , István Kenesei (ed), 157–199. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Martí, Luisa
2006 Unarticulated constituents revisited. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 135–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy C., Katalin
2008 Data in historical pragmatics: A case study on the Catalan periphrastic perfective past. In New Approaches to Linguistic Evidence: Pilot Studies , András Kertész & Csilla Rákosi (eds), 171–197. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Németh T., Enikő
2000 Occurrence and identification of implicit arguments in Hungarian. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1657–1683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Implicit arguments in Hungarian. In Argument Structure in Hungarian , István Kenesei (ed.), 113–156. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Németh T. Enikő
2008 Az implicit alanyi és tárgyi argumentumok előfordulásának lexikai-szemantikai jellemzői (The lexical-semantic properties of the occurrence of implicit subject and direct object arguments). In Strukturális magyar nyelvtan , 4: A szótár szerkezete (Structural Hungarian Grammar, 4: Structure of the Lexicon), Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), 71–128. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Németh T., Enikő
2010 How lexical-semantic factors influence the verbs’ occurrence with implicit direct object arguments in Hungarian. In The Role of Data at the Semantics--Pragmatics Interface , Enikő Németh T. & Károly Bibok (eds), 305–348. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. & Károly Bibok 2010 Interaction between grammar and pragmatics: The case of implicit arguments, implicit predicates and co-composition in Hungarian. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 501–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995  The Generative Lexicon . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998 Generativity and explanation in semantics: A reply to Fodor and Lepore. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 289–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pusztai, Ferenc
(ed.) 2003  Magyar értelmező kéziszótár (Concise Explanatory Dictionary of Hungarian), 2nd rev. edn. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1997  Syntax: A Minimalist introduction . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
2007 It is raining (somewhere). Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 123–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas
1976  Plausible Reasoning . Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Rice, Sally
1988 Unlikely lexical entries. Berkeley Linguistic Series 14: 202–212.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sárik, Pál
1998 A határozói igenevek néhány problémája (Some problems of adverbial participles). Magyar Nyelv 94: 423–435.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1995  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, Kenneth
2001 Sex, breakfast, and descriptus interruptus. Synthese 128: 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tóth, Ildikó
2001 Impersonal constructions and null expletives. In Argument Structure in Hungarian , István Kenesei (ed.), 51–78. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.