Article published in:
The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
Edited by András Kertész and Csilla Rákosi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 153] 2014
► pp. 103132
References

References

Bartos, Huba
2000Az inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere (The syntactic background of inflectional phenomena). In Stukturális magyar nyelvtan , 3: Morfológia (Structural Hungarian Grammar, 3: Morphology), Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), 653–762. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó,Google Scholar
Bibok, Károly
2008Az igék szemantikája és a szintaktikai alternáció (The semantics of verbs and syntactic alternation). In Strukturális magyar nyelvtan , 4: A szótár szerkezete (Structural Hungarian Grammar, 4: Structure of the Lexicon), Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), 23–70. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
2009Az evidencia problémája az elméleti nyelvészetben (The problem of evidence in theoretical linguistics). Talk presented at the conference Kutatócsoportjaink (Our research groups), Szeged.
2010From syntactic alternation to lexical pragmatics. In The Role of Data at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface , Enikő Németh T. & Károly Bibok (eds), 261–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bibok, Károly & Németh T., Enikő
2001How the lexicon and context interact in the meaning construction of utterances. In Pragmatics and the Flexibility of Word Meaning , Enikő Németh T. & Károly Bibok (eds), 289–320. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1983Semantische und konzeptuelle Repräsentation lexikalischer Einheiten. In Untersuchungen zur Semantik [Studia Grammatica 22], Rudolf Růžička & Wolfgang Motsch (eds), 61–99. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
1996How much space gets into language? In Language and Space , Paul Bloom, Mary A Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds), 31–76. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cote, Sharon A.
1996Grammatical and Discourse Properties of Null Arguments in English. Ph.D. dissertation, http://​falcon​.jmu​.edu​/cotesa​/research​.html> (20 December 2009).
Dik, Simon C.
1985Formal and semantic adjustment of derived constructions. In Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar , A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Casper de Groot & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 1–28. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
2002 The Syntax of Hungarian . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Portero Muñoz, Carmen
2002 Understood Objects in Functional Grammar [Working Papers in Functional Grammar 76], Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2005Constructions, lexical semantics and the correspondence principle: Accounting for generalizations and subregularities in the realization of arguments. In The Syntax of Aspect , Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 215–236. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groefsema, Marjolein
1995Understood arguments: A semantic/pragmatic approach. Lingua 96: 139–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, Casper
1985Predicates and features. In Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar , A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Casper de Groot & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 71–84. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1990 Semantic Structures . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla
2012. Data and Evidence in linguistics. A plausible argumentation model . Cambridge: CUP.Crossref
this volumeThe p-model of data and evidence in linguistics. Google Scholar
Keszler, Borbála
(ed.) 2000 Magyar grammatika (Hungarian Grammar). Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Kocsány, Piroska
1997Pro-drop und Textkohärenz: Interagierende Regeln im Gebrauch des Subjektspronomens im Ungarischen. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 44: 385–411.Google Scholar
Komlósy, András
1994Complements and adjuncts. In Syntax and Semantics 27, Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds), 91–178. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2001 A lexikai-funkcionális grammatika mondattanának alapfogalmai [Basic notions in the syntax of lexical-functional grammar]. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Maleczki Márta
2001Indefinite arguments in Hungarian. In Argument Structure in Hungarian , István Kenesei (ed), 157–199. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Martí, Luisa
2006Unarticulated constituents revisited. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 135–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagy C., Katalin
2008Data in historical pragmatics: A case study on the Catalan periphrastic perfective past. In New Approaches to Linguistic Evidence: Pilot Studies , András Kertész & Csilla Rákosi (eds), 171–197. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Németh T., Enikő
2000Occurrence and identification of implicit arguments in Hungarian. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1657–1683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Implicit arguments in Hungarian. In Argument Structure in Hungarian , István Kenesei (ed.), 113–156. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Németh T. Enikő
2008Az implicit alanyi és tárgyi argumentumok előfordulásának lexikai-szemantikai jellemzői (The lexical-semantic properties of the occurrence of implicit subject and direct object arguments). In Strukturális magyar nyelvtan , 4: A szótár szerkezete (Structural Hungarian Grammar, 4: Structure of the Lexicon), Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), 71–128. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Németh T., Enikő
2010How lexical-semantic factors influence the verbs’ occurrence with implicit direct object arguments in Hungarian. In The Role of Data at the Semantics--Pragmatics Interface , Enikő Németh T. & Károly Bibok (eds), 305–348. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. & Károly Bibok 2010Interaction between grammar and pragmatics: The case of implicit arguments, implicit predicates and co-composition in Hungarian. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 501–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995 The Generative Lexicon . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998Generativity and explanation in semantics: A reply to Fodor and Lepore. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 289–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pusztai, Ferenc
(ed.) 2003 Magyar értelmező kéziszótár (Concise Explanatory Dictionary of Hungarian), 2nd rev. edn. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1997 Syntax: A Minimalist introduction . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
2007It is raining (somewhere). Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 123–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas
1976 Plausible Reasoning . Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Rice, Sally
1988Unlikely lexical entries. Berkeley Linguistic Series 14: 202–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sárik, Pál
1998A határozói igenevek néhány problémája (Some problems of adverbial participles). Magyar Nyelv 94: 423–435.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, Kenneth
2001Sex, breakfast, and descriptus interruptus. Synthese 128: 45–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tóth, Ildikó
2001Impersonal constructions and null expletives. In Argument Structure in Hungarian , István Kenesei (ed.), 51–78. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Németh T., Enikő
2017.  In Implicitness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 276],  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.